 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
8 u8 f( v+ N( X
i1 t+ F: l2 c I) y
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
0 V* D4 s3 ]/ p, J; U& U- L阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。8 I; s) _/ } I; v
% X% l7 `* O$ a
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse. u; Z! F# v9 C5 M( v
. p4 G5 ]& U* x" V! W! u# a, UBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
3 I( o6 f; p3 |7 i1 w! R5 x9 w( \: `- S, T
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
& u8 D4 H: o$ T* Z# x& ~* a
3 \. ~6 w% b2 {- Q6 W! ~2 sThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
( V3 ]( Q( q* i& z8 o7 S7 Q+ \ H# [
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
! C; I; O; G' t& L7 g0 D# `" h1 j$ \. c j0 A
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”& q( ]( j" W A9 V+ `8 I6 a Q6 k
' R( y3 a* ?6 n N; {$ e0 e! K
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
$ F( o9 ?) h, D( U+ T- g% {$ ~* `2 V$ Y7 P
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
+ g* M3 C' T) P$ b; |; c8 O R0 ?
1 J, P. Y' K9 P7 Q4 R“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”. o8 N6 I% J9 @6 B0 C& Y# K
/ i2 \ L* B# r. j, E/ P, N+ N3 zPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
3 }) l' e5 u" i% C' ?9 J6 W* Z0 f. G. T% L9 g" g+ z
 5 A: V: F( k% n8 R9 J
0 ~* x$ y) M! _, F/ ~
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
% D' s6 N$ `% ~# l1 k9 ]* P L# G1 W, F r9 l; k
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.) e# \2 @; D+ q, c- `6 C4 V% g3 G* f
' J- c O5 W d1 D7 c& e
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
) t- h. R; {) _: c# f5 G0 h: O( q6 S* t
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
0 k! K4 v3 j Y! d# L/ e0 v9 ]. {. {9 P' k U, y3 {1 y
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
6 f* x$ N' u3 X) |' H& [4 o5 C+ U) _4 _/ L6 B: n7 p
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
+ E( Z! a0 ? M2 u+ A# ] b
7 X" Q& }1 \/ x( R7 U9 z7 p" DActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
/ B" J; b# s) x6 ], V0 n
/ k2 }* U% k9 N+ ~: i5 q“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
$ j7 `) G k0 s0 H% P" v9 m- B+ J! v: ^* E: c& N
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.( z$ U% Q7 X* J7 S# J* j t8 c
4 m4 X$ F( o) x4 A1 u+ f5 r
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”. M/ v* x e* [' w
# \$ T) d/ A8 h" @ |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
