( H& H! n8 B: t* }9 oRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.6 w6 |1 M) u7 ^) a1 R- ~ r0 s( Q
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 0 t1 C! b6 C. ^3 S! P9 Q( S9 J2 `1 L1 L* a9 H
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.; C9 P4 K' h8 u' u0 L; J4 ]
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 5 P% v6 ?, E9 O 6 P9 i5 [3 j6 ?/ ~% Q) ]7 n 1 O( k1 m5 l( K9 w: U% W( n# M1 D# }4 L# b2 h
* i4 M2 x) ]- g9 S5 f c . J8 r5 b' t; h' ?' H$ x! [9 D9 |' v) c% m/ g6 E! u
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
* E7 G0 V9 r2 {) a) m& _" Y$ h
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,- s: E) p% O3 S! n
) Z' D: G8 j- }: x* i
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 , N1 D7 a9 ]2 z( k% D" l# i: j; f6 g" w' a. ?8 B. m/ N- k7 [/ A
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则