 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : J; l8 ~7 X1 t
- u- }* r# w. c3 Z, m$ T! j- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
! M7 N' w9 u$ [$ T% H4 r
9 b! _& }) o2 R2 \# B TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
3 C; y' Q% y% D% T* a8 jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
0 h3 N" @) A1 ?# H2 Pquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic& g" g# q" G" D' {
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit5 ^1 ]2 y6 }, I2 k
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and' L+ I/ N6 I& W$ B
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ I- Q% C t3 O! H
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ u) j5 j6 \1 K1 r0 i5 k" _# H; C/ GLePage Real Estate Services.
# w* _5 ~' O: @$ X( Y$ d
/ G# Y% V2 c3 A Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 x- L3 l7 w+ q4 c1 N
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" x8 o- [' P B4 ^# M8 F" N, gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
- g# E* s9 P, M& X0 e. Msound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
; ?% \+ r: ~1 w0 e/ a2 X7 S) u3 Presidential real estate sector.
7 f- u+ ~% T& ^! G& s; Q- a9 ?5 z' K! Y$ L3 J& v0 s/ V
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
8 {- H9 R7 Q/ w+ Z# boccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& o, ?% B4 Q' b/ B/ Z4 o5 k
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
0 }8 U( K7 g( l' r$ _(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380; b: Z9 ]" z: y1 j
(+13.2%).
/ a5 q; C) [ m# @. W% I8 v& m: I# [$ f( z
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth+ q O E% y& j4 y* b; _, \# ~/ `( p
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! m) P$ [6 W6 ^: L8 S* p
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are4 a6 E* ^, T( P% d: q/ s* B# L
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
3 U$ Q! A# x. bpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ i3 A0 D2 x5 v7 u ?, ^8 q8 \
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We! C- J, w0 ]! q) x, C
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
' T9 f8 D5 X# l* Bbalanced market."
8 ]/ Y! _) z* d; _; b! ?; ^4 h% ~
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
r+ J! _7 ^. w4 _# }: Iconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
0 v S6 {- d5 d& j3 N9 h. Jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued8 X3 C9 H, D7 O8 l% W
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core' L; j( w' ?$ Z0 R
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,4 h/ E" y; p0 ?
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record+ s- t9 f, L, q. P. l; r" L# d! X
breaking price appreciations. u: z0 k4 J" z
1 D0 M, i# v- B0 t# \6 N Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
) ]) H; ?( `- K6 xeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: d; ?1 k- g4 t4 O7 I# A: P6 j
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: \ c7 M' S; z* d; J: s
' t; v) `: u. ~. {( p
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 e; s5 {; z# r K
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
6 m6 \( ^6 Z; K) X( P$ zconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off# z$ K! X, t# L C) t* M" m3 B$ D
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.& k% B+ ?# q. N, G) j9 X' \* T
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- k9 c) z& n9 c5 v- \- `
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 q7 |* C8 g" D+ J) l7 q6 w9 Q7 @" ^
price appreciation when compared with 2005.* H# X+ s; r% C3 D$ T
9 y/ z- }$ {$ k6 p5 [7 W While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing4 ^/ \0 J% Y# n0 I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 Z% p* D" G# b1 z7 V- H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada0 x; G G3 L" D* t, y5 v
are markedly different than those found in the United States.% z4 Y. H, b9 r% b9 d
" A/ l% r( s: s6 U( W1 }: C" H Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 ^+ @- G6 p5 |American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( J- Y$ R7 p$ r
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 {* [7 }8 a0 ~# H! {relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general0 i$ I' l; S' L, Y0 f! J1 v
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
& ?8 j% T9 [. F4 Ddownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 l1 s+ j* O, G) n1 S
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ m; o$ ~; ~" a4 h- O% j }1 Y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ \# k" t+ ]. D, r9 J$ c5 E
$ D: v# u0 {% }. P2 q' F << R3 f: [9 D8 K0 \
REGIONAL SUMMARIES! o4 I$ d# G. j6 t( F
>>8 v: Y, N* i" Y$ A2 [
; J/ B* F( |0 ~6 O( O Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in( Q7 R1 E, [( ?0 s7 T1 @/ _
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate( b$ s. s* ]7 s9 I8 D
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
V9 Z! M* P* o' J' Y' d" Vlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of9 M: u9 y; d1 W5 \
renovations./ g3 I& V6 F7 |, N. K; P3 X1 g
' y! _ ]9 O4 L5 Q9 p The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
; s( @7 L) }3 X" m; r5 Vincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
8 ~8 i3 `. c' i) o1 s' J% \9 t Rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and. T t5 C8 m% I# ~' c) |
