埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2585|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - l; S% h! m6 @. j
3 A  m4 m7 v+ F+ \5 A
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 r, N# p4 {/ j. x9 z. H
. y& N% i6 {' o4 ?! o    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market  z1 \# m, i/ J$ F
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: s- i+ P. `3 x; Q" \& M4 L2 ~: mquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic7 t5 G" s7 K4 w9 \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit! X  J, Q% I7 a( z' B6 u% _* `. }" c
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( C; l) S8 ]6 F2 ^# u  m" Wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 y  b, m5 ^) l) v; W  ]7 L9 cQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 h& p9 Q3 ?6 g0 {
LePage Real Estate Services.
# }- R" B# Y7 B1 U" D9 g: }1 P. @5 G
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 ~) [: A! @, C
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 L. K' j4 }& I& _5 b
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and  v" ^5 `( q) ^
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 T! E0 Q* C/ L+ `8 \$ k, qresidential real estate sector.8 i: Q7 f2 U5 M. |; Y/ v
: I1 o) B' b+ B4 W" d; c
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation4 {/ u/ x# m& Y2 Y, P* }9 F
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; g+ e2 g  i4 o* Syear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562; t. M. V5 P8 v
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 _8 S+ _! L) l$ L(+13.2%).
) [# U2 x/ Z; S5 Q. J& `9 l
2 ]: |+ I- N0 A: j# k! L7 Z    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; J0 L( Q; M& i7 m6 ~8 I
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! C+ q+ L1 n& e( @; _frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are$ r% I& q7 q8 d# @% L- a6 B
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," _4 E& v, }% Q/ R% M3 g* L* ?
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.* F9 u) r- A* B" ?1 y
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We; ]" L. o- D- K
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ T! Z, u  A* d$ ]balanced market."
7 {. M( w5 ]5 \  A5 V4 }) n7 k/ |1 `
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,7 T" D% C5 A' v1 `! p8 o% I3 x- y
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
7 j8 s5 z, a: V; tto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued8 t: |- V2 Q2 c( r1 {
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
5 a# i5 w1 K% e. z7 o/ j3 A, @8 |energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
5 f' P# c: E+ y5 f/ }9 xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record* F5 i+ K$ G3 }1 n" D  `* _
breaking price appreciations.
$ [7 J  r" H. `/ L8 Y
" m9 ^0 i0 d, M    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
) f( q# E! k3 \6 {economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; x1 d) Z% \- ~  S7 O0 I
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.  A! k$ n( S/ k, A; p: ?

