 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
, y/ ~2 ?" J2 r, l9 D5 e: C& Y& F+ F# t9 @- W# L3 w; O
; `( U) p4 q- |( ]% h& a3 R: O
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:6 T$ K0 s7 D) ]$ | c$ ]
Ralph Klein3 I# {4 C: b/ y5 o* l
' k& _; \: j$ z
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
5 V* C/ R; V- R9 }; Z9 m" G1 A" f# M) J
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。" t2 f# y& f" B0 b0 O X
( {0 _- I$ i/ u2 d& ?7 `
" i2 d" }7 p9 g9 P, e; C! N2 o9 L
& H3 A% l& H- o6 u5 r8 |' |http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
' G' |4 A0 v8 t( Q& z7 UHistoric Alberta budget balances:
9 `9 i' ]& L# P
. j7 g$ B6 P( v& C# A( ~1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
; m# i" d8 J& F, i0 q& _
- D, k& u! K6 A2 P6 p- O3 i1982-83: $796 million deficit% U( _6 O' u2 p+ V
+ H+ e, i1 Q, E# ]. }0 J2 Z
1983-84: $129 million surplus8 A* l; K# V0 L. B; y2 z
1 Q/ Q1 r, p, ^6 i" Y
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus4 J, q3 P! h+ d' \( a
8 h/ v* N% O# ?. c: O0 e+ J1985-86: $761 million deficit
: m8 l) f$ V% U" H! h# A7 P, e( D9 l# z/ {% B& l2 o
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit: l H5 m4 W; M' r8 J
7 i6 l5 d+ w! i! T/ {2 V6 K0 P
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit- P8 T3 I5 n% k, Y2 z( y+ @# m
( h) R0 K* L+ l7 q. ?
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
# l, F6 B8 X P8 Q9 {2 e ^
C2 i9 r# z! I1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit( K O. X2 y2 i
2 s% {5 Z6 Q4 J* k. |
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit* K0 B6 l! }6 J5 q6 B. }: b
2 b4 z2 c4 j/ O: X; o) R1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit G" b5 U9 D" s( J" c
0 l; v& v0 w6 N3 N6 Z$ N9 Y
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
" E+ w# L8 D- j% B& G$ H! f9 f; V6 H5 y( t
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit( E' F7 K* Q7 `9 K! W
* X; Z% l- Q# V/ h1994-95: $938 million surplus
) G4 y% O: x$ o- P! p/ o. _! f. n `
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus2 y; K/ i5 U, Y; i! H
! ?5 R$ }: R, D1 g# p/ a! H4 l) H1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
6 g1 B* F" F' J2 q2 T0 N1 G3 r+ i5 _) e' O
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
8 S- y( i8 ^+ W! O* E' w0 D9 @- `# l* R1 J1 V7 D
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus0 e2 D6 Z+ O& E$ _+ W
9 Q; ?' B$ r) Y/ M8 B1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus% |+ [6 _# l2 j0 m n* k" G- z
0 z6 R* i* A" R- s6 W, T4 o
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus, P8 Z2 D+ q0 N0 x, _8 \
$ e, a. Y; `( `3 r( S; Q$ J2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
/ W( ^. ^0 ]- s3 O' a) F* h' ~% W$ J7 A
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus* q# C8 d4 p- k2 p$ `
x6 l& ^/ O6 o
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
$ U0 ~9 e8 b! G& [+ A3 ~% ?
$ ?# n& [5 R; D2 p! z* V! f2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
' r S; K) F3 z2 K+ U9 G
n( K& a) I" v; P) C' I: G Q2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus( i: v9 y7 {6 @0 |8 O
) P0 \1 O# h+ o8 p
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus! x: A0 W7 X+ @( V6 Y
! V5 j( O; t0 T6 K2 Z
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus1 Z3 z2 w$ x1 X% ~0 I1 T- c6 K
! O* N( y, W: T$ m/ c2008-09: $852 million deficit0 ` T- b; P' r
' s% ?* H& D3 s+ K8 N9 J5 @2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
7 m( {5 I- q9 [5 W5 x! w% x( a) n
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit. B) ~ p9 q7 }4 h
7 p( [0 h, \* R4 _, w& b: |
2011-12: $23 million deficit
" w& L9 I, h! c/ E# A6 l( r
5 _% v. n" v9 S) \* N8 \2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit& b2 E7 Q& a# s- F% m
# H4 c4 U9 j( ~/ O9 }, x
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|