Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
) _+ M5 F1 R( h3 P# m) H
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
# s& J, k+ g( T% _0 Z
+ T% c, V9 k& n5 T( `
# ~5 U- r& w- ]& I( Y+ SIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

' v& w. m+ R" ^# @' S) cSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
4 c. N! D& a; s5 a9 kYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

6 L5 V% ^/ t: JIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
/ u1 z! L$ B* M6 R6 p6 n- y; X! Q
# R5 Y7 g' ?/ R8 R1 `" wIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

) F" L7 l& C% b! ^  Q2 e Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
5 O! ~8 }+ E0 S( R Avg. 1988-2000 2001
' P  a* I0 c: q6 tBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
6 \& q( `  c1 \San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
9 X4 n) k/ @9 L9 @/ bSeattle  20.4 25
% _* ]+ ~" V7 u# S! w+ }+ wDenver  17.7 23.7
- V6 W$ R4 a3 v% qNew York  21.2 22.5
7 E) l# [* Y8 L& X1 @Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

7 F' K9 Q$ V% ?% e

  s9 M9 s8 z6 NIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
( R' X; z% N1 |& b0 {6 ~# o8 X5 B  h

9 J) {! p' b: v$ b4 E3 l/ QFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

6 P' X8 g, |$ x% Q' n# I4 Ait would be a good reference.
( `- m+ J/ Q8 Z) I" A# Z2 d* p
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
) d. C3 Z' [! Z
( p  A, V; i8 T2 [/ a" J[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]