 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 6 K1 ]) X3 z0 K# P
3 E- e: T% q: o* V$ Y4 X
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -7 W' I1 z, q& x$ n
7 g4 W* B9 f+ {; v! f6 N8 r' p TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( e/ l4 o, f- `7 S! q! N& H3 Q2 Cexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
2 P% v, e8 K! t- I$ u: u% V9 ^quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic2 I0 i' q7 d8 N: {
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit" l% o/ V# e$ Y7 z$ m
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and- c/ H. A6 t% s v
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,# n0 g. I; }0 ~1 v8 {
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: a F& S7 a3 H6 D% O# j, P
LePage Real Estate Services.
* T+ A9 Q) ~4 p6 N4 M2 i8 L0 W
) d2 w8 F- {9 p- U C3 ^. O Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 s7 F2 J) V' E$ \7 s/ _/ Jare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 g8 o# b4 F$ ]3 N
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. M0 M. M3 r: y+ E# G1 K3 S( Ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the8 f" ~: k# `7 g* `2 a
residential real estate sector.
6 x* @& K8 Z% a
8 Z/ ], m4 [. j7 _* v Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 q; k3 s% s9 E- S) Z; E( U
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' t0 t( N+ O0 r; M
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
% K; s5 }6 Y. o* N1 t(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
* P7 R% _/ Z5 b% c4 Z(+13.2%).& G: L0 g$ Y3 S* {5 E6 h$ F! R' t
9 [1 w- O0 B& t* J6 r" C# N "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth6 I/ s' u# R& f
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the: v9 p. Q8 Z' k" ], S2 g; r
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are; F7 U: d7 }9 n. K
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,* I3 k. _0 B1 A3 o; U
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.7 R; y5 c* V( B' m" s8 ^* N
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We( `9 |8 t7 H" s" T% m" o
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, m' ?! z9 i+ j3 Q' z2 Qbalanced market."* z$ Q, e6 Q7 I% D/ S# S E* p, b
2 ?1 k8 Q* U7 E2 V4 g; q) H: C, |+ [& y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,0 _) y8 T- Z' `5 L* l& e
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
8 V# ]1 E5 B6 v2 Q! g4 G& Cto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
0 K0 ~+ V) g; {7 X2 cthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 e/ `0 F( |5 J
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
' N+ M/ C# I9 M2 {manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
7 p( r o( w) X. [breaking price appreciations.
5 s) n9 [1 |; e/ \% q- J- x( l/ o1 Q, w
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding8 O1 U9 m' P, g7 p0 K
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; Q" w8 i: M7 n/ i6 x n; F
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
- Z! J' ^; }/ L; O6 ~& i
, T) c) \4 M# W, \ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
4 Q" J* q: R: ~; Qeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer- W& m0 E) c k& C
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 A- B6 T1 K7 {. cslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 I5 a. E F2 C7 V, B( @( o3 E
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers' Y, [* @# S" N0 m7 u. L7 w' f3 o
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of; B8 g6 D: B6 _: s9 ?
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
$ e8 q! w( B; `: I% W6 \6 G4 a' M! [4 r6 Q
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
- ~/ U" h% ?+ P' m$ w/ amarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" F* ~# {2 R; J3 f w$ I
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada1 s+ n5 t* z9 b7 v2 f
are markedly different than those found in the United States." U2 b) {" \) Y7 _
& S4 r7 H& _% E9 m. M) i: D
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the9 Q6 M! z' M9 Y/ d {
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
) y2 Q- \0 |: ]' r) Ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the& v4 w: k5 e( p/ P
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% a# _9 i9 Q- ~5 e) h: laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
. ~$ A& [+ y2 vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
5 ~6 U+ V, P9 l0 f0 D: }aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ y8 _( f1 l* u5 I) X
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' Y& J/ S" I* [; M0 e' c2 n
6 I0 P m8 T4 e0 k* p! _
<<
5 w3 o' [9 ~& J. |$ h1 T* C3 E REGIONAL SUMMARIES: M$ o- h- m+ i, |
>>
6 C, y4 G) b/ I* R8 g/ C
3 @+ t ~5 [) q0 R. N" B2 a* B Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in8 w7 C; J" {( `; Z. U2 Y# r; |
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
9 V$ P. s+ ~3 ]! ?6 o4 Fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time, k& x6 L, S6 O7 N
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
\; ~7 I/ I) y3 W5 p0 ?renovations.
