Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
  J' @; d- p. s4 p0 `7 }' B: yLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
8 w" q7 Y- d5 m6 g
1 x. r2 C/ h/ k0 D  R% KTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

) R: c9 V; ]* H+ r) @! X& E. q
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
9 ?' O# s" Y1 j! X
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
! Z  E. ~. g. S; xSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
! z# O) A: M) zNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
7 x8 e9 q/ V% @$ LYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
( R% q7 b) y3 p: _* S" G
0 ^' W! k3 C$ V; G: t+ c( qIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

- K: `+ w' B; ^- S Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
& e1 U; N7 c8 b5 w+ _1 kBoston  20.5 30.2
) v* G8 U/ X& N) uSan Diego  22.8 29.7
9 m, \3 z! T1 G8 @( ], {  ?) J5 GSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
0 R' s: C6 R" S7 i9 mLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
4 p* q% `2 U/ k( P9 G" a5 ZSeattle  20.4 25
, t& y3 w+ `  x* ]: `3 m0 oDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
2 N& R2 j3 x7 R6 f3 TWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
; V9 M- d+ ^1 W% e9 D
it would be a good reference.
" E2 Z: f: ^' s* R0 w
; \  {; ^; Q! m7 @thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]