 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 ^6 I! b* q0 Z0 J0 l
0 W5 e& g+ q, c( Y. P( j- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& a( E$ S- p) H
# M/ P% C/ m/ @! v. B8 ?3 V/ f+ S TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market8 q! N! W$ @0 ?$ O1 z3 m
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
6 N/ Q. L7 ]2 p L; D9 Iquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic' I5 z& D3 i, {' a) n Y# ]. _
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
: i+ G! R+ d3 L# ^2 s6 B0 l! gprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
1 g) d. b8 W% k' f% i0 Umore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ k/ U1 V; r6 T7 P3 r9 P: PQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% p+ W: x2 O' j$ i1 l4 N5 K
LePage Real Estate Services.1 X0 v2 M9 O) J f; ?; U
/ o( f% Q, S% ]( e# U Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
0 P+ M5 x% ~+ O$ X y/ Eare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: `+ [7 K& k4 n$ j" ~; r
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; H3 }; h) N3 y% ~
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) f# @9 t* Y+ Y: O% @
residential real estate sector.( x# J& l9 f3 `8 B1 P, O7 }
( N- Y$ _; s4 U, z( ?9 T& X7 `( e
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ R! i$ m$ \! a w% e+ Xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" x" p: R, _1 N9 L
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 n( Q' b! e) O(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
& u2 s3 K; [$ w3 z4 R3 H(+13.2%).2 z, `+ Y/ k' m/ ]1 Y6 n+ o1 _! g
7 r# n2 h' R9 |# U8 r% b3 U "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 a; b$ Q1 R* v
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the4 r6 M& }! G! s2 F4 [0 k7 W d
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
0 T" f2 I( h& b spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 i# F& R: w$ `- ^+ m/ \
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
+ ^, r5 ~+ m' ?4 x) W# s- ["Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
+ d5 W* Z/ R% C8 jwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
: X3 g7 N" q# [1 |2 z! s4 Lbalanced market."5 u" {+ m" F# e' x6 {7 v( h
$ B+ o' {7 K# q: w4 D Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
0 B2 p( P7 q' f- v. }3 m) }% u% Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 F+ Y+ i+ G# |: B7 [$ Z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued/ Z g) }* E# a" A* d" y3 @
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ ?0 w- T1 i+ A6 ?5 [energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
9 e- A# S+ S* A( G$ r7 h* _manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 @. H8 H* H4 j- B; jbreaking price appreciations.
/ ]' w M9 S2 K7 w% w# F1 P; W. S, m+ m$ b8 Z
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& C' E9 a& N0 t
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
# e8 ^9 T8 g5 f/ blargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
# L5 f4 G! H" ~. I& v: a% ], z2 w* A, J# e2 ^% W/ ]! y
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid& T6 ]0 E/ c0 `3 [$ b
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" J3 f3 A- a( Z7 t
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off5 y( _. C4 E$ _6 J
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.0 s% R+ x8 {0 H& w
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 p1 r. [4 `* r; p% ^, W' ygreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; b) ?$ e. f* T" s& S* T/ Kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.. |& c& t# O+ j
. n% g0 g9 g6 ?' U6 u+ c# Z
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 a9 k; J" X+ {market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ @0 k [6 |4 E! afinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
6 h& L' F" \3 dare markedly different than those found in the United States.. l' F) w! ~5 y
$ C$ [( L4 r8 c3 |0 Y. @ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the3 H3 L8 s+ U& ?2 `% r1 R
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
' w( H/ `* |. ]2 Efavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* A) e8 P9 c. z! |4 @1 srelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 L, Y1 N8 B& ^: Q' Baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
3 R& j2 P- U0 O0 U) {3 I1 T- idownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
: I1 y: ?: h1 t" z& Oaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# @8 ]9 p6 L% I% d. s. Y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
