 鲜花( 13)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
........." we have heard of customers who have heard or0 i, t ~6 J+ P* P3 ~! I% Q) I' D
read on the internet that Basa- C, M" U, J$ o) X6 ^+ s
is a contaminated fish
$ w7 k& I- n4 S8 X' f, with particular emphasis on mercury; s! i N4 }: i5 O7 K" t+ L
. We# I% o. Z% M# p
have looked into this and it is our belief these rumours are completely untrue and may
& b$ U G6 ~ q7 B, E$ aeven
! G3 ]0 W6 }+ z4 A% {0 V+ Dfind( f9 N4 Y( s) @& T( Y
their origin in a long running trade dispute.
# Z8 z; J6 L! ^1 `, ^The CFIA! x" ]6 {* M1 ^4 ~% w# l1 Q
monitors all fish imports carefully, a
5 f9 G1 s+ r6 Z+ U2 ?' Bnd inspect( `& r8 W& Q6 j H% Y
all new importers and new species9 a! C9 j7 k( \ `3 u
without fail. Ongoing shipments of seafood are inspected regularly, but less often' S8 K' j0 d! x, R7 ]
once they have: O+ |. p. k) a8 r. x8 P8 H- L
proved safe
. b# w% G' |- g3 C. These inspections cover a wide range of potential contaminants, both natural and
7 L8 {0 x& `7 [# M# ]those that may be0 U' [2 o' a$ c' C
introduced in the production process.
4 p) F* S0 ~% _! w' |If customers are wondering about the Basa, it is suggested you answer
0 l' d* Z% y4 D/ C( Gsomething like this; “Our Basa has been tested and meets the Canadian
6 d9 L; T7 T; h; v4 L6 |$ b, Y/ gFood Inspection Standards in all regards. There have been things posted
! e2 f& @, c, f. d5 p2 n) n1 G) von th
7 ?" d n( Q6 ~+ Q; t7 o6 Z5 |e internet saying it may be contaminated with mercury but ongoing9 m% v m0 h9 K; Y" _
testing has proved those to be completely false. Basa is safe.” You may
; p/ j! p' W8 eeven direct customers to the Health Canada and CFIA website if they6 R2 ]: I, ^' ~# {- L
would like to research this more.
* y1 p* ^0 t8 A+ P/ V4 EWe have1 W, b" o+ ^/ k d1 R8 @
review" X" |6 Y4 e6 e, f. t
ed
+ _0 A% z# X% s8 xthe CFIA website about the wide range of chemicals, metals, drugs, and
$ [. H5 W# j* W8 w. I/ F5 U6 v+ Econtaminants that are tested for.
' n# x* r* H: B) W- sWe have also
) g* u9 O1 A+ n# T+ Mreceived a test report from our importer which# g B$ O9 Q9 z& Q' h5 @
shows that our Basa meets CFIA guidelines
1 [1 h1 p/ R3 ^.0 L( J9 s- b' G
Below, please find! v b- H+ u/ W
copied
) | a0 N* v, bsections
& m7 Z& y$ l. @9 K0 `+ A1 ]6 Rof the Health Canada website$ r2 X! |. s/ o" R6 H! d$ o
that should put this completely: ]6 r" }. t" [" o
to rest. The first section talks generally about where mercury is typically found. Basa is$ b% L3 [0 {" {0 }$ G& S0 V3 Z1 D4 _0 i2 Z
not
! ?8 L( i5 G- z8 r3 Z6 J$ Sa
0 `' R8 _) u L/ j; p; Ilong lived fish% X% A3 y6 X( h
and is near the bottom of the food chain
7 ^" ^' f1 _7 @+ jso seems unlikely to be6 F4 A( r7 `; ~! |# B/ ]% G
contaminated; O3 T4 Z, e( u% ]: I: `
wit
( ]% }) ~2 J! F* S, s0 dh mercury3 W. a3 ]* Y- f- G7 Q( `
.
. u; O$ y( E& P2 e6 Q, xThe second section summarizes the mercury content
$ {* C2 _$ P0 t3 E; a& o$ p& \actually found in testing
+ L) h( t3 d* J5 S* R1 Z6 y1 n! O# V; pin a
p4 s) F+ w! m5 ~, rwide variety of fish
* u9 \/ a3 b" h1 Q1 ^,: Z# A/ |2 H" u
and Basa is at or below the .02 threshold that was used to show low7 [ s x% V [4 j6 Q% D8 L; ~2 x
concentrations (it- q; W! _, P6 p6 f8 E% Z$ \! f# P
'" g6 O; K( e! T, T. ]) Y8 d
s about 3 pages long so I only copied the top section
) W7 {! ^$ B* ~- A" I4 _ ^5 R: V$ Vcontain
# K) b4 }) S" O) z+ Ting B
- Y$ s9 J% Y" F ^0 Yasa). Over( |8 H9 K+ V& S9 B* V
.05 is the regulated level where it is considered important to advise on consumption limits. If you
* j$ q _4 @$ A" U5 _. Q- `want to know more I have included the link# ~4 W8 y7 l% H/ ^0 Z# [
s4 C; J+ {; s% G- F" q( I* h7 i- p
to where this info is found.4 _; E7 I' T2 O3 @6 {
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/engl ... /import/inspe.shtml7 x) ] f0 ^$ ]2 p6 o$ G! ^
http://www.hc* z( l! J$ S+ P8 q4 a6 C5 n
-& f3 {1 U* m! M+ C$ N
sc.gc.ca/fn
4 f6 r7 R) s/ f1 Z, E; M-
2 w8 Q7 U+ o g) G- G7 p6 man/alt_formats/hpfb
- V9 D3 c+ x3 w, O3 M, N# e-9 s j% x$ ?( k0 y8 h
dgpsa/pdf/nutr; G8 b' V, I* T) l5 |
ition/merc_fish_poisson% }6 C- N% Y. e3 D {
-
1 I1 P4 i: P1 R7 v" B- ueng.pdf |
|