 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 : L0 M# Y2 _6 |; _+ v) E; F5 f( l* D
+ r0 _' i* d, A) i$ q# F
. I) {4 v5 T1 h. e: u) M8 ?If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
% I6 u0 D2 J. C8 c' F' z A0 A. [: j/ A1 z5 Y% S
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
2 t: m7 p% L) t/ K5 H+ ?: r$ A6 Z0 {! h X% N9 d
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..% l5 Z5 d( U1 H8 P" j- P/ m
0 ]) [' `6 N7 v& w
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
6 f" X# t9 Z. e" m$ a; N# y |
|