 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
& Z; m/ s' @7 X* |( W- [. O7 E% ]
+ N% D) J4 v9 o$ |* T. s% G" d- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -' [ f- q* _+ B) a. @4 H5 x$ F+ @
( J/ h- M/ j: i( r* { TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 |- Y1 \7 b; _( ` }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
+ [! m9 O( l" F* T ], `; ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ @; X a- V/ o" A; [ Y
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# }3 q! ^! N+ T( rprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 k2 O( A3 Z" X3 X. C$ p4 Wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 Z" R9 g/ ?8 g* k. k l6 l
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 `% U8 E8 Z# D. o5 ALePage Real Estate Services.
# N8 p2 E+ y9 _1 `/ b3 s/ b( s- d- A, j$ O: K! v/ R$ r$ l: j
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! L7 E, A/ b, V2 N
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: f& h2 J7 O3 ^4 t( W" B
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
% Y6 U8 r H6 U/ Z0 isound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the8 a" z! J5 U& G' U3 @8 K% H
residential real estate sector.
8 f: J" D+ n' [; f' Z
7 a \3 M1 H' s: r# ~ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ s/ y" \) T( x/ C* D3 Y1 B% I
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; V* F# a8 @9 gyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562; k4 t* p, v1 ]
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
$ I" U0 H$ Y! l2 f+ C3 r(+13.2%).
& T' E% d K3 A+ u7 g+ W0 \) ~# B7 p
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 u. I2 w. k5 |" l- |. t6 J* a
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
& W+ y6 i/ o& L' W0 q4 D" qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 `8 P+ @! h6 @' [+ e) M
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ T/ h! f4 W& T' C3 o* A" v" Fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 Y0 ^/ t; x9 n/ G _8 A"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 V( @1 v& ^2 n: M
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, N1 u# \ V o* p$ ubalanced market."
, e+ X& R& @* I4 x: c3 F; V
# h8 Q& T/ ^% v5 j' S* } Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
# k! ?0 o, w0 x! Kconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) H5 l) G% @& M+ S
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued9 n5 n# t0 p2 s2 _! T& [
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! J9 x! A6 K' I& }% V7 W4 k4 Menergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,7 `2 z% I1 T' ^0 t" h( G8 q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record3 E/ F) ^: H$ o: g& f s
breaking price appreciations., i8 G! D" ^6 d1 J. S3 C
1 U/ n1 A+ m* B$ t9 U& [1 ^' y7 z
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
# K# F! Y% U$ _economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the6 n; v4 G+ l0 ~' n: g- O8 R
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 u7 J( Z. ]. Z" |* \% Y+ V$ ?
1 M$ a) ]3 o, @
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid8 t2 s/ H+ O9 |2 U3 \8 f" k
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: _5 j0 H# b" L3 F
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off& A1 x, @$ a0 m( k: c7 D, W9 M
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 w+ G0 M0 S5 ^2 ~In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" F% \, k5 g% z' S& ~2 N) L
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 h; U- j5 N* p5 s; |4 D$ H2 |5 Fprice appreciation when compared with 2005." @$ e9 r" C W0 ?9 U% _
: `8 D' Q5 V- } While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) e# ? n. g4 A3 Pmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; _6 i* ^4 m0 w& G& [$ }, Z' Sfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, |' u0 B* k# Y0 M
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 k X& N. `7 |: ~9 S4 [6 D5 ]8 i7 G2 l B/ h# K
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
% _' k5 ]- a5 V3 C0 s! N) }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 x. N# |7 ~% U# e! R' {favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the5 a2 F% Z) Y! ~8 B" M i E I
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
" j) C+ ]/ G# D2 v; i# aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the- B( B+ a2 ^: d! D0 ^
