 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员0 R% F# O, E/ q4 u. v1 H$ x' _# [
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
4 `0 @* ^) X5 v Q1 H! {2 B6 r# q& J# f' V4 ?$ G) I1 Z7 l
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
0 l6 h2 g& } E) `" d$ J$ R, u+ }3 l
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. + V$ y$ H! C. c
8 c8 r. q$ I( p% JThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
6 Q! o2 L7 ?5 ~% Q* C
9 Y% }- I3 V) E/ H1 E0 d1 LDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
$ [- S' h# h1 C8 O; n. ?+ O2 |* ^. c+ w3 y. [# l8 E" J; ~
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
b. G' b; D" ~. C2 m
! s; l# r4 w3 }) Z) N: ^Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
3 G3 e W: j. b% s2 m2 K6 K1 c, ]$ l0 q5 s1 M. @' y. h4 W
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
2 S: ^- G4 }" @9 [5 f/ j3 w
- e5 T2 G0 R) \8 I+ A2 j& {Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.& E: P6 Q {2 x! _8 H( G
$ n' Y( J1 N$ I$ K' d/ `Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|