 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
6 e' h6 @; n, d( Q( a2 f5 u" c1 H' Q: b
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
7 O1 K5 i; D% w' e; f3 A
2 i- i/ P8 u* L( j, { N TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
: z+ u( a9 q1 j2 @* J0 jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ h; p; Q A" A- Y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ R5 a) `/ S/ @" x8 H& c, R
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, e! i; R1 s, a& \* t5 Dprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
% V# n, @+ r6 V& zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,. @) T( j2 S& I" F+ a1 @' a
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. ?& r* {1 y5 x% Q# ` C! X- X
LePage Real Estate Services., U. G+ p" w% Q* r" j' I2 z
0 G1 {8 k* I4 c* W3 W/ N% s
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters6 a! P5 M& C' ?$ x k/ I
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* U4 V! T. a: Z( u& q
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
9 t4 @. b& {: Y9 n) q3 B4 Osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the6 X+ b0 C8 U, Z9 z4 m6 S1 r
residential real estate sector.
% o/ a& f% P$ ~# j7 t( T f- s y3 h& H9 A" R
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation' l4 {4 K! e# t7 i6 b; H
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) A+ w( G8 J! g
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
0 N8 }: l/ y& u# z8 e(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 V( @, ^7 y; W$ O7 [% |* n& _(+13.2%).: a# l& {! w3 v3 w$ Z# v
7 A4 L& c4 s8 @9 { "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth+ ^' d) X* x0 P# m6 l r; O8 M8 X
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! g. t \7 I; X
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( K2 N: Z' r, Lpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
; {2 r" k8 p. H S% q8 Z6 X0 `: F. E1 h' Bpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.; i% `* u" l/ {; t
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
* D+ n* l( n9 @3 twelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy% l: S# ]& ?' N& s- Z; Y5 L
balanced market."6 Y- P# n" d9 Y3 c
6 r6 `. s' S. r% ^
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
8 P+ B& `% K/ v0 T( e7 Bconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" }' e" t3 Q) X0 h5 c! w3 @
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 C& v8 r) I u5 W9 \3 X- S. r
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core4 |6 G( e" f4 L
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
- T* {* j/ \. `* j6 d. kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record# N- K6 g: n' h4 s5 W
breaking price appreciations.! w. c1 H# W4 k! P6 `
G W6 H- @# u2 j5 n# l8 {& d
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
7 k4 c+ j9 d7 a9 s+ neconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( ?1 J6 [' U) r: r) T4 ^( n; C
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.8 s$ y/ S- O' j- D$ G
9 n% _# C2 W7 ^
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 a7 w: N$ D6 q* E4 m8 A3 q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer6 p! w% O% o0 H# x/ l
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
4 S) F: }+ G3 P8 d, W yslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ m+ |$ i9 k7 o3 A0 X; C- m! j
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers8 M8 ^% }# O) r" c) Q7 @
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of: X: K g1 k' e z
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
4 e7 `$ w, O/ a2 b6 X$ J0 V) y5 \" x1 m' d: ]& a5 G
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
0 G5 [' B% o" l; a/ Pmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 |2 j+ s n- \' c |financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, K3 x d, c' m5 Z9 M1 s. w4 v% z& aare markedly different than those found in the United States.
5 Z# R0 q3 m! V
2 q- O" K# G; A1 l Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 P2 B$ f* B# x oAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
6 z3 T8 i% a. P' kfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
1 g3 y) M) p Z9 w7 C. w* k: [relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general% x! n4 r; N, b5 w! ^) U, L
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) X4 H3 O! ] Idownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% `% q" @" s. N, Q' k8 ?
