 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 7 [( B0 h$ Q7 @" A* U9 H$ P
, @3 b( H" Y& h& i6 T( q
* v( B& r {6 D1 X8 |3 g4 q' EIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
0 K8 h' O' p+ k" ?* R! z$ E* e5 ~0 o( }7 i. Q% H
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
! `) j* b4 Y6 D5 X% S+ V
2 c5 G4 r3 ?* ~: {: kcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..2 h1 [. b7 ?1 @! e8 u
; q7 b& g9 B4 m1 e7 @8 U2 @5 j7 ?$ c
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) , [% ]% S& s6 P( S$ w( P% ?
|
|