请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

- h* {8 ^1 {9 c# W& Y% Y* F, z值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

6 q4 [1 t* ?1 N$ S# L; ?5 \值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

- r9 F) k. l" v2 a" n8 M- l+ S& ?去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

- g+ O- o. c: A+ v0 f( W眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
3 r+ V5 G; x( f3 j9 w' n. ]Tax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
8 ~3 m8 t4 C& D! S* FNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
0 L2 {3 e# @. |( PYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
& z# v+ b- L9 B3 M& Z; m5 K(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
$ q+ n* \3 \+ ^$ EGarage: Yes
6 ]" [9 D9 J, w# R- _Fireplace: Yes
  T/ b+ y; b7 E1 J, jWalkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
+ y' {, ?3 T7 g. ?
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.