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 Z. m, s/ o; a' B3 o zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 S/ S& n5 D @3 W8 F+ q
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
) m7 W( i+ S; U* r3 u4 u* \1 ~* h9 t3 v9 H, ^ @& M3 K( r% F+ U
<<
: N& b8 P! k" ~1 Q& p7 c0 Q REGIONAL SUMMARIES1 |) H+ ~: T+ G7 B9 X3 F* B3 H
>>
& m" w* B" j0 F- v
3 f) @% o3 g8 J3 q' t. `: e; p; A Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
9 n- v6 i* _7 }! dHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 i: A+ {9 ]* w% H* z3 B( Mof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
8 g9 {. }8 w6 {: z) mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& T+ U. g" O. K+ xrenovations.+ j2 E+ w# f, [+ `5 L& Z* G
- v. z- ]. O: @+ P4 s* q4 D1 s The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; v, o0 j' w! F) `1 n6 N2 m
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation& H: w% t; c5 F3 X' }( b
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and2 V X& ` d) Y0 ?& u3 [& ], T
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.0 ^+ b6 T& R1 i) n1 N) V
1 o/ P( P4 A4 C. C
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 V' b6 J" @! p* N
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
& R. p4 T4 e/ Aquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
3 v8 V' v) Q: o5 g* o! h600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores/ k9 R) O5 r/ f, l' k" y
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
( X8 L: R8 }+ A9 ?! Jand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: H1 ?& F0 ]% ?! j0 W3 V- j' d) z, E4 U0 c
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 Z. A# C V# }$ f
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ R8 |6 h: s* t( J2 t1 P2 W
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# p0 R& k Q: m, W. R- u: \7 F, P- B
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: S; }3 @5 y' ^. C; ^( T% w
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ U1 u) Z9 R1 [
buyers with more options when looking for a home.$ ~/ H, D) ?, }2 N
, y# {6 L! t K" b) _/ K
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly g+ `: ^$ m# M/ o$ W! R/ I
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# s0 k- h+ p+ Z0 Vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 p# z/ @3 j3 g% A5 Cas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
" w9 M* d/ f: m" z% O. gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; e Q" x( f+ l8 j" {0 a' U
. I2 H" V- R" Z6 N1 J1 J/ @
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 c8 g' L8 O+ m, U! ^8 O+ cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory8 L, S5 c! W* y. q: \0 Y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
; o. c+ e t& ^3 n: }first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 e% D$ E* j7 T9 J" bwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
3 A1 D# E7 W1 j9 x% g0 spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( v! \/ f" m% d1 |5 f+ Nmaking a purchase.; Q' R% h. Q1 N4 ~3 I9 K4 n- x
3 \- x* z: Q' y* }$ y Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing) l. R4 B; y' X# X% e' F& h
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 Z3 Y* X* q! T$ b6 a7 V7 K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) p" S8 H; _& Vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 ^0 _ n- o" S+ B9 O& w: m7 Cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown5 V, ]1 j* |& `7 G9 q
amenities.; W% G" J; f$ ^9 c
R7 O9 z4 l! d" U+ P0 Y4 d
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 w* }+ n7 A% e1 I
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand; g( R9 f3 s+ n/ y4 w, Z3 n# X
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has- u" f$ x- Z' j r% T" U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 G- ], I A8 w& L9 ]
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; p" b2 G' f, L3 j( [* {4 ^residence, rather than for investment.
+ H1 Z9 ? X, O9 W0 F3 l
, ?( d8 h4 j3 u% z/ W4 e3 ` The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" w5 U. D" N0 ?! I7 ^) d: j: Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
4 M" Y: T, {# H2 V! {: x8 G/ min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer7 v' o3 o9 H- V. z( V! p% K$ S# J0 i
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
: y6 [/ |- u% B! N8 ~9 Rrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' a. g2 I( Y, @' D& I4 l+ L t) r' ]7 Dthe market.
