埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2542|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
& Z; m/ s' @7 X* |( W- [. O7 E% ]
+ N% D) J4 v9 o$ |* T. s% G" d- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -' [  f- q* _+ B) a. @4 H5 x$ F+ @

( J/ h- M/ j: i( r* {    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 |- Y1 \7 b; _( `  }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
+ [! m9 O( l" F* T  ], `; ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ @; X  a- V/ o" A; [  Y
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# }3 q! ^! N+ T( rprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 k2 O( A3 Z" X3 X. C$ p4 Wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 Z" R9 g/ ?8 g* k. k  l6 l
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 `% U8 E8 Z# D. o5 ALePage Real Estate Services.
# N8 p2 E+ y9 _1 `/ b3 s/ b( s- d- A, j$ O: K! v/ R$ r$ l: j
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! L7 E, A/ b, V2 N
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: f& h2 J7 O3 ^4 t( W" B
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
% Y6 U8 r  H6 U/ Z0 isound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the8 a" z! J5 U& G' U3 @8 K% H
residential real estate sector.
8 f: J" D+ n' [; f' Z
7 a  \3 M1 H' s: r# ~    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ s/ y" \) T( x/ C* D3 Y1 B% I
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; V* F# a8 @9 gyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562; k4 t* p, v1 ]
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
$ I" U0 H$ Y! l2 f+ C3 r(+13.2%).
& T' E% d  K3 A+ u7 g+ W0 \) ~# B7 p
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 u. I2 w. k5 |" l- |. t6 J* a
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
& W+ y6 i/ o& L' W0 q4 D" qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 `8 P+ @! h6 @' [+ e) M
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ T/ h! f4 W& T' C3 o* A" v" Fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 Y0 ^/ t; x9 n/ G  _8 A"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 V( @1 v& ^2 n: M
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, N1 u# \  V  o* p$ ubalanced market."
, e+ X& R& @* I4 x: c3 F; V
# h8 Q& T/ ^% v5 j' S* }    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
# k! ?0 o, w0 x! Kconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) H5 l) G% @& M+ S
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued9 n5 n# t0 p2 s2 _! T& [
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! J9 x! A6 K' I& }% V7 W4 k4 Menergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,7 `2 z% I1 T' ^0 t" h( G8 q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record3 E/ F) ^: H$ o: g& f  s
breaking price appreciations., i8 G! D" ^6 d1 J. S3 C
1 U/ n1 A+ m* B$ t9 U& [1 ^' y7 z
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
# K# F! Y% U$ _economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the6 n; v4 G+ l0 ~' n: g- O8 R
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 u7 J( Z. ]. Z" |* \% Y+ V$ ?
1 M$ a) ]3 o, @
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid8 t2 s/ H+ O9 |2 U3 \8 f" k
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: _5 j0 H# b" L3 F
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off& A1 x, @$ a0 m( k: c7 D, W9 M
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 w+ G0 M0 S5 ^2 ~In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" F% \, k5 g% z' S& ~2 N) L
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 h; U- j5 N* p5 s; |4 D$ H2 |5 Fprice appreciation when compared with 2005." @$ e9 r" C  W0 ?9 U% _

: `8 D' Q5 V- }    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) e# ?  n. g4 A3 Pmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; _6 i* ^4 m0 w& G& [$ }, Z' Sfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, |' u0 B* k# Y0 M
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 k  X& N. `7 |: ~9 S4 [6 D5 ]8 i7 G2 l  B/ h# K
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
% _' k5 ]- a5 V3 C0 s! N) }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 x. N# |7 ~% U# e! R' {favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the5 a2 F% Z) Y! ~8 B" M  i  E  I
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
" j) C+ ]/ G# D2 v; i# aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the- B( B+ a2 ^: d! D0 ^
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 Z. m, s/ o; a' B3 o  zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 S/ S& n5 D  @3 W8 F+ q
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
) m7 W( i+ S; U* r3 u4 u* \1 ~* h9 t3 v9 H, ^  @& M3 K( r% F+ U
    <<
: N& b8 P! k" ~1 Q& p7 c0 Q                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES1 |) H+ ~: T+ G7 B9 X3 F* B3 H
    >>
& m" w* B" j0 F- v
3 f) @% o3 g8 J3 q' t. `: e; p; A    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
9 n- v6 i* _7 }! dHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 i: A+ {9 ]* w% H* z3 B( Mof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
8 g9 {. }8 w6 {: z) mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& T+ U. g" O. K+ xrenovations.+ j2 E+ w# f, [+ `5 L& Z* G

