 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable & Y4 G3 B; Q" v& _4 K9 d
/ ~- F6 z/ C/ ^# K
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -+ X, X0 E" [ V, ]# z
+ N) B1 D+ Y) l8 g' C$ R, K4 ~ TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
9 T7 J; f& Z. \1 @' [2 dexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
9 n2 c6 |/ |9 X1 M9 [quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
1 ~" n) j* F N& u! kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* F, |5 I8 r9 c% f
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and; L) C8 N2 _. X+ }5 n6 H
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: Z5 L8 d9 A$ M& _$ B& M0 k5 V; tQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal( i& p* f7 I( H5 z2 c- a% o
LePage Real Estate Services.# F! ?: X% Z- U- X
* q7 M2 ~6 E- U+ Q2 V$ ^: O1 T Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
' ]6 R$ m1 r H8 i% r1 nare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
+ y2 O; n+ J7 Gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and2 M+ M/ s- N, c0 L) \' Y# B4 d
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the% i. `) W% c/ s% k N8 G7 E
residential real estate sector.+ ~5 I1 k2 _; S) b; ^
' p9 q$ ?9 H/ {/ o/ J
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation" R4 r. L; O5 m. h
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( _8 L6 L9 j7 B& vyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
4 e/ r: b6 V. t! y(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380, G* M2 X1 {. G+ E9 Z5 X, Y
(+13.2%).3 ^4 g. ?7 E% ~% Z9 ^: Y+ i
* q( D9 @* @/ s# G* `
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
9 ^4 @* _) y) [$ p0 [* f: y; q# Vduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 x1 R6 n! `+ }$ P) ?3 s- b
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 g% M5 a- g; h; f
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( }0 o7 s) h# }* V# a- o1 {/ n( g$ Npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
7 s3 y( j: {9 }1 q- V"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We2 H4 K7 }0 m; c$ C
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* Y* D9 `/ s& r0 e' l, g
balanced market.") d2 Q V. p& Z/ I+ m/ n
% _& S1 I0 j# f& N u E Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 C2 F# B/ ]: Zconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
$ y+ ]% y+ @ g* jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
r! G1 Z! T1 u2 ?throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core, }6 ~( Q) o' j$ K
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
' n* v# i& S4 b1 S+ H- kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record/ u* f) v* A/ b: t, T
breaking price appreciations.
9 C* h# K6 q8 l w! F: X4 _+ b* D4 f( v, \ `9 K
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
" ^5 \0 B6 i2 o6 C- {economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the# c4 A2 X2 w+ B
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
3 C' F# O4 D5 e1 U- w9 S W* C: E \- D. z
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid0 `$ e) {; O+ L- Y
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
1 w0 ~5 h) Y$ i! @1 M6 \ N0 D1 Fconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off& l( Q/ x4 R+ z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth., d2 Q, }* x; d$ Q5 e! c
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
8 ~0 p9 N: A# z: L; n, vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 x+ M$ E6 m' E! U3 |" |0 e* ^
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
! `9 S$ N8 I* Y2 S( H$ t
3 h- x. t& R! q While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing2 \9 U2 w+ J( D, V0 X! F
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 Q% ~- X5 X0 |( [financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 r$ ^4 U4 p" @. u1 Y& m' ]are markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 H9 v# d- s% f# C3 f4 u% t0 K9 B
@2 Y: H, t' m0 n E Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- }3 ^) n! l- I- u5 j. nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's0 j# A: X5 O- n6 S! t
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the& ~- z8 p& ^6 x' p
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- ?& M! z- C$ Q, w
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the& w2 R$ z5 K# J) ?) ~+ ?