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
# R; Q0 A; O3 Y- {1 \* a& d; v8 r1 j0 {5 `. R+ C* ?
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: _: F5 q0 y$ r; Q. {3 V
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the2 s. ~; ]" Z# y) W5 M# `
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new+ x4 {: A! U! P. G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores4 i4 Y6 a) n$ Z# r8 c+ m( \
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ f" a* y3 q5 i3 n0 `3 z) Fand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.7 Q& {: S! T* o9 x9 y
+ P1 y4 O9 |' [4 ~* C2 |
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced( x9 y6 z/ Y. W: ]' }
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ J+ t7 s5 `+ Z4 b' p
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers2 {' [! ]; f1 S o
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian% I# n/ ? Y$ s: L+ B) t: y& ^+ }0 A
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, r2 J' G, V% p% Jbuyers with more options when looking for a home.; g$ c8 e/ M4 F, ]4 r
9 h0 w9 P. _5 V* r8 j
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, U6 Q% `/ `) V1 F4 [: d2 C
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' b- G5 X1 O/ v5 h& f
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" K; X5 {9 ^. Q' eas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
6 z' o9 M+ |( d7 l% `few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* D8 B" T2 o. P3 z7 p9 A; G
& z4 {3 V7 d* V# _
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; ?6 u' G% i$ r' W, }" m0 c" Mprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory3 Q8 |1 o6 R. x- V
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
1 v0 z5 W5 A; {* v0 pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, u* a0 Q) C0 Iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the, F0 {/ D, r( K4 f* k1 I# v; J
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before' L0 i; U9 o- p3 n5 w
making a purchase.( z' k4 V7 L0 i! `" `
/ f0 P& l; U3 W; d' |
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; s: I, t+ o/ o! m \
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 F( ~/ H0 ?. p9 ]7 `& {! ^
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 Z6 X9 h* g6 e$ G$ U
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
1 \6 C) `3 n6 @+ _4 Gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
0 r8 \8 j, g E% K9 ~# k6 pamenities.& n! Q; |6 w T9 |9 v
$ A+ a0 d0 ]. ^$ D1 R" ~
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 B, q" n: z$ b( z. B
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand0 Y3 E1 C' X% s3 X
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
: N) S# V3 R3 i. \; }" ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
8 C; b; p* w: {8 Y: @6 y* j, Y+ P, {0 Ldriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle) V, z7 r/ c: o7 A0 s; D
residence, rather than for investment.4 y5 J; S, U2 C4 K& p* \& Q* t3 q
: \$ H3 g" ^. ]2 Y; S7 s
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
+ F' @+ p/ v* q5 \8 Y3 a! jhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
% x! F% `2 a$ I, h: v. O7 kin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ z; u- i0 j( ]+ ]+ bconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization0 f$ s, A- m4 M" c$ f# Z' }9 S
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& {4 I# q3 E% a a* _5 K& V) v( ~the market.
