 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - F/ x9 m, {! u, e! U' {4 @
% D; _$ N3 P9 U/ z
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( q& b( h; e: c& g3 O/ K0 \# N
) P8 `; Z4 J4 w* l9 Q1 N3 e
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& p9 u$ _+ Z L
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third4 q) d" [ {* k
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) i) f+ y( b/ a5 m/ Iin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit+ b" Q2 @( O6 ^% G( Q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; \' v9 b$ i! J( P- pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 T2 G& a+ d5 y, ~) S; zQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 q0 T6 r# b% p
LePage Real Estate Services.7 B1 @( K3 {9 S2 S `
8 ~' j7 c3 w; Q" j
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" T4 v1 G) [/ I, `4 i! N: k& o
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic) f- T9 t! }3 _
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 O* O3 U. F+ nsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( \" y/ J: ~! l* p
residential real estate sector.3 @8 H1 p6 O g* Q
$ E; }# X7 i _8 v
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
% r, D: e3 ^) qoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" M; |. Z8 a: r. E' f+ t( nyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 H% C) {% Z9 @- A) J! o! ~(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ O( ^/ x* E3 E. V A& f(+13.2%).9 ^ X w3 c# w
* a1 r1 q+ t6 z "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
, ^: v& `2 n4 T4 E. Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 s) p7 A0 P& q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are; i3 b: B! ~. M& z* q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,/ P3 W! u' d7 B+ P' g# w
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% r* R% ~, \% p( L2 F+ x& H1 M$ ~"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& y9 r. {& t/ v
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy6 Z; R$ m! z* J: |
balanced market."
% e) \# c, q# k8 U7 {; [3 @8 {4 s# s1 \) n$ P" h+ F
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ W+ \0 q, p' J# Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
: z8 N8 b, e, p8 A/ g1 dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
+ e- f/ Z& t/ V# X" O3 ]9 Sthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
) F0 [9 b% o+ y/ w5 nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
" `; g8 {% j4 Z$ g% q; t- `manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) a/ a( T, G+ H3 O
breaking price appreciations.: Z$ o7 \ _5 f3 \. ~: D
6 O9 k& e* h! e+ m+ P
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- {, a" H! ?9 g6 \6 p8 F
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
: c0 W- ~7 c% [; Olargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 p! x7 p8 Y) L8 H& o
4 t. H) R) q! z+ W2 E
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) u" _1 h2 j, W: e; b. |economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer5 L6 P! M: K9 _ O$ G1 Y' i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 j' G! p% `( bslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 ~) }/ g. U7 }3 @& W5 C8 D
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
: N9 I r9 S" Pgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 N8 ^4 P- C; p+ ]
price appreciation when compared with 2005." w4 G" \! f8 a2 G" m- H
4 I$ t4 `6 `" d, r, [ While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. U% y' o! W& [. z. w6 T6 v
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ C3 J3 G& y- O" M! {8 |9 o: kfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* V, C( X& I. D5 tare markedly different than those found in the United States.
