 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
+ g7 \5 F8 A1 P0 N) \2 C$ |$ C3 A! ]( m# B8 N. M7 o
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
6 ~) [8 ?( W# U: j3 i" B/ C
* t0 [7 s* S. I8 s, h0 A**********************************- y) R2 c6 w% X) T0 j+ E+ P0 M4 c
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
, e+ j: L/ h4 Q- X! s
. A* F! x/ C$ t) f" d$ c' g1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
( [" `- ?+ v! }0 z6 F; s
8 F" O+ [& p9 D+ E& g0 X2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.+ e) K `% F1 H1 | l+ y4 \
; ]5 J# d4 @" D, m5 K ~$ E8 ]
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4./ u; @( l4 o2 R
) ?) |/ G4 ]) ?+ _+ B5 l( n2 b5 m4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
+ f k* G0 m3 Q
/ O1 S2 B% Q# a; F2 n5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|