 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 * ~1 U" K' J! y3 b
0 @+ l; D6 ]1 K5 D) s% K# k4 I9 M. ]3 W# n2 `; ~7 A' q
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
3 j( n w& v: O+ D* }, FRalph Klein' T& R; I! T/ Z8 ~: A7 b$ s" }
( C& O* f0 Q( i* L6 u# w我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!9 r( |# t9 \6 i% s) Y
8 e# ^( y8 p0 |& p3 n所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。9 ~5 ~6 U' Z5 s1 V' ]
% e3 h: k1 ~, `2 z: z+ f7 ?9 S& \% R, i9 v; {+ s9 J$ E, V7 d5 @
; i2 ]/ I9 k5 @1 Q+ ]2 U
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
1 C: Z+ q8 `* k, {Historic Alberta budget balances:
) D# N5 t: z! \% x
( s" u8 l1 @( A$ r, |3 d8 W, r4 E1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
' g* y6 L+ Z) I% L; T) P( x0 g8 o6 b$ Z$ z5 ]* `/ v% h6 q: a
1982-83: $796 million deficit% @) v+ Q5 }) N! _5 L
' P. T, H/ ?+ A
1983-84: $129 million surplus
7 b7 D3 @* [0 W S0 _& Y ^$ X/ g8 l. s
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus5 g2 \3 i: }1 s) z& j/ J* V
1 c& n; a/ `' a) C1985-86: $761 million deficit) c) L0 b% v1 h J
& z8 L! z1 X# M1 t# {- t, u; ?+ G: C1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit- w& X$ L0 u2 l+ z2 T4 G) q
4 O: R/ ~$ R# @4 [7 e1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
7 g" Y3 l- k2 M$ g
! K E( Q& c0 C3 `3 |4 z1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit6 ]: F v+ ~ l
7 A* N3 e$ [& H, h% Q; l
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
5 }" k% C- s! n3 c' g9 T. g: Z- m5 u. j( Q3 S$ D
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit1 v) c& g8 B' @; B0 I
6 B# ~% D; _! \" L U A
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit* D2 G7 j: T/ Q) c$ w
% I$ N' r6 Q# g# X, C3 t1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
5 n! Y/ y: C" ?! @+ u0 \5 U8 P, A4 d( I6 H* F+ B; Y( p) a# r
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
7 `: b! z2 z( m' y, v* t3 |% O' {) z' K/ P
1994-95: $938 million surplus5 i! Z6 L& Y1 ~! ~# }6 S
4 V4 O' M- X# p3 e' F/ {1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
1 n* m6 _. j& ~- J5 C2 U! Y) M0 w- C3 w$ n* a
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus. Z: Y) k/ R. Q8 P/ } Y0 N
( X$ M3 w% I8 G3 C/ N1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus) `1 q7 V/ n0 P
/ k0 X* V8 c5 }6 S3 T* X1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus9 k4 t7 n: n7 C8 p0 j5 h3 j
; T3 C9 r0 A$ F$ S
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
4 g( k" |" u9 d
+ Z9 I3 a2 Y) h$ W( s2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
1 A! c3 Z# }3 o; B( \3 H
8 Y1 D/ s- n* `2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
3 k% d) B: ]- Z* r7 h! [( B5 ^* X5 E# ]0 n
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
, k: y2 y p! B- P4 B1 O
( o5 H$ e7 a* \# c4 L2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
. ?8 G+ b! W$ |* I4 j
5 u, B( Y E3 R- L2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
4 G& J9 w( j M ?4 S6 b
* S% q& R( a" g* M+ c3 s2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus# C! Z5 d9 Z7 X p
: d q3 i+ E O( S& |5 Y: Z7 ]! s2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus1 y7 c7 A% @# {5 [3 ^
: R; s6 H. U' s) d
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
( A7 o5 b4 g( K; w) p6 F- p+ j, r
2008-09: $852 million deficit1 X( n. \% L0 ]5 `) z8 g
4 C9 }$ L& {. V( M I9 A- b5 K6 T2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
! P6 {* T4 W3 V; W8 C
% R$ A3 I: `8 A2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit' n& Q: N7 g! C6 F1 v
- s2 e- n6 u( x4 O: L
2011-12: $23 million deficit
# y1 Y- @5 @- ]/ f# y: ]$ f& A/ j3 q3 m {5 w6 J. O
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
- F! B$ ^- M- r; i# L/ b6 K* \& K1 N+ v; T! u
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|