 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
' ~ @; L2 p4 g/ j0 pfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
+ G+ @8 o0 ^% }$ G# B- g8 I" [+ t' eunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house) C+ ?3 y X' t; O
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
% a( f- b& w9 P$ g1 m( v7 L0 \fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This3 I8 {' s/ P T" \8 n! f3 \+ [
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
% I |! s* t3 i) c7 X/ lthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately# M" j7 w8 k! |7 c& Z' I8 \! l9 K1 Q
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past# r a' L6 p8 \
three years." Z+ q$ j0 {( `. o% f+ H2 p
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from9 d$ O5 _5 T# w, c3 k
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of8 [- E* m$ ]2 b# q/ ?- [3 [
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
8 U/ J6 f4 l4 ?) ?9 Hboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices1 X/ B( X6 Q1 K' \$ b n
to fundamentally justified levels.! V3 Z. d$ i8 }* J, e, t1 ^
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”$ A5 J- h/ y! P: N* E3 l4 n
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
4 B) K9 T+ W+ V6 k k* M; @- ]that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
# r% ]8 e) f: r! P" v! B kwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
, T. ^0 j9 M# u: nthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
: ]- r/ Q; m( o. S) N' d“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
[- c, T6 Q7 h: C; d# zhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
# R8 i4 p4 H. bthat is now being rapidly reined in.* T4 S4 i$ E' F: Z( \/ z5 ?. z
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,) L \9 T8 W9 M A: ^) z+ L/ ]) @
the construction of too many new homes over the boom! Z A& d8 b* w% `( f
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh$ J: _ M m, g; }2 c0 @/ u
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
# R( b4 A# G; d8 A) B3 r* Wfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will# t0 J' m: I% {! @+ t7 d
remain choppy and new residential construction will be- W2 `1 X0 O( m! X' j a
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
. f) c7 a" _$ ], u! s- H! d! dis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this- S7 L3 D1 {( a) v E' I( W3 h
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
" w5 _) ?: D% s- X$ sresidential construction will fall further to around! C. {0 d) y- q* H( t/ ?, S! M
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units! W9 I0 L' }' m9 @% d) A0 w9 f2 B
in the fourth quarter.
5 E; V3 o& A2 P9 y# {' F( oTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
& U! J ]4 y2 O9 _; d$ l& Fwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run H2 r; d" Y5 B; i: R3 b/ `4 B
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each4 K5 \/ p; O/ ~/ N
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home6 t t3 b! N6 O" m- L! m
values since house prices should track incomes over the. u$ |# E0 M4 ?: G
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we2 W4 R& k3 V! u7 [# s- D
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
5 x( c; L, G. Yof residential construction.5 Y9 n6 }0 @( q% h3 u5 h
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a4 o! J2 s. D/ y
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction; [% d' t' C3 e" ]% L$ x
would have occurred if housing had been priced# h+ B' G1 U& z; ` T8 S& K& y. \6 L
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this [) B- s4 P! n1 K7 h
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new" V+ S3 h$ T( F" x
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
. C/ L A- r+ Y2 N& E* S; R5 @many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.& v6 G( w- g: w
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* h' Q/ t( F# c9 z4 ^: M5 m( P
where housing demand will further contract under waning
; p) D9 B" [4 qpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
" f5 q! v' S/ galready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the4 X6 s" W4 i* Z2 m9 v; X
very time that the resale market has swung into strong, |) n% k: u: }+ A5 E0 ^' j
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces) n4 q+ |: B/ `! J, R* @( M, M- H+ V
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
6 o0 e+ N/ w" v& ~6 V( _9 Fweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless. m% [: ?; N/ [. ^# i" U# U, v
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the, v* k3 T8 v$ [) l# R( B# |; @% }
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de2 Q& [# m" Y0 F9 f
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,+ c" d4 v3 ^3 T0 ~
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership1 j4 o. i+ J; y g1 a9 s" b
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a! U0 ^4 N. a w1 p
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
" @* F$ F0 f+ ^ Z( ?, climited – with the important exception of the Toronto
. e1 L8 q) N! e+ w8 j! |condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically/ L3 s, A# G. _8 `$ i
high levels of apartment-style units presently under6 B5 h% e; M) D3 @# M
construction mean that record numbers of condos will g+ c# k! x2 K4 o. i
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
$ R, a( U9 n% f2 Q! vcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could+ M; B4 o: a- k0 I% ~8 C- I
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while- [2 y" R2 i6 S0 M4 ^2 k; \
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we) C; i- T1 \( c* e
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
7 s) ]9 O& F$ {inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
9 C9 D' `0 l0 O8 qyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,7 x# h& u5 T# d/ G2 ], p
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.% s' Q/ `0 D- n
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING( D+ C" H1 m7 J+ `+ R6 k
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS( U" v6 W, [& Q3 w0 ^# D
Grant Bishop, Economist
2 p( k5 \% }1 f4 `+ K416-982-80634 T4 L0 L$ p$ t. R9 N
Pascal Gauthier, Economist! q g& T/ _+ V* u8 O
416-944-5730
$ i( f2 w! x) s! m0 \+ {) ?6 B' l# T% M4 O, q7 i$ E% x7 P
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|