 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 @1 F1 ?8 E* w, W% d u
" ]* u6 w7 j l- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# f% o, I: S# N) c) _* w
) I8 q2 y- g& @2 _, s- D
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 Q! q2 s& w* W5 ?7 H+ s; M4 e( Texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" L" R4 D% M' X A4 z" T
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
0 M. p5 V. F$ T( n$ {( }$ [in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit/ ~& |' M' f! ^6 I
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
* c$ x# }6 u% A) {1 wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
9 E$ k' e( i* |9 R% _# XQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
$ h" M0 Y* z. ?) qLePage Real Estate Services.+ d- i# V' ^* a% k) @6 N
# n9 w* \: o2 H3 _
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters; D# M" H$ a6 P; v# c K0 Q' o
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic& ~2 n' N! O2 v- ]4 J, e
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
6 h2 H9 U$ R" c8 F5 Msound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% d( y: g7 I: ^4 x2 E( cresidential real estate sector.% M6 G/ A3 f2 i
, q6 M7 o# m T2 x0 X2 t* V Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
" e. e3 d! [9 Q8 xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
5 z/ K$ S4 k+ H9 E; Pyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
* F' ?; C: @% O8 v5 S(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 K7 S! c; [9 c5 b6 k# v
(+13.2%)./ r( p6 W, U; W8 D0 D2 p4 n
# c3 o5 f1 E! \: A+ x# N- H- }, E "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
5 c; c* }7 s- yduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
5 Q. U8 c7 N+ Y, u2 Ffrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! w9 ~( u7 H H, W3 ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,( \3 ]* \+ }) H2 ^' Z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services. n" |0 a7 b+ k, D" U/ V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We L' u0 A0 }1 k/ \! S
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* ?$ N/ f! Y7 Q. N- w0 a6 g
balanced market."
; `2 s: }/ n) z9 o: \: w9 n) a$ c
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
& O7 Y" W! S# Qconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) I* F8 B/ w* c: W+ f) h+ y
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 e4 ?; A9 l8 V P6 j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- [+ Y1 z$ q/ L2 R. _" J% y& w
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
+ C% n3 G2 E- ~9 b2 ]manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
- u' Q c, `2 G3 ]1 V& S: n& sbreaking price appreciations.: ]: W' P" H& w! k* Z
* h- u2 ^( V- I, \7 ~# S Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
9 \0 S8 p1 i) R8 P$ M/ _economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
' U9 B7 F3 I$ T( c. olargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
0 p6 l6 Q! z, s9 V3 p% U- f
9 N" _, X% F7 e In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ M2 N! Z' `) ^) l) J. q4 e! y/ heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
, I9 z" R5 Z8 x& H vconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ k& D3 G: k3 X% @4 ]/ Y; y0 H
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.- ^4 \: |# r. _/ [8 z3 Q( |
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers6 K- I" r# B! ~2 M
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of; F4 T8 ]1 c% m. N
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
9 @) N( D5 o( R, B% o
0 g- e) I, o" |2 D: Q While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
5 B' |3 `- { a8 ?" X( Q# J8 X% Rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 e: U1 J$ y( Ofinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada% w1 a+ B$ d: w9 c
are markedly different than those found in the United States.( e+ ~" J0 w1 Y4 F: {8 N" o
Q9 C+ J8 w" h9 U% F3 V
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the% F# E/ o1 E5 Y4 h% p' _9 d6 {
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
7 u9 V9 d, Y6 Q I0 G7 u6 ?favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the/ f! _- h% f5 L) L) X
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general+ L6 g" j4 a8 _! D
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the1 ]! |& t7 s, c: y5 M3 C# n
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
v8 g* H9 \" ^% y3 B- paggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 B1 q: Y5 o6 w6 |- n3 O* X( j
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
+ j y( b6 d l& S) d U( _3 h) K; N7 S
<<
: g% w) _; ^$ | r8 T) d! k REGIONAL SUMMARIES9 q; {( {% @" r: h* r' f _
>>
! ^* ]4 n0 G: n& g
: `$ f; T* ~$ [' p) A Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 t7 s; j) n/ n/ ~7 }
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate% f" }! U& B# g
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time' ~9 Z! R2 k% o; j* _' @
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ h7 y3 e q2 Q' @, p9 S8 grenovations.