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: a& K6 Z/ ^0 r2 \9 K, f
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: C# s3 r: J& a" s. Q" gmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."& B3 b8 V0 B( o3 r2 `
% B; l( H# q1 u" C. L n; b <<
7 R3 |- {& X/ c5 f' ~% X% w* h5 X REGIONAL SUMMARIES' g( f, y" r) y6 v2 C9 j5 P
>>
3 d( H7 ^' L5 _ v; _' {/ }! y, q
7 \; f2 ^! o5 U; `0 [: m; } Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
7 I2 Q. Y i: a7 HHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 b6 d0 m/ M9 g1 A4 G, b/ Zof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time3 D- p; j9 L$ z% p! P7 }$ n% O: [
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ h1 E9 H: k+ I1 B& i
renovations.
, X. B5 l6 T3 w% A' p' O8 y' F( d' a# G% @
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 Q+ D/ A% j$ X$ V
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation/ M: {1 T+ E N5 A: e, Y5 c
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
0 x1 ^6 k3 M) I0 uSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; A0 o" ]/ Z! A" p0 Q# b+ E
2 X" T" a4 T- u2 R: H/ O The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 R6 N$ B) H& _( L3 Lslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 ^# O6 E( L1 I
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) ], B, a5 S2 H( t1 E& ]$ h600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 ~/ _5 o/ B" _; t
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. k) ?- x9 U- n& ]- T. Qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 p3 L" U* n* D9 k, m9 z: Y6 T8 ~! Z+ K4 X/ e: ~) c; ]
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced* [. D" s$ |# {+ w: X4 |
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 H, ^% W' o6 ~. S7 F5 ihomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# w$ g4 Z8 {4 a2 R
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
; ~$ N9 e6 ~! R' Udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing$ H, o1 M9 x+ |+ o, C
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
" a0 i: p) M* h/ A7 d
& z( Y2 x$ R4 N8 i% F Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly1 @/ T/ P; @2 k' k
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# G* |- @3 x" d& l) Xpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
- w" t0 O* n. c* ~- Xas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last/ y# F8 @/ ^9 g7 ?' L& r N" Q
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
8 \& G# W: W% b- W/ v! }# Z2 k( ?" e# |: a% R* {
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house$ ?$ @3 u( u% ]/ ^
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 O; I$ t+ r0 A, zlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 b0 @- e; m, ?# P$ bfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,7 m4 |2 b: ~2 r; d; Y' U
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
9 T% Z4 o7 O& K. @* @# Apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
8 x6 J! {( ?/ Y4 x+ g% U5 N3 J6 }making a purchase.7 G! {7 G. b. L, b0 r: Y! i. F
& b3 B! y& B- C4 e3 n) v Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
k' Z' [( Z3 Q7 p vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. K4 y" d1 |& Q/ p a
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 J: @* L. P! c# h9 \2 Ecentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting) L1 W5 Y$ {5 I1 K. ]
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# c: [4 h7 [, h7 r
amenities.8 V8 E$ v) T/ G) w+ A$ z; ~/ @0 }
, Q! C$ x# u* O" L) v The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 M1 N% ]4 J/ K4 k# W
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand+ _, h6 O2 ?. s3 E# d7 Q% f; ]
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
( ~, f0 E' e- s0 X5 ]4 Tcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 C" S* j! m0 G
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle6 _% ]7 ^; @& s2 ]" O, i) ]3 E o
residence, rather than for investment.) C4 @5 L7 s. K1 f% S+ P' E+ n
& b: y5 Q5 H. P8 O) m- J
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 I; l0 h8 X0 ]% {" ?5 ?8 Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
, R8 h6 O7 [3 f" a% ~' Bin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' R3 q* Q8 `- K' W bconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! s0 K. {0 O, \+ \6 \rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: D1 X! d2 c/ Wthe market.
# t7 ?7 g- h; D' s" x+ B4 L; R0 Y+ Q) w7 |2 M1 b& B
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through2 b4 |; w ]4 D. Y, h! ?
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In+ k0 Y4 J( o6 n+ m# b
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ r$ p0 \ y; z Y9 w
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due( G2 R6 U8 w9 c7 n
to the shortage of available inventory.
