埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2586|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 2 F; g9 v: k/ d0 {! |$ W% q
  y  ?) i4 ]; x  n/ U
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* R. L% o/ \& M4 G
3 Z) A) f" X6 B
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
3 }4 X1 T; d" r! w1 Dexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third- G! K/ J% V* o+ l
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 K) k' L3 {) e7 Z4 m& x/ A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ t) V! U# q) d5 Q( P9 Y* Sprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& E  ^. [: d6 M8 \. umore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,: k% I- M4 [& W. \" `1 S$ k: i
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal; H  D/ c* Q& M$ O
LePage Real Estate Services.1 R; m4 j. F+ R; }0 G  ^9 p

, }; n- ]# {! g2 s# w! ~9 C0 W8 x    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters, f, L' H' P% b' ~- {' U
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 s! P: q5 Z' ?0 Y4 \, \$ u
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) ]% s- ^: w: X
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the1 ]  ?7 i3 f  h' o$ V1 Q* z, V
residential real estate sector.
: _  o  H. j5 Z  G, B
( X! c9 t$ n* O4 \8 \3 O: y    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
3 A% N- n7 n0 i0 o. poccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& R9 E, o% c$ W, M; ?/ Y" wyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) x  _- X5 F( u
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( ^) }: c2 k1 I9 S
(+13.2%).
0 r- W0 f+ t0 l4 U* G5 Q  v, u0 w- c4 U
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
' n8 \3 \; {, q# }8 \8 i) l3 J3 Oduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ T! O. ?$ b9 V! w9 j- s
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! g5 E( T6 V3 s) {( |5 p+ Vpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,+ w! s' G* i/ b
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
0 n2 F5 `: ]  b1 A. D1 e"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
& X" p$ [- k, rwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
' }0 d0 t9 ]" e* a2 mbalanced market."
# R7 a0 f/ l. g9 m4 m
( f, k# f4 k8 U    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& L. x2 \  L! {+ z2 |% n
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; n1 U, c( V. y/ ~to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 o6 O4 P: X1 O" p% s/ O% g6 \1 vthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- \+ ]8 A# O+ X& x2 m: N+ w, Z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
+ @( b! @: Y" l$ r* t* lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
# v( w' l* m0 Vbreaking price appreciations.
& s; `) S+ r. h
0 w; o* `8 i9 D( M$ e9 J2 Y: |    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
  c: h8 o% ~7 [& }. weconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" [% ?% d) t9 w' m& u4 V
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 s4 q8 ?$ j1 O, E6 {5 u/ f% g( G- M( ~- e; N
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid* C" K4 z" A6 d4 T
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( r  D4 Q2 F# Y% v, I; G% fconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
% v9 z) ~9 X# f& x& Q2 V; Pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% ]( W' ^  o7 I
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
8 N1 D* \; S# b, h" |( D  Ngreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* s# S. }0 S3 h: T3 f* J( Cprice appreciation when compared with 2005., \$ l7 E  E6 ^  ^0 E
- o, ?: `: W7 F& y7 g
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( l. ~, b$ {% d, h4 K; N( q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and4 R- ]3 F* u" d+ J8 ~* F) G
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada# }" v+ g2 k4 V4 c
are markedly different than those found in the United States.( K2 i! w8 P$ e! q
, L/ ^) W! _) c' R, N7 Y
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the: G/ i) a; q3 o
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
* W+ w9 q- h/ s' ~; c6 ?favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the1 g) }. [0 Q; n& c7 A3 x+ s
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general9 S( B5 g7 Z3 W3 L. k: Y
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
" N; o7 K0 B/ r2 B4 odownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
% ?+ f, k  v0 W6 `1 raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" B& D# d0 `5 U; ], O' Omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.". V5 U- D' Y( H/ U) `! a9 k9 D
! ~2 k( D1 P, ~, u0 f5 |) o2 E! {
    <<
, o. t( a: G6 L% Q+ @& }                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES* r, r- f5 Z" J& F0 \! U+ B" a
    >>
( x; {5 A" f5 U4 h$ m, `+ Q2 W5 y3 n# K1 P" I2 t2 G9 A' h4 S
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in2 {& y# X, O+ [) }
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
6 L* g: o, t9 d* {of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' _' ~; a8 D9 |1 P- Rlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
3 U4 {8 Y- R1 X9 Y3 _$ \& prenovations.# J3 _* o5 m& O  q0 ]) h" f; ]