* x. `' `; j! v9 s4 h6 E( X- i, e( s
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight e5 M+ }9 T# S' ~
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation) `1 d$ W& G2 n
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and& z/ R# B+ w) Q5 R6 s& s/ f
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 I2 Z8 n$ V4 N8 Z( z
6 f6 t$ D9 d& @ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 Y. _8 G+ G. P' g( gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 \/ d2 V s- U/ d& u/ nquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% q3 i2 [* a8 K" X600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
( o0 K9 u5 G9 W( Wto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
3 w- Z7 ?0 R- u8 u. ]+ N, |6 a$ qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 ^) C. u: X. m9 _- e7 I" e
; p* B# Y3 t! f. M
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced4 _. f8 _* g+ ?7 X# @ C! O
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 ~4 L& Z; n; X( o3 H
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
% w5 ]+ B+ b/ b: Pwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
4 ^( A4 S& y4 R* _6 E0 Wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 ^4 r0 a: { v2 \6 D5 S# r! o
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
6 W3 P' B$ F/ l+ k: q O6 u
. y' U0 ], I- h6 ?0 c Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, C3 A# f8 o0 g. g& B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# W+ F8 v# {( a5 e8 qpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
8 w$ ^2 ~0 `( `! S" mas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! Y& P2 E3 L: R4 Q6 t" T
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! F$ n1 ?/ a( x, H7 G( Q
/ H: |' j- d6 }! C9 h9 _ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house3 h, t$ b6 s1 k
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
7 @3 P9 M. s7 j0 q* Ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
U9 C: [2 F D& d7 Z" t3 ^first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,1 I x. S; A+ \! n; V" X
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the9 b& j- z! d- i! J
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before+ B6 z6 A) J) J2 ~& L! U0 V
making a purchase.
7 a) m2 g( a8 v& ?% H! E% e* q6 l* N# o- _
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing7 [6 ~$ H3 k; M, q1 z- X
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong% N! p% Z% f8 _
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 c+ m. T7 B* f$ Pcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
$ P# ?$ g4 _0 O2 Iattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" v4 [2 @" g7 V [/ q. u
amenities.( ^" @, F2 v! K6 W. @: N
! j5 B0 Z; L+ s$ O- j6 n9 g: y& L The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels8 d. e6 l9 q1 e7 U0 ~
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
2 o8 x6 ~+ q9 d( }9 gacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
1 a- j1 t: ], |/ Rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
1 }% u5 v" S9 V8 v+ Pdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' d4 m7 F9 p9 |! C' d
residence, rather than for investment.
$ m+ f! X: O2 h/ E8 ^) y- E" U/ `
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ I( D2 Z: k) m& I$ l3 y/ I) O5 _
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 v5 h, a* t, s" {in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
, p; P K/ L/ b- Z% \: Z0 w8 Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization. R/ S: K+ z6 h! h
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 X) b) d# n$ |) W
the market.% f: c3 s. ]& ^6 y: ` L2 G
' Y. ~9 x( v4 }* A% o& K" F In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through! T2 z# d4 [. @ ~* t* V4 s
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
" l6 J6 B) Y# _3 j1 MAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 I6 b B5 N# X& r i" i6 z; a& mmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 E3 q9 v( X- jto the shortage of available inventory.