; n' @7 H4 O/ C& m
0 \1 A+ N( T8 {+ u& P/ p$ K The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight' h; S6 M$ N) U+ b& t( t- O4 P
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% F3 |& @. n$ h- G% u
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and% _0 |9 u3 {2 f& s& S) L1 d+ L
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) e+ F# n/ V8 t8 w t- |
6 k$ Q& K+ [4 H& z, n# c! \
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 }6 H! u1 X* [6 ~0 A# eslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) p6 w9 |8 K( P
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
4 \4 u' E1 U7 q8 ~/ R( w$ V% l+ d1 `600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores6 E6 t# o7 \8 X
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes. u2 E+ |# u% ^& u3 O
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 a3 U Y& [8 }- Z
1 v2 p$ D+ q# G6 V \5 c In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: f# y) _$ Q# @. Cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their6 A! I! r& l0 V$ j2 U
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers$ Y& F9 l/ U( }* G; v7 I: s: |# X: e
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
& O+ g2 s" @2 D. h5 a0 @" m. Edollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! R0 u$ @ d7 g
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
: n. r9 G5 ]) C$ A7 h, a" k) k+ m! D
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly8 N* u5 x: K* ~2 [
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
) A/ V4 Y% U4 H5 d& Ipriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. E; t* o# c, S# U1 tas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
# p, j4 p$ u0 V( ?9 d9 [few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions./ C$ e0 Z2 |. A7 ]
; l. z: E' ~2 t4 C Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. K# P3 R: J0 l5 Gprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 v; W4 Q- G7 Q4 I/ l9 [
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
# V0 s: N6 i4 p$ _first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,6 n6 b* \( g5 O7 \4 B
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
) E+ t- O, h& [, Z _$ e* b& M0 ?pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before* N" h5 c2 b2 K( r
making a purchase.+ `6 X: B: ?4 A1 N+ }1 K5 a& O1 W
( l* }6 x8 R& i; j4 Q8 |. ^
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing" ~" S9 c; t* n& _ l
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- p( I5 z6 _& L& O& u( X2 B5 g, ^
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city3 R+ N: E$ Z* o% z
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
8 b: g9 _) X- @- C! O3 qattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown& n3 y( @6 r4 Z+ K% e
amenities.
6 s g7 }6 i' v m/ J8 K1 w$ o) c
+ Z5 u+ t/ @; t8 P The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
9 J f9 M9 s, Fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
! k" P$ F3 G- d) B$ L* M: kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& ` [6 ^4 U+ @: X) e0 @
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( t+ s5 H$ z4 Q: K- K( w0 t
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 Q5 a' e4 q7 c
residence, rather than for investment.
7 s" g$ U/ X+ X1 e7 @. W& {% D; E
3 n0 q0 D% ]; O- q/ A+ n6 e% \ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ q0 O# M/ e& H5 Whouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 ]* F' e+ Z2 U' ~
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer( S0 i8 M" n/ {* i" S
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) D; O. n- m" S4 z) F
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter C% y8 x7 `$ [. |
the market.
+ k; x+ M1 V0 l1 r
2 z3 ^# }& Z$ O+ M In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' |: @" K1 |5 P
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In" Y4 Z1 Q3 K2 j, ]$ e, d" z1 |
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring: p: T3 V- N& x; a" k
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
6 @; o( H2 z _ J C% Rto the shortage of available inventory.
