 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 / B3 X+ V. n4 X* h. G& j9 x7 w
, P7 C) `0 C1 |, r# @0 c" c
% b- `+ L7 ?. Q) n5 P7 C你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:; ~, m( a5 l! _& {' ^% Y: s
Ralph Klein
8 q$ m8 b9 G3 k: G: `
$ X: H( p/ a& ^2 H$ C% u k1 }5 J我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
8 _0 P2 L, g/ j! G; `5 q/ n1 ^
+ l' E2 N; b0 `( y* `所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。0 p$ t3 M: k/ C; Q2 I. E! s% I
" K4 o: f0 e l$ ?
; ?- i% v; k+ {9 {' e3 t3 i7 U) Y; _1 s+ h
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades) L4 f- t* c2 W' x/ ]- F+ Y
Historic Alberta budget balances:
7 g, p& |) P' L+ Z, c1 |! {8 Z" {0 z
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
, M+ r" @, @9 ^& {: {0 m2 g) D; f+ z+ _
1982-83: $796 million deficit
9 b( V7 g: E \ K( e2 Q/ K: [" r4 [
3 \0 n; O; f( Q6 M L! x7 e1983-84: $129 million surplus/ c" o, B y' q& E- W9 D4 s
' S! Q6 u. t/ A3 h# o l& {1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus0 A& S& W$ E% l* n
2 D! j8 I/ j/ V1 X: C3 H
1985-86: $761 million deficit
' i& D" I6 r9 o6 g! T+ H- F3 ?& v) b- n; E+ Y# t4 T! J+ H
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit9 t6 H0 g6 n, I
; D9 _6 j! _3 j; p, @" \0 H1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit/ N! u# G- A( Z
. z) k& B4 s" v1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit2 U3 ^3 j4 I: t! W; N/ a
) J& J5 y! o) ^1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit B, o& s$ \, e9 L- c' F
& Q3 g& v7 d9 J" m$ h# b1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit2 Y* X: Q" O0 U* T0 a( }' f
t0 D0 j1 D2 F+ ]( F1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
% t: N6 b; V" x; l
* X. H9 \( o* C7 A1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit8 S$ T; q3 R& w/ Y1 {
7 \: v1 l# @* D. _- ]* U# J5 w* W
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
0 S6 V; \+ X" i, @& s6 H. a5 o6 B' k& {1 N" `
1994-95: $938 million surplus' i) h) |/ r2 ]$ S8 d% P0 u/ d
! J$ U$ t b' j2 j1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus* P$ ]2 v/ B/ J# x5 g* ?
4 u, S1 @ e- ~ _
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
6 A8 V; U3 H2 N) G1 v% L0 q* J1 r X! l+ _
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
. }- A: e: \* A3 B* M$ ^" X p. z. c0 f
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus/ J5 s3 I- H- c
: j+ F4 r- r# r+ C7 g. }1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus6 ~; Q0 P. h8 Q$ o
% I. ^9 r# A0 s2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus/ M: C, i& o# E2 M9 L; U) K/ }) _; Y/ K
( Y% J" @) x$ s1 k
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
* t' m& u, F, K+ Z: }
& u0 w4 c9 y# g4 ~0 H2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus) r" E, m& c) \3 A4 U
; b4 J+ P2 u2 h* N. S9 R4 Q
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus6 o Z" o( ~: Q" S3 x% j, H. q5 q& L
& g+ z3 T& Y& V/ `2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus' n) R2 r( a9 X( M: e5 B& y9 z) r* J
, t0 {6 c! [" Z' ^% D1 ?2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
, i8 o ?0 N: y8 w! D2 p
! |. a: k/ E% x5 O/ N6 S. V! E% H, Y2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus: F& G( A. X8 ]
- ]- @3 B! A& \, l9 p1 g# `2 Z
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus6 {$ @5 O4 W; J; V3 v% b" y1 z
: Y- t! c, f4 b" h2 A& g
2008-09: $852 million deficit7 x7 Z8 H2 U0 w C& f
) p0 F' J) _0 a& z4 [* i
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit5 h% z$ ?2 D+ d7 N% b1 O& B& {
% J9 ]0 X7 U1 [2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit( N5 I- K3 d* v/ }1 O: l: O
6 g: |: Y, ^. P! Z: y9 d6 |
2011-12: $23 million deficit6 R4 l4 b2 O% F7 w0 M
( n! z# A2 C- P
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit5 R) ?) |0 N3 W u- H
- C. q4 R8 Q/ L
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|