 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员* V+ A# | j k! W) t A
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
0 |6 @% S+ ` F% g. ?' U3 m, i: R# [; |$ I( @
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
. N! |1 K6 V- t0 U1 L
9 E# V# Y" [# ]) n# z" MMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
4 q$ K) _$ U# W! V6 H0 ^* z! }8 V. F
' o- V! t# C* n: U9 oThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.- O, O: I* e$ m' k1 ^5 `/ k9 t
6 y R0 i! }' S0 W: T4 g6 g
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.3 e2 U6 }! n; o6 J& i
& o! y9 M# c' q$ R7 ~! E: kDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
' z+ q! I9 y5 }9 O3 }6 i, X8 T4 c$ X8 j/ B
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.$ l. O% O$ j+ O+ {7 ]& B; o
* M: Y7 F8 K+ p& Q/ ?
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction., L W: C! i) w( ?
% E+ B9 Q9 B$ Z7 ~% t/ xPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.7 S. L# Z# {! p# [/ `
: ]- \( W9 C" @! u: R# p( G; g
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|