+ w% n' O7 p, P* K7 c; J& X0 z8 M5 v X, e5 g) f
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" l* G- A0 a# I8 e) \- b1 h# {momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains$ o# W* Y ?7 u7 |& I7 X
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 Q6 o/ A' T( l4 {# j4 Ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.$ ~8 [8 G9 v3 P6 _" r1 p
/ m3 V" ~" _" a5 z( v1 t+ x; p Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# C$ ^+ X1 I1 s7 a1 Y3 D
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low% ]8 g5 z7 C: S( J
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% H$ d0 B7 J" L/ o. A. R( ]0 B% B1 @pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
$ z; R( l5 }' K5 xprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer$ z y6 } `6 ]& A* b/ V
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
/ q" @- j5 O$ ebuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.& [& t1 T9 @5 D3 l. W
: r) i7 D) q- D6 q5 @
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
: X8 Q8 I7 l" k1 F, Uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
8 L, G" {6 ]$ K: W) [# d( Z0 y) k3 l( \remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,; y: J- x7 X2 ~4 `. U
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices9 T! B$ k& R/ _; V; q V
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. s2 Q& Z/ G; {
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
% ?1 p: F4 t* gtowards the end of 2006. 5 g+ u+ [) o( r% M/ u, F$ H' C
2 B+ H( m, @8 S X6 H
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 I6 D" Z( o8 d$ t
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
8 ]% U+ A7 z$ m4 Nto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
, r7 z2 H+ R- I0 N `. Agroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
7 U& W3 e6 X7 J& rforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added% B) a9 i7 x, l5 M& ~3 L' P
pressure on tight inventory levels.
& R1 u6 D4 G8 d- B7 `" G; M) b, y% [: v* g G* R7 s
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ R. b' C% I4 T' J" H
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people& ]" ^) t8 t7 G: k8 b
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;; ?0 F! r4 n T3 c o" U
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching( |6 }6 R8 @/ d, ~3 K
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.2 }# E; X B0 M, H* L+ S* N
) U+ p7 A% f& v1 t <<7 `3 Q; w1 B+ r+ A! r) z
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
& e$ E% ^8 p) w# [: j1 q; C8 \% z* i* V7 V) S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. F: c! q4 R9 d s( F8 @
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
' F6 l" {" \1 g1 `" d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- c* I) L3 \( ]3 w 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3. X i' Y( z" c4 N
Market Average Average % Change Average Average5 v9 {6 `- }! |. \0 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: }0 ~0 t3 ?0 j7 F4 k, l Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
- n7 x% ~4 z3 y, e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ F m) M5 T( I2 O7 f) A; k( k5 O Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0003 H$ J4 J2 {! q' \4 V- ^, |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 h' d4 { ?8 ~6 P
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000, n" Q; ^9 D' u) O% v# ^4 `4 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 k4 I2 ]4 H' ^, G% H; z3 | Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -4 r2 ?8 Q: t4 G# l2 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 ]. t7 Z6 R. p& b9 C2 T St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333' n# a! P& F( T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 ?6 I8 [( M- }8 M
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
2 ~8 F: v" J2 _7 L, }3 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ~" I# ?* \, v( I! f4 ~7 `, B! G
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
" s: ?( H7 ]6 c$ G* x -------------------------------------------------------------------------# r8 Z) ~/ |( t) p n% Y4 I
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
% n; @, A# N6 ?1 K( _/ t) ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------- i0 A& h$ Q) U( F* M. s# ?# j
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
9 ]+ X: j/ }# T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# i+ G* O( {2 P7 h8 t( d% X Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7074 l% ?0 T4 u: l2 G/ d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& r8 g0 W. O" }' F
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 l# J, U# o8 G+ u. D t -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 }5 g! A s- H5 X( t, R" `# Z
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
D# L$ L! V U9 ^) Q( I -------------------------------------------------------------------------# K/ J4 H ~7 v+ A
