 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
" P; h4 J" z: v+ f0 K& K& v6 l/ ^; j* V- t* ~" u
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
+ A5 C! L ]2 Y+ |阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。- J/ Z% I3 Y' ^" M8 P- v
" N1 f \! R) H2 ?! {: Fhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
# X v8 e, f2 C/ y; s
' T% {, m, y8 D) PBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
0 i# {1 S6 H( \0 r5 L& r p0 e5 R% [) k9 P) `; p8 \
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
L9 K6 L6 X9 F( {+ T0 c |4 { z; b
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.; ?. o. V/ i2 G2 a' d4 P* Y6 |# Y2 Y
: \' d9 S' _! Z4 a
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.7 S8 \# }) |' v( W2 o2 D
* w5 f- P) C0 u- G. D
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
9 L/ E, y' e4 B5 R2 y
7 ]& Y: y( @8 X: x9 xActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.0 M# z( a1 k- f C
* K" I& a2 k0 i- n, `# _7 V4 sBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
2 u$ x. I- P, Z+ |" E+ n% C% {( U. r! S* M
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
9 P% L; R: I/ g4 t3 R: j; h/ Q$ b! g* ]; M& ~: ^+ {3 |
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”( p" m) X c m
5 e) G3 X, j$ j* o
7 t; s+ s2 v5 D9 B* F
! b* e! W/ {7 G0 f" W9 P' ?5 hThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
( m" h- K# n2 b% n# e$ s! t' M' x+ r. a$ ~# @1 p7 s% O9 A: v
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.: S T t! {2 l" p& D- g# q, s
' o% F9 ~# b0 b2 w4 s/ P5 s5 @
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.& [: s. K! o' a
6 b* G/ \. k; h4 m8 |3 L
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
# n! L+ C# M1 M1 B1 H/ Q( ^4 a* ]4 S1 o" G9 i# v! P
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
# z. \9 m9 f3 A
5 D) h% ]5 o; H: g4 e& n8 q- {Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today., Z0 C1 G- M' S( L( T
, M" q" v6 _4 p. X0 N0 d% P
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
# h6 t; U: W4 I& y- k9 V! `% ~9 N+ h
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
; Z: ~. k2 y5 u5 Q2 M8 {4 j: O. a3 }5 O3 U
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.( I; a* B6 ]& d# v
6 U1 E4 ?/ G1 s7 y( k9 R+ D' Z“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
5 a4 C Z5 l6 G' G' z
( p" R( {( h8 E, A, q( ~( s( N |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 . \2 R" o1 [: F$ F& ^: H: c
