Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
# Z$ i) n9 F4 N: C: ^7 JLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
, n$ Z$ e* F) b
7 w$ O7 l& `) D* I7 LLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
' q) P) d5 N, @
" b% e6 V4 @7 j% g) |! [To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

$ v9 }; P9 }5 N) [1 F1 n# `
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
1 d3 K# r; X: O: Z6 _1 eYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
* i8 ]% \. @$ y1 F8 r3 q
" `  m/ E; c& u- D- ]% x) l( P. qIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
3 k- p4 I7 V* k6 q4 i) S, T) d
, [. O5 @: N9 w# s  d% y% LIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
& p( l9 b; v9 H# Q
$ K8 N0 k1 Z: @  N Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
/ H" o7 E0 g$ |( C+ q- R& G Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
. O  j# T1 a& WSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
1 f8 \+ Z# ?& Y  NDenver  17.7 23.7
% U# k4 h' \4 [! i* W6 qNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
! Z9 U$ y( l% H3 [. V, KWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



9 _8 _: M0 Z4 V# l# ~( |It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
# ^9 ]" ]3 |$ i9 x! _+ m, S) U

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
( w; E, d) g: r# G. E* r" o( D
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]