原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:# Q" y1 g; } c- ]* Y) e. o0 M
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. " S+ Q' T3 n: Z) j2 S, e: H# m; o2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. - ^7 a. }! A* Z 3 D E1 Z- w' M1 U% ]上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. 2 [8 P1 F) p' h( z: G/ K# H' k. ^ + l4 R4 k. `. R; Z[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20058 A3 m: M& _3 t0 f
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 5 `7 r: V/ k, h( R1 p3 H * S. A9 w( ?/ l J x2 D5 a"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."0 p4 i; c1 I0 x3 I
5 m' P% L' {) o4 x- y
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 3 c' \2 c2 [) G) Y( d4 P. Y0 m" v, O6 c; w$ v4 v
* G. o+ p+ h3 l% H
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: ' E5 U; a( F% M/ q: ?+ @7 G3 VHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 1 O1 A1 o( X2 z! I- }3 V; aThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 6 `. G6 ~+ I% [. F8 ~# j, `' J; @3 E" o& f! v4 T
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend:& H- f1 |' V: }% C( Z. C
( u, E5 D! V$ _& q
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.