9 U" j2 A, c" M- J$ g. `- s' N& d( j    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 N( w1 J5 j1 l. Dincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
1 y+ e# g% e* w$ @compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and$ D4 ^1 m6 ?0 |. Q% `! W. W
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
4 K9 N" P$ G3 c+ `; p2 x) Y  Z; Z9 f* C8 ^
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& v+ l$ g7 s# e1 K" pslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 h- u1 z, z4 _9 k, S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& K7 S* O' F  l3 B+ a+ Y0 s  Z  p600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores! S/ q. k4 y+ C$ T8 x* m: x
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 ~) u  }/ `% e1 b: H5 q
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
) b& W) \$ F( i% I3 J+ H, b- s! B! U' z3 T$ k
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced" \* c2 j; f0 o  s  [( ^9 m
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their' Q5 Q1 P$ x; Z
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# z: ?2 j! S: t' Y6 I3 X2 E2 ~" W
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian/ J, E. a0 `8 f  d
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
5 ^3 G) p+ Q% a, }  m/ Bbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 o2 m  [( W: M# A' {% L' J+ U; G% k6 G, `/ Q( w
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
+ S9 p, T- K8 t7 |0 P* \among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
* z9 [$ {0 o+ V- |priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
' l. }: n* D# q! das some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last3 G( X& v& R+ o9 E/ g+ i+ c4 k4 e- L
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 j8 g" x4 Y( _0 w
& \: s+ |4 ~" s6 g" I
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
# V5 w; F/ s* Kprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& J- G& {3 a2 @4 J; E
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
- q: T" Z/ o6 ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, A- T$ l9 v. U5 u" b5 j- T" Q* Y+ Kwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 ^* Y; L2 d' }8 B8 Z( v: N  l  B6 H
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# c' T8 a7 s4 f* S" R# tmaking a purchase., W  q" q* R- T6 B# P* k8 R& i

3 @1 g' j' }$ z. `    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing: |4 }: Q0 Z9 i% f
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong% w; X7 a% q# E2 o, W8 }& @$ X
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city% k, l# D& g3 g7 v# @; X! C3 u
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting: z8 i; W( m1 [* A, U0 y; ]
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown, U- `0 B: q( x) r
amenities.; j' y: V/ I/ D+ Q
( }$ b: }: v7 B
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels& D2 I" x; x4 O% d. e
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 W: M! d% j8 b/ J3 Y6 o5 o& sacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has3 _! I7 A% r7 X/ k5 ?  N8 C
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( o8 v. S% X# L5 P% Udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 t& F7 |& a3 o3 @: I: presidence, rather than for investment.
8 L3 ]6 i; O0 f/ g# v# K% z2 n8 |1 R0 t; z
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) ]. F! g4 D& U  C  y+ r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted& o6 e) N4 t% B0 s( s
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer% W& a8 N; a4 R& z7 c
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization: A; h& T& K+ k9 ]! @, t
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 `% @1 U: Z3 T& j# I7 I
the market." _; f  _/ ~' b5 p5 P- s+ \
* B& |" q) M* K; e
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 Q* p; y- B! {$ }9 PJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 p$ R$ U7 M% E/ E5 x* b$ v; AAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ L4 n* {6 ^: f/ ~; k  M3 x
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due. d8 w* U# p8 k
to the shortage of available inventory.
" N* e! x: o4 W* R9 i- l; Q
  A, ~) _; x6 W1 H4 R' d  m' `* T    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& r" z, R: W/ c9 g! Y
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ b& R2 t9 i* E( ?' T) nvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses$ H0 W7 @6 C1 ^5 W3 u% e4 z) Z3 S
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.. R. u" q6 |  g! {

