 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
/ e# z8 o' \, ?楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!+ O0 G; \' N- B$ R7 Z2 q% r9 d3 ?
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... [+ o7 q' {. ?0 B7 p! g
6 G. r- _1 K G2 \
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。' v4 S2 l/ {% x; ^' c
" B* N# J7 e5 c1 b0 j A+ g安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
% u+ R5 G3 Y. d: |
6 u: u6 \, C8 J# I5 L5 k" a不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
6 ^7 \ @' U/ g- m" f
3 n: [# B. J$ k0 B/ ~. K2 y# B另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
: Y. w9 w" i4 ]5 D3 |: S# w
[+ N$ w7 I/ X0 t0 N# _: m关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):1 A8 f# I! ~5 {% z: u0 [
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
- P+ B" V# z$ p5 I- j5 w4 y
1 e. G D9 n; I7 TOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
3 M& C9 G7 B, r' I2 ^! R$ S9 U Z$ ^" R; F$ V' A
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.2 |8 q* q: Q v" [% o
" r7 `( `7 C+ {( D6 m! ?[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|