 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
/ K O7 g. u$ G+ F3 p2 P3 A4 q楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
9 {5 b; P- [; ]% Hcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
' a' H1 b; N% x) V' y1 l9 E
) L- C6 p2 Z4 F: d* i& p您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。9 Y4 ]0 S% r/ k2 g! q, i
7 N$ R8 `+ p+ |# H+ x. A
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.9 G( k/ S& Y9 Y0 J; g6 ~
4 Z0 {2 i; M' c+ R不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
# p* C7 E+ w y A# ~3 x) }! ?% m
V: Y; s6 C. m# W3 i另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
: w5 S) Y! H4 w. ^7 h
6 ^5 E" C' D8 ?0 l2 N: Z关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
$ R8 S8 X# b8 _" N6 xYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
: l7 O& |2 V3 V' w! w4 L5 H) N, U- x3 h; x; F: ]/ q8 o2 ?
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
# e4 C! F. f+ Y! u! B
% {; n& y& N7 m. l C2 xBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
& j3 R$ d" A) S, C \
+ p! ]' e a7 t! k$ n[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|