- v. z- ]. O: @+ P4 s* q4 D1 s    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; v, o0 j' w! F) `1 n6 N2 m
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation& H: w% t; c5 F3 X' }( b
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and2 V  X& `  d) Y0 ?& u3 [& ], T
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.0 ^+ b6 T& R1 i) n1 N) V
1 o/ P( P4 A4 C. C
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 V' b6 J" @! p* N
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
& R. p4 T4 e/ Aquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
3 v8 V' v) Q: o5 g* o! h600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores/ k9 R) O5 r/ f, l' k" y
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
( X8 L: R8 }+ A9 ?! Jand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: H1 ?& F0 ]% ?! j0 W3 V- j' d) z, E4 U0 c
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 Z. A# C  V# }$ f
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ R8 |6 h: s* t( J2 t1 P2 W
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# p0 R& k  Q: m, W. R- u: \7 F, P- B
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: S; }3 @5 y' ^. C; ^( T% w
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ U1 u) Z9 R1 [
buyers with more options when looking for a home.$ ~/ H, D) ?, }2 N
, y# {6 L! t  K" b) _/ K
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly  g+ `: ^$ m# M/ o$ W! R/ I
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# s0 k- h+ p+ Z0 Vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 p# z/ @3 j3 g% A5 Cas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
" w9 M* d/ f: m" z% O. gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; e  Q" x( f+ l8 j" {0 a' U
. I2 H" V- R" Z6 N1 J1 J/ @
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 c8 g' L8 O+ m, U! ^8 O+ cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory8 L, S5 c! W* y. q: \0 Y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
; o. c+ e  t& ^3 n: }first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 e% D$ E* j7 T9 J" bwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
3 A1 D# E7 W1 j9 x% g0 spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( v! \/ f" m% d1 |5 f+ Nmaking a purchase.; Q' R% h. Q1 N4 ~3 I9 K4 n- x

3 \- x* z: Q' y* }$ y    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing) l. R4 B; y' X# X% e' F& h
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 Z3 Y* X* q! T$ b6 a7 V7 K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) p" S8 H; _& Vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 ^0 _  n- o" S+ B9 O& w: m7 Cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown5 V, ]1 j* |& `7 G9 q
amenities.; W% G" J; f$ ^9 c
  R7 O9 z4 l! d" U+ P0 Y4 d
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 w* }+ n7 A% e1 I
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand; g( R9 f3 s+ n/ y4 w, Z3 n# X
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has- u" f$ x- Z' j  r% T" U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 G- ], I  A8 w& L9 ]
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; p" b2 G' f, L3 j( [* {4 ^residence, rather than for investment.
+ H1 Z9 ?  X, O9 W0 F3 l
, ?( d8 h4 j3 u% z/ W4 e3 `    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" w5 U. D" N0 ?! I7 ^) d: j: Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
4 M" Y: T, {# H2 V! {: x8 G/ min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer7 v' o3 o9 H- V. z( V! p% K$ S# J0 i
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
: y6 [/ |- u% B! N8 ~9 Rrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' a. g2 I( Y, @' D& I4 l+ L  t) r' ]7 Dthe market.
& b6 f, n$ r: k* R
' [! ~- z- s9 X' k, R. s    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
; }7 Y( R) D& F' A, f- Q2 I' nJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 g* p. v2 Z& n7 |6 P: U# o% RAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
$ U# [6 k" |( h5 K: y6 Xmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ [8 d" |+ Q+ _8 e" T
to the shortage of available inventory.4 ?- H+ f2 l9 K$ o: F- _- Z
- [4 _8 m4 D1 H+ I' i' R4 W
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( P4 [" e9 P$ j) q+ o
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
. X1 h( J: K4 }5 r# ]! y. qvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( ]1 @% k5 G) A, Q) {% b- X
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
+ }6 B6 s& H! \# I  U1 A$ s( @$ q1 M4 A( r- r. U, S" ?/ ?
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 x8 P0 s- k2 t! R( Q  X0 \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low4 g$ T; `6 @) D& J; Q* a
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ m! Y* I2 @' B  @( J2 j6 lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring* X7 X8 ]$ b& ]- [$ `/ L: @0 @: s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer  w" x$ s' g, c# V) t! U
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, V3 B. r3 }+ N: t% n, q# l6 Z0 N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

