 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
Outlander 发表于 2018-9-10 09:40
. G8 v" q$ }2 D1 k) S3 X8 f4 G0 v你这算偷换概念吗，诺特利什么时候要求总理立法了？
. N6 k3 b1 K0 p9 q) f% m8 d! ?觉得土豆选择不立法，是你自己的猜测，我也可以说 ...
S D" ]2 a, [2 I
5 [+ u& P A1 l: U8 R' S& e+ c诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
3 A; j) V5 D4 T7 l$ p) J$ y阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。6 N4 ?: v$ p0 S( r3 a
8 m4 S+ f* [1 x$ nhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse% M0 Y$ S7 Z0 F4 A. s. A
# ?; }% k- V! E6 _) CBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
/ s6 }7 U5 P4 f9 T
! ^ y3 M3 A/ i8 \! v+ fOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.( T7 `! A+ j7 w# S& Q! y, E) T* L
% d: }: R' y9 v$ h
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
1 {3 v# G% S Q9 [' L* `
0 X% r* {, d0 u5 T' @He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.$ e- c8 r+ N4 k
/ e7 e/ K% [$ hAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”' ?% V+ s. }9 p; @: Q
- S L( c$ s& A3 c
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.# x" ?, `9 X6 W4 o/ c2 V, V
- b9 F8 k* C$ q) M* T8 E, Y% X `* @
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.5 K8 H1 K5 L1 Q) j8 m
7 ? V, m% m8 j0 w4 q' Q
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
# ?) |8 w) W5 i( m0 g- p" N2 ?+ R( K
( e) M" e; v0 ?1 D# G xPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”9 X4 [' N# w. N3 T7 a
5 T, d3 h; C6 z8 h' X* n
/ K" `' g; k9 Y p8 n0 |/ L0 U' n: _8 Z7 ~5 U% y
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
7 {* R3 w7 g% H7 a, G8 E# f7 L2 X& Z
3 Y/ l+ ^+ j) [It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.: I5 a; M- X# \
6 {& x0 n* J6 ?( M2 @
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.0 l, `" d( q7 d
# n2 P5 t1 p5 _- QGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.& h; X5 {) O' o+ A- [
9 G1 L3 R2 e+ }3 y6 ]" T2 k1 jBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
5 }1 B& Y# B3 A' x# X! a2 w4 I
) U5 h# r* H0 q) [Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
) y3 ~' r0 e$ z0 h( n
) q, F; ?/ f. z, R; @Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
& l ^7 ~3 W2 D' |
/ a3 M8 h) n4 E" D# J9 [5 P“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
. Z* t5 `# x0 v$ {2 g5 i2 L0 R: J% S4 K, j" _# M& n, t" o* u1 L$ Y
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting." M; {5 p- V8 C# I9 Z5 J% O. S
: v& r! s' z4 [% k8 I: I7 d/ N
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”0 [9 P& `1 R& p+ t. k6 _
~# \" f& [0 D$ I+ [ |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