: w( L+ P& j, ~. Q C/ `( `
: h# t* L7 u# l9 P Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the, U i/ i' M$ u% g
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 b7 O( J- V3 w7 q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, S9 ?0 j" {7 Xrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, |9 u6 D/ h0 L2 ~$ R! waffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
~7 B6 h8 t$ Z& rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and) ^" B8 H0 P! q( S2 F" I) |
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 ?+ e& P5 R& v8 I/ u3 ^0 k; [* f9 Y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 ` k- k0 o7 ^$ n
{0 O/ f( K. F; X% s- h# u/ q+ @ <<1 g) t2 M/ I5 B2 E5 D q9 M
REGIONAL SUMMARIES0 J4 ~3 x/ D I
>>
" [: t6 m, ?) a: A! n
0 [$ z; q( J5 |7 x ?$ i; N Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 Y( h- j' Z7 i$ U6 kHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 Z3 s% l r* Q1 ~3 X i% Qof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: m4 C/ }8 S, r8 E
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 G& T; A, u' t7 O8 D
renovations.* F( {. F3 q! ^8 N
" a8 A# r% f5 R" F, F( i" c3 ] The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# e6 O9 ~# u, o7 Q
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 l& k. G; l) Q, q) pcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and! ?2 g- I8 h! I( N3 `' I/ j
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
! J4 L1 \2 v3 v, P1 {( h" N+ K5 ?/ N; s# Y$ E7 }. g% ]
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer. d$ T; I$ w3 I$ v0 y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
- o" W5 b8 l aquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" ^+ m: }: k& }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 J- W; ~5 B1 r, y% r; ]
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 T2 B$ e% i! z f3 k- _9 s
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! k- [4 \# u. z' R9 D- g; |" f2 Y, V4 G# s( z, |) ?
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced$ c& N! N. ]2 l* a5 B
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ @8 M1 _8 _" H$ ?/ B$ X4 ?homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
- z2 s9 x' n" o' x: nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' ?0 C/ F' V, H3 z
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ m1 U; U# I- i4 e6 {; Y
buyers with more options when looking for a home." Q* B) N7 W4 s) T
/ S& `4 Y& s- e" @: Z) f2 H; ~
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 X3 {6 n# A- |0 D+ A& Iamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' [( ^$ Q" o" C# l
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' Z: D0 k) [4 i; I- E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ s4 M0 c9 O5 B$ p( D+ c ^' ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
3 d6 o8 c3 B m- y; z/ H8 d: `& {0 b
1 k+ d- e" H. \$ ? Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house5 P5 x+ N( z- u; m
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
S( T: _# `% ~$ a6 |1 T$ Mlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 n8 x- [* S H: F; j8 Y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
9 w' C8 p& a% ?9 X/ g7 \; jwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( a3 O! A4 X1 b- S$ n
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 G1 O: g& I6 v4 P# ^. b
making a purchase.% I& J# x/ @9 n: D7 ?9 O, @
1 u5 F$ c4 z p' N; ]6 B
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing* S i; h$ U( k) P3 `
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) S+ F; T+ g5 |; Z2 P2 Sconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
F* }+ W* Y+ t6 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting V$ }# F( J3 J, z$ a
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 b5 a1 h8 K3 Z4 }+ |' U% M( w
amenities.
$ y3 B4 u. q$ h3 w# t# S3 D) o! S+ N: N/ O9 B9 S' C
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- {. a& H. p- [throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
- C* q4 K9 x* u9 U8 Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
( E7 r K. s$ @# N: x8 Zcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. x. ~- a6 r2 \4 Sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle# r$ r5 t6 C3 d) z$ t- e' e& J
residence, rather than for investment. O; \6 ]* m+ O8 J1 W
6 a& N3 P5 B! c2 ?+ K+ \' p% c1 d
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. M5 \6 b! ?' m3 C. O
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 P6 P2 o6 a+ v: b5 @8 s6 @
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
% Q# B# J- M D& v# @1 t) n& q$ Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
% n7 x5 a5 r$ }2 xrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( m5 Z- e! \# n, i0 m+ G- Q
the market.1 J2 d3 T4 z; u' ?
( D, H: C. L4 A- k In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% ^' N- [. b* i; j" `% S$ n6 ]6 qJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In u' o, ^: X% {! Q L$ N
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( p0 f* r Q' V" r: }; Q( R8 Umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due! g& S) U" Z# _
to the shortage of available inventory.
