埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2155|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
, |9 `) F% L* O1 Y! J
8 q: s3 L+ e/ u- v. s- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -4 S, Y* E, e' t- h8 f" Y% Q. K4 g
+ U  d+ P+ H  s" w: ~7 G2 y
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market5 U, R, d  W# y7 q, P
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
9 ]3 p2 \$ F5 Xquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic9 w9 ]% ?7 U+ y6 t+ ]7 X
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit% g: C) {" |+ P2 X  w
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and/ h( b! x8 K. t& p  C, T
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario," {- ?1 T) j& M2 A/ Q) E7 P3 ]
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
& }5 F4 C* j- ]/ M% OLePage Real Estate Services.
. k3 \. j; E6 g* I9 U, t: T
2 q. ?& G; b- K+ `$ ^    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters1 a5 }8 R2 ?# r, X5 l6 e2 U0 K
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic. C$ b: d, T2 h3 c
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
2 _' Q! D! x, k7 u+ b( N8 s5 ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the' R- U) @( Y' o% g2 F) x
residential real estate sector.
" {( h; i- V, S6 V" `* `% ^/ ?/ X0 W$ d& F; j
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: [) T0 L% ?+ a, @7 }9 U: u8 e
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%), ]/ E4 v3 Z  f) R. {
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562. C' j+ ]9 a# v
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
4 B8 S4 a2 W; |/ r" r& e# F(+13.2%).
- }/ w1 Z9 v6 k; n% k' g2 I! n, _( O: E% w
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ b. D; H, ^' {
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the/ W7 I7 Q9 a5 l/ S  `
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 m+ Z9 o5 D% C) L4 q; c; N8 l
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 N5 t3 J3 K* y, i8 N3 ppresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 P6 Z0 e) s) j, \8 x
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% b4 d/ S' A; I# s0 X/ J
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy$ }$ v/ y9 G3 r, i' G% e# c
balanced market."
: y7 b# q6 _% Q% M% }( |
1 X; @: V" i" @& c! I( ?$ c# M    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,) c# p! W8 S5 ]& r
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" ]4 ^0 F5 s- Z4 k2 ^5 Y) e: {to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
/ m9 b# J6 F2 {0 ^: s: U+ ^) Ethroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
5 T, h- @& S7 l  }* O: o0 Venergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration," M3 G$ O0 Z$ R$ |9 Y' q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record# P* |& j1 ^! N7 ?4 ?; @5 P
breaking price appreciations.7 A- f2 p  [3 L* |& g

