原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: " I+ ]/ ]7 H6 z- u5 _3 d% d6 [1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. f- t$ |- K. X2 X3 {3 \# g
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.# L. y5 v% E" o" H% u6 n) W
+ K/ E- G: _* K( I上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. 2 P4 p: ^0 H. j9 S3 b( f, a U! k) p9 Z3 I! V. I5 S( X
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 + x8 O* U7 \6 _ h. F1 K( ~* Q5 Z& L4 ^The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 3 T7 c' f1 ~9 v( U, J8 x$ j! K5 T" }+ p# j [
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."/ t! Q2 f3 a, d* V K4 e
* ]7 R' _ C* i4 e7 `
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。' m$ s8 e' ~& |
5 W( h; d/ G) V _# ^
$ q5 E0 |9 G% u# G+ y O$ ^
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:0 ~6 B' E# a! Q; ^
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 * t' x9 j1 x, d. m3 f1 mThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb": p( @) H2 S' i6 M& t* |: P
" _! G: `3 k0 N1 C2 q* }9 Y"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
: U9 R; X: W ]. u* v- dDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.