2 j' E$ L, V- q2 r5 k' K' V2 G1 U. J5 Q
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% o, q# `5 U+ m) M3 \# Q) ?momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 f$ F$ A' G) a
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, k6 ^" {# i( |+ \- B( T: M" f
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
' @/ O5 x# A; A+ t# O1 V( ]8 W3 k! X* j
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" p) C4 ]- q3 `# `in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
5 f: y8 M( Q% j( O) p3 \ u# Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ B" L: c% ?7 L
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; C: ~3 z5 ~' v2 Q, r4 v f
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
% [1 a3 n0 L. s Z) c/ O! j; Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as0 \1 m* X. E' f2 t- a Y q
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
6 v+ U2 x% N8 F: R: K4 G
% F0 w* x) `( E5 j, C Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
: i7 t0 X) D7 \* x. T" xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; }: O( x4 q: j( S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 Z/ D u+ B( H, T `- ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; Z8 c; V" B- l8 N- d/ U* C3 w
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
1 R2 _8 {6 Z# B @! I' Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
0 E4 B, H8 U3 Y4 l8 S7 `towards the end of 2006.
: T J0 M, Z! [8 e+ I* o, U# H. N) c4 R5 z
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 M9 N/ N9 s. |, i$ N3 e( H+ ]inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
s# H! e0 u! |7 @7 k, Gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
' ?8 P- j* n' }( k. \7 cgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to" @, B/ Z, x! D9 J9 i; {
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ {; f1 P6 f3 c* Z; Lpressure on tight inventory levels.
/ J7 ~" b& \3 ~3 J& L& M6 o) A. E! Y# k" Q+ Z7 K
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic3 Y6 r) r. ?, ]. y8 O8 [/ c4 o
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) V* H9 @8 `+ z9 O. g+ ?" }
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. n# D& S$ ^; m
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ ^3 K2 C. A x1 W- Wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.( d! t! o# J4 W
) o! c: U8 c8 V9 I
<<
8 @0 |; Y N2 t Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006$ m3 O8 p- P+ k1 u
. r' r K7 T: X/ y; N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! B4 s/ U3 ?; K `' D0 l1 U+ P Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey( G+ J6 a, ]! o2 K' S$ h* Y8 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! |: J, p9 x1 l8 W- i6 k) { 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
% r2 ^4 [" Y( w Market Average Average % Change Average Average
- L- ?( u5 r7 L/ i8 Y- s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ i q1 h/ {* t8 n Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 H3 u8 d d0 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" Z w/ R C1 Z6 Y# E
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000- K8 P! x6 \7 E2 K- v$ S: e* @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 t1 V7 B6 G; w
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
! g8 p% k: T9 H, `4 G0 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 \( f1 `2 N9 _4 n V. n8 [+ A% F7 S; _ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -1 m: Z* i4 n% I4 r/ _/ z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ]' n( x% n# e7 {8 k St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3336 z4 n9 G8 P$ x% B4 @" p/ Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }% s" d" s* \: Z$ _ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
J) Q, _' T( r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 p# u ~2 h4 k! x) }, ]+ S Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185. I' [0 N7 O* U9 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, F: t" G8 u8 W5 |+ P8 x: L Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250# _. ]8 `+ e# }( F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ r) [; {, n" A Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7663 w; q9 W' Z M3 ~
------------------------------------------------------------------------- a/ h8 c' H) U$ O
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707$ |, g* I6 f) a5 I8 V# g7 f0 B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% M9 y8 }# U* c C v% D2 a Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500# x, F! q# \7 c) m8 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 j; E- g+ L( ]% L+ X* \
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389 @4 A- W- v E6 ~$ A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! Y7 U& y% b/ N; ]+ [( N# ?5 `. m* ]" [* m
