 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 , M; P7 b- l' E9 _
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
' o# u8 n# e/ Y$ d0 P! C H: U: o4 m' Q4 c2 ^
这明摆着是两码事# J# `: f- \( d1 y. N
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
( @+ d; O* l( e9 ~, J
- E5 i, ~# u. pcan't type chinese at work,
; Q; @& B$ j! w# o( W+ a1 d! j! n2 ` H6 U9 S0 ^/ ?
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.& O" ~2 h, R$ o. ^" \" J
/ V8 ]/ s. F" v; e( N/ U
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|