IS Macewan GOOD LOCATION?

QWE321

Any comments for this area, good or bad, how about the elementary school.
thanks for your advices!

2 }$ N! `6 w4 \[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-3-30 10:26 编辑 ]

QWE321

Nobody living in this area? is the bad area?

Dongbeiren

NO SHOOL IN THERE...

April

Not the prestigious area in Edmonton, think somewhere else if you have choice........

Homework

为什么呢？北面的Twin Brooks不错，南面的Rutherford也可以，111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲，为啥就MacEwan不好呢？
* O$ o! N' l7 \& G; K0 }
* K, ]( C" O$ c; a5 A3 L; A

原帖由 April 于 2007-3-30 13:54 发表
1 \$ P# X3 u* m: wNot the prestigious area in Edmonton, think somewhere else if you have choice........

胖妹妹

it's good place, very convenice

WST

原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表
2 s  g- {. p4 J5 R$ w为什么呢？北面的Twin Brooks不错，南面的Rutherford也可以，111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲，为啥就MacEwan不好呢？
0 H, ~) Y/ R9 \

* r8 B5 l; B  A: e% |1 gMacEwan is fairly good. But not as good as Twin Brooks and Rutherford. MacEwan has more multi-houses (apartment, duplex) and the number of rented house is higher. The followings are the comparison based on the data a year ago.

                          Single house/total house                 rent house/total house
% I$ ^" [" M; wMacEwan                        62%                                             17%
! m4 w8 G/ H+ I1 gRutherford                      78%                                               4%
" u9 Q. A/ v* X! CTwin Brooks                    85%                                               2%

胖妹妹

why is not so good as Twin brooks and Rutherford?

Homework

楼上的意思是，因为MacEwan容积率高，也就是多层和attached的房子比较多，密度高。
$ n6 m+ L" M+ h7 d这个有道理，差不多的地段，肯定是低密度的小区质量高。

万年小腰

APT 多对小区会不好。

十年移民路_

原帖由 Homework 于 2007-3-30 19:30 发表
  L# `. g* B% B9 y1 y' u为什么呢？北面的Twin Brooks不错，南面的Rutherford也可以，111 Street对面的Richford的有些房子价格不菲，为啥就MacEwan不好呢？
! X" H: O( g7 S1 @+ J: T
6 C9 w' q5 b! q  |& E$ e6 r

( l; p5 o5 p  s9 Q4 m- U" S+ j
$ ^3 o! Q* y% ]3 m1 q事实上，那几个区，都要特别注意新高速路的影响。现在的车流量是越来越大了。

benq

Macewan是个不错的小区,不过房屋密度过高,开发商没怎么留下树和大空地草地,所以现在价钱不如Rutherford

冰糖葫芦

原帖由 benq 于 2007-4-1 22:45 发表
* ?2 o3 S8 ~7 C( S6 k  t! [  F' B; CMacewan是个不错的小区,不过房屋密度过高,开发商没怎么留下树和大空地草地,所以现在价钱不如Rutherford

$ D8 V* {  A- bi agree ,but the price is so high now .
3 h+ R7 |0 {  S1 o, h. m: s: U
close to 111St and anthony hendy ,easy to reach the high way

冰糖葫芦

原帖由 April 于 2007-3-30 13:54 发表
Not the prestigious area in Edmonton, think somewhere else if you have choice........

if you has choice ,go to WEST ,personal advice .

QWE321

everybody telling the SW is best, now I am comparing Rutherford and SouthTerwilliger.
. |5 Z# W( j% }% iAny better advices?

benq

为啥都往南区跑,西区也不错啊,也有好学校,有医院,有大MALL,有大同华,也有ANTONY高速
2 `& U* w: y* g$ l& R+ S1 V: ^9 L, g5 [9 M而且EDMONTON最贵房价的区是在西边的博物馆付近那几个区,有个房子都400万了.

QWE321

do you have more specific idea what community is better(with good Elementary school), even SW, Macewan is not as good as some others.

冰糖葫芦

原帖由 QWE321 于 2007-4-3 14:53 发表
everybody telling the SW is best, now I am comparing Rutherford and SouthTerwilliger.
" I3 k- [* J5 Y8 D% IAny better advices?

no big difference ,

and the price is good ,

* r. A  `( U, W( ]6 m7 y+ O3 ~) rfor me ,I suggest you select another city use the same money .

( Y; V0 i) d6 f8 s- c1 X[ 本帖最后由 rounde 于 2007-4-5 11:52 编辑 ]

QWE321

Yes, i want to move to Vancouver if i got a job there. at least there are green already now.

冰糖葫芦

原帖由 QWE321 于 2007-4-5 11:54 发表
Yes, i want to move to Vancouver if i got a job there. at least there are green already now.

# H$ w1 f5 A6 X) J: p+ Z/ O

周天

打算赚了经验，练了英语就跑去vancouver。