埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2484|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
道化工亚省工厂将裁员* V+ A# |  j  k! W) t  A
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
0 |6 @% S+ `  F% g. ?' U3 m, i: R# [; |$ I( @
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
. N! |1 K6 V- t0 U1 L
9 E# V# Y" [# ]) n# z" MMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
4 q$ K) _$ U# W! V6 H0 ^* z! }8 V. F
' o- V! t# C* n: U9 oThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.- O, O: I* e$ m' k1 ^5 `/ k9 t
6 y  R0 i! }' S0 W: T4 g6 g
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.3 e2 U6 }! n; o6 J& i

& o! y9 M# c' q$ R7 ~! E: kDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
' z+ q! I9 y5 }9 O3 }6 i, X8 T4 c$ X8 j/ B
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.$ l. O% O$ j+ O+ {7 ]& B; o
* M: Y7 F8 K+ p& Q/ ?
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction., L  W: C! i) w( ?

% E+ B9 Q9 B$ Z7 ~% t/ xPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.7 S. L# Z# {! p# [/ `
: ]- \( W9 C" @! u: R# p( G; g
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-11-4 04:28 , Processed in 1.094776 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表