 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
, Y! N5 B0 o- P% o: j n; A8 [楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!- B! b, x9 k2 k
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 5 U, ]- X: m2 P
2 p3 N3 u& v1 ], Y1 ]
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。3 b" K8 U: c# y0 c1 I1 [: k# r
- d& a& x! i! _7 Y
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
0 x6 O) }3 J$ I% D* |; U& C$ P, a
* T4 }8 L$ v5 |) O不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?! E `. [( m5 {. S9 u0 N
1 |6 x3 z6 T: ^! i) i另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。% W: s* A- j$ M) @& H/ D+ Y
]5 O+ R+ ^ G) D关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
k% c G J' e2 bYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
+ l1 o" F' `- r8 E: t2 X4 ^! M: P4 B7 M! c9 p- ]8 m
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".7 Z6 ?- Z+ ]3 m3 f& d, P- _, u
c3 q/ ~) m$ O5 D$ O" A+ m
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.2 [/ N1 v8 H7 `* {6 Q$ H
6 I; G# T/ y8 E; U( N. p# ^[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|