 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 # D3 ?2 A+ s) k o% [8 H
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!3 H& d3 E- r4 ^) K/ [1 {
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 0 Q, h/ d* h% R D( x& a) u7 Q
, u: e/ |6 ~( X! |您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
+ v! g, y3 l; S) \
9 k0 u$ V2 q/ W" a0 M/ V8 d" p安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.: m) L* I: |( J, y
9 k3 f Z/ X0 o1 D V
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?/ d" C$ L* V, s$ C% d
# F; D/ Z3 v7 n7 b1 M) y' q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。/ ]# x9 ^# r7 x. T. T& t( L" @
3 Q. u8 g+ L2 s L+ a; `, e6 [. k关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):% ]! I6 C0 f; s8 }& \
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
9 J! x& I5 G3 F9 ?( Z( G
/ N5 S- k0 Y% W9 r4 g9 \( JOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
/ P5 L# A: f; u/ M2 E5 c
# C; j" n8 J1 o! oBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.7 ?3 x( d% E: ?7 S8 \, m
* |2 d4 w" ?# P- m7 u9 h3 _! a[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|