 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
$ Z: _; _: o: X" w6 }Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:148 r- F: H* I) Y' r; e/ j$ c% m* A, H
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... % P3 p1 Y+ d: L o1 [
& l) S4 m& t3 I1 l( _9 \% f
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
$ u2 k4 V; f/ H' a0 L
( E9 o) K9 n: P. N7 M; T2 M; ^! m+ ]Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.031 a" r- u9 ?- k5 |' _
6 Z! ?3 w) Y w& a# r! t
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
/ q1 X0 Y) \! i& g# b8 q2 U6 q$ k2 X" b) [
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
7 `3 b6 n* y& r! m1 s |
|