+ h, a$ X) X) u. s    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
  w* I9 r4 a. P9 K" qeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. ~0 \5 e& ~$ s! v
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
0 S1 M' I3 I3 N* V3 |0 N, U; P0 B7 T( z& U/ T0 E. R' u0 W0 i) ~
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
( g' E) s; ?8 K& m% [9 p- Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer8 t; L, i$ v: o, m
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
% E& i# H, e) Jslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
8 D  E% ]) ~5 _- pIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers/ Y: j! _* N. L+ V, Z2 D+ V0 g
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
- k# X; v: b, xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 A: O/ o7 C  l* }0 Q% t) B3 j( p* Q0 d2 x: Y/ `: b
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing4 @5 e  H, C( q0 s9 }& M: T* l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& b& R4 _) {. S* p* l! |2 N
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 Z& N  M$ o6 }are markedly different than those found in the United States.
. k8 R- {9 J! Z5 N: Z
  `, K2 X  b: ^( f8 O    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- Q- z; l# w+ ~# rAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
! e& o% m4 ^6 Q) h' {5 c$ Rfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. N; ~8 m' p6 Krelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- G! i( d. W9 ^! t
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 c0 U8 l) z( }, Y$ Z: ]& Z9 vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and+ Z0 v. Z$ F6 L* O# s) E* q; e' B
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization8 T! R4 e9 e/ j. I- \5 a1 W: n! D
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
  P+ `# }0 Y3 _8 A8 d  F: g  R( [! T3 U' ]$ I
    <<
% `  ~3 w# w; x' \/ T* x                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" b6 S" `$ D2 _; o5 ]6 j% `    >>
/ D3 D7 Z7 _& y+ c) z; H( O6 |% r: M  _% v
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
# \/ O; t# [2 J0 E# f9 IHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
+ E( n& q5 O1 Tof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' a' C9 ]; R: ?9 ]$ Nlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) e! U; Q1 p' v  D* A
renovations.6 b+ R8 m0 j: c" T  b
* W5 B7 D0 Q* b5 \( R0 j! u" f$ n
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
" j% R  b0 W, I! z( gincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation6 S; ]1 c: x' i: I4 Y0 b9 i0 r/ G' F
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and5 p, t6 O+ i3 k, C, G
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
% `( ]' c) u8 v3 [/ r4 I& f5 _7 R  a% W7 ?' o
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- t6 o7 u+ {1 fslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
, \# ?& e6 w3 |7 Q( P& Jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
5 a$ J* f- W: o% w1 e8 C0 Q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores  \. ?- Y+ a5 [5 Z; E
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" E& ]; |2 r- }8 \3 l; x4 {  n
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
. {2 T3 e2 E. C& j5 n
7 j5 x6 k7 {% E( g4 F+ d  s    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
$ s1 r3 X' [' U% z6 ^$ Kconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ [4 |6 ]2 L& k4 phomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ G3 {+ D3 Q* V$ ], vwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
; q+ P: m8 |7 f4 }5 Sdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
2 L" `, v9 I; J9 a' rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
  P' @0 \5 t3 M& e3 \( K9 }& C$ _1 J2 T$ q7 L
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly  k7 l7 x4 m  C9 d  r- a2 {
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; n# [. O5 c1 g* Q; e% ?
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
% r  v9 l* H) ]+ k" Las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
* g+ J  R, G3 p5 rfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.& F. @% _3 j3 J; y. i5 \

: a1 r0 J2 b. A    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" L, v  h6 @' dprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% v4 N+ p1 a+ b; Z2 w; ?
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 w% e# n  ?# \7 X3 c, o9 z+ p9 L
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ U$ m) V3 E$ m) S8 \; Nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ U% Z% @8 T$ U+ R4 K1 N
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 p: p- ~9 m0 i) z
making a purchase.
# |) Z! ~# f; E7 _' e/ l
, k- k5 t" h5 d8 [0 P    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# A, Q" r: M/ Z: b- |" a
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
5 H+ J5 X. s0 M; U- \  G: k$ gconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. o7 K2 ~  i4 `centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting' O8 E7 \# ^7 E* E) z: \
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 t6 t! o% Q8 D5 @0 R- K* _- l" Wamenities.7 U2 {! i) z8 O

4 Q" z9 a% l8 w4 m2 A, o    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels2 \) u  @. u5 F
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand2 L+ {. c' M+ T! p+ t% k5 X; x/ a6 V
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has, x1 N+ I( y* h' N. L2 r. V; F' ~
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been4 M! }; U# T$ k4 ~
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 c$ I! h# ~& |) t7 p
residence, rather than for investment.0 M1 \- ]5 ~% ^3 I  G

6 N" o1 A1 g3 M. [; j    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as# W4 ~- H$ Y- Q
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 e/ ]& z. @- \; u0 E
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer+ c& \; i' D: X9 _
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ ~" k6 Q7 N# q" m" H/ \  Wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter5 k4 f8 V5 T4 Q  O* l1 Q' |
the market.% U% k8 C0 I; q4 g# _

' B* y+ m- V8 f1 w# r    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ I( _% a* s% JJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In( ]- b8 }1 @' a
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring; F5 E5 G& i9 G$ B; k  b; ]& l
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 b" X! y* d+ E6 B0 u
to the shortage of available inventory.$ v5 u, p1 R$ L0 G  O  C