! J2 j9 X9 z) T3 E0 \) Q9 X$ ?* s0 u3 u
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' V) U# z* z5 U5 |
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 c* }' R ]+ d, H) NAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
* R. ]8 T) z- bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 J5 D: E! o/ P! a
to the shortage of available inventory.: |1 q- A2 _. E/ v6 ~. |
8 n8 n7 ^7 H0 `1 g
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its7 E1 O6 r5 b0 U8 p0 f+ T; R
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( v% \. y1 h- }; R8 Hvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* Z6 }+ S/ U. b: l. n- Zstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
0 h8 [# f* P' q. S6 O
# j0 V6 e o8 W Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases! _9 s0 }: `* h3 N
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ ] J0 C1 M% N* O6 X+ v0 ~
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that0 A. C6 s7 U% }* N5 _8 \
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring: z: Q# D+ ?4 b. {* O, K$ C3 [
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer4 k5 _. r' m% ?' ]. p# d, { ^
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as/ T3 w, G6 g: C. ]* p# B3 y1 t
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
H* E' c' h* {4 r+ I0 [. S" N5 v4 s+ |7 ?% ?% s
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter2 {+ S+ s! \4 n' S3 v3 m' A0 Y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton3 l6 W# y% y2 c' O8 u
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 d8 V; F) @1 u1 Hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; e& M& I& K5 N% h/ Wincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve3 r4 h. R% }$ ~, N% g" S
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 s/ M# T1 N- n. O5 F. stowards the end of 2006.
4 _; `" K7 N% B
0 V4 m8 z' X4 ^+ h d. | jWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
! ]1 _% i5 `7 q5 Iinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- E% a0 K' R! ]5 @- y Fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse' [# M; F y+ n1 B$ _# C9 U
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( t* O8 d- L" j# F/ d2 _foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; B7 p8 t0 E! q# N- G2 ^$ {$ V
pressure on tight inventory levels.9 \; F- k; m; x9 G
( \, V% O0 g- t4 Y5 \: _
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. ], h5 q* V- H# a
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; C3 ]" w& B/ x4 B$ w
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;: D, y- d" b6 W2 f- q
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching; E7 [( X' J% d- f; n$ \6 Q
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- i4 z5 L, o4 m9 E. t, L, W, c' U2 `7 Y f: k4 h8 q
<<, A, g& r/ h1 z
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' i! `9 g- P# k
2 H. p# C+ O" d: a3 i0 S/ K -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Z% b8 S1 D- r5 U! J* z
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
0 ]0 P2 n( L; s4 h- d7 V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( R" ]8 A4 x$ A' W 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q34 }; M }; f$ y0 q9 t# {
Market Average Average % Change Average Average5 r7 ]6 s8 I2 U1 `' j S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# d* P" M" ?( E( ?4 A7 F
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 Y) J5 E2 ~% g W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Z. u: J% j* V$ u' H" d Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
" o; `/ j4 H1 ~& x+ J$ I -------------------------------------------------------------------------. e6 N) A" \5 y* z+ @
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
2 a$ q) b+ r- u, a1 c. { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* _8 y3 L0 y! A' c Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -2 T" K& ^9 ]: i0 ~5 d6 j+ _
------------------------------------------------------------------------- m$ S$ q% Q2 {3 _ j$ c
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3332 g/ `2 }1 |% Q1 J( k2 ^$ u- N6 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( O# [3 a: z- F5 i
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583+ a* K% C4 I! y. K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: `* E5 R, d( H# i" R6 o/ Q Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
0 i. p/ f; {8 x) a4 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------* ]+ A, d) G/ j
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
& O1 P! n7 `7 q; n4 x; ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ I" C; L4 v; H Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
2 j! l' N8 @; g+ _4 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ]5 ?. V; G }& `' G
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707) o) q' Q# l! m9 ?: l5 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