# |# \0 @( d4 ~. s* \. {9 j- `; O8 @" d. u5 A" {) ?
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 `" I+ G6 O2 z" |1 H
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# \3 Y. S& r6 jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,& N( s+ }" X' `8 a1 _& A
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' m7 K& Q; m5 z/ e, X2 E2 l' C
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve& o3 F4 G% G  g* w5 j$ B
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 J8 [: ]) _% |: _! @0 Jtowards the end of 2006.
   
/ p& u. u3 m- X6 ^5 b! J9 j; y! c+ w$ R$ c5 E7 ?- d
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ i# P* P: q. y( m/ P
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- u  n5 v% {  u4 pto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, M& [% z2 u% i" L4 W2 p
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to2 U. U2 |. N) N# n
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
$ Q, c0 E7 |: S7 }5 dpressure on tight inventory levels.  Z6 Y: p4 i) m- H& s: P2 ?) `

! X5 G1 [5 i) j8 W$ `7 A8 o    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: F7 k! A, S/ t& U7 k8 E2 z, g) F
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, K+ s  [7 e& [$ G
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
' o& Z' O0 s0 Cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 O5 F' n+ w8 Z( {% G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% z& K. i" O' \* {
) p: }3 s) \3 ^
    <<
7 o/ ]% d) Q' y& t5 t/ d      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
9 l7 [& o' D; I' C
# L: A/ {) e1 o8 H" l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, s- o, l( ~9 V) k) I
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey- o8 w# c" A8 N4 H3 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% {5 t4 R% \0 r
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
+ ?8 {& S+ E6 u; @- {) U  c    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average& {8 c/ Q- D% C" u: o; Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ F# W+ d4 W; ^& Y9 J) }6 r
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000- i5 {4 E3 g! P) g  J  h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% \: `/ i' L9 @7 {/ Y! i7 ^
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
0 w& y% e- F4 C. s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* }' k# k, j4 [' c3 m5 [; t6 R4 {! x6 H
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
1 B4 G0 P, W- H% x5 w5 M5 @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ^. ?0 G1 O" y6 h# I
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
1 l, O& ~( P4 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 R  |* z9 j  D: M( y' G) x% J    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
; }' L) Q% ~  }6 [/ I0 z, z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 x+ D, D& |/ N) F- H0 _1 P    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583/ b% u2 I( N6 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 l3 O* U% ^+ L$ W. ~, L
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
2 ~6 X% n. a* r8 p0 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ N5 C! C' {  v4 T+ G: T
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250! ?8 C4 x8 {( C2 q" }) J5 D" x- I( @) l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. K/ A; c% x- b
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7661 p' ?  o  N" h+ g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* L& E4 C" p" W1 _- f4 Z
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707% x! i9 H7 O7 k. L/ Z$ j6 H. T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 I) \" I+ ~* M$ @& k4 G8 y    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
$ z* c2 ^1 e) b' g( F: Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 J2 o: Z* Y- T
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
: n! J3 p' P; Z2 c* w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- q/ `% u! o0 T
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
# L" ]* Y2 b" `, Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 E  O* h+ N* D5 A3 t9 _6 r. V    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
' y9 j& h4 G3 |* b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 l4 f% _7 _* B& O    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
& n4 R( u6 j9 v# \+ K/ Y; |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- T0 Y4 S1 b: F+ b2 N) `4 S8 {
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860; `$ Q& C! Q6 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 E, p: o& f7 K3 F& V5 i
