埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2311|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - F/ x9 m, {! u, e! U' {4 @
% D; _$ N3 P9 U/ z
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( q& b( h; e: c& g3 O/ K0 \# N
) P8 `; Z4 J4 w* l9 Q1 N3 e
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& p9 u$ _+ Z  L
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third4 q) d" [  {* k
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) i) f+ y( b/ a5 m/ Iin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit+ b" Q2 @( O6 ^% G( Q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; \' v9 b$ i! J( P- pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 T2 G& a+ d5 y, ~) S; zQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 q0 T6 r# b% p
LePage Real Estate Services.7 B1 @( K3 {9 S2 S  `
8 ~' j7 c3 w; Q" j
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" T4 v1 G) [/ I, `4 i! N: k& o
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic) f- T9 t! }3 _
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 O* O3 U. F+ nsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( \" y/ J: ~! l* p
residential real estate sector.3 @8 H1 p6 O  g* Q
$ E; }# X7 i  _8 v
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
% r, D: e3 ^) qoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" M; |. Z8 a: r. E' f+ t( nyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 H% C) {% Z9 @- A) J! o! ~(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ O( ^/ x* E3 E. V  A& f(+13.2%).9 ^  X  w3 c# w

* a1 r1 q+ t6 z    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
, ^: v& `2 n4 T4 E. Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 s) p7 A0 P& q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are; i3 b: B! ~. M& z* q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,/ P3 W! u' d7 B+ P' g# w
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% r* R% ~, \% p( L2 F+ x& H1 M$ ~"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& y9 r. {& t/ v
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy6 Z; R$ m! z* J: |
balanced market."
% e) \# c, q# k8 U7 {; [3 @8 {4 s# s1 \) n$ P" h+ F
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ W+ \0 q, p' J# Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
: z8 N8 b, e, p8 A/ g1 dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
+ e- f/ Z& t/ V# X" O3 ]9 Sthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
) F0 [9 b% o+ y/ w5 nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
" `; g8 {% j4 Z$ g% q; t- `manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) a/ a( T, G+ H3 O
breaking price appreciations.: Z$ o7 \  _5 f3 \. ~: D
6 O9 k& e* h! e+ m+ P
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- {, a" H! ?9 g6 \6 p8 F
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
: c0 W- ~7 c% [; Olargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 p! x7 p8 Y) L8 H& o
4 t. H) R) q! z+ W2 E
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) u" _1 h2 j, W: e; b. |economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer5 L6 P! M: K9 _  O$ G1 Y' i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 j' G! p% `( bslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 ~) }/ g. U7 }3 @& W5 C8 D
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
: N9 I  r9 S" Pgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 N8 ^4 P- C; p+ ]
price appreciation when compared with 2005." w4 G" \! f8 a2 G" m- H

4 I$ t4 `6 `" d, r, [    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. U% y' o! W& [. z. w6 T6 v
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ C3 J3 G& y- O" M! {8 |9 o: kfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* V, C( X& I. D5 tare markedly different than those found in the United States.
: w( L+ P& j, ~. Q  C/ `( `
: h# t* L7 u# l9 P    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the, U  i/ i' M$ u% g
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 b7 O( J- V3 w7 q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, S9 ?0 j" {7 Xrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, |9 u6 D/ h0 L2 ~$ R! waffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
  ~7 B6 h8 t$ Z& rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and) ^" B8 H0 P! q( S2 F" I) |
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 ?+ e& P5 R& v8 I/ u3 ^0 k; [* f9 Y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 `  k- k0 o7 ^$ n

  {0 O/ f( K. F; X% s- h# u/ q+ @    <<1 g) t2 M/ I5 B2 E5 D  q9 M
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES0 J4 ~3 x/ D  I
    >>
" [: t6 m, ?) a: A! n
0 [$ z; q( J5 |7 x  ?$ i; N    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 Y( h- j' Z7 i$ U6 kHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 Z3 s% l  r* Q1 ~3 X  i% Qof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: m4 C/ }8 S, r8 E
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 G& T; A, u' t7 O8 D
renovations.* F( {. F3 q! ^8 N