3 `2 M& F2 v6 h) t0 ]& W# A7 j2 @( X5 m* u |
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( ]) r7 t0 l' }" T
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- R+ w0 E- M6 V2 S' s* \
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 m, ]& D; B+ d, n& D( i# `
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.* s1 b: Z+ k0 @$ m; t$ P
% B* f$ _* R& } ^: z: n5 J* x Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
! z d0 S8 B/ T5 x# K0 C/ hin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
$ ^% m# r9 F( V9 p4 q k( }; sunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 o7 b; [9 O* u9 E% c' t4 G) mpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
5 K0 F8 S, L* Y5 p& Z5 L4 G6 R; p. ]1 Jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer6 r. i) c! M5 F7 Q( `
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: t2 o8 m; |: p$ `9 f5 ^# @
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.2 ~; m3 \4 @* g. u& H& c
5 K6 {0 U$ x1 P: D0 u0 R8 y, m* Z Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter( I& D2 `% d4 C, j
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton2 _7 Y9 [+ |3 b8 `8 m4 G0 ?, i
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 K( r. `3 c; Q/ j
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices I& }% l+ f; f3 h
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 _" [3 P" j# Q+ k
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% y8 h! R3 Q- C# b9 G6 a$ w. n
towards the end of 2006. / B/ p- U: a: F9 \9 {
5 P% ?' C: W5 w4 ~: s5 {2 k; O9 r
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; Z$ e2 T$ {! [inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable! A( _) |- m& x
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
# {( q R( v; v5 O& J3 g4 y& [0 |group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to/ N' n/ Z/ D# |. ?; t- W( y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added& w; {) ?- Q# F0 C( b% {. N1 E
pressure on tight inventory levels.; w2 Q4 X8 q4 C; V* z( Q
" o/ F% J0 C* c3 c: X8 T7 h7 S Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, K" i0 V$ f) ~' T! f- ^! \
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, G* s9 }8 n6 Yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
# G# B$ H! A, v# \$ W6 k" L6 [while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching0 ~2 {8 M: n! S ~1 v
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- O$ P$ Y- }' d, F2 y) d
% z/ ^8 n D* Q6 l <<
! T5 D) k) S1 K; [ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 M) @1 I8 l5 P2 b. f$ r
# V' q* d* @3 K' [( F* \) ?& d -------------------------------------------------------------------------# A& L5 \ A/ H4 H7 O3 _* Y1 m! ~
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ U( F; Y( j, g* L9 h -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 R# T/ X5 V2 J+ q. u4 ?1 n
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3$ K8 \8 A. P; t- X$ ?" [+ Y
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
' n: E% R' x5 K2 z0 ~" Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ~& G8 d" z. R$ R Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 w* R4 o, X0 R* y6 {0 r0 s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 t3 r+ F; M7 w" U& O; t Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000/ Z0 C7 O0 o W0 w( o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. P7 T! B6 x# D: S Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
. X$ @; c0 g3 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------" U- B2 y0 _# Y1 ~
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -6 V; i9 v) c4 x5 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 V! ^; l- [$ Z5 |* I, B
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
) r- f2 z7 _6 [: [0 H2 K& Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 D7 Z5 B4 k9 l, K- `
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5836 B' j9 J7 E# Z* r% `6 @% j3 t" x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, v0 ^; s3 S' y C# V Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185: z' {& F# ?. u( ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, h& g9 k, m: V0 S1 r) a; X+ R3 z8 w Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250/ F( Y" b9 N0 y6 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 N% U5 B+ t2 b) r( o) \. Y
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 H* w) G L) X& [8 ^$ R; Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 o7 Y; K t- K Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707! z1 c5 f3 E a: E- z% W( e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- M+ e- }8 u$ F6 u% B Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500" G, R( \& K5 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# N! y" f. Z" t/ x! i$ t+ M$ R Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