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 ~1 e( M- } n) Kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 U3 D" Z. ^- z
j: C% l5 w* b <<
9 m7 v4 q; B6 N3 i+ S REGIONAL SUMMARIES3 f/ F5 K0 M# \' b
>>8 T, r& O7 H, Z! i4 ]2 L/ N ]
* @) G2 u2 A! R9 X) b, M
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in m- \) ~: [8 F! V$ G1 ^, p+ D
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 I- \ P# F7 W3 \of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 a4 a2 B. q2 h0 R% \; b! A
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- O2 ]% P* y% H( d3 R
renovations.1 k6 d& X8 r& F7 ]) m h3 N
# d" U' F9 |# m8 r: P$ J4 p3 _
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
" ?8 c$ G& ], M4 ~increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
6 T" l8 O x% u. j+ Ccompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: R' g% ]9 S+ YSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( l, z& t& M7 E
1 k( y0 c8 y$ ^, R
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 X: q% h9 J3 R- W. R/ q
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the0 j+ C6 v/ a8 n8 y
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
! u$ J* Q6 g6 p3 e L q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 j$ Q* d: i" D9 L0 T1 i4 r4 R! R
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes, R# [# r' C0 H+ W; T/ t" T
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
1 x# U. t/ B/ Y T2 v: ]8 @+ N0 t1 j3 `% q7 ]- N" S7 y9 P4 @! i
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
2 ~0 _! Z7 w, E' Vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
6 N: G6 _2 ^ o3 Phomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. B& e5 T; P, ]. {6 g i
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
" A% _6 i3 ^. `: g7 rdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing8 |3 `# D2 t1 L7 ?+ R& Q" X0 s! N
buyers with more options when looking for a home.' {: G0 }8 V+ n: c) G
6 L3 X+ m z7 ?- X
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly# a9 V" C& h; N7 |& i t! f: w
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 C5 Z* j; n1 Z* M0 \$ T8 Cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ h1 X; ?- u+ v8 l0 c2 ^; ], Y) has some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 `7 i5 v6 ~( ^" y* @1 W; a% T! A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.: F+ b: p$ [& R' O/ q# s0 q# _
9 M3 z, y7 [9 T/ g0 P t3 h Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 i% k* ` ?. `: i* ^/ U- j; Q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory4 o$ N5 r# [; W {( Y# n3 v: J
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting0 ]* o1 b( u1 H1 ]6 J' _$ t
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
% w6 w! t; P! x$ R$ D, S' lwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
3 K9 q& t% m; u, W, E2 a8 ipressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" i+ G4 J6 b/ Z1 i) @making a purchase.
[% \& @9 Y/ a! J5 C+ M( c6 [% a# Q+ T& K' ]
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
( v3 f8 X& L* S Smarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong1 B, ^( A! b) H( ]2 s, u7 G6 W
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
' `" M* Y, E$ `. v/ L# q: r- A+ [centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting- i7 E8 ?5 l/ W* M; Z, }8 @
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
* i4 x! |# Z4 \4 ^) F9 u4 l0 Tamenities.0 S* j4 q2 t( u- {& E+ p
# {$ L6 j) u7 M# k, ]( U! M
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels! |% g/ T7 M8 [& ^ `
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* X: C2 W+ \: ?
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 D- U/ V1 `( m- @- X3 g9 zcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ y, n# N7 S: ?( ^1 udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
# q* Z x0 h: u# Lresidence, rather than for investment." [" N2 A/ D k7 b2 D. v$ U6 a
* e: J& l2 [8 _2 I* Z" G
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. @9 K" U- C# p7 l4 X
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 ?- f3 F" }3 g" P: `& S0 rin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 T+ [9 n% ]/ z* d5 q$ J
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& ]) Y: ?" ?6 S
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* Z1 L% @, l2 d2 u$ x3 I7 Kthe market.
7 S! a5 \. J: s( D2 n: l0 g Z$ E5 \- g4 M1 |
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through% z! A! Y) l' L& Y8 K% O
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In1 l3 ?2 {9 [' D) s7 J D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring3 k- L, @$ I( N& @
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
/ @" e7 q: o2 _" l0 O6 Tto the shortage of available inventory.
