 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
7 H, T5 i+ L# S$ j6 F楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!6 E6 Q2 }. S% w( O7 l9 A, g
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 9 G- O* H/ ]0 E1 q! ^* e% {
7 `, u4 p/ L- \8 b: `您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。3 L' `2 T# E/ {( `$ W$ j, Z0 ~% D7 G
. d: f# o' R6 E( l( N
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.5 g( D4 Z5 w2 w+ d: ]1 L# e8 @/ N
# d N8 ~- L9 x$ C9 B+ E
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?1 s9 t* N Z$ x
/ N3 F/ [8 K0 y; Y3 }另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。0 w. U8 Z$ f+ D: H: s4 o8 R0 p
/ R/ k7 m! e' l- Y; w/ W关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
! i% K5 G, a& m- [7 M" PYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
. {( M) H$ |) n% Z8 t. S! A6 L) R7 w1 A' \
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".) t9 i9 F0 g# A; o) o* Y, A
/ L* W. R( b5 A4 w5 HBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
+ }- t0 {; ~& p2 n
' h P0 s7 B" }[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|