请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
8 R* E. W8 D. m7 a) W. z1 g- y
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
' }6 K* |+ T1 {" K) `skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

5 G! s, Q$ p7 h, |! F; Z; B$ c5 h眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
4 L, n! K/ j- x( B100% Taxable: Yes
' z% |3 m& ~1 p100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
4 t) P3 c, F, a. RLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
" O9 O, B5 `; F6 T7 n$ ^Building Count: 1
$ M# ]& d: b) L3 H% ]; c* dYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
: ]* ^# S( }, L( b- w9 F$ v(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
Garage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
$ S( G4 P  a! `3 S0 f* S6 VWalkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

/ N, P1 I: m+ r  @7 x: o0 m, Uyou better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.