0 v3 z/ l* N. T9 b# `    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases4 T& T: ~8 \' S6 C4 }. J( ^
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low% R2 \2 @1 e$ g
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" H3 e1 v7 Q; `8 [  O3 Y% x9 [6 Opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
( m  |/ P* T* O; a% g+ Sprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
# b+ _+ t" U3 h: kseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
# D# A. K& F3 _  o/ K$ i, }buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

( j, b. }' c* w3 j1 x' b6 [
7 U/ s! x9 p8 A    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter. S* _4 M2 B8 H7 a+ j/ N
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton5 L1 K1 C9 S* Y2 o$ @; m
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
6 o0 n# B2 y& D0 `6 Q/ e3 s5 p# M- Rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
. R$ B6 P8 W- x* W- ^increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
2 W! O( X" n# Ein the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly6 w8 N5 G) H: ^5 M/ C
towards the end of 2006.
    . _, e, ]1 y& `' u1 j

  k) M7 H1 ?; f' c: m5 `While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
' N3 H  r5 X. v5 w4 ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable  |1 _" M: a' }% k# c8 W0 M
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
  ^/ S0 l$ |! z9 v/ g0 Q& F% c* ]6 fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
: S* A5 p* K5 e7 Uforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 Z2 N5 S+ V5 q" O9 N7 k5 k
pressure on tight inventory levels.+ \! |. x. K6 ^; u  t; j7 n9 w
" V8 B( D( Q1 {! u9 n
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
* k' m8 _5 d( |( z0 Vfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) R. ~( J: w' ^5 s. J. _4 \into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! a. \5 }/ K  i8 u
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
6 e, \4 ]' y2 Z) e# `6 w0 `" K/ Sfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; z2 x2 y$ k) M- f) l
! u) C0 m+ J: o# k2 O: c    <<; _; Q; l4 C; H9 d
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 g1 W* N: T: y

