 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
1 r* a \$ S C( n' A1 I还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?2 X7 B7 O, V1 ~4 p2 e
1 z/ B6 U4 ~% U. E这明摆着是两码事. a8 b' f6 |" i1 ~
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  3 {* D# o% A) q: I- g
/ q {6 m' I Tcan't type chinese at work,; T- ?. L8 }, |; s
' h# S4 o/ y% f% ?, E8 H! |6 I
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
7 _7 P+ i3 S9 s) v# X) p, T9 n( k3 D m: M7 H" K) k, U* L1 U
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|