Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
* V) F7 P* {. QLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
5 Q( u) I# j% e. y+ `# U! b
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
5 }, c, v- Z- D( Z0 l
: k. I2 U; j& H( U  mTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
  B/ B0 s% }! s9 \

1 p1 a" p% w# I7 _+ K6 qIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
' E; r# I/ _/ B9 \  h7 o9 [( E
, q( @" t( d  s0 y, kSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
9 D1 Y* e; ]5 S& g9 c) Z7 QNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
) X5 P- \& U! Q- W Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" s  V! g# z7 o" E% |Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
4 M" u$ K7 n  x) m) j6 h: \$ WSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
6 Z) a/ i. i4 J) L3 ALos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
  L* `6 x: H6 KNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
  ]6 ~/ x6 q4 L& tWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

" T0 G% P* F( d0 g
6 d1 s  V3 \6 Z1 `* k
; q! K: t# ^7 T6 g3 X  sIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

! K* S, e- a& j+ @  q
* A9 V/ S; o" gFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
+ b* V/ b5 S! g! ]0 I
it would be a good reference.
6 @/ Q1 Q6 [; [6 \. H9 O
- D. Q4 s& ^  n. Lthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

8 A" o, u) H2 {, s[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]