 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
; M+ ^1 _# T, N- `% K! {% [4 A: Q
7 ]* W3 z0 b; P/ b$ JF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
+ ~7 c3 { t9 E
6 X9 A2 C4 a& f7 h# d) @1 o**********************************7 A1 J7 k# V7 d
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:' \1 ?) W. F3 x8 J% E/ w
' o$ ~4 X& h% e1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.7 `9 [6 h8 P( n" G9 n: \
2 x" r2 G& K! Z: A. I2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
7 \* I: M( v+ V. I$ u6 C$ a+ f5 V3 T) m; s/ ]8 ~! \" [6 F0 a7 B
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
1 c) F, v, H6 k+ j* W/ j0 I4 |$ f# O2 U! v
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8./ e. F x1 L! R5 ?6 o/ z) o6 s& S8 u
! C s) }6 H' d) z$ G5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|