 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
) q* N. a1 u$ q+ @Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14" T: u3 }$ Z4 |6 i. g" y' i) Y! u
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... 8 j% y2 d/ {" }. V
' Z* q7 u& D& C* M9 W, ~' y' {1 b
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
: g" V% M0 o8 c- v7 D* t: N+ U: Y
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.039 n8 S9 z! Q- j
% k. |5 Q' H. K" Q
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
: S- d# @2 ~ S6 f* \$ d2 L( q
. v. a; O G" L# F! uNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 6 N' e- d6 M) U0 b. s6 d* { H
|
|