6#cactus_2009 ( I& {$ `# y$ h9 O7 K9 B! D" P0 [- o" f2 }% A/ d
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 8 V" K0 Y! X- {" R9 A" z" |, `
, F+ Y; v* O2 O' y7 D
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ...; j; F: a% H1 }* d6 y
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
2 L3 u( ]7 E' }3 F3 I- V, t
$ j4 P. l, u, K5 K9 k1 _So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?( H) z4 X' q: B V' R( S/ g: l+ |
特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
$ q& p @- @# ?
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.