 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
/ t9 U+ l _7 I9 O. H' n% l4 q- w" I/ Y+ t N$ T/ T
- u4 ?+ X" ] ~$ z% j5 [
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
1 E. k' w8 o3 s$ v1 K8 o; xRalph Klein
# [5 J1 `$ ^2 y) y$ c& \& s" U8 }# x0 O8 E# J" r0 C f
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
0 G. [' ^' V, R9 U2 L. i; e1 b- {
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。1 q' k( S; }' h
. Q: Y) M& A7 N! m, J
" Q# N2 _, g6 ]- u9 y) }
/ N/ E9 B( T1 Y! }http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades ?% {) C3 c; }) E# c# G& H; y. J1 m
Historic Alberta budget balances:
, U5 j; L8 u( f/ {; Q
( R( C9 E( O- I+ V$ ~3 Y" r1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
# | M9 M5 l4 l. R) r6 a1 k8 }4 j2 B5 N: ]2 N* T3 C }0 a; u( D
1982-83: $796 million deficit
, g4 J) G" t" I2 p( T6 U$ l% n$ |' _; f8 [( V
1983-84: $129 million surplus, M1 e) V7 v: T5 Y
% ]4 K# F6 z1 [; P. h6 K
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
' b( r. {8 x; e; @! K
8 X1 S3 k3 T! r; L% n$ h) w0 B1985-86: $761 million deficit0 G8 y5 r3 c% j0 q
$ b% Y" L( ] @8 K/ \) _; ^" c
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit) Z& O2 V, v% ?- y. m
$ F5 T7 s2 G& u9 G9 M1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit* U6 [3 Q( \1 `- z& N3 d9 i
, p9 E: ~( a+ c8 n7 l$ k# J7 W
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
( [6 L* G0 @$ m3 f/ g* u0 c+ L Z" _9 a& {
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
9 o1 D$ J) B1 A; I+ u7 Y: S
% M& G. h1 ^) `1 W- b- z; ]& x1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
8 j7 G1 u7 Z# `+ D8 w s# }
0 V, }7 k4 w$ _6 s8 ?; N0 r3 j! O1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit' g; j: D, E# v% Y
$ r5 u! h/ ^" N/ {- m1 Z1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit" W# C; y1 ~7 c/ G6 g
/ Z# T& c$ X) m+ X8 d# S: l; s
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit; B& m ]( d7 D
% G# w3 o; P% W6 Y: X1994-95: $938 million surplus6 g3 |5 @& ^* y( ~ D1 B" `
- C! v# z6 F8 ^0 t1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus" [! m3 s9 F2 M4 x2 Y3 k
( x _* P& z- _, e! i ?, D1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
* T& m; A' U/ {1 Z/ f& h" x0 r( m# {/ h* H
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
|# i! ?0 Z! U; |. y9 C1 ]4 {: B& H* `& S' _
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
5 {% q, Y3 u% t/ x' X' Z
" l" C9 @% a/ q5 c+ s1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
( x% Z5 N, j3 _9 i3 b
# F7 r, P" l* |; L+ v( w4 r$ g2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
2 t# k' B' i- |; q5 h0 E) z6 j* m4 |; V0 o2 k' O
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus( p0 u+ Z* k! r3 Y5 u4 ^
- m+ t3 G6 E4 u% P+ U2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus( t1 Z6 `) ?: V$ p1 J
3 v( O* p/ {% }4 u2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
3 S8 o0 q( G; J4 p- e, w& Z! K/ ?0 f; m# ?9 |
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus Q" D0 L$ b5 l
$ q: P- w$ O- p) k/ y* p
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
. W4 F" w6 J2 m) ]2 g# Q8 S) l( E& B! Z
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus& w5 I8 H# f' k. Y. B. v: }
; d1 F \% e8 p2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
( Z) y) d \7 L' w/ t4 K
1 d( K R' E( x7 i2008-09: $852 million deficit
0 L4 ^+ _) T8 I( n" B" ^2 K% t& G0 v% Y+ h
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit$ p6 O L" M; s8 }
- [3 h9 ~: `0 t/ h: O
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit! A' J Y7 M% g+ V% W6 A* o+ b
+ p+ m2 O9 Q8 Q* ~& y- N4 z2011-12: $23 million deficit$ ~+ g7 i% C* G j6 H
) s' X( _; n1 b
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
" a; p7 v# g5 v% C. M9 X5 J! P+ i7 I1 i/ r
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|