 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
+ r8 L9 a' p2 A
9 P Q5 R) r; M0 D: D诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。6 |, r- C! S5 z! L$ |8 C
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。/ p' d% E: N- m: C
* c. d' W* B) h2 Q& e# ~
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
( b( B- a: W2 b r! V% F& c
3 [5 E7 F \3 F- XBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse! W. x- m, J7 ?6 g0 y# F# B/ D
" y7 h. d/ g9 WOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
: G$ n9 J% A! b5 B5 M/ t8 w) [! K9 S$ D" I* [ s" q
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
( r1 g. Z% ~, V% G- T n/ a0 W9 b% C* @ E0 E0 |
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.2 ]/ P k1 K! S+ o: `
0 i8 Q2 @/ ?- e) u& L$ e) a' H, ~
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
3 b8 R& r8 ]6 S6 X8 F2 @
- I4 \5 I8 @" i, iActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.2 _% c( w) t2 q, p, {- g( D* Y, B
* m2 G ~4 D: i! G( TBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
5 u) s2 T" m7 S
; Z4 s6 v5 w, N9 M“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”( Z I0 v1 O( f/ x$ U: x8 w
/ [. c- j+ u8 B: p) P5 [Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”6 { W* `4 I: b3 b: a
; }- e0 {4 X6 }; [, C7 a4 P ! K8 x" B- f8 W: }. K* r
: _5 M# z4 K; v5 v
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.; S8 s2 E( s6 j& ?
5 M4 F( ~ A' T+ _, Z9 V+ W/ TIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.% J7 y; {( V7 [, V7 v# k6 A7 N$ N
- ^" r5 {6 I% U% y1 U, }Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
& }0 K) A: U# C! N- U- e z X! N
% P7 B) w" k* s8 _( gGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
$ P' o% G5 z- C; W- m$ f) w
1 U0 E, K- A7 L2 GBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
3 F7 x4 M: J& N9 E1 H1 e/ E
5 M$ O, `* r9 s- E2 [3 v* fTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.9 f, a% l, L, ~1 d2 F x
! c: _: t$ Y+ h& x: X3 ~" |Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.) Y6 {5 N; c: a7 N2 }; ^9 O3 X+ E' T
8 s5 r( m$ H+ T5 }: t( ~# A o
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
6 l; n* \5 q! s& P! e3 Q
1 s5 e: l! d$ S& c% a“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
: [5 ~6 j! ]7 |+ w
2 i; I; g, y2 m+ m( A6 U“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”! d. K; J& L0 Y- x9 {
1 S( i D: |" M5 b _' s
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
