 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
' {% U7 ]) r, L1 N6 s6 ^) t6 F$ i
t8 K( A6 P1 w2 O, i
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。: p1 O- T. R# h5 ^2 L( z
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
8 d$ w7 j5 ], c6 y% m! j# x) d
' a1 u4 U+ i4 |9 A; lhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse: X$ m: @: f( Y5 r0 s( d
. U% h) u- G; z' p+ [Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse2 j( _* L2 k; ]! _- ?6 X
- R* s3 r" d' \1 `1 A$ N
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.4 K1 n+ R6 J$ Y# }- g1 W
3 i, t9 `4 j5 { N; R; r \$ eThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.) O/ ^$ I2 u! G' W X n
. V- z/ |1 p8 h( C( y; N+ ?, eHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.4 ^: g1 i+ F8 J4 P2 s
' @3 [0 y' D3 J9 p5 N
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”9 m3 w3 D/ V1 {; y
9 k8 u" Z" ?5 `Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
% f/ ~ Z7 |* H
; x' z; @1 [3 }But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.- o& A' r$ P! V' ^# T. k
0 y. {; U: ]( b4 A' U" z
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
% z) a* l7 B, a4 x' p& U# f( n' X5 G2 \: o9 q
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
( E) B. Z) A5 U9 ^5 B
% J' B& L0 C) i . L% N) ]/ P% j0 _% L! l0 f! z
9 a# ^" z/ m6 a+ H7 KThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
8 W9 L4 K2 q5 u' R( [
4 t, t( ?: v3 i; {" H, X+ [/ eIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
2 {+ `* q* w4 Z% a! g6 h( j
$ \5 D M1 P. k) _0 n$ V8 xNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up., i. S6 Z) }: r. g
/ G; I d0 e0 u) t# V: T
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.# O& @9 I6 k) R4 ?& {. y2 U
( Z9 h0 J5 h. g+ C/ j% j% g
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
8 y- f9 J: {9 ~/ G) ~ e3 ^9 ?1 A" H. m- H6 e& r3 l/ b( x( i
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
+ Y3 q, S$ ?; I9 `. N1 ~ y+ L) J B, v( D$ s% [
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
' A5 s$ n1 X$ N" N% N& H* ~4 `/ D H p6 n/ ]1 z
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.# ?+ r# y$ u& g& O8 ?% `
5 \3 Y- v) U; J3 i ^“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
8 k: e- M1 o6 j2 p3 I$ o: W$ z& ~: R+ n2 f! Y/ q9 B% z9 }
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
& C" m- u- d# d2 n/ |' H: M* {4 }& E% h& Q, u0 D3 o
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