/ G7 B$ g  D4 b7 r    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: o2 B9 h; a& |! e; G9 e  zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
$ }! {+ U3 S; {+ a- y9 b8 Zvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
8 d4 c' {( a" j4 g" A' fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province., }; N9 M, _% m" s( ?+ E
# K/ B& U7 d/ t9 ?7 s1 R& N2 R3 Z
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases. T$ G- e7 I( ~2 C
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
* B8 |1 e2 W4 V$ {  V6 Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that* w# Q; X5 L8 Z8 D3 u* {
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring: t+ L4 L5 ~  `" f; g$ o1 J$ x, L
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' T7 _& Z0 _$ p% l" _% Fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 T8 V& I% Z6 a: h* Jbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

7 K6 b3 b4 e6 f7 G2 ^* A. m+ e5 k" e" x7 \6 x8 T
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" Y4 n0 q' ?, ]7 ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 [* u9 G7 _! ~5 ^9 G& ?remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 F8 b3 [2 R' d  _/ P+ v& W3 Umaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices* x7 O" i2 s# M
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
& l3 ]* w0 t* J& i, S6 y! pin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' R  j- m6 i" Ytowards the end of 2006.
    8 m: g. W  b, z8 c5 V( L3 {! Q
* o3 B$ `" n( J1 e) q4 j( O. R
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 ]$ i: d7 r. G) d8 l. }' B; Yinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
1 m6 n2 ~0 U: {! a2 U" Bto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse3 }$ E2 Q  i% h& X& ^, I
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to8 G) f. c+ J, o" v- F* m* t2 z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
* `& K  g' Q; }+ ppressure on tight inventory levels.
$ V) j. h- I/ ^' z$ i* A; @* g! w8 }$ }& @: e! F
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ G, A4 s# C. x% C
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people2 o2 ]3 `+ z6 J( H0 s0 D! U  u3 J
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;$ T. v" t8 E3 T, \0 L/ k
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
6 ]% O6 ?1 m$ }+ ~9 [for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 ]  r7 j0 X5 a# x2 F
8 P/ _% d! h$ u1 ~    <<9 _& a8 N: W: U) @2 X
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 M( @/ |) b0 _' g: Z4 A
0 j' N  Z; S1 `" r% k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 J+ u$ P# c$ L1 \9 i! N0 e                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey3 O! Z. K3 f, z) L& i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 B- b9 u5 Q0 ]8 {; s; k
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3; h' k1 C; L: e, ^. ?# c
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
2 m/ o% b/ x2 v2 }. R; }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% _0 r1 r- m0 {+ g1 V    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
) t  I9 p, @2 e. d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' [- V1 v5 I5 z, c. u* @    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000* J  B' V& m% v" x& _# T. J6 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( b7 s) ]* q' h+ o: H3 _/ X    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000. t5 ?' m5 |  o$ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) r7 m: Y/ }6 e6 B    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -. u1 E' w6 b6 C, V3 B, j; L6 a1 _8 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- @9 |  [1 w( F
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
& W6 A. Q0 o, R7 O7 C) Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 g- q; n% ^  U# [+ o6 C* Z' u    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
7 ?; S+ @7 e- P/ W) ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" `6 j% C5 a2 ^* M1 {
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185) a8 a" N3 n1 [: [& d$ {5 G+ Y; ]! M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. h( T0 |! \% @8 E3 o; N% D1 h; G6 n3 j
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2505 j2 X- p! K! L& ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 G; H: [$ W# F. w8 p, ^
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7660 C, J8 z& h3 C" |6 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; H) @. J2 I. k
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
& i0 A# m1 F, j0 _) ?% W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 M: `& s# P. G) w    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5003 W* m8 D- D5 @. m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 B0 N$ J! j3 Z% y; s, h9 e2 Z    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389! B( I  U/ q/ {% N% f9 q- C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; l/ b/ s2 g3 f1 l% V5 N
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714+ Y6 Y8 ~! L1 Z4 B# Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 F7 |' W+ Z3 J
