 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
. O& v# X1 X9 x, u' [+ B* _楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
$ k% q/ g8 u$ x1 ~% jcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
2 o4 n7 J. x. N( W
9 }$ @6 Q7 w; k( l( V您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
3 Z' h/ j1 b& d6 w7 O5 y8 h
: @( |9 L7 u. r; L7 k: n安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
- S8 F: x3 [) i' R8 S7 I/ c; {& D" m/ Z
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
8 c9 T& A% y! T( E8 R8 P% |7 W/ C
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。% ?4 z& |" T! u/ f, g7 u- ?
p* m. T( j# e# n, y$ _
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):6 x' C1 H2 u2 }) S F
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. X5 b; h! ?( O! l- D, k
* g1 _: O5 e v5 q& |- ]5 {( g6 |Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".+ }' N1 X" N) ^! y
! G# r# K" G% B+ m2 S6 jBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.: x4 S9 L; o* n* Z' }6 t- F" Y
4 m! @( ^" t% ], J
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|