Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
. t  [; l; Q- f: ?
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
" q$ ]6 x4 |! K4 u6 i+ B! X$ D, l

In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
9 A; t8 {3 k6 w* r4 L3 {
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
3 N# M2 R$ N1 P% q0 ]" u, oSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
: f! r6 b2 B0 d2 r& w8 yNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
  ]7 N9 F" e6 X, j! S2 jYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
; x4 z2 @: j. }
. S" z: G1 _- h5 u: q4 a0 E: \If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
( m+ |. u0 u% e
; ~: `' a( F+ z6 m0 v1 s5 | Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
' d, D! [1 {4 h; q Avg. 1988-2000 2001
! \: }2 _+ {" G" e- D" \Boston  20.5 30.2
# h5 I5 A+ q( e3 H5 PSan Diego  22.8 29.7
$ @: ]5 s6 R$ \6 c. R8 ~; s# PSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
# ]- d$ f0 q/ b  J/ jLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
* z' N7 ?7 Q* s3 Y. b- z, M* G$ ?1 YDenver  17.7 23.7
$ D3 B# e6 N, h! _8 dNew York  21.2 22.5
3 t( ^3 O2 s- B1 U, l9 EChicago  17.2 20.8
/ }# Z; t1 v6 w, e3 B/ TWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
8 b3 U# d9 {  I! Y9 I& T- W

5 [# w  u7 t' \6 J  Z5 k
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
8 t+ W1 S7 y8 R# ?9 k" o& G

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
& q, }) m, G7 B" Q5 I' h. {
it would be a good reference.

$ o# A6 `, D& d% \: U. p* p, mthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
, O5 g$ b  L$ D! I. n
* f, ]6 k7 v, F. e* Y[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]