 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 4 C1 X# Z9 |: @( Z0 D
) c0 y# v. n" p9 b! h$ a2 I7 q& K6 l5 I7 ]% C8 u- c' G5 y! H
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
' g! M% H& v; H6 X9 H
1 }. ]& @7 M6 eLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03+ X" c# }1 y d5 W: ^, l4 ]) ]8 E2 ~
, N/ M) M. f' A$ s2 s& [comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
3 o3 Z: K" R) n. j& \
' ^# N( l* a* n3 yNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
8 o ]: {/ O" j# `8 Y& c. ~ |
|