i6 P, s" \; v) U; O2 ]0 K6 f! y Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5002 D; B4 w/ q& C& E2 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% C: f3 K: I: } Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389$ Q, n! a4 F7 g, X- C! t" t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* \0 ^9 f9 m0 S" i% [1 T Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714! B. C! a% t* K2 d9 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: \& W! D8 B. g" l8 ]* f1 R
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
: D; b6 A; k4 R% ?( z | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* T+ B9 h, ]9 W# ~3 U" o5 ? Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0000 h1 t; C( J0 Q3 r1 z9 W6 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ m8 B! t+ _% ] D7 T' j
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 {" b9 i3 b- ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------: y0 x* ^, t4 h; x3 }. i% V
6 A' J) j5 l# C, } -------------------------------------------------------------
: ?: ?7 ~1 U$ s) X# z& S& L- C Standard Condominium
( O/ E* F/ @2 I1 C; y ------------------------------------------------------------- N$ V; c0 N, B% |$ S' Q
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo, U6 A/ X2 w8 N# q t
Market % Change Average Average % Change4 \5 }9 W9 a3 ?5 L# G* R
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 g' ~5 m' u4 G6 ]* `% V" Q6 E- c! l Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%3 }& ~1 G! Z6 z g2 O
-------------------------------------------------------------" {% H# k! ]5 ^- B8 P$ `
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0% E: x7 H: y0 Y/ H' O' T( c. K
-------------------------------------------------------------
' Q3 t& v8 b! I/ O5 C1 x. _ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
: R! c# h$ {* o' b -------------------------------------------------------------' v, e: K0 a# L2 @5 x
Saint John N/A - - N/A2 R+ v+ }3 F' t! s1 u
-------------------------------------------------------------% P7 m: C" S5 p' m! o2 e8 c
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
. P: a U `! x# L% i* S. a -------------------------------------------------------------
% i6 |' V) c; U) j5 ^3 T1 N4 s Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
8 i1 d% J! I4 F4 `! V -------------------------------------------------------------7 {% F) y" ^! F
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%7 n6 |6 C8 i! @0 R
-------------------------------------------------------------+ x3 k4 [: M# A. A3 \
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%7 Z4 Y, D* t/ ?* F( q
-------------------------------------------------------------1 x+ W+ X. m! w% |0 ^+ v# L
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
$ ~- v( g' p) I) S! I0 K* E -------------------------------------------------------------
0 Z# |0 @" E' _ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
& Q3 f8 w! {' v. x. q( ? -------------------------------------------------------------
. m# n- ]9 P O3 a! h( W Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
, b3 q7 A7 T# ] -------------------------------------------------------------' F0 Z2 C% P, v" x$ b- k
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ Z7 u, ]. y0 E -------------------------------------------------------------
( Z: }$ C8 A" k Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
8 r( q% F! Z8 s' R: {; a' e -------------------------------------------------------------
9 e, }/ Z; y3 h" M& M% b( y Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
2 l4 V9 o- Z" q9 e) {( E! t4 g4 m: | -------------------------------------------------------------
' c2 y! H. `6 X" z Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
3 e( t- M8 w( i: x -------------------------------------------------------------5 ?5 X9 n$ H6 {7 K* W
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%1 B) \7 }- V6 J; B! Y
-------------------------------------------------------------: E$ e! Q7 t' u6 n2 K
>>
5 w: F" B: @8 c1 i
, T* Y2 i- j! @* l+ | Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 ?$ E& G* ], x# U
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
: U3 l, x0 H' |John and Victoria.
7 D/ g% C& y3 ?9 p! s- j1 J1 ^! |0 W, Q5 r; m$ i- G
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 D& K" Q! e4 x/ r! K
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" F: w4 l; {# J$ ^3 mhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 s# ] O1 d4 ^
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
- `4 \3 P4 q. Btrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* u; K+ C4 Z/ @across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
t; u5 V1 W$ C: r1 l$ ]available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
x V" N& A: E3 ]( B. @8 `2 {) `figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
: R$ E& W( J: ]) p. h4 hversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
2 |1 h# Y6 @3 R4 P. k! ]November 15, 2006.1 O8 I: ?/ o4 K/ \
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 k, o' U5 T1 k, I: B' o6 s: r: ?
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
8 W5 ^3 \( b! H; M7 {4 o! k/ I8 {" M% hprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
$ H) d; D0 F$ u( q0 Z: J' `1 \available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|