& b6 f, n$ r: k* R
' [! ~- z- s9 X' k, R. s In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
; }7 Y( R) D& F' A, f- Q2 I' nJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 g* p. v2 Z& n7 |6 P: U# o% RAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
$ U# [6 k" |( h5 K: y6 Xmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ [8 d" |+ Q+ _8 e" T
to the shortage of available inventory.4 ?- H+ f2 l9 K$ o: F- _- Z
- [4 _8 m4 D1 H+ I' i' R4 W
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( P4 [" e9 P$ j) q+ o
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
. X1 h( J: K4 }5 r# ]! y. qvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( ]1 @% k5 G) A, Q) {% b- X
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
+ }6 B6 s& H! \# I U1 A$ s( @$ q1 M4 A( r- r. U, S" ?/ ?
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 x8 P0 s- k2 t! R( Q X0 \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low4 g$ T; `6 @) D& J; Q* a
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ m! Y* I2 @' B @( J2 j6 lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring* X7 X8 ]$ b& ]- [$ `/ L: @0 @: s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer w" x$ s' g, c# V) t! U
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, V3 B. r3 }+ N: t% n, q# l6 Z0 N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# |# \0 @( d4 ~. s* \. {9 j- `; O8 @" d. u5 A" {) ?
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 `" I+ G6 O2 z" |1 H
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# \3 Y. S& r6 jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,& N( s+ }" X' `8 a1 _& A
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' m7 K& Q; m5 z/ e, X2 E2 l' C
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve& o3 F4 G% G g* w5 j$ B
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 J8 [: ]) _% |: _! @0 Jtowards the end of 2006.
/ p& u. u3 m- X6 ^5 b! J9 j; y! c+ w$ R$ c5 E7 ?- d
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ i# P* P: q. y( m/ P
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- u n5 v% { u4 pto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, M& [% z2 u% i" L4 W2 p
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to2 U. U2 |. N) N# n
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
$ Q, c0 E7 |: S7 }5 dpressure on tight inventory levels. Z6 Y: p4 i) m- H& s: P2 ?) `
! X5 G1 [5 i) j8 W$ `7 A8 o Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: F7 k! A, S/ t& U7 k8 E2 z, g) F
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, K+ s [7 e& [$ G
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
' o& Z' O0 s0 Cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 O5 F' n+ w8 Z( {% G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% z& K. i" O' \* {
) p: }3 s) \3 ^
<<
7 o/ ]% d) Q' y& t5 t/ d Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
9 l7 [& o' D; I' C
# L: A/ {) e1 o8 H" l -------------------------------------------------------------------------, s- o, l( ~9 V) k) I
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey- o8 w# c" A8 N4 H3 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% {5 t4 R% \0 r
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
+ ?8 {& S+ E6 u; @- {) U c Market Average Average % Change Average Average& {8 c/ Q- D% C" u: o; Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ F# W+ d4 W; ^& Y9 J) }6 r
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000- i5 {4 E3 g! P) g J h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% \: `/ i' L9 @7 {/ Y! i7 ^
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
0 w& y% e- F4 C. s -------------------------------------------------------------------------* }' k# k, j4 [' c3 m5 [; t6 R4 {! x6 H
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
1 B4 G0 P, W- H% x5 w5 M5 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ^. ?0 G1 O" y6 h# I
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
1 l, O& ~( P4 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 R |* z9 j D: M( y' G) x% J St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
; }' L) Q% ~ }6 [/ I0 z, z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 x+ D, D& |/ N) F- H0 _1 P Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583/ b% u2 I( N6 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 l3 O* U% ^+ L$ W. ~, L
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
2 ~6 X% n. a* r8 p0 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ N5 C! C' { v4 T+ G: T
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250! ?8 C4 x8 {( C2 q" }) J5 D" x- I( @) l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. K/ A; c% x- b
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7661 p' ? o N" h+ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* L& E4 C" p" W1 _- f4 Z
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707% x! i9 H7 O7 k. L/ Z$ j6 H. T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 I) \" I+ ~* M$ @& k4 G8 y Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
$ z* c2 ^1 e) b' g( F: Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 J2 o: Z* Y- T