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5006 g# x9 `* G3 s$ O4 t# q6 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 X+ q4 F' J( C9 d7 G; E) c7 M    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0008 j7 J# @% g) Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 H! m- }: O7 f6 |% P8 x, }" e    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860+ w4 \/ n3 G, O1 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 C* [% Q( T! k. z  {% H) t! Q/ k: R& I
    -------------------------------------------------------------, k7 p: i6 ?! a+ _# Y7 y/ J) O. M
                               Standard Condominium
, c1 r6 p6 T4 X5 M' L    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 ]4 Z, `2 V3 y  @! O8 |                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo# @( U# T5 W7 ^* d5 i: D
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
/ X4 ^( Z% Q0 Z9 b/ X2 s$ g    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^! A" ?/ T& i1 c2 P4 z2 w    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
) h: b6 F5 i' F6 R2 ?0 g- U    -------------------------------------------------------------% |7 p! Y& B! ^( G. [4 }# I5 N' h) y
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%7 Z9 I1 ]4 V+ k! J+ S! ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------% @2 Q+ @1 R3 c0 Y) v
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A. U2 w5 v: b" w, y( Y+ r
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 `" `( A+ Z1 Y
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A. O7 b6 I2 H# U
    -------------------------------------------------------------# A  U. K' U  }! v* Z; {) G. K: v& D
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' u* Z  p5 j7 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------* _9 l& K" U0 Q! H4 p) Z. X* _
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
4 \" V% J( c& n' P9 }    -------------------------------------------------------------3 H& y0 N" {8 }7 J
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
( D9 s1 E/ n  V7 C: o' Z8 S    -------------------------------------------------------------2 `$ R1 [* V9 f4 a
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
3 `, o3 U5 |* N" d$ `" [  a    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 E* a2 A* F: r+ C, M7 `    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%: J( D! [; ~6 [0 J3 U- F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& O2 L6 g: S# ]) Y    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
0 a6 m0 m7 w( B: `! S4 @, O9 p    -------------------------------------------------------------
- F  e, K+ p5 W( a1 j- C' q/ p- X    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%, |# j  Y( A+ _5 L+ w
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ [4 t( y2 `% ~+ O/ p
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
# W2 @! G3 O9 ^# {' T    -------------------------------------------------------------
! _) M- c; G& ~+ |% A& R    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%7 W$ T$ [+ D) R, j1 J' L. ?; t! {  ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 n' ^0 k: F5 E: p7 |    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
, y7 ?! h' N+ E9 N! D" n- X6 t    -------------------------------------------------------------
* H, X- I7 ^: r* F4 y9 Y0 D( z    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
5 o, y9 u. W/ p- b) `  V    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 r. @2 V) j4 N4 ^6 {. _' ^$ e    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
7 [8 m0 H; F2 l( B" [    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z2 \4 h$ s, q; p4 F0 d    >>
8 s1 p/ i) K. z8 J: _$ b) U  l& B: Q& A5 s
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
3 w0 B$ ?; h+ \7 g7 @, h; X; Sin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ ?) p# G8 V& Q
John and Victoria.
) s" w! e2 S; I; C
! ^4 A1 L+ r% L: O9 L9 g! ?    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
0 P  v! ?3 T2 Q' ?2 ~% ^% |comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of) z/ S5 r7 O  a9 v
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release+ }* W9 A- u" W2 A# z$ ^. j
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price& y3 C+ S+ K7 L3 G+ l" F
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities$ K, P* d: k% Y. y& M, ~
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is+ p# v1 L5 k( X6 H8 m
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% Z- R( t; |3 R' `1 b
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 {+ ~# F5 U. ~$ eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) O  T3 y+ b9 t2 C
November 15, 2006.
2 f9 U; y" g/ G, Q9 @" K, p    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. A  Q5 \5 B1 _6 n# g% h. mfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge& B% O. F4 C. K, M# o* \
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is7 p4 ^1 I0 n6 o: z8 `0 i
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
大型搬家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-12 07:27 , Processed in 0.210545 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表