 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
# s! ~* K, [( ]) D* j7 l
; @; w4 _) O0 M
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
/ _% d! \6 k% U/ j/ C+ d阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗?请看文章红字部分。. Y8 ~/ L8 O2 i( t
/ D" B/ m* E+ D1 ghttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
`' m9 w: R: K
|8 {& q7 k2 K, A3 cBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
* F6 v0 [; ?* |# T6 s! ~# N. l: w2 C7 N2 h
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
& ?, ]$ p0 c" a/ [
. {6 a5 I, j3 Z8 C. IThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
9 P! |* \- x& J% G6 J
- |" v0 N! V- v/ W, W% gHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
. v: A3 r7 e. T7 i) m; X5 D, t: x& H; N( W" E+ d! F
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
8 t7 _' u; W1 a5 {/ z" l+ K7 N5 G: b( O4 J/ h3 n, x7 h
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
M9 @% M" O5 E! G+ p, A5 \9 @- U0 \9 ^$ W
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
- W2 V9 k9 o. ^
0 \( a2 p- {" d2 [) \“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
0 ?3 _5 _' g1 t$ S* d
, C2 ], `. i6 UPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”" ]7 o1 I q3 G
. k+ @0 }5 |* Q0 ?1 D% P+ j : q4 u9 P: F1 Y
% }/ y+ p) I$ q) W- @The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.0 X* |& z q. @( H
1 Z% v7 I* `' k
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.5 }2 G* ^' q: H
+ L/ ]2 c) x8 A
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.2 u' \1 u- @/ d6 d0 Y0 }8 N# N
3 l: p3 r2 t. Y+ [* q
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
8 R8 c/ q5 p1 J# K4 S
9 R; x3 C* i. \% w2 t0 vBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
+ [3 w3 w6 }7 s# n' e/ \ y
6 G2 D/ A3 D- ^8 t/ D% @6 F7 ^Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
7 I, K; D3 d# B3 B1 v& n" ^0 a, O$ J$ J: f1 j7 t8 r- _
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
8 H' j/ @: T8 _. U
# B$ d3 W% [+ ^( K“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
8 K! X0 K' I' \& ^% ^
6 O; x1 K1 e* d" i9 K“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.% @& U# p0 L1 a& A, p
6 m0 \) L: I# _“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”. H% \" x2 Z9 G# Z$ s
$ A! j! S- w, `9 U/ b( {% i# w7 I3 f# m |
|