 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
! ?/ ^3 o0 g! a. I* Z+ E/ t$ k3 C* G i* ?6 C8 x* N: w2 S1 p
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。( Q/ e7 m( B! `8 f/ F D9 w
7 B$ U- B& X; \' H7 u**********************************5 L; w: B1 Y$ O
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:8 c7 g1 t; y- O5 }6 Q
7 z; y8 Q1 d% K2 K9 X, O+ E7 ]
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.% f" c) a+ ^; J6 M+ ?/ z
0 f& U2 [- M6 {( t' [- R+ }% c9 Z6 v' @
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.1 {( D5 T% f( o9 p- M& A; ^) N
M7 t) [- O( r/ I2 W
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.. I. @5 H4 y" o1 r
: E0 K8 |6 f+ s7 J9 D
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
- ~5 H* b' S+ I% `
, @ k, d% c& }/ N; d/ L8 E& O5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|