 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
6 q" q. J: s' a还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?1 j. M- U( y @
' C( ~' P+ c2 N这明摆着是两码事
8 m$ u( Q) Y* |' G6 bsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  + ]) G7 e( E. ^1 |9 z+ \9 m
+ w z3 N0 V. W, ]4 X. _( zcan't type chinese at work,
% R2 h) _) X; f$ ^1 ?2 W
3 }/ I& Y1 {9 m2 }, @4 E"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.: d) V0 |! u& i& N$ M/ D
3 R+ S# `, D3 G8 H' V4 AWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|