0 A3 x4 b7 j: S# Q* K  z/ H    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
  Q6 q# \) [: Z# O, oeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
' H: p" m& n7 w# o" _confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
  |, O9 @4 t" M3 A, }4 N; xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ E, o, {( G' I- D% c0 T: HIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" z# `3 \" A% T* {0 l) T
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
0 D/ V! C$ M3 B5 n; K6 p0 Jprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
- r4 |& W5 `# }% c; Y' @! o% |" @7 D5 X* ^7 [
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: \& i0 o2 D+ b8 b4 R9 u
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. M  |  V" ~; _1 c
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) S* {! u9 h* i; }$ Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" Q) T7 g6 m0 s! N) W* p# ?' I8 H  t, p+ N6 i  x* R: _( S9 w
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. T# Q# ~! v% B* i' qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's/ b& r: D6 B  Q) M  b
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
& X0 ~' q" A6 U% |; Nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general! ^! i8 K+ G& n
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the# ?% \( |. [) ~9 g9 }1 a, H# v
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and- Z+ Q. E* {+ o/ S- D" x4 U
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 S) C5 K! e) amortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! |6 Y3 ]( M0 h7 @
. b0 l" P+ e5 C. Z/ w) y. w% i2 L" H
    <<  F4 T1 c4 H: h7 j
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ ^0 t" p/ g* T1 w( Z' T1 C' q
    >>
9 X9 p1 l, z0 u" x, Q
( }3 U- B7 Q3 N# H; ^7 ]    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in6 e. l2 i8 `$ N
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. z4 E$ v0 t' q
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time# q, J2 W2 q# f5 u& @
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 \0 [  d: \" s8 E
renovations.2 S! w  z- D+ {3 c) w
' b/ i) V1 ~/ @5 H) e
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight' B5 d# h7 Y/ w3 h
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 p% C8 P- V+ @% Y) O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
& z2 x, x  ^9 [" F8 ~, sSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
% D+ s; d  R# m+ K/ a
8 B0 X! {6 K) R/ O    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
  L# Q4 H4 l$ X- Rslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the2 C* X" e& N$ ^/ l$ D) E# z
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& ], w% y4 ?  P# k% H* D6 P5 I600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
( T! k. y* R6 Y( T% [% N/ Cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, ~: T! C: j4 ?and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; _0 C8 m9 Y: n! e% K. P- e- Z. m; l( q
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
0 o- B+ b' o( w6 K8 L( nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their3 _- L: H# ]1 g1 l. m3 _7 v( W
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
8 Z7 w0 F3 A  x) s+ Hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
$ X, `" h1 W3 I0 |6 Q  d6 R  |dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 k! x& a$ w& |3 R1 h$ D& Jbuyers with more options when looking for a home.' I0 C! m' l$ `- n$ E6 R# k

" b$ F' D: B/ ]  S5 b' z% I9 ^    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly- Q$ U7 r/ H! V' J8 y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes! g9 A2 h! K& C' I# a0 ~8 _% D
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* b: \! N1 k% k$ s5 pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
& s' k- X6 y+ |' o( m6 v' w# qfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
% h4 l* K% ]0 v8 p0 I- g7 r
4 J, ^& i1 C: t    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
& a$ x, r. S8 r* ^prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 b6 S! n; `6 Q- F0 ?" J
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
. y1 M: k  |" Ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ W6 c( i) \" d3 u) }# Ywhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# S# E9 T+ G& P. g% ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
5 T6 b3 Y, I; w! j8 h  G" T4 v& Y- G, f% _making a purchase.
: u( ^3 l6 |5 i5 A5 `; \
0 ~# Z8 k' J' i0 l  ]    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing% c0 Y$ M' Q- f( l' P$ T
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 A( y) m7 |: N, {* U( j8 ?
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, h; K$ y0 Q6 y6 f: D
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 [8 O) C7 e6 E" C0 N+ G/ V* `- Eattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 ~3 A! g1 o( Y( ]/ k3 k: ~amenities.# l. v% J; }: L1 ~
% X6 k  N1 C/ ?' i! H
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
* v. ~' m- i$ |! |" p7 Y5 I( pthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand3 f6 [7 |, F( g8 m7 |3 d+ ]/ A3 a! O" j
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has! W. J$ R# F% w! A- M
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: R' |* A  {: Y- H/ n+ G! Zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle7 J; R3 Q9 w: b" C& u# ]
residence, rather than for investment.$ N2 H$ v5 Q* d+ K0 k9 }1 G: F

. t! j. a6 _' y+ h+ V/ w1 r    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as4 X! E3 i1 O# y  y0 e* F  e6 b, q
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
- @+ @4 E# U$ _) @6 Qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 n7 W0 m, B- Q0 l% O& ]
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization5 ^5 I( b3 q7 z# U- ]
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter- ?/ a" P" O3 M
the market.9 [: \! U' ~9 ]$ @) _

