 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 1 q, n4 [& U8 o& l5 z
% p3 R Q, ?5 U( \6 G1 [# {; v* P, M; H7 T; |) C) @0 M4 a
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
9 |1 H* O: q1 x- ^" p5 q4 a" @ i' O* ?8 O- t) M
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03( e/ F; ]2 t7 l$ m! g* ^
( g1 S7 G+ V5 u$ K! w3 F/ U+ E
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
4 M. I/ `. ]8 |4 M1 o6 s: W! B6 J
/ h/ Q% k. C, K8 hNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 3 E! i% a B& I+ q. x
|
|