* `1 {( P& n' z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ A( ]! { ^! ^ Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7143 G( L& u: T( T5 s9 ~0 X- P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' j9 x! X I2 p& d# f( i5 E Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500: I2 Y4 ^3 W; w! u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 @* _1 [5 j3 B% G# t1 [" s Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, P0 O' y! L1 K' u* V) C! z, y -------------------------------------------------------------------------! x, x0 y8 s- V8 T" I& }
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860$ D$ U% L: N0 W' A W3 u! z: h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ l5 s6 E4 |+ G
T" z- `% A3 I! H8 o -------------------------------------------------------------
" v* C9 Q1 t7 Y% J Standard Condominium) D2 U; s- W2 R! M2 p1 A+ q
-------------------------------------------------------------+ j$ s8 |: D" @, W X3 q. |
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo0 ~6 C2 }9 r. O F# u. _. k
Market % Change Average Average % Change
3 j/ q; ^+ ?! j/ g, v -------------------------------------------------------------
! b' f: X* C2 ? Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%9 d# L7 Q5 Z$ \ K9 [8 D$ z
-------------------------------------------------------------2 N7 [& K' ]3 h! m0 P( O" ^/ _& Y" U
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
% V6 R- z8 R. v4 n -------------------------------------------------------------, }& z0 X2 z; E0 @6 k
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A7 L, i9 Y3 V4 e# m% Y3 A: o
-------------------------------------------------------------
; G& H7 Y$ ^) {* b Saint John N/A - - N/A
3 |' P4 z; T5 [ -------------------------------------------------------------
' o. G- m. x0 U; @ |+ p6 N# T St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
2 A2 w% [+ e+ ]* t7 |- x ------------------------------------------------------------- d+ t6 ^' S2 a% E' n1 h* {; c; k8 h
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%7 p1 r9 ]& t+ ]( z1 `9 S
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 C8 a9 x, R9 V$ D! d0 h6 f. g Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. l7 m! B- e. r" ?: b" `) G
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 I" A6 x G2 A# q/ [# w& j- g Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%& G P4 } V) O) L3 H6 {
-------------------------------------------------------------& J) s% d v3 f1 y
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
1 |' Q8 m. M3 C7 D0 S -------------------------------------------------------------
$ R4 ?+ c# Q6 t! Q8 u Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%. p1 o& j! |) _5 r R
-------------------------------------------------------------6 o! S2 u" L1 O+ C9 G, ?: g) Z
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
- k- Y, a& `5 n- @, [& Q8 C: L -------------------------------------------------------------
0 Z4 ?3 v9 u/ r3 W: z Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%3 t: q, e: u' N2 N% }8 ~" w
------------------------------------------------------------- X5 r0 q: ]$ D9 j
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%: _: T: N$ y* e" u
-------------------------------------------------------------2 i+ L4 X% |# N& ?2 r+ \' t: }
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
) ?! {1 n) S- F: l0 E x" j) B) p+ @ -------------------------------------------------------------
) b+ ]/ v% t+ w- ` Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
" f9 E! P) K7 r: p -------------------------------------------------------------- Q3 F0 M0 W3 k* c9 B- r- M6 ?% t
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%) k9 G) r% a5 E& E4 h7 T
-------------------------------------------------------------( f+ W! G! \9 k# ~# T
>>
, j$ Q# P* p- X+ s
( J& Z @1 q3 r$ l, V: ] Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined# t' B: g0 l$ o$ ?" {
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% C Q2 P7 Y$ W7 l; x% V
John and Victoria.
. v" I% {+ { U3 P" v: ?" d9 S d' e
( @; A- }9 v# ?0 Z1 I& V' K- k The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 W9 m) I5 c4 Q4 G% K" A+ `
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of8 F" ^; u+ F2 ]
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
9 E) l& Q. K1 @4 Preferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 v/ | j: a" U3 y1 Qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities5 U+ g: z3 C4 K. V+ K) I2 _1 J5 G
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
0 O* V0 S1 Q& yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- I( F( C. m; u( T+ k& y
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
) }: L, L9 ]) dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on! R# [# N$ N) E3 y6 m
November 15, 2006.+ i8 {' v" h/ E
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of, {1 L4 E o8 ~' U! A
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! [* r" P C' P3 }0 A9 M, `
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
! Q2 K. K7 Z7 @6 x/ {: havailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|