" a8 A# r% f5 R" F, F( i" c3 ]    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# e6 O9 ~# u, o7 Q
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 l& k. G; l) Q, q) pcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and! ?2 g- I8 h! I( N3 `' I/ j
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
! J4 L1 \2 v3 v, P1 {( h" N+ K5 ?/ N; s# Y$ E7 }. g% ]
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer. d$ T; I$ w3 I$ v0 y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
- o" W5 b8 l  aquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" ^+ m: }: k& }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 J- W; ~5 B1 r, y% r; ]
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 T2 B$ e% i! z  f3 k- _9 s
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! k- [4 \# u. z' R9 D- g; |" f2 Y, V4 G# s( z, |) ?
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced$ c& N! N. ]2 l* a5 B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ @8 M1 _8 _" H$ ?/ B$ X4 ?homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
- z2 s9 x' n" o' x: nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' ?0 C/ F' V, H3 z
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ m1 U; U# I- i4 e6 {; Y
buyers with more options when looking for a home." Q* B) N7 W4 s) T
/ S& `4 Y& s- e" @: Z) f2 H; ~
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 X3 {6 n# A- |0 D+ A& Iamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' [( ^$ Q" o" C# l
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' Z: D0 k) [4 i; I- E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ s4 M0 c9 O5 B$ p( D+ c  ^' ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
3 d6 o8 c3 B  m- y; z/ H8 d: `& {0 b
1 k+ d- e" H. \$ ?    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house5 P5 x+ N( z- u; m
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
  S( T: _# `% ~$ a6 |1 T$ Mlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 n8 x- [* S  H: F; j8 Y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
9 w' C8 p& a% ?9 X/ g7 \; jwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( a3 O! A4 X1 b- S$ n
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 G1 O: g& I6 v4 P# ^. b
making a purchase.% I& J# x/ @9 n: D7 ?9 O, @
1 u5 F$ c4 z  p' N; ]6 B
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing* S  i; h$ U( k) P3 `
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) S+ F; T+ g5 |; Z2 P2 Sconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
  F* }+ W* Y+ t6 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting  V$ }# F( J3 J, z$ a
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 b5 a1 h8 K3 Z4 }+ |' U% M( w
amenities.
$ y3 B4 u. q$ h3 w# t# S3 D) o! S+ N: N/ O9 B9 S' C
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- {. a& H. p- [throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
- C* q4 K9 x* u9 U8 Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
( E7 r  K. s$ @# N: x8 Zcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. x. ~- a6 r2 \4 Sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle# r$ r5 t6 C3 d) z$ t- e' e& J
residence, rather than for investment.  O; \6 ]* m+ O8 J1 W
6 a& N3 P5 B! c2 ?+ K+ \' p% c1 d
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. M5 \6 b! ?' m3 C. O
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 P6 P2 o6 a+ v: b5 @8 s6 @
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
% Q# B# J- M  D& v# @1 t) n& q$ Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
% n7 x5 a5 r$ }2 xrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( m5 Z- e! \# n, i0 m+ G- Q
the market.1 J2 d3 T4 z; u' ?

( D, H: C. L4 A- k    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% ^' N- [. b* i; j" `% S$ n6 ]6 qJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In  u' o, ^: X% {! Q  L$ N
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( p0 f* r  Q' V" r: }; Q( R8 Umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due! g& S) U" Z# _
to the shortage of available inventory.
2 j' E$ L, V- q2 r5 k' K' V2 G1 U. J5 Q
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% o, q# `5 U+ m) M3 \# Q) ?momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 f$ F$ A' G) a
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, k6 ^" {# i( |+ \- B( T: M" f
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
' @/ O5 x# A; A+ t# O1 V( ]8 W3 k! X* j
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" p) C4 ]- q3 `# `in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
5 f: y8 M( Q% j( O) p3 \  u# Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ B" L: c% ?7 L
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; C: ~3 z5 ~' v2 Q, r4 v  f
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
% [1 a3 n0 L. s  Z) c/ O! j; Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as0 \1 m* X. E' f2 t- a  Y  q
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

6 v+ U2 x% N8 F: R: K4 G
% F0 w* x) `( E5 j, C    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
: i7 t0 X) D7 \* x. T" xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; }: O( x4 q: j( S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 Z/ D  u+ B( H, T  `- ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; Z8 c; V" B- l8 N- d/ U* C3 w
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
1 R2 _8 {6 Z# B  @! I' Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
0 E4 B, H8 U3 Y4 l8 S7 `towards the end of 2006.
   
: T  J0 M, Z! [8 e+ I* o, U# H. N) c4 R5 z
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 M9 N/ N9 s. |, i$ N3 e( H+ ]inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
  s# H! e0 u! |7 @7 k, Gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
' ?8 P- j* n' }( k. \7 cgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to" @, B/ Z, x! D9 J9 i; {
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ {; f1 P6 f3 c* Z; Lpressure on tight inventory levels.
/ J7 ~" b& \3 ~3 J& L& M6 o) A. E! Y# k" Q+ Z7 K
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic3 Y6 r) r. ?, ]. y8 O8 [/ c4 o
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) V* H9 @8 `+ z9 O. g+ ?" }
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. n# D& S$ ^; m
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ ^3 K2 C. A  x1 W- Wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.( d! t! o# J4 W
) o! c: U8 c8 V9 I
    <<
8 @0 |; Y  N2 t      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006$ m3 O8 p- P+ k1 u

