 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
$ Z7 ^$ T( ?/ w. x1 A% p9 H
1 ^6 x0 V. D$ t诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
. `2 P8 Q1 p7 V* C' ~7 I0 k* Y阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
) L6 v0 Q% M/ n9 V7 U4 [$ ~. i" x6 m/ L5 @0 |# E: O
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
9 t3 E3 t3 t% U! ]0 n
) {& V$ \5 G* P) N. Z1 eBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse6 [* M: Y f3 j- m# @+ u, y' D
# ^, ]) X2 X, w4 X8 `* G
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
6 Z6 I5 X# G% E. R, F( \8 c" Q2 D( G# e9 _4 _- ]) b$ |& r; }
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
0 i! [! r3 j' G/ j0 X5 @/ W( L Z0 ]) D* F; r3 ^% X n0 D
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.4 P7 n4 h6 }" W6 {5 k4 c
- S: }* f( a1 @
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
3 L/ T, v( \' b2 b; g* e9 e# m3 ]4 |
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work./ Z/ f- L# L0 r+ b J7 d; k
6 h- r% i8 x9 ~
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.6 k: D0 s- X! v; r% x1 U8 V
# \) l! X" l) A4 W- o8 y“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.” u9 S' ~# g' L4 H$ {
! n3 a4 |: w) vPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
, @$ S3 K0 r$ s/ J) J; I) F( m
& I: M! H! d. {$ O " g8 E/ M! x' T1 y/ f- D7 I
! p4 y3 d- W1 _
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
* i- A( X8 L. ~9 A6 i# R: x, J$ `5 ~5 U1 y( v+ `0 \- _' J
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
. O9 _) i& h# O; C4 D* ] @$ N; |& r7 `/ j H
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
% l1 x1 j, U8 a* @3 x8 Z6 i% v: ~2 h$ u1 ?* d$ p! U
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.; j' T7 S: I5 N9 i6 w; G
. p0 x# u) N, A: V- j1 Z
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.. i, m1 Q% f' K% w1 B+ S
! j" I& z) q& z% D2 kTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
' S6 I" J# T+ w! S9 y3 u' q* Y* x$ c4 E( B" T
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
k0 R; j$ e- U$ `' c$ A; Z+ \6 ?
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
1 Z9 ?4 z( x/ K/ T5 }2 E. X
; A' N1 r. v! r“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting./ k+ Y% } u. j$ ?1 \ D
; s( {) y; m/ c O, c7 |$ D
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”- s$ e8 e& X6 A3 z
4 N7 ~' k5 Y; N3 N
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
