Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
' @! `/ K; B  W6 E- N  q, [5 v7 }: uLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

3 L  `: v: i$ [3 mNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
% F" C' `3 k1 V
+ {, N& h& U3 O& w& n$ O$ qTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


0 [/ B- _! U! IIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

2 k3 \+ Y, {7 p; E$ BSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
6 N: k) S6 m# a3 [# oNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
( ~. ?; v9 M& k- U, ?; _6 oYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
+ j+ w% [+ z9 h5 G0 k& H
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
4 c# g! }. U+ a
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
/ m. j  K* x; f8 ~
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
* x" M$ Q4 c! y9 v1 Q; GSan Diego  22.8 29.7
4 ^5 B+ r6 P3 uSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
4 }7 }4 ?9 g# I. a2 U& x! C1 oLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
/ |& o0 a% \+ I5 B$ cSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
7 X! ~" x7 Q5 bNew York  21.2 22.5
$ [1 b' [5 h0 b8 Z, a4 f# vChicago  17.2 20.8
2 p5 }1 _. ?* a% I: A3 l- @Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
6 U8 X+ R. `1 s* v


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

- W% ?0 {  D5 K, F: o  @1 o0 w9 K, d
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
* f- p* U5 T/ L7 N. k% p
) Y) Z8 }8 ~/ [! d; K" Xit would be a good reference.

8 \3 E2 f- i4 wthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]