 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - l; S% h! m6 @. j
3 A m4 m7 v+ F+ \5 A
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 r, N# p4 {/ j. x9 z. H
. y& N% i6 {' o4 ?! o TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market z1 \# m, i/ J$ F
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: s- i+ P. `3 x; Q" \& M4 L2 ~: mquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic7 t5 G" s7 K4 w9 \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit! X J, Q% I7 a( z' B6 u% _* `. }" c
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( C; l) S8 ]6 F2 ^# u m" Wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 y b, m5 ^) l) v; W ]7 L9 cQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 h& p9 Q3 ?6 g0 {
LePage Real Estate Services.
# }- R" B# Y7 B1 U" D9 g: }1 P. @5 G
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 ~) [: A! @, C
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 L. K' j4 }& I& _5 b
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and v" ^5 `( q) ^
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 T! E0 Q* C/ L+ `8 \$ k, qresidential real estate sector.8 i: Q7 f2 U5 M. |; Y/ v
: I1 o) B' b+ B4 W" d; c
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation4 {/ u/ x# m& Y2 Y, P* }9 F
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; g+ e2 g i4 o* Syear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562; t. M. V5 P8 v
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 _8 S+ _! L) l$ L(+13.2%).
) [# U2 x/ Z; S5 Q. J& `9 l
2 ]: |+ I- N0 A: j# k! L7 Z "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; J0 L( Q; M& i7 m6 ~8 I
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! C+ q+ L1 n& e( @; _frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are$ r% I& q7 q8 d# @% L- a6 B
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," _4 E& v, }% Q/ R% M3 g* L* ?
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.* F9 u) r- A* B" ?1 y
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We; ]" L. o- D- K
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ T! Z, u A* d$ ]balanced market."
7 {. M( w5 ]5 \ A5 V4 }) n7 k/ |1 `
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,7 T" D% C5 A' v1 `! p8 o% I3 x- y
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
7 j8 s5 z, a: V; tto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued8 t: |- V2 Q2 c( r1 {
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
5 a# i5 w1 K% e. z7 o/ j3 A, @8 |energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
5 f' P# c: E+ y5 f/ }9 xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record* F5 i+ K$ G3 }1 n" D `* _
breaking price appreciations.
$ [7 J r" H. `/ L8 Y
" m9 ^0 i0 d, M Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
) f( q# E! k3 \6 {economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; x1 d) Z% \- ~ S7 O0 I
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed. A! k$ n( S/ k, A; p: ?
0 A3 x4 b7 j: S# Q* K z/ H In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
Q6 q# \) [: Z# O, oeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
' H: p" m& n7 w# o" _confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
|, O9 @4 t" M3 A, }4 N; xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ E, o, {( G' I- D% c0 T: HIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" z# `3 \" A% T* {0 l) T
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
0 D/ V! C$ M3 B5 n; K6 p0 Jprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
- r4 |& W5 `# }% c; Y' @! o% |" @7 D5 X* ^7 [
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: \& i0 o2 D+ b8 b4 R9 u
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. M | V" ~; _1 c
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) S* {! u9 h* i; }$ Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" Q) T7 g6 m0 s! N) W* p# ?' I8 H t, p+ N6 i x* R: _( S9 w
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. T# Q# ~! v% B* i' qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's/ b& r: D6 B Q) M b
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
& X0 ~' q" A6 U% |; Nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general! ^! i8 K+ G& n
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the# ?% \( |. [) ~9 g9 }1 a, H# v
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and- Z+ Q. E* {+ o/ S- D" x4 U
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 S) C5 K! e) amortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! |6 Y3 ]( M0 h7 @
. b0 l" P+ e5 C. Z/ w) y. w% i2 L" H
