 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:; E' e4 O1 i6 C, ^# `$ E
4 V/ L$ {, H! k6 Z' G
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。8 f' A" N5 {# r+ g7 C0 @- k: y3 w
$ @2 P+ |/ I8 d7 I" L
**********************************
$ E: F+ u" B. |% s, GAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
) |* z: a0 `/ m( j9 \; b2 c) P, Y) p2 ]) K0 ]( Z: ?- b; ?
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
& G4 w' Z8 j0 D4 V( {
; \4 b4 f% u9 x6 J* B2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
( j) R1 ?2 q3 @9 n7 |& o- D# ?, b& [& X. z9 i
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
6 e5 a. f1 J7 _. a9 Z! A: x0 E7 N: n0 b1 ^% ^! L, |) J5 b2 l
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
. ^+ b! W" w' X& y# |& ~( @
. P6 N X- i& r A5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|