 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ! L K, _/ _! `* U
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!. d+ B: ?* S% S/ o+ G
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
5 I! w0 `6 T; ~% N: m- [, }/ m- X* ~, Q% E; {/ G& k
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。4 @; d1 d% ], ?$ P
' G5 p% m7 ~& `0 x2 L# J3 _- x安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.5 p1 I4 \5 q* o( t$ V: h L/ m
9 L1 F8 k! o& V! X% k' k4 } `不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?) {. a, n9 o. }4 k
# z7 @/ g' t! i7 N, Y另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
5 c B: S0 _ c" a9 p
2 n; z$ n& U4 b! V5 \( w; K关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
& N, _' e* N* p. m( `. A9 L$ \; uYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.7 K' _9 x# [) u2 G
3 P" ^: ~2 D$ q& I7 w% }1 FOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
, N! B) y! j$ F3 b. {; F1 e+ A1 A" H# x+ i5 G' W3 F0 f" G
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
4 G* R4 E7 Q! Z* ^, M, T; f
4 V- H( [( r# Q: {[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|