 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 x. ~* q! K+ ]3 j# Z- x" }楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!5 D: w$ p, u/ z3 v5 b: l
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... - [, N/ z2 x' S! [ o/ H( [( f
/ t" M$ E/ B; k. w8 a5 W: b您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 Y2 K0 m/ e8 T" S7 G/ |2 }, D& x6 ]! p, {
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
0 x4 A! }) L0 h" R& a: L3 C9 m
5 v+ J' q/ i0 }# h4 C不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?6 {6 y& q$ m( J. U! A' g+ H
* z1 r1 }$ \9 s
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。' Y' ?9 N- X7 W! ]+ |) g
% x1 a+ |# d; H% d
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
2 i2 a0 }' o9 }, h/ @Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.1 o3 Z4 c3 F5 F0 W+ o8 V
+ I9 p/ T0 I7 d+ B! ~Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
# f. |* |& T; L# m. g/ K( i( p1 I% U$ k+ f
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.8 O$ e% c, h! E2 R. ^0 A* ~: B
' I( B: n- ?/ e3 }$ y9 L) H; A; _[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|