5 I& Y4 U  w5 l; J    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
4 M4 _( D' `- c0 Z  @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
: h% C4 P5 a, k2 C+ Y0 nAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
0 V$ d  G5 `6 C8 J- M8 G5 l: Bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% [4 `$ d1 |$ y! u( d4 o$ }
to the shortage of available inventory.
# K( r2 \. ^6 Z; I0 C9 K2 @5 E4 o2 _$ z3 S1 j: ?* L
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its0 u0 E0 n  T  a5 P. y2 D: @. m
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 V' u  x3 \' ^+ ^3 |8 [3 \
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 ?: R# [( c9 u: i
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
- d1 `% B( Z6 K5 L+ A9 I3 c( B3 t5 }9 `# R% b8 U' u- c
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases" A2 k7 X  Q6 G2 [; P
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# j$ V: Q% A4 Vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ B  C8 o5 \1 ~9 _: G5 T! b
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 f- D6 X4 J0 O4 V  J, yprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- t6 v8 l" O' D2 a' M/ pseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
  W' y4 M. Q& R3 ^3 Ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

) f& A# A. d. m* C" Z
) i" U  V" F% s0 r7 i& F! e: E& Q    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% C1 Y, D) ]' m: s: z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton& {, H" {8 [5 w: O* f% H' i
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
6 |. ~8 c1 G4 Bmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
) H$ t9 K1 O0 T  p% O* G$ Gincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- g9 @7 ~( X& Z7 f9 o8 f: `1 v$ Sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' l: F, F+ ?, B6 x" J/ r# w  utowards the end of 2006.
    , U2 C: G8 {1 ?1 B
6 i3 D9 s: F0 u  C- a# l1 w
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
1 ]! D9 ]9 w/ U. Y: Xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable+ I2 `+ _) z) y% V1 c
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse+ R$ L9 A/ u* Y! Y1 {% l- L( V
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ ~( [( W$ h$ W( G+ z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added6 X: a$ R7 z! B% F3 ~9 s
pressure on tight inventory levels.
6 \- T& i9 {; Q% Q; I' e% c& u. T6 N3 k6 S! A
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic' P& t( M9 p2 W( R5 V# y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 Q  y) v! d7 N  [
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 {( g5 `9 {' Z& {+ Z
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 C+ r5 @! q) G0 ffor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
% j+ E' a) d2 U; o, V% E2 F: g) c' E' N1 W5 z
    <<
$ G$ w1 D0 b/ i' M  g      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! S$ y7 g% J* B% U) |; m/ {. {: q

