 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑 ; `5 j1 U7 {% k1 V$ E+ j* s- q* T% T
8 X" z+ u* d' D C$ ^7 [/ j/ c" ?, F) P4 N( t! x
第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。
! y: ^* {: u4 O纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。
; U' ?" m) h/ J. S9 q梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。8 I% J4 @ y* w0 L
梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。
- z1 m! r, E* I \: f梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。
) ]. y Y2 I; G+ C8 R0 l
' P- U9 f& P' w! J* | q5 m: {梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个" p- H* b( ]( a+ {) E
S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
7 K/ H9 S3 ~$ V' w; {% M A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
' [$ F2 l( N7 S P5 g7 wcriminal negligence, he causes the death of another person./ X* F" {* R& n- n% Z' [
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.1 P4 Z5 g3 S( w9 x
criminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。& a& ?" m( I) m
最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。
- @: I2 c: W: l/ q# r+ x* G' A8 k& t& i4 K
如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
( P3 z. H- I& z你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。2 M' l) }' G$ U) Y1 I! p# m
e% E6 D% M) F D! \4 F- q# b
S 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree." F) N/ s: S& ?
A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:
- D. o# {, @" y* ?" ?& X 1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
. u* D, E3 t( L; |2 Pcauses the death of such person or of a third person; or
( a+ d5 v5 z1 A* V$ G$ `5 u/ b; K 2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
1 s; B+ r' B: N# G; S8 @death of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do! w, O# v0 }5 `! ^% e: ~+ d7 @" T, f
not constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
6 L2 O8 L+ n; remotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
3 z6 [4 J3 L) |$ bsection 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence9 ?7 O$ G2 d9 M7 \
of extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance
' ]$ P& a5 t$ d) oreducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be
, ]* F, ~- `9 u4 O" p5 d0 Bproved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
% Y1 z2 ?+ a6 R 3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks: t. I, P/ R! G7 _# f
an abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is/ [0 h* z/ Z/ F7 E
justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or0 Z1 U. d4 E/ t4 G, a! X$ z# M
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical
2 K% |4 {& O& r0 w. d; Uinjury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly9 {6 d5 e4 f0 h @
engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury2 r. n3 p7 L8 d6 A; k* k
to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
" ~# G9 _6 v3 d- }# v' [8 j8 D R: J Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony." S9 P1 W2 d6 B3 O# g, n; b
|
|