 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ y. R5 \) r! g- s8 _
1 f$ M$ J1 c* n" H1 ^! X0 |: ]- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
# @9 b w1 S% @! C: ~$ x1 q
" @# X' p4 g! b# n3 G; v) Q TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
3 a. e& I5 l9 f" rexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ H0 A# `; Y( r0 {" s% }& g
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic* _ L" V/ D: z9 y+ G& V
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit; B& m2 g y, Q2 G2 i0 }3 T! h f
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and/ P( w9 `: F2 w" O
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,2 i; X0 T/ o0 L; _! c2 A
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* R {7 I9 `/ O
LePage Real Estate Services.4 l3 i: w! X+ _$ a" E7 ^3 C
+ F9 v6 l0 \: j2 g3 o* t& U" t; h% a! D Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
* k. U7 j7 ?8 s7 y& s) W6 care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
# g! z( W4 @' z( Nconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" C: v+ J j3 c5 P, Y+ Bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
: f! X9 s# l M* d! t! u' wresidential real estate sector.$ y5 R; }5 j: D+ v/ |7 p M! {( e
' d1 Z8 z) t2 B8 Y2 b1 ^1 f" j! `5 Y Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
4 h; }8 z$ p, a- ~% A1 e: f: H0 G2 ^occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
$ f4 S; e4 l K myear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( J1 h0 z4 B' l9 d# i3 k7 F# q% f
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3805 }3 \/ `! K1 x. U' o8 x J
(+13.2%).7 D1 G, Q8 k6 K5 w( W, H6 N4 A
% K$ F! \% B1 a1 E2 z1 M% x6 q
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth9 u3 ~6 d5 K( T0 N, O
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
2 q: n/ x$ {2 t( `. Z3 Ufrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are% X s! _" d/ z7 R
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,9 g. T1 x* _0 R# c( F
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. `9 X8 U5 e% T. y6 g! A5 p. j
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We1 Q4 D7 \! E1 E3 t, C8 [4 j
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 C: d3 x3 R6 v4 s' n9 D7 l- wbalanced market."/ M! j* Z6 V7 I% `$ c" e F! u
: R2 ?5 g! M, e0 y: H# i4 s Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
1 q4 @3 e4 V% l5 w5 E8 {considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
2 B; q& ~) `8 Z X* w2 nto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued f/ b0 ?7 f$ ?) ]5 Z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 }. F# \" e: E! X+ ~# `
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration," G' p$ v Z# a' D1 B
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& ?9 w4 f# r+ {$ Q
breaking price appreciations.. W5 i! K, P6 O: I% k) ~8 ~# [' c, F
3 {6 [, V; W7 \2 J5 J9 x1 k: g Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. L+ Z7 b2 u( s# U3 y
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 _7 h% E( _! z$ Z/ Y0 _, vlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( J( p5 A% J2 i1 d+ e0 w7 x! s( Y# q
" G7 f5 [4 z* D( T9 }' K" M In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 X& I# P6 S9 u7 M! M3 {
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer' r! j+ P6 Q7 e9 S7 [$ J T& u" f8 e
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
$ ?3 N: Y# s- z* zslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
) }& Z6 _: f( m" H/ f/ VIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
1 m5 x+ E2 x% h' Ngreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of9 t8 Q' Q+ h8 U, }& b6 z
price appreciation when compared with 2005." j" g8 r5 f8 {2 }" p
) E! S8 p9 B8 s, ^) {9 U While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 F- D! D8 \. j' y) k" w& K7 k% nmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 T' E; ^; ]8 i* z6 W/ V' n! Wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada- m; k- t' H% @( d5 ]$ x" c* S
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
# _/ U. D3 N5 V7 D* o& C ?- y* h( ?5 n8 g4 K( u, X* ]
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# L9 n0 h8 N W$ }8 uAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's/ [' T2 @* Z. H2 Y: a
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. Y; z, i/ `: O2 l% Lrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ s; [$ S a2 X7 h6 _
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) Z8 d/ G0 Y" N. qdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
" X+ ?/ f- A- r$ n1 b9 O6 N caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
9 o( |# m# W% Wmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
# w ^4 c. F' v* [
: @4 R5 a% u) ~1 H$ b" _+ J' N <<
; t( F! ~8 ^4 z O REGIONAL SUMMARIES# _# B$ v1 E x9 c# D0 \& L
>>( D/ \, F0 M+ R! @+ s1 Q- M
6 d8 v7 o5 @2 _- W0 c+ L3 W; ~$ ~ Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, Q% x. l1 N K) XHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 d8 ?, c, c5 Sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 @3 I# g6 a8 hlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
+ z4 f7 z6 E# |" L) j! qrenovations.
