 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
1 Q. W3 v. Z; f4 i) `
/ N+ t1 L1 y4 |3 ?# s0 v诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
* H8 K% ]9 r' G* E" t阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
# l/ H {( G+ \7 y6 M6 V3 t4 r m' m, I4 N! {6 }4 h
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
( j, f5 F: e% u
9 w# g) H# O+ T+ p$ \6 p2 U* ?Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse6 l; B9 p+ r6 N ?0 [% W
& V! ?$ E% G% u3 cOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
' [) y$ n0 ^" y5 w* e7 U' s1 F1 D
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
4 @1 I/ }) d4 M/ N( D0 b3 O
/ p+ g- j8 l! a7 B+ r# ZHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
. e n V$ J8 D7 a! g ~2 j) U k
6 V$ Z+ p# j' c3 W8 [At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”1 ? m( @7 f, E3 }: d5 @/ g _
, E3 B" P0 ~9 D0 Q5 ^) WActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
6 x2 I5 f8 c1 k: _1 G% J6 V' ^
; n, L( X1 g/ o" ]5 j3 a; d, xBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.0 N" N( ?8 A, L5 m
' S8 m# s+ a& E“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
1 v3 G4 z) P5 u; x$ u$ E4 m3 B$ C* e* _7 e7 J$ ?
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
/ u1 ]- N- F; s9 H
D8 k% R( z( O' [$ A 5 l- A0 \1 ^) s# E) `6 H/ B7 o3 u# R
1 _2 B/ {8 L/ A" IThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.8 N9 C, C" A0 \- d& I
0 U% T7 N# k9 BIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
% o* _" q3 F7 P2 o4 l& m, u' k7 H# N' s: q
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
1 |& L6 q& V& f' y* p. G: b2 c+ m0 W* q+ d; c6 T
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
1 S- |- R% u4 [9 d/ m2 [- d% P7 @! X
U# C8 @ \+ M( |But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
J) ~9 z5 e5 N: S% }: Y
+ T$ j( T) ?4 z5 DTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.: d4 b" ?/ E6 o O4 Y
4 L: l k/ G8 F& F" t! ]8 ]Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.. S1 M( }; A" _' F& o
. z/ b% d1 h8 d" L“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.2 l% x/ `4 e. p1 Y2 ~ ^
H" k8 ]" R$ E# x# L; G) [“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.' R2 i8 K+ Y2 M9 `! J( m
* `) Q9 M9 L/ C' Z0 e8 e5 O“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”/ J7 v4 O, p3 V" Z. }
2 R& W' X. C! c( ]1 ]
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