@( M" L7 D a0 V
6 M0 J; C: H* S C6 ^ <<
$ Y0 R% B, R) J$ f7 ] REGIONAL SUMMARIES) D7 c- {1 G8 H
>>! E' V3 ]7 J8 E& S
) y8 V: c' l# @: H+ Z* O
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in# g( I+ n B: H' u( z( m
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
3 r) F% U) f0 | xof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
! E; T. g2 M+ Z+ p$ plooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
+ I2 J" s0 |4 @2 m9 O' I0 E/ vrenovations. W2 ?) }3 D8 j' s
7 ?5 T/ B$ Y* e
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
& Q1 e1 w$ Q& C8 f v' oincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, f# Y5 a; j( c% T- s* [4 Ccompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
# ?2 T7 C0 Z# MSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 e# r6 o; l+ c+ U
+ C2 \7 u1 A7 f3 |* T: o, C The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, o% _1 l# h) d0 \/ F! {' {9 m2 [1 ~slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the2 y! G4 a& R( K* q# m7 H2 M6 A
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
; `5 _' }1 A$ O# {8 N% I; \& I) f600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
0 E8 \8 [4 U, M" c$ I& G$ gto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 |+ N0 @: u1 {4 o4 C4 z! r7 `and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
9 r4 Q% ? m+ `5 n3 }$ [
# A. s9 Y* w! i# p In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% h+ \" _6 [1 j- Z+ G
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their& ?$ R3 r9 v% a% a( Q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
! k; O0 Z! \: w' gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian, L4 S5 N1 I- v* G6 x; Y2 D; j% R
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- Z% ?* ]8 h5 E8 U9 [ A( J
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; s8 L4 }8 w4 ]
C3 b4 b( U/ d4 O0 O Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly+ W4 R4 Z) W" m, @- b
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ S; j" R/ u, q ^9 N$ d( l
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
Z' E8 s2 V3 M3 V; B6 S! ~as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last' O3 S! o1 k; D& Z- l8 s5 L
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
; X9 Q( Z$ v3 L0 B
/ }' ^; |( U) L Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
5 u- H; d4 ]1 t( X8 X, O: e$ rprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 f- o+ W) A& m" r5 H$ H. k
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 C1 x. f# ?/ v4 p) O+ [
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
% h0 n) b& \9 S5 q# `when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
8 @) r1 d. @, ^1 Z8 bpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
0 s; v' s4 G9 }9 B$ n7 O; d- y1 Kmaking a purchase.
: q* T( @9 T4 S5 |- f) s! l. a" O1 g% U
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ S( Z6 B& y! v" q$ A, m
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong$ ?# R" Q2 R+ }
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city0 b. r$ e/ Z$ b9 A# w! l( [, H7 X$ h
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
* z# q- z6 m2 M$ H; a8 ]attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 W3 M( s, x: Z
amenities.! o4 P/ R+ R8 H# U
! I) O1 A0 K9 g, X# k8 a5 b
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' P* y: Y) D, p1 Z8 x& \+ p8 X
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand! l* O9 C0 r3 |' P8 ^- M x* J% [
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# D) N! G: ? i3 j" t
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been m5 C* E/ J; Q
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle( Y) O! i$ Z( M" l9 i
residence, rather than for investment.& H2 x) a- J( L
. ^/ x5 M% a( p1 B0 y+ C6 Q The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 V( H, M1 d7 _/ h# y; [house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ q7 z, I8 t: C U
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 ?4 y; R8 n' wconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, v! V) K2 ]/ v* I/ s" Vrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
( c! X& D2 C! {the market.. K2 q, b- Y! Y/ n5 a" U
& C: b5 Z3 l, U7 D r2 i6 A In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
* n6 N+ u- x! A- \" E# ?July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
% X7 d+ p1 o. JAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
) _/ r( X* M7 b3 U9 Pmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
, z1 n5 O. o7 c; {, sto the shortage of available inventory.
