Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
, b' c; j; @5 ~Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

8 m/ m3 I: [  c+ nLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
5 D8 C" l1 a. M& x* n9 K
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

2 I  R% V5 x; r) \3 l+ y$ S) s
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
3 x. n. m; G! ]9 U! {5 i+ V
5 o& K) ^# D' z; ?" TIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

: h; S% p* R2 E+ ~, N6 mIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
3 `2 v* B; h- k: b( A7 e% U, D! w
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
6 F5 q! v+ s# z- V+ A' v) fSan Diego  22.8 29.7
2 _$ F9 Z2 c+ pSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
$ ~. U$ J  h) w; {( }. W1 A' bLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
/ }0 J' m$ X+ z1 R% G, [# L. TSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
5 L/ a  o+ u& y3 |Chicago  17.2 20.8
! g5 k. H. w% y- S9 Q* @  I5 VWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
$ h: F. d$ }* X& s4 \


% q* X, v( I. o) X/ h8 R. R! x% @It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
5 R9 p* U5 o5 A* E, }8 j7 a6 s

' K/ N4 z7 y6 L$ c. }From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
- c: a! M% ^. f9 h+ c
: T) `4 _4 p% `" C: |6 `it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]