 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 - F# y/ M# `. |3 D& q
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!* s% n% B5 [$ e7 P
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... / d7 T* x, v4 n4 H
) ]( V4 o o$ x8 W; J, A您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
. i+ d* T$ D$ ^# M _; P" G
; y" Z, n$ J) u8 y4 v安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.# n5 [! @9 ^" Y" z. @- }9 S7 ~4 P- v9 U& \
9 u- V1 L* b. I: _% y
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?4 E9 m1 |( t& `& Z% `+ q/ K# M
! B, P" t6 f3 I, O& w0 z另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
0 {% z8 \+ R G F
! ]8 M& T( H" w, S关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
; @" z& u/ e+ pYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.+ f" y |# V7 ?, ^! p7 D7 [
8 q2 P0 @, Z6 z: g: g! ~( L+ _Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
* @6 ?2 I4 E* U# p1 q4 g
1 _- C" `* W3 w4 FBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.' m }9 l7 E( g% K0 R5 m# R: {! t4 O
/ O( u3 E, F! O h8 K u
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|