9 m2 E' Q1 w7 B5 @" w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( c' E: I- H* W) f                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
+ M1 _+ D! c& \2 {2 u8 F% G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" G% ~) p" V/ c
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
: h2 |( @- R  X2 i+ b    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
) N" S, A  y' _, s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" L# v( Z# E2 H8 M, C4 K- y
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000$ q4 w4 G+ L3 O* v' ?! n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- K8 y# I* j$ N) Q: I8 |6 }1 T# @    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0006 ?" S. ?  U- z8 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 z% ]8 I1 e, g
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
6 u, ~% |$ x  s- O3 s! P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# p" n9 T6 F) Y% k. l3 x3 ~, F9 `# R    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -. Q0 ~$ b- b: C8 o5 m/ @* \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ J; `; ^* h% \$ f' I/ k    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333; N$ l7 x( |9 f3 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 N6 I! g  q4 y$ V3 {* ]$ x: e5 {# g
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583+ `3 `+ V* j5 l* N" G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z2 r- {0 }3 z2 ~! `* H' G" Y- i/ N    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185! T5 K* D: ], X5 K7 {+ L% D5 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ^! L9 }+ p& j. y7 {: h3 ]
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250+ m6 R+ G, |4 w" n' V+ _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" i% h! Q+ t; _+ U) a1 K2 C
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7668 I3 r# }2 E9 F* h& Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 p0 [+ r0 u, q2 I2 ~    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
( \! H5 G: H6 Y: ?- ?' _0 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Y  }( P; r  K# T! @1 r6 A
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500% q, ~! p; G: ^) ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( I. ^% q! M4 |: j) h# T2 ^: X    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389# F( z* @# A( ~; O- h6 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" I" F2 C$ d9 {5 R" T) ]5 j    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
, h7 ^8 j7 x4 {' j1 R# e; Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 I% D  m2 t& K5 L    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500" C/ l# O' e& Z, T) }! a9 B: g( D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( A! [: B/ R& A    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0007 v8 m3 ^# \/ m5 P/ ~, p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ~! e0 _4 q5 I6 Q7 @% J
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
" `: r6 ]) b; j+ U2 c( k7 t# R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Y7 _5 w1 N; G: y% i! I$ D" q, N/ d. q4 ?! a* Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ `1 A6 G: ^0 y
                               Standard Condominium9 x! q" {7 d6 `# L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 D( J! w( O, c  e                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo; d5 y6 L: p( G- U9 P6 u
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
5 ?3 \5 v- I" l/ ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 W; T) B  f" ^# h- D    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%9 l! S& U/ ?3 @1 n1 b' }( _& j$ h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# \) I. X5 T2 ]9 X' \    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%! k; X, s. [. _0 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ~5 Q6 c) @* o5 u9 F* V8 H: F. ^    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A; V1 }6 ^2 i5 h/ d
    -------------------------------------------------------------  {2 w- A% V  x4 T3 w: d7 R
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
) G- }8 C) N4 W# }& I  d: N    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ L8 @( h' P4 M: \2 \    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
5 A& X( B, Q) _( ~& b7 @    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 a: @, ]+ q* g# V) k7 l    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%8 o. S6 X) B2 N' f! J3 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ Q6 o/ ^/ E: p6 |
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%0 Z* x% Q" l# M4 `5 n  h. C
    -------------------------------------------------------------# o0 j* l5 l4 }
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
4 \" H3 U& v, ~9 b3 }$ P$ H! R& R& u    -------------------------------------------------------------4 i, ~$ S+ U5 S* |
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
6 Q) i% Y5 c$ k4 R5 ]5 t. w    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 S5 ~. P) @- [$ e" {2 t    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%( E/ F* R: ~& H1 V3 D, \$ U
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* N: N# u7 v2 k. d    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
/ R! f' S- o( \# Z( M& p    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 i0 C4 f3 n% R/ ?0 n* i+ ~    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%. {/ E  j# I$ I; X8 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------* c. B) e9 G6 ]4 b! b2 ?1 k
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
" |9 H  C- S% ^3 t: n! B, y    -------------------------------------------------------------3 N- k; O& T$ i( L5 R. `1 V" ~
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
+ d) N" m) ~$ f, e7 q' t1 [% B    -------------------------------------------------------------; V2 Y: f0 @+ @9 ?1 \: @
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%5 ~' T$ Y/ J) E" Y' s& i0 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, {- B' n1 J# z9 _' z7 G. l, k+ L    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%. ]. c) e. J, u! {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 ^2 ^' T' x0 f2 U9 r3 }; F    >>
" n; ]6 u% T1 R6 H: H" x
$ Q) V2 |! i0 W3 |3 o    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; C  O; ^6 W( T, n* D6 _" Fin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 ]5 u- C% w- D& G5 B
John and Victoria.% F+ F' m8 l/ E' U+ z/ k

+ O% h5 j5 ^7 O) b8 v, n    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
6 `. t9 c5 d8 s/ `1 |+ w0 Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& V  o/ }4 T, q
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 b8 f) j+ O, z4 F: t7 G8 p0 dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price* T! F% `- b, m- m, ]/ ?) `
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* g0 ~7 G& D8 Cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
0 _9 U1 F1 Z" K% M+ oavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 l8 N) \& N# Y' Q# G& C5 Mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 k& D' u+ ]# c
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
. L1 t" G8 I4 A1 X+ \November 15, 2006.# {' _0 g- w  u) w; K' f3 L
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 _6 [/ x* S- Y. k) x! y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
5 j( G  @* i7 [' ?" X$ b1 qprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is, ?, x- y. P2 i; k
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-25 10:59 , Processed in 0.075065 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表