 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
4 `1 _ @% e( b2 L还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
& \6 a, b& B3 A4 q6 S* F. k" F: G7 |1 `, H
这明摆着是两码事" z6 S; q2 ^- i: u
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  3 h3 I* z1 V1 ]4 C
5 k) v4 j0 ? ]+ fcan't type chinese at work,- o1 O- r ]0 E+ Q% G' P
2 {& K3 y5 k/ W Q, ^"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.8 T0 e0 _1 r9 X, e9 ~* m6 ?/ U3 O
4 e1 |) ^2 N' oWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|