 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 3 I8 W" g& Q5 f E! b1 ^4 ]7 `
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!: p1 o1 ~2 {+ v' O h
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 6 U/ `3 o' z: v& [% Y9 p
1 `2 v. ]* s% o- _& Q- w* k) `
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。 M8 d; Q" x. _. _
' D- U9 e0 E: E( L
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.- h6 ]8 `2 M4 l; C$ I2 O3 y
$ G& \+ j, z! U4 z8 j
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?# S6 c! {, L5 i4 t* ]. v$ u
c! N9 |7 ^1 V7 S另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
0 X5 q3 d$ b9 @9 X0 v
7 N H. i9 \5 F关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
7 m8 B$ a+ z6 ]4 L4 t5 Z6 g- cYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.1 t, t* s% B5 K1 ^+ X
3 U- Q1 b6 B9 \0 T) m
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car". r& k5 k# b, g# h, @
% `: O8 R' ~/ A% k3 Q
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
7 k% }$ [# H+ v/ Z
) r* t W+ [; S0 n- {[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|