! `# v4 g4 e% j
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.7 q) b$ U1 _0 Q, X3 E+ i' ?
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 6 M# Y( [' a6 T 9 F7 v: A8 l: k; S' k! v9 f
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.7 G3 G3 ?0 B! h" Z
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. 8 R; R! a' U+ [2 _8 k$ Y @, A: w9 s$ W% A( L
& n1 A9 O6 Z0 ]) g' }, h+ b8 Z
: y$ _9 w u0 Q/ T: P. C1 Y ^4 N: F2 ?% O
! c! ?% z+ g6 {0 F8 w4 I* o' g# G
小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
2 c A( B/ o# {$ Q1 a/ e: F5 E+ E$ G9 L+ t) p7 j
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理,% C6 L v; Y* b5 c1 X5 m/ A) v
2 I, X; B3 p6 B7 k0 i; }* G( Y
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实0 @$ @" z1 H/ s3 W3 R
+ J. J$ ]$ B: G! G5 |; ?& L记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则