 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
5 n5 B4 V8 y+ S: d* U9 u
# V( E! F5 T$ L: j5 A" |诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。, t1 L6 E% d7 k g9 J/ q1 X3 c: Q
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
8 W( d2 _5 c: e8 b7 ~2 N+ N
" B7 c M; p8 _https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
+ J6 ~+ W( V- C- m y0 Y% K- J+ _; u2 o- Z3 w1 M. r0 \
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse% K) j$ w# m5 @' s% \& L* n
$ A1 W7 _" M# g0 nOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
2 I+ D! f4 T9 e1 n6 C
, G& l: o4 F) s) z3 YThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
4 C' N: E/ \8 o7 q& M/ v- y" x5 J# Z
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns. c+ [, G) K. r' Q: L
( M3 U- o9 `( g" { G/ rAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”4 Z/ t: f. d8 f7 P& D
6 q) A" Z% H2 K7 M3 cActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
5 p5 ] l( Q5 j. {$ J
! s5 L8 K3 T0 DBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
- c6 r8 j5 {# M6 V
7 L3 F, |( ?* q' n- s“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”* N+ I: ?$ o, w! B8 C/ \8 O2 H. I+ N
/ c: I- y3 C( PPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”; c+ i7 K. {, h( p. D1 H
! ]* _" n4 e0 _
( I( e6 h8 P/ E2 X f% C! |( H8 i' r
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.7 O- K; P7 Y0 j- G- x
1 R1 M9 H9 N6 O4 zIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.+ }; A/ k Y) d1 f* C
# U2 P2 M5 r% x5 t4 B' A+ Z
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
" D1 W* k8 W6 J& O8 z4 b
* |9 Y* ]5 u) A1 Y4 NGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.2 r( {; R! @- f! \: I% [
: K8 b) e0 K! D; u
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
7 w. X3 U) [9 j0 x+ z* M# L2 Y
+ m( J0 H' s& l8 B1 v2 lTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
8 \/ x' ]# `! l* a' V4 K8 g/ m
+ T! X5 W0 j3 @ e" K# o! [8 DActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
, z3 A$ k' [/ j5 j
E+ G' `1 ]9 }2 N“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
( Q' g# U% S$ V8 a7 k
3 E) X `- K" w( c“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.: ^" K9 N2 a" A6 f8 G
, x4 _: U: u% n4 c6 M, v, r
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
) d8 W1 \8 v+ v6 R* x, B& M% a5 U# Z' p! ?
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