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714) R0 \* H+ z' r) ^) \8 X! q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" |) V' Y/ J' M W Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
6 Q7 }( b+ z. A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ q. m( R2 u' x# s' m2 M3 l Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
3 I2 W2 Y2 f; ~) Y9 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Q( j+ e9 l, P J( C; j( d4 K; Z
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
& k5 a' `3 E' ^2 [% m) t -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 D% m5 Y$ ]( d) T* Y
( x+ {% w1 I8 r) u3 a* H -------------------------------------------------------------: J2 Y7 l" l: r, w
Standard Condominium% Y' W2 O: g- \1 y% G2 k" N& d
-------------------------------------------------------------/ F% k. R' v+ ~& i* @) x0 S" `$ k2 k/ e
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
! H+ V$ r$ D6 }5 ]0 N3 m9 X% k/ G Market % Change Average Average % Change
" }0 o) G* n* f1 a7 ? -------------------------------------------------------------! q+ d, y/ V& \7 M7 b
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
% I j5 T E4 M: ` -------------------------------------------------------------
- J) R* V/ D8 V3 L- P2 M0 i; z Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%# _; v {; I% b8 g# _; j
-------------------------------------------------------------* M! @% V3 Z% A1 R
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
' B: {: M9 |3 P. H3 p# o+ t -------------------------------------------------------------* _ k- w7 P: }* `# g
Saint John N/A - - N/A
0 f. R. w1 \, F) ~6 E1 t -------------------------------------------------------------6 q+ d1 ~/ A$ W' i" ?- C; [3 ^
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%* ^, y# u" _! M* Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
) O& S8 y6 ?! c2 v Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%6 f/ }8 u' c3 }. y- K) _" x1 L
-------------------------------------------------------------, ]+ C2 ?7 ?* v+ T" V( s
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%3 p; Q8 V3 R# A. B% _6 W
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ v0 F5 u& \4 ]# O2 f Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%& c7 w& Q" i2 J% H
-------------------------------------------------------------
& s: i! i9 V& `/ R Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
u( Z7 }4 ~2 d -------------------------------------------------------------
) T0 `& O' {' i1 }' z Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
# U7 {; I/ R- T/ N- C5 |. v -------------------------------------------------------------* V4 h) h7 C5 n. C
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%3 E- H7 k5 s) z" U
-------------------------------------------------------------1 {- U( g0 J0 s: N" M
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%9 E6 z9 R( K# r# q
-------------------------------------------------------------6 z1 @# ]# |" Y/ v& y
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%$ K, R% Y& }$ i1 o
-------------------------------------------------------------
& S8 a4 o2 z, q4 k* m Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
, F5 C3 [, h* ~: N S& o. B: C% F -------------------------------------------------------------
2 B1 V7 q/ L0 K, [4 N Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 P6 X' ?) s7 C: W/ _ -------------------------------------------------------------. g( `1 n9 \, ~: D
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
6 k. o5 ~$ J) t( H4 N. Y% z -------------------------------------------------------------3 h/ U$ D1 z& b3 Z3 i/ d" o
>>
+ }1 o* D2 O2 I" Y* `* @ T6 i$ |# ~$ [! ?' P" _8 E
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) f# J( d1 S5 F, n5 i6 f, Lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
7 x$ W! L, Y: pJohn and Victoria.1 z7 P6 R: ?( C
) C/ @( a! C* i, t& y# q, d The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# n5 |" {( ` K, ?; J, Ecomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 v- P2 v% ^7 e
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ i) m9 M# N5 n, B" t0 h8 Hreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 r% Q( @$ }4 o
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities' ~) m( @5 J; b O0 J/ s# ^
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is& e: d7 R- G V& r8 \; W- Z8 a
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current( ~8 @% J) i1 {4 c
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable. P8 A: P# `4 c: P1 I$ [1 K1 Z
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ @1 e, a7 I* G) u, y
November 15, 2006., |' ]6 W6 _# T4 O
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; c% Z: M; y9 P5 Z4 Afair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* }4 @# g, K: x& dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& _' H9 Z" r" i3 Y
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|