 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
3 N1 Q! `/ B6 G+ X/ R$ s0 g
* z% U# |2 H p) d$ R, g! j
6 Y0 H3 M- I3 c+ z. FIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
( o+ L3 G! M* y0 j2 }3 A+ D. o' ^
- L$ M, j0 Y* \/ j @+ kLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
% O) \4 C* I7 x0 V
- p! e4 Q u8 Z* E( y. bcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..: w( S# H( m7 d! C$ K
0 k9 f! \! [8 b i
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
( k- l+ U% C$ U5 w3 P; \7 D7 D" F$ I |
|