: V) {$ L4 A0 t2 x) z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 B" E, m6 V5 r0 b                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey4 A, ^6 q2 z# Y% e, T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Y/ }0 o5 u3 P, o' x* F6 g; A                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3( R% u! ^& J: C* ?  I
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
$ ]% y0 A2 g) |3 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& Q( W1 ~; [3 R8 I6 l
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000# P; a; ^- b; d4 G/ n' u+ l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; X0 q6 F+ ~0 |( T) F4 @4 \
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
8 S4 q! V2 [5 ^  {9 T3 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* R+ ^/ s+ Y  a( e/ ?
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000" @+ w- f* ]) G' d9 H  j+ g3 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" `9 m5 m& I9 ?; w8 o% c9 a3 t' z
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( M9 Z" a7 v# r5 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 e  `: B& _6 \1 P7 S& J9 \* T
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
. f/ q2 W* G) C$ G7 C! s5 x  F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ i8 i. k% Z! Y+ p    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583" t2 R8 w: E) C9 s5 ^6 b& d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: p; D* }! N9 }. c0 i* \    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
% y3 H0 D' H- w. |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' f; ?: H4 J; U6 g1 T    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
. O/ u5 z% J9 I& l9 b+ ]5 h  ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 x! _% W% J' y. M6 b2 b    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766# f3 A* P2 z0 Q3 }$ i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  a! i4 Q2 S# P4 [    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707; w3 y2 j7 j& I  i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  x6 D" N  e0 ~6 I. I! H6 g    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500$ i5 F# Q$ I6 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ p; s1 L5 B5 Q. T$ o    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
7 ]* z' q  w! T- l' b1 M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 [) T/ V/ W3 A7 d$ W( L+ |6 d1 R
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
0 u+ L4 c4 A4 ^& Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 @" z, {2 a; ^6 k' }
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
: W  }8 l6 ~' Q8 n% N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, E  O. n' K, ^6 p4 s8 x' a* w
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
! H8 Q# ]- J9 e4 i5 g8 }, O6 e- r: L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ f' F# H# X; y, l- m6 t* n
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860/ O' p" M) h5 n# ~3 Y( p9 P- {: D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. X% V, v2 W9 F6 L  c- F- Q% o: i+ @, R( H" d
    -------------------------------------------------------------: P' Q; r! o0 z0 q1 u9 O
                               Standard Condominium/ k% Q, x1 h$ g# m7 K- q% F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( y9 h# p/ l; m! I2 D3 l4 h                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo, L  A8 _% A) J. E
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change: U3 C- Y* }& R, T3 }. A
    -------------------------------------------------------------& b  r  }/ u" P7 U  V
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
6 q3 }; X( K5 e2 M. X- ?; x: j    -------------------------------------------------------------3 Q0 x: M" u5 N2 Q% E7 h
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
7 U( G2 _- }) H% O$ i2 y    -------------------------------------------------------------( |4 ^& ~, v* q' B' ~* H: P
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
. F9 H8 x0 t% g    -------------------------------------------------------------. t6 C* _: p, E. L& W4 Q1 e# s1 b
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A" [8 |( y, ?; I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! }0 v  b9 r* h5 B9 |/ H* H6 \    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%3 \1 R3 H/ E, Z# S
    -------------------------------------------------------------. m, f7 v; P- k7 h7 g; ~+ |# Y0 F
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%. l7 n+ C3 P+ `+ c. R) [8 c7 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 o" y/ [* b. Z. p: m, d5 I0 o
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
6 e  F- X5 n5 j    -------------------------------------------------------------% ?+ a8 @$ @; C$ v& l3 ^( f
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%: _2 y1 Y% P& Q4 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ w8 I  L0 N$ h
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
: {& B, g, R* [3 A( L3 d    -------------------------------------------------------------5 z* y' d% m; u8 |  {) }
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
0 A+ H; G- q3 Z" y( i8 w" x    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 M: D: A' V. k( L    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%- w  z' h- d! ^) R  Z+ |; f
    -------------------------------------------------------------& r3 ?5 i5 O* L* L
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
  f4 ]# ~. G0 }    -------------------------------------------------------------! x5 N& A9 f/ s) T  [2 v
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%3 i6 y8 U  J7 c" {5 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------& I7 Q3 j* c8 z/ W" S  v  P# e( l! i
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
5 Y0 C* C) f. p; K! K0 Q, {$ b    -------------------------------------------------------------  [& s: p9 j( O  B% S% G
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
+ r' x; `0 v) b# \" K6 E6 `    -------------------------------------------------------------
- o* \) t7 u; b    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
$ J6 S% n( C/ C* W' ~# H    -------------------------------------------------------------8 ?. S% a  g! m9 V$ D) W
    >>
( L" _( ~3 R6 e4 {  A# y* S- L9 L4 k1 n
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined3 ~4 ?. G* B5 g6 R5 W
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
( f% D' V# b7 t3 V) d. h+ BJohn and Victoria.4 a6 \$ l$ b& G( x
5 ^0 s7 ?: M: m9 o( X3 k
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most% ~- d; P9 u8 V6 _" m( ?
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of8 I, X$ Z- U! U* ^/ x
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- I7 @, p) X( f) V1 g2 B+ o9 [# k, [
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price! l" B5 J" K$ \1 m0 \3 T
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities4 ~. J3 W9 B  x  o  L
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! u& W5 }: c5 O; G! u. S5 savailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 j6 x6 e: F( S$ @$ |0 }6 yfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% G( l+ x) v" j8 _2 A
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
- ^! h/ J: f; |November 15, 2006.
8 e/ R1 f" U# t: f    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
1 V, E8 Z" O3 w! K% Cfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
. r; B6 k- a1 ~' ]1 R. U% A2 iprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
0 ^- y3 a2 Z& vavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-25 11:38 , Processed in 0.071090 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表