咨询一下如果用2% Realty来卖房子有什么坏处？

愤怒的小鸟

哪位用过2%的经纪公司？这个公司收2%是指卖方和买房的经纪合起来收2%吗？有其他的LISTING费用在里面吗？
谢谢解答

Edmontonian18

One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st 100,000.00  3% of the rest of the house sale price. Good luck.

EdHua

it's 1% and 1% totally 2%. but usually the buyers realtor will ask for full commission on his side. so it will be 1% for seller's realtor and 3.5% for buyers realtor.

al877

我曾用这个公司jj 卖房只给了1%, 买方jj2%. 全部经济费3%.

xchen

+ `# {+ M& {, h' Q

Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
5 T8 ~# {; e4 B( BOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st  ...

9 F  I; ^, s& z: n* [4 |If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.  
$ ?' R- U, t  U3 _6 [2 Q6 x* j
) ?8 R- U( ~% z0 X; p* |1 MLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
* }3 N) l; A+ Q/ E& y: ?; |
9 {) \3 |  W, U' b. A: ?6 M3 Scomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..

. M/ v7 L  ]4 PNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
/ C: ]/ X% w/ H  b# W9 k