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714- E) `$ p/ X! ?, t' r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) h6 `2 Y7 e/ C) C6 D7 O4 ] Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5007 ^; }! s2 E* Y9 ^" b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 i0 j- _4 e6 H
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
" w$ ^( _+ b: z1 m, @+ H; I. A( r( G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ S5 g8 E8 I: l; ?4 N, ? National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860+ M1 W B. F* a8 C" o4 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 w8 r' b& i _* k
/ }# h% D" A: F$ U# D -------------------------------------------------------------5 @' Y; _6 D$ y3 m/ d1 n
Standard Condominium
8 J; X5 U7 ]0 Q6 d -------------------------------------------------------------
8 {' q# X8 \1 Q7 q" R. w5 s' c 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo" h$ x1 r. A+ y5 p! d9 q! y0 `9 b# i
Market % Change Average Average % Change% ]0 m/ ]9 A7 B" t* w5 ? t
-------------------------------------------------------------
( K6 v6 F7 @2 N* `6 ` Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%, E0 d- W: @9 ]& J$ a9 C. \5 Q8 O
-------------------------------------------------------------1 h. d! |* V) A9 c' Z
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
1 d& r5 q& v+ R2 T4 l5 | -------------------------------------------------------------
6 j& T7 G; ?0 e* n! r8 G& p Moncton 4.9% - - N/A8 D' I8 ]1 n. @* ]6 G
-------------------------------------------------------------9 o! F+ p6 F% ~0 p. W
Saint John N/A - - N/A5 f* H* S, P6 b1 ?; }- G; p
-------------------------------------------------------------4 K/ ^ J) h+ S& P$ U* Q+ K" y
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
% l) B& L; l- G+ w- D# { -------------------------------------------------------------
: ?+ d' D1 _ B! o& d6 E Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
2 v. M& n1 d, y5 r7 V# A5 w; _ -------------------------------------------------------------
2 E. A. D8 F" v9 H, m Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. a- y; m2 k1 R* E& i) u# I
-------------------------------------------------------------
# N$ o0 K% Z: b; k1 K Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
% u e* J* O# b( c3 v8 t) U( e, H -------------------------------------------------------------
6 t$ a# Q# @: a' E- r& Y Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
, h9 h$ i) {) T% K, ]( w# ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
) {; q$ _7 ~# d5 J: ] Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& r+ _" i8 ?* M
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^2 G* S" O9 s3 Y+ O7 k+ s( U Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
3 ^/ W0 i4 A- S- A4 A -------------------------------------------------------------8 ^. n' @1 |9 c, ?. Z! }, h+ u/ o
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%8 P: v, @( r. z/ q, y% A) ]4 e/ x
-------------------------------------------------------------6 N. ^- @/ m8 g& Z% a' A* t
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
( I+ m7 e4 J: l/ M) `- w8 B; e1 M -------------------------------------------------------------
4 c7 G9 F9 @3 A# q% t Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
4 ?1 K- D4 m+ Y$ |6 k7 P -------------------------------------------------------------
* n* f+ D1 r2 \! k' E Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
8 @ Z, }9 N1 }$ ]: ? -------------------------------------------------------------) j5 f% c3 ~7 M4 Z e$ m
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 U) S& d/ ?" w# T+ z
-------------------------------------------------------------9 h' E4 w! x" w9 ^
>>
. q7 F2 r/ b& s& F c4 Z% U9 k! O3 n; Z7 z, Z
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined* x- y4 I& g F
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint& U& V2 J9 o7 [. A9 h& c! ]
John and Victoria.+ L" C( T) _/ z& U* n
6 X/ r' U$ l: v, c
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! ^. T6 Y2 w9 L5 L3 R2 v
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 N! I$ u/ c9 E# Z( Khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
, a1 M9 t8 G0 Ureferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 G$ O2 H# I8 g- H0 ptrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- q: x9 e) _3 h: Y- B' f Q3 pacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is: ?4 Q4 p# k5 f7 F( a
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
B; B2 [' j' N: D' Ofigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& E9 C1 ^$ ~5 C' G9 i$ e4 X
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 ? U d( N5 b3 c8 b3 |& oNovember 15, 2006.6 j& e$ `( s4 \" t% r/ y+ ?
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# D, c* K. |2 k( J0 S
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
4 X' J+ D2 @" M& G& J4 Jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& X5 }* W" r/ n7 h& X9 F& cavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|