 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
# h" C, V" A# Z/ P) n* M( {还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
6 x+ H% N' x' {, ~; Y! `9 a5 E+ o# t- v/ z% Y6 l3 ?
这明摆着是两码事
1 M. ]. l2 `- Z2 Y# n% u/ Jsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  9 Z" S5 V" i* n, t2 b
5 e% N* z3 \* j" X
can't type chinese at work,
% h$ x8 L) p/ ?9 M+ c# x
, W q+ v* c, T& N1 h( W5 y"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
8 I' N- u( |) \+ |' V
2 j4 v1 `. G+ ]( Y: zWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|