5 q! ~/ G1 ~ t+ i# L- Z" r @+ R2 w2 c) u; o9 H+ j
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
6 D* v% ^3 k2 p; J2 [momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
; | y! Q& v; T" D. |vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
3 S# {* N9 }5 g0 e5 P* Gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 V2 I2 O1 Q( C: a
+ h* y9 t* \2 n; D
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
* W8 K- F3 x6 \' A/ U9 n* Q( Sin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ |. w/ r" p6 y: t1 lunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ K9 x+ U' j! m/ c/ bpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
' A8 Y9 d# V( x# Hprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- |7 }) Y {5 i/ }0 D9 k6 P; Mseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
0 T9 T9 W2 F% M. g3 A5 Gbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.: O/ Y9 a5 v4 A& o
: l8 ?7 S( {0 v* m6 F5 F: D
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; K) P( \3 ?( Oas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton2 f( E4 m# ^& @* E
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
0 y8 |6 l) X, C1 Hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
6 [: z0 z0 p2 g9 q( Cincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* q# A) }) B. {. }; D
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
. y4 ]0 S! k% F* u" n# Atowards the end of 2006. / e7 h# |& }$ U
# W8 K- \0 U1 m( ^0 a" O# k
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of, Y% H. ~: V) R2 C5 }7 c0 a$ a) C. @
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ R1 \& C6 w/ B. r4 Ito meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse+ V) P9 |9 g- t+ o! s( X% K
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- g V& {: x* U4 [foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added3 P( X! j- Q+ P4 R' L7 _
pressure on tight inventory levels.
3 x0 W) \4 w' X# _2 }7 H* Q
! M- O+ {1 z: S Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
/ I z7 b% s" Ofundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people% B* f' A2 Z( @4 S, U s
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;6 _( A1 @% I' r' t E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching% O. K) j; a2 \. b- e
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.4 ?2 l; I8 {$ @- r+ w
" ?& ]! J0 Z6 {) M$ b' n6 X$ _, ]: t <<
9 u' e+ w9 C' v: v Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006- r4 ?5 d; C( E" B# ~
* Z+ Z% T& n% B4 o! I2 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ U0 ?5 @; ?; ?' g; W Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
4 u( X$ h; h# r c! V; c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* @' B; A7 T8 i6 n 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
& a/ d2 u8 T$ c9 S; J/ [) w4 k Market Average Average % Change Average Average
) K& w C- i" z -------------------------------------------------------------------------, S8 n$ t% }) v( h
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0005 F( G) P. Z: r( F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, k& P* z1 H- j1 [ Z
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" U( R) U& }# \. D8 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ \+ D( p( _1 S Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 V2 U0 _! y4 S4 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 A4 s* e( Q3 u' K4 C) [2 N Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - - ?! b/ P6 U5 }- O* I8 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& b0 @: G* X( P: Z b
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
% s& t. C- n7 k+ b6 {% g) A" u -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ ~! p( U5 v: r' k; X5 r
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
1 L. |7 P9 _$ u9 v& e. L P -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Z9 w7 z5 M5 i9 H* C0 ^
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1854 |% N: b6 U/ v. K# v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! U: ^ H6 T, T- Q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250& c% \; e- q% x2 B8 g& Y, f5 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 u4 l% c% l: c" A8 m/ h: F) a( c- N
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: A+ r2 g9 T: O% }* H' ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------& Y+ H) V, {, w' S8 M$ L
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
1 A: n* ~2 }' M/ W* h% F -------------------------------------------------------------------------( Q# ^0 X4 H* M0 r. _, H$ @4 b
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500; _! S/ t6 G6 L r, A, i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 _# s% f* t! `* l6 Z: j0 W! A) u
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389* @2 A2 A9 f" f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 U$ S: v: H r% t
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
