 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 & P7 J0 t. t- A
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?! z1 n8 Y Y, b6 R1 Q* v
* g) u5 \3 l4 A4 P" N这明摆着是两码事
/ d7 w' m( b! i1 R9 w" Ksweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
$ @6 ~% v* a# A5 \4 T1 ^& G
: q2 @" ^0 p- _1 qcan't type chinese at work,; d1 T' u( W+ @+ H! m/ t, T
" ^( @9 @+ @$ { K/ Z% P8 J
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.8 e9 R* r: k& J
* e$ j8 t5 u, V- @* Z& `+ KWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|