5 _( p. a* l8 L$ p- H6 @" H+ Z" L$ s" b* e: x( [1 B3 `
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
3 A. C4 Q/ L7 o/ Z4 ?) \ Hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- m4 ~/ I- ]8 _$ N- O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
+ f) |# ]) Z' h# U0 k. O8 ~, Y5 gSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
# m# x8 b# }5 b6 Q3 P+ K. _ Q/ Y* _* V. d7 x3 s% b$ J
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer. `6 g4 k+ p! C8 E
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the, Q' Y' X- z; V8 E1 s% }: r) p
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, F$ J* S. D7 J+ s/ Y e600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores6 _' p/ t( e @7 b0 L) F/ L
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
" U5 R5 z9 J. h% ?- h; l1 cand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% z$ T* Q+ x t& y. y: _$ w$ Q9 k* }6 I$ M# V
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced I5 H8 q, @3 Z/ A
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ u. V: L' J; v# l) w' j( Z* U
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers; b( f, B, T0 r, U
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
& q+ s1 g; ^7 S: v, E8 X5 @dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- e$ @) m! s+ J
buyers with more options when looking for a home.8 F& x' u' L9 c- B
( K$ J6 r( m) E! z+ [8 s Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
?- ?' k2 l' A" I# K6 T- T0 a# ^among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' e& p, P% e& X0 Y
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ O% \7 b6 M0 ~+ Was some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last4 `+ a. B& l3 e% _7 `. O" e- A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
2 N9 P8 d- l m0 q- a5 @( S, S) S! m$ r( c" |
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
, Q1 {. e* f1 Iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ [1 {% d6 s4 R* _4 S' K3 F9 q
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting* K# I( F: W* z' d
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,$ c* y) n3 V7 c, ~
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the9 k# g$ L! j2 q# I
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: o* V' C' J' M9 p- d: |5 j
making a purchase.
# J9 w7 v; |4 F$ W
7 @+ x% X* b- N m' W0 } Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
) G7 _( M! S) N# Q, Bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 L9 k4 K+ {1 R. K! {& j) Sconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
* o) o# v; ?, j; r: u4 Dcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' e8 p1 z, s9 j! Y1 lattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown7 f, t$ E1 A: }% s8 D
amenities.! m: {3 C. L( D3 J2 \) T$ `
# H$ `$ a" t/ v, y) B* L The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 g1 |: G! P) e
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand0 F. g# v- g Z0 K3 Y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
1 D9 X7 \ Y7 W+ n- x8 qcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
; M1 { A4 ?6 s# w6 W% Vdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
: g o, ^# L8 ^residence, rather than for investment.