<< F4 T1 c4 H: h7 j
REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ ^0 t" p/ g* T1 w( Z' T1 C' q
>>
9 X9 p1 l, z0 u" x, Q
( }3 U- B7 Q3 N# H; ^7 ] Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in6 e. l2 i8 `$ N
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. z4 E$ v0 t' q
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time# q, J2 W2 q# f5 u& @
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 \0 [ d: \" s8 E
renovations.2 S! w z- D+ {3 c) w
' b/ i) V1 ~/ @5 H) e
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight' B5 d# h7 Y/ w3 h
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 p% C8 P- V+ @% Y) O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
& z2 x, x ^9 [" F8 ~, sSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
% D+ s; d R# m+ K/ a
8 B0 X! {6 K) R/ O The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
L# Q4 H4 l$ X- Rslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the2 C* X" e& N$ ^/ l$ D) E# z
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& ], w% y4 ? P# k% H* D6 P5 I600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
( T! k. y* R6 Y( T% [% N/ Cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, ~: T! C: j4 ?and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; _0 C8 m9 Y: n! e% K. P- e- Z. m; l( q
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
0 o- B+ b' o( w6 K8 L( nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their3 _- L: H# ]1 g1 l. m3 _7 v( W
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
8 Z7 w0 F3 A x) s+ Hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
$ X, `" h1 W3 I0 |6 Q d6 R |dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 k! x& a$ w& |3 R1 h$ D& Jbuyers with more options when looking for a home.' I0 C! m' l$ `- n$ E6 R# k
" b$ F' D: B/ ] S5 b' z% I9 ^ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly- Q$ U7 r/ H! V' J8 y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes! g9 A2 h! K& C' I# a0 ~8 _% D
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* b: \! N1 k% k$ s5 pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
& s' k- X6 y+ |' o( m6 v' w# qfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
% h4 l* K% ]0 v8 p0 I- g7 r
4 J, ^& i1 C: t Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
& a$ x, r. S8 r* ^prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 b6 S! n; `6 Q- F0 ?" J
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
. y1 M: k |" Ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ W6 c( i) \" d3 u) }# Ywhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# S# E9 T+ G& P. g% ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
5 T6 b3 Y, I; w! j8 h G" T4 v& Y- G, f% _making a purchase.
: u( ^3 l6 |5 i5 A5 `; \
0 ~# Z8 k' J' i0 l ] Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing% c0 Y$ M' Q- f( l' P$ T
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 A( y) m7 |: N, {* U( j8 ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, h; K$ y0 Q6 y6 f: D
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 [8 O) C7 e6 E" C0 N+ G/ V* `- Eattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 ~3 A! g1 o( Y( ]/ k3 k: ~amenities.# l. v% J; }: L1 ~
% X6 k N1 C/ ?' i! H
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
* v. ~' m- i$ |! |" p7 Y5 I( pthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand3 f6 [7 |, F( g8 m7 |3 d+ ]/ A3 a! O" j
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has! W. J$ R# F% w! A- M
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: R' |* A {: Y- H/ n+ G! Zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle7 J; R3 Q9 w: b" C& u# ]
residence, rather than for investment.$ N2 H$ v5 Q* d+ K0 k9 }1 G: F
. t! j. a6 _' y+ h+ V/ w1 r The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as4 X! E3 i1 O# y y0 e* F e6 b, q
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
- @+ @4 E# U$ _) @6 Qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 n7 W0 m, B- Q0 l% O& ]
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization5 ^5 I( b3 q7 z# U- ]
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter- ?/ a" P" O3 M
the market.9 [: \! U' ~9 ]$ @) _
5 I& Y4 U w5 l; J In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
4 M4 _( D' `- c0 Z @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
: h% C4 P5 a, k2 C+ Y0 nAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
0 V$ d G5 `6 C8 J- M8 G5 l: Bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% [4 `$ d1 |$ y! u( d4 o$ }
to the shortage of available inventory.