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
: n! J3 p' P; Z2 c* w -------------------------------------------------------------------------- q/ `% u! o0 T
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# L" ]* Y2 b" `, Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 E O* h+ N* D5 A3 t9 _6 r. V Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
' y9 j& h4 G3 |* b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 l4 f% _7 _* B& O Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
& n4 R( u6 j9 v# \+ K/ Y; | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- T0 Y4 S1 b: F+ b2 N) `4 S8 {
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860; `$ Q& C! Q6 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 E, p: o& f7 K3 F& V5 i
- q" m6 i. H r8 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
. o Y3 N, Z' a$ ` Standard Condominium4 P4 Q3 l- J4 i. t3 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------% p) l( _# d0 ^3 x
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
/ Y; S- A, w0 h6 Y) O. m+ b3 q Market % Change Average Average % Change
) D2 t& K) B% D' k -------------------------------------------------------------
. T" s- G- O: W2 R [: s Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%! R3 S" V) c7 T& A. B* m0 ~4 m
-------------------------------------------------------------
: s/ `1 n' C- ]4 X; L- M* L Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%6 d5 [( Y$ H% d5 N' O5 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------. q% |& @9 Z) J1 b$ Z& K* i
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
1 x* Q2 |' S2 D: S0 d -------------------------------------------------------------
' D0 C9 s5 Q U l" ~; K. \3 i Saint John N/A - - N/A
# G5 I# a* Z6 ^; n& `7 x' J -------------------------------------------------------------; G3 L3 n9 q3 c! t% Z. k
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%5 C/ l& a& L% B& O5 E
-------------------------------------------------------------
: ]! J0 W4 j1 P1 R. U# x6 F( J Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%% {8 f% _. t5 X$ h' d
-------------------------------------------------------------" u+ L9 j+ R( ~3 X0 v) N6 O
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%" e8 Z5 s w- ^: I% l
-------------------------------------------------------------+ g+ p' x9 j$ c$ `; F4 n
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
7 z f! N8 h& r, y6 }: l -------------------------------------------------------------$ q; p5 q/ a+ h6 U' ~ o0 k
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
( o M" |" N1 r -------------------------------------------------------------
+ x/ [' g* n0 B& t K7 K7 J Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
2 q0 Q% \: A. X7 V" F+ D -------------------------------------------------------------
9 v8 S' w5 l* x/ Z8 I0 D Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%% X9 d5 u6 R) N4 O2 u- P4 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------2 N8 P0 l { S2 \ ?
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%- o: `5 X7 V6 R7 a4 L
-------------------------------------------------------------+ x t- l' G+ f$ M
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%- J0 e9 F( r3 v" b3 U7 y
-------------------------------------------------------------9 Z) E, a N5 ^8 \+ t7 W
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%- l; p @0 |- m2 f: x' W
-------------------------------------------------------------
; t7 W" L; M2 \" |' |! {9 L) [ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1% H7 L/ g3 D: i4 m" \+ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------$ p" s" V. j9 N f+ O
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 ]0 S P" t2 A8 O( \% m7 J -------------------------------------------------------------8 o; d) i6 h0 t, s
>>
% @, O4 R( [3 B# y1 s F. P
5 x' G# C, o# T u) Z Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
P7 K, t$ S8 qin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' W( L9 k; o; W* I
John and Victoria.1 I" m1 ~$ E! ~
! D, A' b8 ]. D/ k9 Y9 x The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( l5 A+ p/ ?* b0 l. I* u) W2 @) ncomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
k# D; c; v4 O% k8 Fhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
9 I" c# t' y7 g( c W3 `. Z" rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
: b0 }9 o/ N1 Dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ O, p4 n# t6 C" z3 @3 v5 X7 Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" n4 d1 ^- b# h- t$ _/ Lavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
: _+ c; n5 H6 `& a# q Lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 N( k7 h% M# B; E" F, Rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ L# V5 F) v. j z3 z# MNovember 15, 2006.
0 s' Q; U4 b2 @4 T9 O% p$ e( `/ O Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 W8 j Z# I" x% N5 F/ E9 v
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 k1 p q& A! S; A5 X9 ^
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is6 p/ Q0 i+ L, @3 M8 ^
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|