 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
, q `3 ?1 x( \+ K: f
6 g) ~2 N# {( i& O9 s3 G9 L% U5 F
4 a! K8 _8 s' g& V你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:1 ]# `( `. h) Q5 b& P% s, F
Ralph Klein
7 E6 R0 o" t! X! m) ` k/ Q
# j& u0 @. v4 j0 J* z2 |7 d我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!) B/ O6 T9 |% D! \) E4 Q
1 }4 A( r3 }% Y* C0 c
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
, s3 \5 d; z5 G: @
1 m5 g1 I0 q3 K1 R) n* r G! S7 t
. x/ V1 \% u0 I# C+ R# ]
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades' G# z, `' A. g! F# t. o
Historic Alberta budget balances:
5 P- o/ k4 n6 F( t% Z
% E0 D. ?6 K% z# Q1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus- Y$ s2 s$ o( J& |' S! w/ C
) d+ y% M0 S! K/ }/ c- N* F4 J1982-83: $796 million deficit" M+ X6 c( f4 z! `9 }' H% N* h5 }. ?
$ R4 C, d: N: W1983-84: $129 million surplus% a: n2 e1 Q! g% A4 Y! e( N
1 a( q3 [3 i- z2 }, y
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus' _- o. A2 ]- V3 B# s- r3 Y- V
% i" C. T! e7 w9 F
1985-86: $761 million deficit
6 c7 \/ _6 D' {% J7 l1 _- h
2 q. u) u+ c, X" A( f1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
) p! t( w% e. o. j
1 E# ^5 ]' W g' z9 B6 ?1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit; j6 V/ O, `7 L% L
0 C' _0 R6 Y; D9 u- R
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit: p6 x% w; k/ v% O5 L5 i4 e
8 |. x8 B$ \4 y j' q8 c1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
9 D5 _0 ?4 ?) k9 {0 m
) Y8 W3 t6 H' u+ F2 b v1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
5 b! l" J) Y7 R8 e8 ~/ T+ J; K1 G4 S% F9 e' l9 o
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit! x! i; c' U1 Z! V$ @' {5 o
1 b! j0 D8 \0 d! L; J1 I9 Q
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
; w+ R3 q s0 ]# ^
& v/ J8 }8 f% Q2 G( \+ t1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
$ {% T, z3 e1 J7 J R Z
- ]* F+ q3 H' D ~/ g" ~1994-95: $938 million surplus3 Q" y+ b8 K% p. O
6 l I6 T$ N2 N* i, G9 L
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
7 F- Y+ W _2 l9 ?7 I7 b) T( B. \) {1 Q! x u& p: v
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus6 a0 @$ H5 f& o
. L7 y3 S' _3 C* f2 N7 |5 j" z
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
/ s* A( q. ~% A$ i2 S
9 {8 }, F+ K) f& h1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus$ K7 i6 R& p" D2 u0 j8 h
# r, m/ q( K. C+ \" o2 r1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
$ ~' U& W( E7 U: g' @- B G$ J8 D5 f; S0 p: D2 _
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus, L! j' I) T( m" @4 M, i
9 b$ r! D8 d) A) G I
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus* l' J! M+ _- M$ J
$ d# \ D5 v) E
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus. R2 r; N& a) Y7 F4 c# g
# d7 K8 \) E) h0 v2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
9 k) [# @( |; ]/ K, L3 D) A
& Z8 @! Q0 `6 Z2 h+ Z2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus; G& E. O- X. t0 w4 a7 d
. w" b# A- \4 j5 [0 J$ q# B b# `
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
; a J% ?1 d5 V( ], ?# H# B3 S- h/ {5 R/ e" s
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus9 J+ Q% {2 ^5 w% u a
$ b" r. X6 Q- s4 U. r
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
/ A% Y4 k2 Z' O, y+ X2 G
6 M1 @! M0 R/ A2008-09: $852 million deficit
8 f, j3 {( m. b7 p! B8 }# x e6 l$ R y2 A! K2 ~6 i; u$ _4 M
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit, q- }3 V" C/ `, M+ z+ Z
3 ^+ l: y$ ]1 O& r, n* q8 G
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit! |* O. }' F5 n1 X# I' z3 Z2 l7 X
3 b1 o4 }2 r9 n2 w9 |: T2011-12: $23 million deficit+ s& f- A5 ^0 \! u6 c4 v( @
# G: K5 K; c4 [5 e0 H |. h4 Q5 s
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit0 d" N+ n; _% e' `1 ^' m8 [/ J
( J: q% N9 n# Z1 A/ f0 ]5 _
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|