. r' r  K7 T: X/ y; N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! B4 s/ U3 ?; K  `' D0 l1 U+ P                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey( G+ J6 a, ]! o2 K' S$ h* Y8 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! |: J, p9 x1 l8 W- i6 k) {                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
% r2 ^4 [" Y( w    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
- L- ?( u5 r7 L/ i8 Y- s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ i  q1 h/ {* t8 n    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0007 H3 u8 d  d0 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" Z  w/ R  C1 Z6 Y# E
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000- K8 P! x6 \7 E2 K- v$ S: e* @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 t1 V7 B6 G; w
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
! g8 p% k: T9 H, `4 G0 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 \( f1 `2 N9 _4 n  V. n8 [+ A% F7 S; _    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -1 m: Z* i4 n% I4 r/ _/ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ]' n( x% n# e7 {8 k    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3336 z4 n9 G8 P$ x% B4 @" p/ Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }% s" d" s* \: Z$ _    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
  J) Q, _' T( r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 p# u  ~2 h4 k! x) }, ]+ S    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185. I' [0 N7 O* U9 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, F: t" G8 u8 W5 |+ P8 x: L    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250# _. ]8 `+ e# }( F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ r) [; {, n" A    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7663 w; q9 W' Z  M3 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  a/ h8 c' H) U$ O
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707$ |, g* I6 f) a5 I8 V# g7 f0 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% M9 y8 }# U* c  C  v% D2 a    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500# x, F! q# \7 c) m8 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 j; E- g+ L( ]% L+ X* \
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389  @4 A- W- v  E6 ~$ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! Y7 U& y% b/ N; ]+ [( N# ?5 `. m* ]" [* m
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714- E) `$ p/ X! ?, t' r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) h6 `2 Y7 e/ C) C6 D7 O4 ]    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5007 ^; }! s2 E* Y9 ^" b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 i0 j- _4 e6 H
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
" w$ ^( _+ b: z1 m, @+ H; I. A( r( G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ S5 g8 E8 I: l; ?4 N, ?    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860+ M1 W  B. F* a8 C" o4 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 w8 r' b& i  _* k

/ }# h% D" A: F$ U# D    -------------------------------------------------------------5 @' Y; _6 D$ y3 m/ d1 n
                               Standard Condominium
8 J; X5 U7 ]0 Q6 d    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 {' q# X8 \1 Q7 q" R. w5 s' c                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo" h$ x1 r. A+ y5 p! d9 q! y0 `9 b# i
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change% ]0 m/ ]9 A7 B" t* w5 ?  t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( K6 v6 F7 @2 N* `6 `    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%, E0 d- W: @9 ]& J$ a9 C. \5 Q8 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 h. d! |* V) A9 c' Z
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
1 d& r5 q& v+ R2 T4 l5 |    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 j& T7 G; ?0 e* n! r8 G& p    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A8 D' I8 ]1 n. @* ]6 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 o! F+ p6 F% ~0 p. W
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A5 f* H* S, P6 b1 ?; }- G; p
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 K/ ^  J) h+ S& P$ U* Q+ K" y
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
% l) B& L; l- G+ w- D# {    -------------------------------------------------------------
: ?+ d' D1 _  B! o& d6 E    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
2 v. M& n1 d, y5 r7 V# A5 w; _    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 E. A. D8 F" v9 H, m    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%. a- y; m2 k1 R* E& i) u# I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# N$ o0 K% Z: b; k1 K    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
% u  e* J* O# b( c3 v8 t) U( e, H    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 t$ a# Q# @: a' E- r& Y    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
, h9 h$ i) {) T% K, ]( w# ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
) {; q$ _7 ~# d5 J: ]    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%& r+ _" i8 ?* M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^2 G* S" O9 s3 Y+ O7 k+ s( U    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
3 ^/ W0 i4 A- S- A4 A    -------------------------------------------------------------8 ^. n' @1 |9 c, ?. Z! }, h+ u/ o
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%8 P: v, @( r. z/ q, y% A) ]4 e/ x
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 N. ^- @/ m8 g& Z% a' A* t
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
( I+ m7 e4 J: l/ M) `- w8 B; e1 M    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 c7 G9 F9 @3 A# q% t    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
4 ?1 K- D4 m+ Y$ |6 k7 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
* n* f+ D1 r2 \! k' E    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
8 @  Z, }9 N1 }$ ]: ?    -------------------------------------------------------------) j5 f% c3 ~7 M4 Z  e$ m
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%7 U) S& d/ ?" w# T+ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 h' E4 w! x" w9 ^
    >>
. q7 F2 r/ b& s& F  c4 Z% U9 k! O3 n; Z7 z, Z
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined* x- y4 I& g  F
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint& U& V2 J9 o7 [. A9 h& c! ]
John and Victoria.+ L" C( T) _/ z& U* n
6 X/ r' U$ l: v, c
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! ^. T6 Y2 w9 L5 L3 R2 v
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 N! I$ u/ c9 E# Z( Khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
, a1 M9 t8 G0 Ureferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 G$ O2 H# I8 g- H0 ptrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- q: x9 e) _3 h: Y- B' f  Q3 pacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is: ?4 Q4 p# k5 f7 F( a
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
  B; B2 [' j' N: D' Ofigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& E9 C1 ^$ ~5 C' G9 i$ e4 X
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 ?  U  d( N5 b3 c8 b3 |& oNovember 15, 2006.6 j& e$ `( s4 \" t% r/ y+ ?
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# D, c* K. |2 k( J0 S
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
4 X' J+ D2 @" M& G& J4 Jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& X5 }* W" r/ n7 h& X9 F& cavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-3 10:11 , Processed in 0.250486 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表