# K( r2 \. ^6 Z; I0 C9 K2 @5 E4 o2 _$ z3 S1 j: ?* L
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its0 u0 E0 n T a5 P. y2 D: @. m
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 V' u x3 \' ^+ ^3 |8 [3 \
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 ?: R# [( c9 u: i
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
- d1 `% B( Z6 K5 L+ A9 I3 c( B3 t5 }9 `# R% b8 U' u- c
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases" A2 k7 X Q6 G2 [; P
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# j$ V: Q% A4 Vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ B C8 o5 \1 ~9 _: G5 T! b
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 f- D6 X4 J0 O4 V J, yprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- t6 v8 l" O' D2 a' M/ pseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
W' y4 M. Q& R3 ^3 Ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) f& A# A. d. m* C" Z
) i" U V" F% s0 r7 i& F! e: E& Q Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% C1 Y, D) ]' m: s: z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton& {, H" {8 [5 w: O* f% H' i
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
6 |. ~8 c1 G4 Bmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
) H$ t9 K1 O0 T p% O* G$ Gincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- g9 @7 ~( X& Z7 f9 o8 f: `1 v$ Sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' l: F, F+ ?, B6 x" J/ r# w utowards the end of 2006. , U2 C: G8 {1 ?1 B
6 i3 D9 s: F0 u C- a# l1 w
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
1 ]! D9 ]9 w/ U. Y: Xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable+ I2 `+ _) z) y% V1 c
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse+ R$ L9 A/ u* Y! Y1 {% l- L( V
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ ~( [( W$ h$ W( G+ z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added6 X: a$ R7 z! B% F3 ~9 s
pressure on tight inventory levels.
6 \- T& i9 {; Q% Q; I' e% c& u. T6 N3 k6 S! A
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic' P& t( M9 p2 W( R5 V# y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 Q y) v! d7 N [
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 {( g5 `9 {' Z& {+ Z
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 C+ r5 @! q) G0 ffor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
% j+ E' a) d2 U; o, V% E2 F: g) c' E' N1 W5 z
<<
$ G$ w1 D0 b/ i' M g Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! S$ y7 g% J* B% U) |; m/ {. {: q
9 m2 E' Q1 w7 B5 @" w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( c' E: I- H* W) f Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
+ M1 _+ D! c& \2 {2 u8 F% G -------------------------------------------------------------------------" G% ~) p" V/ c
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
: h2 |( @- R X2 i+ b Market Average Average % Change Average Average
) N" S, A y' _, s -------------------------------------------------------------------------" L# v( Z# E2 H8 M, C4 K- y
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000$ q4 w4 G+ L3 O* v' ?! n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- K8 y# I* j$ N) Q: I8 |6 }1 T# @ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0006 ?" S. ? U- z8 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 z% ]8 I1 e, g
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
6 u, ~% |$ x s- O3 s! P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# p" n9 T6 F) Y% k. l3 x3 ~, F9 `# R Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. Q0 ~$ b- b: C8 o5 m/ @* \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ J; `; ^* h% \$ f' I/ k St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333; N$ l7 x( |9 f3 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 N6 I! g q4 y$ V3 {* ]$ x: e5 {# g
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583+ `3 `+ V* j5 l* N" G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z2 r- {0 }3 z2 ~! `* H' G" Y- i/ N Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185! T5 K* D: ], X5 K7 {+ L% D5 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ^! L9 }+ p& j. y7 {: h3 ]
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250+ m6 R+ G, |4 w" n' V+ _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" i% h! Q+ t; _+ U) a1 K2 C
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7668 I3 r# }2 E9 F* h& Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 p0 [+ r0 u, q2 I2 ~ Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( \! H5 G: H6 Y: ?- ?' _0 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Y }( P; r K# T! @1 r6 A
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500% q, ~! p; G: ^) ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( I. ^% q! M4 |: j) h# T2 ^: X Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389# F( z* @# A( ~; O- h6 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" I" F2 C$ d9 {5 R" T) ]5 j Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
