埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2269|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员' m) \4 M! x( P! R4 ~2 q
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs8 |* Q, |4 @; W1 N

7 k$ ?0 C7 W# w. o6 y, }EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.6 t" X- {$ x" z! e
) \) n  T# f+ M$ c% \) C% Y5 t
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. : J6 R& R% \/ T/ M. m; X

( Z+ @' b/ _" r9 L& u; b$ ^The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
7 f3 B! g2 L" I( ]
* M/ O- E. O6 Y7 XDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
( K0 j9 b% o$ _; N8 O+ C3 N% n2 C2 H, q: g+ f' C
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.1 N- f  K6 c. Q5 M# d% {' d9 s
, z- c5 u5 `6 r$ N
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
& s% z6 u1 J6 L; J& P; _! e, p; u; p# W1 m& O
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.  T! f7 k7 @% ~6 y3 Q

9 x) [4 O, W. L3 ?$ z4 PPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.( [- D8 o2 [( w' l( N7 M

% n: R+ H1 I0 b1 y' k  YDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-22 12:42 , Processed in 0.197149 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表