 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 $ \/ |; X! F) a+ `4 W
+ I" k3 o+ Q% g. k) N
1 K; Q3 A7 ^/ S5 E# V6 tIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ! U1 e- m, P. |) b8 C; i; Q9 A
9 Q: M* _% v1 m2 @: D8 r$ h; X+ LLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
+ {/ C. |2 z. F* P7 R3 ?. ]
% o6 H7 C) `) z$ Z3 _0 |comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
: q! i1 Y! m2 V b7 d1 z; v- w
$ {$ K) J# v! v4 C% Y O3 SNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 4 y8 \# d) u- o1 L0 u! ]% w
|
|