, h7 ^8 j7 x4 {' j1 R# e; Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 I% D m2 t& K5 L Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500" C/ l# O' e& Z, T) }! a9 B: g( D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( A! [: B/ R& A Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0007 v8 m3 ^# \/ m5 P/ ~, p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ~! e0 _4 q5 I6 Q7 @% J
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
" `: r6 ]) b; j+ U2 c( k7 t# R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Y7 _5 w1 N; G: y% i! I$ D" q, N/ d. q4 ?! a* Q
-------------------------------------------------------------/ `1 A6 G: ^0 y
Standard Condominium9 x! q" {7 d6 `# L
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 D( J! w( O, c e 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo; d5 y6 L: p( G- U9 P6 u
Market % Change Average Average % Change
5 ?3 \5 v- I" l/ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
1 W; T) B f" ^# h- D Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%9 l! S& U/ ?3 @1 n1 b' }( _& j$ h
-------------------------------------------------------------
# \) I. X5 T2 ]9 X' \ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%! k; X, s. [. _0 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 ~5 Q6 c) @* o5 u9 F* V8 H: F. ^ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A; V1 }6 ^2 i5 h/ d
------------------------------------------------------------- {2 w- A% V x4 T3 w: d7 R
Saint John N/A - - N/A
) G- }8 C) N4 W# }& I d: N -------------------------------------------------------------
/ L8 @( h' P4 M: \2 \ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
5 A& X( B, Q) _( ~& b7 @ -------------------------------------------------------------
4 a: @, ]+ q* g# V) k7 l Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%8 o. S6 X) B2 N' f! J3 z
-------------------------------------------------------------+ Q6 o/ ^/ E: p6 |
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%0 Z* x% Q" l# M4 `5 n h. C
-------------------------------------------------------------# o0 j* l5 l4 }
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
4 \" H3 U& v, ~9 b3 }$ P$ H! R& R& u -------------------------------------------------------------4 i, ~$ S+ U5 S* |
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
6 Q) i% Y5 c$ k4 R5 ]5 t. w -------------------------------------------------------------
7 S5 ~. P) @- [$ e" {2 t Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%( E/ F* R: ~& H1 V3 D, \$ U
-------------------------------------------------------------
* N: N# u7 v2 k. d Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
/ R! f' S- o( \# Z( M& p -------------------------------------------------------------
2 i0 C4 f3 n% R/ ?0 n* i+ ~ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%. {/ E j# I$ I; X8 r
-------------------------------------------------------------* c. B) e9 G6 ]4 b! b2 ?1 k
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
" |9 H C- S% ^3 t: n! B, y -------------------------------------------------------------3 N- k; O& T$ i( L5 R. `1 V" ~
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
+ d) N" m) ~$ f, e7 q' t1 [% B -------------------------------------------------------------; V2 Y: f0 @+ @9 ?1 \: @
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%5 ~' T$ Y/ J) E" Y' s& i0 V
-------------------------------------------------------------
, {- B' n1 J# z9 _' z7 G. l, k+ L National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%. ]. c) e. J, u! {
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 ^2 ^' T' x0 f2 U9 r3 }; F >>
" n; ]6 u% T1 R6 H: H" x
$ Q) V2 |! i0 W3 |3 o Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; C O; ^6 W( T, n* D6 _" Fin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 ]5 u- C% w- D& G5 B
John and Victoria.% F+ F' m8 l/ E' U+ z/ k
+ O% h5 j5 ^7 O) b8 v, n The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
6 `. t9 c5 d8 s/ `1 |+ w0 Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& V o/ }4 T, q
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 b8 f) j+ O, z4 F: t7 G8 p0 dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price* T! F% `- b, m- m, ]/ ?) `
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* g0 ~7 G& D8 Cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
0 _9 U1 F1 Z" K% M+ oavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 l8 N) \& N# Y' Q# G& C5 Mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 k& D' u+ ]# c
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
. L1 t" G8 I4 A1 X+ \November 15, 2006.# {' _0 g- w u) w; K' f3 L
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 _6 [/ x* S- Y. k) x! y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
5 j( G @* i7 [' ?" X$ b1 qprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is, ?, x- y. P2 i; k
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|