$ k$ u2 g+ I U+ W' R8 w% |' a) e6 o0 k. W: N% b' e% b
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
2 x0 D; F' h; g( n( r+ v+ ~8 h: vmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains5 ~5 m8 p$ m' J: D; v6 ?, c
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 o; F# r+ M5 \ {struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% r/ M* R3 D% G' L& c" [/ {( |
) L! \. `; _) U! A
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases9 p. f% v. }& t' C. y
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
& L" R+ f: U0 q5 k+ O8 a( R z' Lunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 I4 T/ w n3 n3 o
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring3 u: |4 t9 v3 a1 U; M
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer9 _! X8 @ J5 e4 R" ?+ K
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 R3 m6 _+ l% C) {buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
5 h9 Z# X! H% N* m9 a9 z3 O5 r5 L! S9 H# D* b
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
4 \5 y$ r$ I2 l2 T' {/ H# n- ~as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton7 C; j+ h% f7 { _
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,$ Q4 S2 F3 |# I+ \7 _% O
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices6 @$ D+ w) O5 q
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve8 X; S b, v: C5 ~; ^
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 H9 u6 h. Q" U5 m7 h
towards the end of 2006. 6 F7 K$ e+ S+ J/ ]0 G- o7 C$ C
6 Y' }$ C& l* V7 A9 M; pWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( U0 x: x" O+ P4 C p) Dinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable) I3 h* ]2 g! ?( ]3 I5 T* a
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
: n0 w* B7 ?7 ~, b, X- igroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to1 p3 h+ _4 d! h0 V
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 ^& }) ~0 }% Z4 Q- P/ ~% A' r
pressure on tight inventory levels.) T6 X8 r6 P4 F8 T
" V2 ?; P+ Q( b Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
& {$ h" G3 m3 r$ Efundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; [& ~" I9 e$ X
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
+ M, [' O. t* C- c' e" |5 K- m- Pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ R0 V6 Y& l+ j) D6 J i
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace. _- A. H" p2 {. k) L
3 y4 L' B( y* ]: Z/ c' H2 i
<<- U6 L0 E$ F0 p. A% E
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
4 N) l5 P9 Q0 r2 }9 ^7 U/ S6 G; h- |2 q0 b3 K' h) h" S* ]3 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ L8 m. k4 D6 _" W) d
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
. [) q9 a- [) [1 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! ]* O8 P. u& p, D 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
* _; _! a8 S% s$ ^* Z0 o Market Average Average % Change Average Average
0 S& x- K8 [8 n6 R5 x$ @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- E' J' e) r) X3 z0 g/ [! a" L Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0003 d4 D* D# }3 F, k2 H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( M) V8 J+ X9 {; x" D* m0 y
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000: I: ?- t0 s& a* @- }8 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. A6 w! s$ |/ T
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000% O0 i% F% O! W+ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" n- T: l+ Q% N3 z Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
1 m6 h# S7 A5 I+ }3 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ s- B# G0 M! W0 Q, m6 `
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
2 _! ]; M/ {+ K& [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 x( K( g5 J) U0 {7 U" u# ~; p Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 g4 J, U, `; O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 A( {0 o5 V% H/ s
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
8 @) l4 z" |% A" \9 S+ Q9 m -------------------------------------------------------------------------: W& u- |& @4 V" X3 k m
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250! m' f. P! q5 G7 G2 k, ?- [8 |8 s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ v/ E/ c; l/ } x Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766/ ^: d) R0 _! _. a: w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 b ~. u5 x7 A5 _+ o. u v
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707/ w& Y6 d B: P( t$ ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 k/ j0 T! l8 c4 w+ u Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500+ M! T& V* h% J' b& r0 H, s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ^7 ?7 ]- `& z
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3891 |4 x) c+ X8 r8 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. @* ~" U- n, Q* v
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7145 l- @7 ?& D0 X' s. J0 o! @% H+ X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 [. ]. v& i" h- U, u+ \% o7 r( T