- q" m6 i. H  r8 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. o  Y3 N, Z' a$ `                               Standard Condominium4 P4 Q3 l- J4 i. t3 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------% p) l( _# d0 ^3 x
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
/ Y; S- A, w0 h6 Y) O. m+ b3 q    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
) D2 t& K) B% D' k    -------------------------------------------------------------
. T" s- G- O: W2 R  [: s    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%! R3 S" V) c7 T& A. B* m0 ~4 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: s/ `1 n' C- ]4 X; L- M* L    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%6 d5 [( Y$ H% d5 N' O5 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------. q% |& @9 Z) J1 b$ Z& K* i
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
1 x* Q2 |' S2 D: S0 d    -------------------------------------------------------------
' D0 C9 s5 Q  U  l" ~; K. \3 i    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
# G5 I# a* Z6 ^; n& `7 x' J    -------------------------------------------------------------; G3 L3 n9 q3 c! t% Z. k
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%5 C/ l& a& L% B& O5 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: ]! J0 W4 j1 P1 R. U# x6 F( J    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%% {8 f% _. t5 X$ h' d
    -------------------------------------------------------------" u+ L9 j+ R( ~3 X0 v) N6 O
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%" e8 Z5 s  w- ^: I% l
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ g+ p' x9 j$ c$ `; F4 n
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
7 z  f! N8 h& r, y6 }: l    -------------------------------------------------------------$ q; p5 q/ a+ h6 U' ~  o0 k
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
( o  M" |" N1 r    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ x/ [' g* n0 B& t  K7 K7 J    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
2 q0 Q% \: A. X7 V" F+ D    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 v8 S' w5 l* x/ Z8 I0 D    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%% X9 d5 u6 R) N4 O2 u- P4 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 N8 P0 l  {  S2 \  ?
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%- o: `5 X7 V6 R7 a4 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ x  t- l' G+ f$ M
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%- J0 e9 F( r3 v" b3 U7 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 Z) E, a  N5 ^8 \+ t7 W
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%- l; p  @0 |- m2 f: x' W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; t7 W" L; M2 \" |' |! {9 L) [    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%  H7 L/ g3 D: i4 m" \+ ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ p" s" V. j9 N  f+ O
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
9 ]0 S  P" t2 A8 O( \% m7 J    -------------------------------------------------------------8 o; d) i6 h0 t, s
    >>
% @, O4 R( [3 B# y1 s  F. P
5 x' G# C, o# T  u) Z    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
  P7 K, t$ S8 qin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' W( L9 k; o; W* I
John and Victoria.1 I" m1 ~$ E! ~

! D, A' b8 ]. D/ k9 Y9 x    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( l5 A+ p/ ?* b0 l. I* u) W2 @) ncomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
  k# D; c; v4 O% k8 Fhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
9 I" c# t' y7 g( c  W3 `. Z" rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
: b0 }9 o/ N1 Dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ O, p4 n# t6 C" z3 @3 v5 X7 Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" n4 d1 ^- b# h- t$ _/ Lavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
: _+ c; n5 H6 `& a# q  Lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 N( k7 h% M# B; E" F, Rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ L# V5 F) v. j  z3 z# MNovember 15, 2006.
0 s' Q; U4 b2 @4 T9 O% p$ e( `/ O    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 W8 j  Z# I" x% N5 F/ E9 v
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 k1 p  q& A! S; A5 X9 ^
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is6 p/ Q0 i+ L, @3 M8 ^
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-7-10 22:10 , Processed in 0.109484 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表