) F& X/ ~1 d& _" j# J3 b& O- b
* B: P/ U- w9 f8 E* T* Z Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: w- {4 V5 Z; W: ymomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains% o2 ?1 B" L, _0 |! W2 y- |
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses; b2 X0 x( y* ~* N1 V3 I% e6 ?8 V5 X
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
7 @ Z) E C5 @" S* \
% \# M9 z6 j% p6 ?/ @$ o Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
( a$ d& u8 S" E6 n+ @- F; f, I3 E/ j+ bin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: E% k% w4 t2 r9 m; W
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that3 e0 r/ s% E/ Q7 y
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
. b3 g& U1 y3 P* q. m" Z& T$ dprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer2 ]% W( F8 O9 W6 {
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! k- {% @2 T" ?; t& F1 U0 S( i
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.9 A6 w4 ? e# x- i6 W) v
( H$ J$ R% r b9 L( `4 V' ^: p
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
3 _4 ]; |2 ?) q- e6 `/ [' h) O, jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ c. H: ?; W0 d
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 p) `' b' h0 z& I$ G2 R6 S
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( a1 a' w+ E( s& v1 j5 }$ D* l
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve: h# m0 ]! V d$ `1 f" i5 x& r( H
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
# |) \0 W% i+ P* Ttowards the end of 2006.
8 _+ @8 l: r% }5 g$ }& s
6 m' t% c" s1 I' y: w AWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
: k* I) A: j% J$ Vinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 `: m) k+ r4 b$ x
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
; A% f* M/ t. a# R& l! ~5 Y* L% m3 |group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to+ D# U3 j! }. l
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) y. s" n1 p. I0 |) N, ^
pressure on tight inventory levels.; H0 |) ^; _- ?/ k" n8 S3 c
! W6 ^8 h' o& [4 r" B. M" M Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
0 S, Z Z* f% ofundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
! n! B+ Q- E' U8 m/ Tinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' c( C& D0 i6 n/ `7 y% X
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
0 z7 q2 W" V4 |# }for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: T9 S# b$ \3 f1 d) Z W
+ H/ ^( I# F4 z7 E8 z
<<
% T+ O5 }- ]2 }: O5 P3 S0 ~; @, ` Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20067 X! T' R: t; \+ v2 S) U
/ O* ]$ Q8 R' g* o+ \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) s' s) s* n0 t+ a* ~ Y% q Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
+ W+ H9 o7 L, E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 b$ k2 v( p& s! L9 f1 Z 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 p5 |& r6 n, ^: N; o$ |* f" i Market Average Average % Change Average Average
, i3 f8 W: ?1 q ^. U# Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 q3 R+ F7 G! @7 N Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
% y4 p3 ~5 Z1 Q2 Y! ]& Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------# n8 D/ l( K3 g, d/ q
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0008 h; R9 R, U3 T2 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 i. x: W$ A& b! G8 V
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
" M! C" f" R- {" P: o -------------------------------------------------------------------------# ^7 r) ^# `& Y+ t/ Y
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
. U2 E+ [9 X, a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" V3 u# V: x: M. Q2 K7 W St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333; [( K( E; F/ h5 L1 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 u) r3 _) v1 W5 q% e! _
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
& K/ H+ O- w8 O. n' n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; Y# c: K, \1 @, z1 Z, i+ k5 j Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
9 ?. z$ F1 k) Q$ W. { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* w6 G8 o+ `- y: h Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250 Y0 @5 O u6 M% y, N0 W. W$ j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 x6 p. Q% a% L5 q8 P Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 n, A. K/ T4 S6 m( n, y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 [9 P5 v8 y& O7 m. ? Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 w1 K/ y) |( g0 d6 R/ o -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ^& G4 `4 i \2 r/ J h% d
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500* C$ X" y) ^; f4 z0 m6 i0 ?+ N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ w* l: l% c; ?9 A8 d
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389: I/ ~2 j' }! P* c( _5 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% V8 B H( p$ o' B6 r Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