3 j3 P4 N" Z) D' D- r; O6 S6 J
2 y6 O2 A6 A0 l# h% F& J The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as, b: h/ v h( M% m% _- j; `" b5 t
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* G, i- c" W5 p+ w* ?! a* t3 U4 x
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) t( @$ H' ? l! k4 jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ C! U3 N- a/ j {& grate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
# V" c7 K! c6 \5 g: N: Pthe market.( G6 V! I+ H3 ~/ ]% G4 T( ~
! `2 z0 M) i7 T+ k- U
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through+ S N( p& G- e& ~! M3 x" H9 T6 s( P
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
% i8 N% O7 I( v6 u! H3 R3 tAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring, Q+ _ D+ z1 l0 h1 L$ L
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due8 J6 l8 B" a9 ]: s
to the shortage of available inventory., N1 k5 I3 a) N* U
) p9 t, V' m# L2 q- ~
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
; q1 F3 g6 H2 Dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 ?, i* }+ N# [4 F$ [
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses7 I( u8 I; _8 R2 |" v5 k4 N; Z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.+ ^$ C; l: G# h; `2 N+ r
, P8 S* P& F& U- H# k
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
0 [* \/ F6 i9 h6 T7 Nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
0 P( A( n; g/ X, l; vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 b9 t3 K) R3 ] tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
7 v7 ?" p5 q* y0 `- K# M: Lprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( H" B! o4 }5 Z2 k
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
. d4 ^8 @) x: ]0 B$ `# Ebuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.. U' l* A. a) a9 w3 a
; g) x( N8 |* s2 k. V8 i
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; r5 V( y9 p0 a/ z0 was activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton2 r# Y3 I: {8 C8 l4 Z* W
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,, ^6 q8 ~1 {/ j% x* h
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices6 C# @, V& I0 V
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
& n8 _3 y8 g% o5 P* R9 _- ?in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% c, P! B! R; U. s6 ?$ }. a8 k/ A
towards the end of 2006.
+ O' V( V, L2 V, I5 ?+ b+ m6 W, i5 ~# L
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
! |$ m+ a" c5 V) _7 | f3 F0 ?$ Xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable+ f+ e/ J }) q! D* c0 b
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
M6 o" Z i' T J% T6 W0 |group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to* q2 |2 u! h. I: a9 z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added P$ h: j W' x$ r
pressure on tight inventory levels." `: _! l6 f! G4 J$ g# Q9 T: r
2 \0 O( m% o8 j ~* h, S8 J Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 c# K7 w0 ?7 l) a4 Ufundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people0 R- n+ N5 t5 f
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( u6 n# e8 ~0 b+ {+ I
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching t$ z& Z- ^- M$ R) \
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.& j$ }. D6 K' w8 {% M- l( `
5 t; [* m5 H) O& i/ T. P9 A# m3 Q <<: U" Q7 a* G9 ^6 E; ~
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' N @/ `2 V# ~/ L. n9 W4 G" u
2 A# [# n; y9 g2 p6 x, E7 N& F9 U5 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 U- `& ^2 M2 ?. s( t H1 A& k Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey z* C' n. a6 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 G! `# J9 R' Q6 O# U3 P
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
6 G% G9 k3 E2 ]! v8 a5 h/ W$ O; V9 B& Y, Z Market Average Average % Change Average Average
) R+ z( j9 V- d# E- [, W2 j! X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
H% Y7 O g3 b/ ` Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000, |9 n; `8 r: o; u1 k2 | R2 V, C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( E, Y! s( U2 [' m: b* G* q
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000+ l4 o- K) d. C: R8 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 L' _* J, F$ v" a F7 q- Q; T Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
) m& E# O. D" S% N" O0 x0 u5 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% A9 p3 H/ i8 B" Y' ^ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
6 w; L: j0 E: {( x4 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------# V; D% _8 I8 `' x4 E
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333( k8 S% Z! G( _3 M7 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
l ]; L+ E2 E, S4 T7 h; J Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583$ X- k3 C; C4 b: o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 F4 _% \) T; N7 f2 _
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
# p5 s% x9 T5 [, [% e: r5 P2 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------" N1 _- @0 |3 C- `
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
( T( ]6 i5 F f5 L/ w -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 O9 { X) Q3 {& X% t& G
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7664 H" ]' K" I. O" C! x" }( u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# t3 A- \: W' p. T P
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