6 v2 ~; J, R n: d: P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ C9 u, M+ D, U Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5009 J- `" i/ K- d* P: t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 B% a: @" N& a; ~- e Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
- k" S7 }& @8 X* ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 U8 r1 A- m4 V- N" K4 ^% Q) e
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860: }8 t( X7 g( y. x1 J$ X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ _4 g0 I' E4 T' B* J
2 `3 {( ^, K$ r -------------------------------------------------------------
& E$ n/ K# y" Y' H Standard Condominium- c: Q8 Z4 G% H+ b/ p4 |5 u6 l3 _: Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
& n& A6 S: x: \ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
3 s9 B7 D: J0 p, }. a! k Market % Change Average Average % Change$ h; D3 V. ?# T" f4 z; @9 A7 K
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 g* [9 h3 d8 V. N! E2 K: H Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
# b: K- d* W! |" n& s& Q: m -------------------------------------------------------------4 V0 y8 J# [- B2 B! F
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%: g9 Y0 r5 ]$ j/ ]3 Z9 o( G" L
-------------------------------------------------------------
% H7 @4 _, D" m/ R& ?2 I4 N* e5 w7 W Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
X" h* k1 j& x: a -------------------------------------------------------------5 o* \0 i' W3 F- m5 K
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ ^1 n4 H( ^: ^; E2 h* l2 u2 M% e7 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
) D2 X3 e: E+ O! p5 i St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%# F* e% d2 x& `4 D2 _0 D
-------------------------------------------------------------5 D- V: Z3 p% n4 g [+ C
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%6 S( c# C" C; D
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ Q U; W; i, Z; u; v Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
4 |7 C3 Y% {, ? I- p3 w" g( H6 x -------------------------------------------------------------
* ]5 P; T6 ^& q Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
9 h* X7 A9 ]) e, g6 | -------------------------------------------------------------, b+ L! L. F9 `# F/ a
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
: Z& N# u6 p- f -------------------------------------------------------------
/ j; d9 U0 h. Z0 D7 R% t Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%) X: X% Z& x. B
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 A# V$ U8 i/ j- \) f) o Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%& i/ E9 z5 d- w
-------------------------------------------------------------# T8 h; i, R- o. z$ `7 [9 ?% i
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
4 C7 x5 [- b! k" ?3 x -------------------------------------------------------------
( H' y) m, ^- ]6 v6 ` Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
" _' m% u5 z8 r/ a- o- K -------------------------------------------------------------0 G' i/ A" k3 O, D
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%- L' I1 [" D) f$ R3 Y0 e
-------------------------------------------------------------
' L: c8 m! z1 Z# y* h* \ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%1 X) }7 s5 \ m0 h, y
-------------------------------------------------------------* e3 ^" B) k3 j
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 t% i$ f, T8 ^9 v; {+ L! ]$ Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 ]5 k- K- O- z3 Z >>3 Y& z) q. F( E9 \/ `1 b
" b% r$ Y2 q$ T( u6 c
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 n( L0 G: z X' F2 L" H% b/ \4 Jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
7 R- e; c: P. b: [" i& C. KJohn and Victoria.4 Q2 b1 ?8 _- D7 C' b& ^/ P
- P0 e( o: {% q
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& `% d2 X+ ]2 F3 N( ocomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
$ K+ e& e4 w5 D1 o2 vhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
" h' _3 S2 y, k: C9 n2 T) i3 `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
; e1 H9 X) | Q& A6 wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities6 Q, G+ t9 a3 y. Y" z8 ~% P
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" s0 m) I7 F4 davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 {2 M# t4 @9 h: t4 @0 d6 Kfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* F& M; V2 s V* J Xversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, O; F G0 S' C: i. a' K: \
November 15, 2006.
" S2 a: {$ P7 P! R5 R2 y z5 C$ z Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of% @7 R) V1 o. @! l1 o& O3 ^
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge0 n- u/ j5 h* W( ^% [
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
K9 j L0 Q/ s! pavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|