 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly2 J9 L, {! V0 X4 F) r
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove% x; L: F3 X: r6 D2 }
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house! l5 V: W4 H r" r* s
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
! L* n$ r% `; i1 {7 Mfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
6 H" A, Z0 F( }9 |3 J Xoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction( ~. c/ G) w' q3 _0 o3 c' i' m s
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately# c; I& I" q% F( ]
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past3 b1 k1 `6 A$ c1 ?4 H
three years.
7 ^+ K# E |2 f6 j2 |- }: yBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
$ X/ @8 w1 ?* D7 `7 d9 ~! ^; `their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of1 f8 O1 N# f! f! O8 R2 H
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
) U- E+ x4 y% r0 g, qboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices; K) `, X4 e8 W, B
to fundamentally justified levels.$ |: o/ I+ l: o" D! @% U
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”+ B2 M! X) T3 T4 Q/ K. D' G; K
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
3 n& k2 k7 y3 |that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”/ O# D+ L) U3 P( a9 Y1 J6 Q6 \
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
3 _7 S, i1 G. }+ v. D$ x9 w) sthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s3 d5 z! n2 R# o) H$ |
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
3 q0 L* A( W, Ghomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch6 [3 E, N/ J! K- m' W9 _2 A5 R
that is now being rapidly reined in.
" x& G5 U; S% [/ B# kWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,$ r9 ^6 z5 R/ q) x' W9 V
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
6 ~ i( c, v: b0 ~; J9 _5 rmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh+ h7 ?" h' [" @/ N
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
* p7 p! y v8 P5 \0 i$ t( M9 Gfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
; j4 C2 E8 n: E# k d! Sremain choppy and new residential construction will be' T+ [# U. s; i& M: v. H
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction: C! _' x+ }/ D5 ]9 J/ Q2 N
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
: G; {' }0 R( C5 ~( p' T2 V0 Q1 U0 P) p# cto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide& h0 s& F) g6 B
residential construction will fall further to around
' g$ a. Q) L% \- F( q125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units9 G* z+ V, M# _
in the fourth quarter.
: t+ ~4 k, [" D! STo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
( i2 P+ O( T6 C* m/ R& t9 N* Gwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
( H) q+ k. H; m% n- L, R: Q2 k# wfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each+ l l# c) z- S4 b) k6 I, k
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
# L7 E# `) Q+ u) T- X5 t8 hvalues since house prices should track incomes over the. L' R! r; y R' }& J- ?
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
& S' d4 d7 E. X, ?4 G, S) M- Pregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
' ]+ P" E8 V6 o5 vof residential construction." t0 J% S% i+ C' V2 x
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
) P$ e8 T& r e( G“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction. ~& a9 m; h* i, G* i0 i
would have occurred if housing had been priced+ A# Q& a$ L7 @/ K" _6 f: G2 X1 d
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this4 H* l* P R) c5 u, Y# Z+ V
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new2 D$ L! ?1 e$ R+ d$ A/ n
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too5 E% V5 Q. F# T
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
1 ^6 {( r. k& L. m qRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,: u7 w4 O! t$ f
where housing demand will further contract under waning& z* Q( D: @0 S8 c1 t
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are0 O2 e: V7 S; b ]' m$ S _
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
4 y7 r8 S9 E9 m2 u6 I6 T! S/ ?) fvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
7 ?; T* z& g2 p5 c+ xbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces, r( v1 z& H6 M4 f/ u- o
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural3 y2 i4 z; F: m9 ^0 R( N" H4 d7 t
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
4 v& |' `: p! zQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the; o9 |' q+ O6 W
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de5 r, {( V, O% d* {1 T3 k
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced," I( Z6 |; {6 r2 c
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
! @; O* H; J4 B8 qrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
' g& `& M4 h! o( C8 V6 ycyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears& G0 \3 b) e- G
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto: Y" \" [: Y6 N( _) K8 t
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically" @$ B8 N9 w- b7 a
high levels of apartment-style units presently under, n2 X2 s X0 r6 M( x. I# w
construction mean that record numbers of condos will, Y$ T( g+ R% P. E1 v/ e/ O# E
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
3 X3 [8 D2 u* ^4 R' y/ e9 E! t! L) ucyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
4 n! W, x8 d( \. f' y# h2 s$ j$ sspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while9 Y, `: \2 S4 e) Y) r! I
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
# U3 K: j9 a7 V. I: r9 W8 p& Kanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
" o* y k7 V* q& x+ }+ Binter-provincial and international migration over the coming
- B; i7 b+ L$ [, I m) tyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,+ o1 v/ ^9 u4 X! J/ p" v
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.6 [* c) N F& U; Y, t
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING; I. R0 E, b4 W6 l6 q
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS3 }1 m; x2 Y8 |, x
Grant Bishop, Economist
6 c, p, p: w% ]4 z. k! x c416-982-8063
3 H2 D1 s& d w1 |" H% }Pascal Gauthier, Economist
, i h; d2 `, u; l+ P416-944-57303 X2 q& g& y1 N
) V: {& T# X$ N3 Nhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|