8 C) R+ j& p. t) T6 h9 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ p, a, x/ M `; J% i* p. e& u9 e Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500' @! r Q, }6 w. e5 y6 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" \) m1 ^7 d7 P9 M. w6 W
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000' z9 w- e" v( R) \9 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) e5 p3 a5 V" Y
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
% B2 d6 v4 U) i! t z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 c% _( X3 t: D' D1 U: x) [3 C1 n# q
( _& d( \# q' {9 M -------------------------------------------------------------8 x$ c/ W4 T* `4 \
Standard Condominium
/ s5 X9 S6 u: i" L. R$ I2 C -------------------------------------------------------------. z$ _2 o8 K5 B X9 u3 N" k
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
0 [/ [3 V$ E2 r1 V: p5 z# g% D Market % Change Average Average % Change1 J+ I* X8 ?* U- _2 R
-------------------------------------------------------------" x3 t, g9 }1 O& D/ U8 U2 Y% G' t& L
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
8 p- V% k4 E# Y: N -------------------------------------------------------------
6 G5 K4 D) c6 X4 }: G Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%- H' U: {1 F( {' l
-------------------------------------------------------------
: V! w+ V# J z' h2 M. X Moncton 4.9% - - N/A9 u- p7 q- ^& A3 p% s) u9 U
-------------------------------------------------------------
; e- @: O! ^; X& c' X3 { Saint John N/A - - N/A
* [9 e" j) y: Y( d! J$ ]0 @ -------------------------------------------------------------' \+ f& b: t* E* ~- R
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%9 z, l8 G& a' k; y7 U% F
-------------------------------------------------------------
- m* M9 x* O/ m2 y# Y0 | Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
2 Y3 Q8 W7 U# }" E, W, l -------------------------------------------------------------
8 O$ o9 J6 P7 L1 L V3 z5 O: T; R Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
( E% `" P6 F/ g) ^8 k -------------------------------------------------------------: E5 w( q3 F- K/ W. k- P( ^
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%8 n3 }& F! ] `1 m L
-------------------------------------------------------------& b' v; u4 J$ K' e. A; \* f
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%4 N h2 M( ?% D" H
-------------------------------------------------------------
. p4 Z8 H, j+ J! i* E, @ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%/ S2 ?3 k5 S0 n$ O1 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
% W- g/ V" P0 R! q' f Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%& D) `2 o% n6 i
-------------------------------------------------------------. }+ v. {5 L4 A* @6 ~
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
" k( {" h# R _9 ]! A; D -------------------------------------------------------------
6 j+ o1 k3 Z. e. E7 r4 _ Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
i" ~$ C$ D+ n6 C4 a -------------------------------------------------------------
$ X4 J) T. Q8 W& _- h# I: _' e4 O7 b Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" X A4 P6 h; X% F
-------------------------------------------------------------8 {+ A3 u8 B1 a+ G5 }$ p& a @
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
, n9 Q; k1 D/ ?8 o) ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
) V& m6 Z9 R# D, j" {/ X; [ ^# G1 G National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
. j( E' |/ }3 J8 H) e" T9 E -------------------------------------------------------------
/ t0 A! J" g- n' |# d" P6 T8 | >>% M9 j, U5 W) i0 e7 n& S
! s+ o, W) _7 q: Z: ?4 r' i
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) r w* J" W9 r1 _1 R+ _# ^in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ i* U4 |9 Q5 }
John and Victoria.
9 |3 k; m9 O" f* f4 Y6 t5 b8 K D& \; y! d6 H0 b$ T7 S
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most Z' Z, f1 e2 L. }/ d( M' q! e( b! L; k
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
8 g3 B: q6 U, g( Whousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
. m" o3 s2 V3 G3 B2 n0 l- Dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
4 c' A6 E: ?7 S0 y" Atrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities! l- @; M& _* f& H
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! i' ~- v4 Z0 s7 G! gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
# o( x( ~( }. F& C& dfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
% L* N* p, G) W$ z! g' ~0 zversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on- \ X5 ]4 H) w3 D! M+ e0 H
November 15, 2006.6 x' y# Y0 ^1 y3 {
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 p5 T3 t( |' l3 Q* E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
6 T m: B7 R/ h2 w' P8 w' f S5 tprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& g8 G$ ]9 }% G2 t4 t/ C& havailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|