鲜花( 1) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
; k4 J6 t( G6 c7 \" Z+ Z+ J, i& U6 J5 D0 T
7 G' R, L) b2 O/ m6 o9 MIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. $ z' ]3 z- \' n8 x- j# ]
/ V! ]2 P$ `0 k0 \ W5 ^. O7 U
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
D. J0 b1 f, ?( G* R) g. C$ |5 D7 W8 m; M- T8 J0 o
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
' W( m+ O8 L4 K& b/ y3 A& i- T' ^/ M6 Z6 X
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 3 Y8 R, f/ [! M5 k% T
|
|