 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
C3 I+ |, m J, j8 C6 K- {3 h) k
' b! U! m g; F$ V你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
' _8 ?) W; w! X' t4 iRalph Klein
& p2 _: Y4 Q7 e+ i9 N/ W- U4 b) ^4 c) j) n9 h2 S
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!( n5 U+ B6 ?! Y5 Y
# v! n$ n- d) } n1 l- }! N4 c所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。+ ?% |0 V8 x' N2 z v: e: N
# J+ q. s" ]/ d- @: L
1 C4 K% h# d. x) a/ H
, I: u* G+ X2 `3 A. [& P- ^+ }! L: ]http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades! m* G" p0 p" ^# X+ Q8 l# L4 q- o
Historic Alberta budget balances:
. H9 V2 H. D- [& u
& v) T [) D* ?1 n- O- |; I5 S, [1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus6 O2 ?. a9 C* }% L3 Y+ J
9 R- m' x8 S, D9 R, S2 ]% c
1982-83: $796 million deficit6 O3 Q2 v9 N; z
) z+ C; }4 y5 E4 d. Z% l3 a
1983-84: $129 million surplus
4 Q3 G6 c; Q$ D- a& n# c( ?, O3 @: v8 M
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus- M# E# r5 ^6 s' O' W& w
3 |6 E: `$ p, t9 J2 u# w) L1985-86: $761 million deficit) O$ ^7 Q$ O1 T0 Y9 j* M7 q
3 u. _+ r9 s+ y& L. h) Z1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
$ C @" T1 w) p) x" k' B/ Q; T- S2 x& ^$ }# A% M f
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit: T0 \) g D- @0 U
: l! P, U# M \, H4 C5 ~* S
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
1 @4 O' _ C$ \$ s0 K: b; C( m, d% q8 e; R2 ~
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit5 @0 B6 _( i: A2 P
, J# H ?5 v- u4 o1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
. y, Q% p" C" m f
6 l. {/ _9 ]9 t$ H( G: ?7 w8 R1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit7 [2 ?" n4 I& g2 s) O2 |
5 l5 J) ~. v* W7 V- _1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit( o+ j6 B. a: x- K5 a
: X. _8 A+ X0 T. u% x1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit9 P' x2 z% d4 }+ R. V* G8 S6 c
$ t. S% u x- q1 L1994-95: $938 million surplus
# B6 u- V" [+ a5 `- M" _
! ~0 C- B. |# l/ C. \, N# o1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
1 D! y# l. Z8 T6 K1 W4 P1 ~0 Q" m) K6 Y' I) w6 N4 c7 Z
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
6 g0 g7 g7 W1 d3 g% t- T7 H& [% ?" X( }) ?# a
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus4 a7 Z" j0 e0 r8 s: d- h( n
: K2 U4 D: o4 g, w1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
. f. {: Z$ [7 N( N0 B) j: ~
* I$ F. W( C8 D- X) X8 t1 {( q1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
5 B$ k2 g2 X7 D! T6 N+ P$ q" h' T, f6 Y
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
7 m8 _+ q b/ ]1 N+ p* G4 q" d/ j- J9 G; U C
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
5 b8 d7 t& T* g/ N8 ^8 P
0 L4 R5 M! @$ z5 ]; A( o# b3 c: B2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus! |' i+ H7 o/ M& x
9 j7 n5 @9 s7 X, o9 H( C$ X2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus; \: Q4 N, [+ G
: y2 V; F* u6 D+ ~: a z3 P
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
) S/ y# |8 C4 c& ^; ]0 \$ F3 g! I
/ M9 l9 {: x: q* Y& s' Z8 Z2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
* P# W" h+ T9 @" Q% ?) Q7 G3 U5 d& `( L
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
; u+ Z+ Y3 ^5 ?1 o1 X1 k5 ~
9 R8 X1 Z4 i( C5 U' \7 q; C2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus7 r# ^' ~* [) F, x, m* C
& _0 s6 _* v/ G7 k
2008-09: $852 million deficit" }% I3 H9 w# v& |
' C+ L a( }: E: X9 K/ K2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit' q, c' _6 u) {+ g8 }0 p, S6 u4 {
9 P) J9 d* B' G- K) a; _9 k0 X
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit* {# m& b# v% z- X5 o
6 P. l9 J5 d- }+ ?" S; W/ Y2011-12: $23 million deficit% E4 e' U+ r5 a) |
7 S; _7 D9 l, j
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
9 l7 D0 v. J/ r/ {& |0 R3 u5 K
3 ?2 n8 m& x: B& t( A( v2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|