 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 B) u( v8 B7 _6 u
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?: e$ `4 X% x2 H
, z8 |+ C: X# @: ^
这明摆着是两码事4 L6 b$ v. _8 v) {: \0 w
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
- O5 e/ o0 `; {( H7 o, c& v
8 H; U0 s. j5 F) r; Tcan't type chinese at work,+ t2 |* w! _2 |
* d" }/ j/ m; b; ~. L6 O5 z, d7 ?- l
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.+ D8 X& |2 M5 ^( q! B& _( ]( d, a
; E% G* _6 A" ^. W5 V/ E$ p
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|