 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 * ^. C1 [- C6 T7 j! n1 [1 {
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
. n/ | _0 u% n5 y' Ccorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 3 m* |" X9 ?9 I4 r+ D) a
! r5 S2 C" z( f
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
+ v3 e& J/ X4 p( {+ A3 k2 b5 c9 b6 F" ?8 L1 W$ F
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
" L6 w7 ?# h6 H1 J# K
3 `- h0 o8 M/ O" `+ `不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
2 N3 B0 z5 b* ]; d# L( v8 p/ t9 E' g+ e. k7 J- ^
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。* t+ t( x6 o, e8 X
0 e, r! l; L' j. Q
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):$ ?/ I: V# `3 ^, P; C# R
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.7 V. A3 L1 V2 Q: c8 Y# A$ ~$ W6 G/ z
. Z5 D+ x+ p7 M) d* H, M% K1 F
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".7 ]( f+ {+ D% }
/ c1 h$ D* ]3 e1 F/ m E L
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
2 \' n3 r8 I8 M' z+ ~% Y1 a* ]0 H2 x
4 B/ ]$ \! O! R" a% [! Y% Z[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|