$ \5 P( K& t2 L) {3 [* P8 {, ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ r! h7 i& q" n% W$ K U
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
* Q. p9 r8 |* Q) [6 E! G3 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 c( i5 K) d2 L- Y R, O
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
2 f1 g! t. k' k! C( P5 x" O5 t! E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ~/ t! u5 |) H! l' |$ t" U Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
- ?7 R* q$ }( v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 J0 z9 L! j8 o$ [! y7 E Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500, U* Y* f Q3 e7 j3 r) h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 W$ k' ~: b( Z, \3 U- F7 n
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ a9 |& P! \$ R E) N+ I -------------------------------------------------------------------------* k1 |& S, t7 f1 `
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 F/ r( }, W" k; z o# R+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. K+ Q. ~; F2 [! w9 O
/ t$ P* G$ V5 o2 V1 I -------------------------------------------------------------
[9 H; f6 |: y4 o. f Standard Condominium
5 J; B" C6 m& s$ c -------------------------------------------------------------
* [6 k9 M& D) J7 L) L; U 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo- w: D6 D, a$ j+ d2 K% G
Market % Change Average Average % Change; T$ e2 R. U4 i- R0 t, E
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y+ F( P" v, E$ I9 }3 g7 H0 O Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%) ^1 U) d6 I: {' C+ U
-------------------------------------------------------------$ E2 k7 V8 \- f4 M
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%9 X9 X- [, V1 S% T
-------------------------------------------------------------4 y# v0 W7 I0 A! I' n
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A9 l+ J( z9 `/ {% F9 H" [9 F2 v
-------------------------------------------------------------8 f& g5 F0 Q: R3 ^
Saint John N/A - - N/A2 ] n2 I/ P6 [# m+ P
------------------------------------------------------------- V2 ^/ u! `- x) r! ?! e
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
6 v2 J9 _. ]: ?+ G+ j& `/ W -------------------------------------------------------------
! R5 U( O [ V& K# U8 l Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%6 b7 @2 v$ R( }5 t0 v( c: V
-------------------------------------------------------------3 ^, Y, w& |! j' ~' g
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
$ e6 q* R9 L0 Z& m5 G" T -------------------------------------------------------------( ^& c) O$ z: N" I- C
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
: p _- n* U/ Y9 |4 K7 S -------------------------------------------------------------
; o/ ~8 h! k$ H, H! g Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
, B) V0 y% C4 `2 J5 y -------------------------------------------------------------
; W# m7 x* k% B B) G& U Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% [3 r. l; |" X$ U1 g
-------------------------------------------------------------
. N) H& H0 m8 `; H- I/ ?( _9 V" N Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
" D2 r! p+ u' s8 u -------------------------------------------------------------
: B0 T9 W& y, H4 h9 d2 p Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%, [0 ^ q1 P- t5 \+ Q6 ?2 x: R$ B
-------------------------------------------------------------, r4 \% T5 F/ j) W$ O1 a. W% G( m
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& |# `1 U+ N6 l' A+ a% N V
-------------------------------------------------------------8 Y% _% y. ]0 q( E
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%) \( O8 l. \& ]* w+ w9 d% ^- m
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 |6 h0 }9 Y) @$ T# f! U6 ^ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%( N$ C. S3 b7 `/ |. Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
- m* v8 q) D7 S8 f/ [ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%$ d) q) x2 ]7 a; V
-------------------------------------------------------------7 `' X% A, z `8 c
>>
; ~) k! o2 n$ \/ Z$ i1 D: G/ [7 {: @7 V" ^
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 C M" d" b* t
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ T( M# K7 _3 R& C
John and Victoria.
( |8 ]8 t- n( g/ J& |' `1 H! a& t3 F* V% [* q
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 r- d6 O) J6 M: c; x8 e# n- S
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: M K- k# Y5 o- y0 y- p! k1 Shousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
# a, Z& i7 ~- p; { ireferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price9 A' Z* S8 a. B/ S1 C. P' i
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
8 K' Y# [, ]4 w' _9 zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* b/ g# t7 `4 G
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. Z# `% s* _! s8 I+ Z( R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
& n G4 c! \9 L5 }4 lversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on3 P- v' D" z: v+ e) k
November 15, 2006.) K* f0 V+ S* G
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 S5 u( Y% M' e6 W7 v$ S: D; f
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 g! M8 u$ [0 p; R
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is# |! \' u6 J" H7 p
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|