有请APORO (谢绝APORO以外的人回贴, 请大家合作!)

Rake

重开一贴, 该贴只容许在Edmontonchina.com上注册网名为APORO的回贴! 其它的人, 无论你是何种理由, 一律谢绝入内!

Rake

亲爱的APORO, 你都找了两天了怎么还找不到那damned rules?

Rake

现在来看看你自己介绍自己的简历: As being an architectural technologist for 4 years with 6 months framing experience......
# c' f) F% D0 w# |6 o2 {0 d! y
你还真别拿TMD这architectural technologist来吓唬我, 不就是在AutoCAD里把那些个脸盆,炉子,桌子,还有拉屎的盆子挪来挪去, 建那么个model, 再放进一个3D的软件里渲染一下吗, 这在国内连上高中的孩子们都会做! 你说你显摆个什么劲呢? 那就是画画儿, 画出来就是个皮囊.

Rake

再看看你的Framing, 你也只搞了6个月, 就敢来这里Point out这个, Point out那个. 而且还是个TMD木结构, 这里那么多搞了一辈子建筑结构的人都没站出来说这说那, 就剩你一个人儿在那里NB了, 知道什么叫NB吗? 就是牛的B

Rake

" N6 g2 U  A* `/ A1 ~再看看你一进门就大喊大叫的样子, 这些都是你放的P:
OMG, I dont mean to to rude, but the framing work is so unprofessional, no backing studs at the corner, no duble stud at the door jamb, you can't just corss bracing the closet wall to save some material, also a single stud for the closet next to a wall is not going to provide enough space for the door trim later...wood fram seems easy, but still there's rules your gotta follow
8 X4 m$ T- r7 C4 t& h! k8 l! V
4 H& |7 o4 M8 Q! \4 P4 P你说的OMG在汉语里应该这么读吧:   偶卖糕的

Rake

再看看人家回你的贴子:
5 d9 V+ {- @+ y7 N
回复APORO:  你说的那个Corner一共有三个Stud, 只不过那张照片你看不到而已．Door Jamb不一定非得double stud，空间不够的时候怎么办？Code是纸上的东西与实际操作是有区别的，这是施工的常识．但有些Code是应该严格遵守的，比如说电／防火规范等等．


8 S: X: E; V% X你们二位最好能换个地方去讨论你们的理论！


: O- L1 M/ f" I8 W  m& y亲爱的APORO, 也难怪你不来这里了, 你提的问题都有答案了.
7 J$ a0 @6 _1 k8 P7 y' v4 M$ w不对, 好象就那蓝色的字没答案, 人家可能不想给你解释了. 因为我看来看去你说的该放Trim的地方没放Trim, 可能人家根本就不想放trim, 你说你这不TMD瞎起哄吗
你提的第一个问题十分不妥, 这不能怪你, 因为你TMD瞎眼没看见
. W4 I: }; m# n第二个问题让你找红头文件, 你到现在也没找来
9 \) |- R/ j6 M1 O第三个问题, 是我猜的, 所以看不清楚之前是不能去人家的贴子去捣乱的

# l! o$ h& c1 Q2 |/ n你看你把人家好好的一个贴子搞什么样了? 你在那里上窜下跳的, 人都有意见了.
结果TMD单独开个贴子你反而不来了, 我说你这个卖糕的, 你别偷偷摸摸地卖你的糕啦

Rake

别以为就你会说鸟语, 我也会一句, 你翻译一下看看是什么意思:
, h, K6 L! a8 |
Do you feel pains in your ass right now?

5km

Rake

进来的这位, 以下的字怎么个读法啊:
+ g0 C1 E9 T6 {  b
/ f9 p$ L+ @: G重开一贴, 该贴只容许在Edmontonchina.com上注册网名为APORO的回贴! 其它的人, 无论你是何种理由, 一律谢绝入内!

Rake

亲爱的APORO, 今天是第三天了, 我让你找的那个Jamb放double stud的damned rules你还是找不到

Rake

找不到, 老子也不难为你了.

现在老子替所有的APORO们来扫扫盲.
扫盲之前先读一下毛泽东选集里的一句话: 世界上没有一成不变的事物
) S+ Z8 b, t" m9 @( [5 k# {

<<<<知道门旁的Stud出现最不利的情况是什么吗? 是Lateral Deflection
3 P% H/ K! z- Y! x7 \<<<<知道如何防止Lateral Deflection出现吗? 是Reduce that damned Slenderness Ratio
2 y8 _3 `" U% m1 v7 P6 D5 z好了, 现在你这小兔崽子再去看看人家做的那个Stud, 人家是不是在reduce啊?

Rake

不过老子讲的, 可能你也看不懂
回过头来再看看你那可怜的简历:  替建筑师擦了四年的屁股, 现在又开始替结构师擦屁股
所以你这小兔崽子是只知其然, 不知其所以然.

加拿大的鬼子们是不可能定一个僵死的code放那里说所有的门的jamb都必须有damned double stud, 这就符合了刚才你读的毛泽东选集里的那句话的精髓

Rake

3 W- D' Z0 V. T2 k- u  H这三天以来, 老子在这里关门打狗, 目的只有一个:  就是不想让APORO们来这里指手画脚的捣乱, 而是能够让更多的Handyman们来这里自由自在地发贴, 因为老子就喜欢看见Handyman们闪亮的工具, 粗糙的大手, 不想看见奶油小生们的damned shity face
" i. U6 z- ]  X' q5 m& S
名词解释, 什么是奶油小生:   就是软软的, 白白的, 粘粘的, 甜巴垃几的JB玩意儿

Rake

& b6 N, G3 S% U5 Y
. Q% V+ `, _- L* C最后, 给两个连接, 是我发这个贴子的原因
0 @1 `9 B0 h) {% t1 N' p2 L8 f* y同时再次提醒一下:
该贴只容许在Edmontonchina.com上注册网名为APORO的回贴! 其它的人, 无论你是何种理由, 一律谢绝入内!
" p9 j7 R9 B7 e& H
http://www.edmontonchina.ca/view ... &extra=page%3D2
http://www.edmontonchina.ca/view ... &extra=page%3D1

APORO

sorry to let you waited for so long, I was out of town for a couple days.  
; e  X1 t2 L  W- ?; {0 s
# R* Y! A2 |8 {# c$ }1. If you have to know the reason I said the door jamb and coner backing was not done properly. Go check 9.23.10.5. and 9.23.10.6 in ABC.
6 _( z1 b9 S; k) n3 l# f
2. Sorry about not understanding the framer's design about using a sliding door instead of a bi-fold clothset door. door trim might not be a must here, but what if the owner or the next owner wants to add a door trim? anyway, an clothset door still consider as an "opening", refer to answe 1.
( y; b% L& V6 D, d
& t; T1 j9 P! r4 o1 qFor your information: ABC- Alberta Building Coda, building regulation By-law, It's Law, not just a book. Also, not that I have seen how other framers did it, I did it with my own hands. And there's no way a single stud jamb can be stronger than a double one. Therefore, I still insist the framing I saw was unprofessional.
* Y7 |/ f: S* F
From your expression, I found out you have no knowledge about what an architectural technologist does, so I can understand  why you wouldn't agree with me. Anyway, I did not plan to ruin the post, but I don't see why I can't point out the mistakes I saw.  I would be happy to answer all you questions, but I decide not to waste too much time to argure with a mad dog. So if you want to keep barking, be my guest.