Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
' T; {% D6 E' a  O$ o
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
$ R- f2 ]7 c5 A
! O) B% _* l( ^2 }6 ]% e- E, f! ~To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
8 W( s) b9 G. F2 g% }! m
. P5 ?+ i9 P* k& B, @
2 y$ G7 h3 H) i: R5 ~) Y- dIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
) o7 S2 S% t5 `1 D0 `5 S$ O# X% K
1 z! _% |7 |3 x5 ~# d* s0 g5 U: _San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
, g- ~8 W( w6 n0 d0 F% \
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

' L: X0 ]3 v- H( @* IIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
1 B" e, ~4 c2 k- J' Z; P
2 b; @) l; A* y3 Z5 s Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
0 d8 o& q! @9 s! j4 y% d Avg. 1988-2000 2001
7 |7 g& L& N: N; }! ^: WBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
5 I; ]* H" f2 [, ]' S* B( aSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
1 z" f2 d/ ~) j8 [. x( QSeattle  20.4 25
/ F# m7 G& j3 MDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
* J! W4 f2 N& Y: L4 b' ^" vWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
$ ~" N8 n9 ^' r
' _: A7 E! _" }$ s" y
& g9 z: O" I6 r
1 e* l1 k" Z* _9 H- {* YIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
- i! p" J/ u/ `' Z7 `
, k" T/ }; Y/ A) h& T
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
4 w* ?  j  m) w5 x
& \2 ]1 t& S+ F$ G3 ]it would be a good reference.
8 {% g8 G$ o( P& x6 d9 `
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
1 u, W7 v/ G' O/ F* F0 P9 b  l
3 e- M& j2 q( j4 _8 r! a[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]