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500+ c R' o$ D/ P% u. s* t) m( d; S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! `) x; N+ K7 \
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
9 t" E/ f. N6 X! I# |6 u3 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' @0 L" ^1 V* T3 |/ K; b! p& m National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860+ t$ ]* ]/ r% q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 D- D3 P2 y! ^
- G j1 L; `% X8 g9 d -------------------------------------------------------------
% J1 o( @% `" s3 {! E6 m Standard Condominium0 H; a8 G! D% V: g
-------------------------------------------------------------; j+ S* l; ]7 y% p' ^. D
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
; N8 F) b) M. e, z/ o Market % Change Average Average % Change' s w0 J8 S" P8 h
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 \- j; w; ~. ~+ N% _ Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
) ^. i2 j' ~5 f; o A -------------------------------------------------------------3 t5 z/ K) u$ h) U+ K- x" p/ T
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
) T+ ]3 t0 l! e. J7 t& ` -------------------------------------------------------------
8 j6 z( F% O `+ x- I! K Moncton 4.9% - - N/A2 o' k/ T/ v( d( @' I
-------------------------------------------------------------' ~5 ^$ g: g8 D- k; C
Saint John N/A - - N/A- O4 c: Y# E% }( p
-------------------------------------------------------------1 A/ H( P9 t4 A- m2 t4 [4 T
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%2 i6 U Q" J4 K6 f
-------------------------------------------------------------9 o/ N: s9 Z9 W, Z
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
0 C9 x. d h; L0 H. ] I L2 ^, ?( J -------------------------------------------------------------
+ c; ]3 X1 Q" \ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
@# W; y m# E2 d0 [' D -------------------------------------------------------------
" Q( J r* H& C9 ] @7 I Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%" n, c. m, n# F$ T# H) A4 @9 @
-------------------------------------------------------------# B0 z3 Z4 ^! P' x( M8 i
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%+ g5 z) d% ]+ J/ M6 ~$ A
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 ~0 r% n& P! B% C/ ^) X8 m Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%- o7 i# P) ]9 H3 G# o# g6 s1 V7 a
-------------------------------------------------------------
( W f7 T: [3 {2 |) X0 _! u Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
4 |+ P7 H, e1 K. V' d -------------------------------------------------------------
3 p3 }+ @ n4 G4 a% U! ?& z2 ]5 j Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 S/ k& }- U, S# D/ P. M/ _ -------------------------------------------------------------
7 a/ z8 h s: l/ G0 u( F( F Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: z/ U8 o# F; C1 G* ?& m -------------------------------------------------------------
- r, c8 x8 c$ S9 q! |# c Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%4 ?3 e& q; S) I7 W) \
-------------------------------------------------------------' H. y8 H, L# F# z$ q
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
5 _2 l, H7 c+ X0 e- X: |0 w -------------------------------------------------------------
! w/ f; Y' N; D Q National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%$ f( H& j9 B$ C+ L3 ^3 x k" p* M
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ s% ~0 N U- \- w8 J" D: A >>
4 J6 E* M; u) e$ A b1 A: M- ^* A2 I0 ]' l! o$ Y0 Y5 U/ w9 X9 e5 T5 b ^
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined* J/ \: V/ h5 V) e
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint7 u I, ~: P. d2 }( |# N
John and Victoria.
' d- d' r; w+ ~( N( }& @* y+ U
( b7 C% U/ o( x6 W$ u The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 u* c( E+ i1 d, m$ ~2 `
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- G# a: k# g1 ]5 S5 ^; A; Mhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release6 ^& D8 l& @0 @
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
; c$ I7 u( f* _; ?6 m) X7 {% W5 t; z, ntrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities1 }6 u2 B8 S( {0 r0 s. F5 i( n
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is% g* j k! g+ \2 `
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
6 Y! W9 X- p. [0 }, Tfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 y4 v) C2 E; O# h* r \version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 L* L* M2 Z4 M j5 S
November 15, 2006.1 C# O- y) d, p; l* D, @$ T
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
7 D/ k8 E# H. f( Q @. ffair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ s4 n5 I$ Y0 x X& K3 l5 jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
/ p( \. T+ h; o& i7 J6 Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|