 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
/ ]7 [6 U# E5 x- ~) ?2 @! y- LDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs: W. \; z$ K7 g3 U* ]
) P1 v5 B1 \/ G; t0 o# @
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
7 T M& x- F2 O2 v3 @. `2 C; |4 A) R' X. J/ J6 h7 O7 \
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. z! |' ^4 S6 ?# ?) F$ `7 R, y
0 T: {6 f; e& q6 C% |3 _
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
+ k) A2 c9 v0 P( O3 s: p/ n5 u8 O/ R; r. r( a) j
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
+ z: Z0 v4 g+ `: o8 p1 w" o5 J( u; D5 s
2 D0 `; W+ o' R5 S; ~' l" dDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
8 _5 d! C+ Q# P) s e0 H+ m9 c; I7 m$ N
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.) k- y$ X/ u& L
h3 j7 A7 B- G: V+ C; f6 S9 \. U- BDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.! L# [5 H; N$ Y0 i. Q8 s
9 b, a- v+ n" E) f n9 x" Q
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
& ~! o4 B8 o% E" ^6 W! x7 T1 z
% R$ k' v3 S, c' ~( qDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|