 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 3 {/ J, g4 ?1 h; V, a" ]
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
) S; t$ W6 q, F. scorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
5 p3 d+ V3 _) Q/ i: z/ p- q: p6 d4 u( X3 n! q
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。" J" A; \# B/ G
% k: [0 R+ s7 e4 \8 D5 ~
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
; G% ^! x" P8 [5 q! f& C2 [, P8 z% ~) n# B. s% E; o( l2 _9 p/ M
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?6 c7 q: }8 i# `( B" @- a5 A, U
0 o+ q, _5 _# b1 |另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
; f6 v8 ^% |+ B }) l" a
- ]2 n. e; \" _3 c- T/ T Z* u关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):) }4 o: C; j" _& F j- ^
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
, j0 D1 O8 u4 \/ y- ]7 q# s5 |# s$ L
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".) ]/ r: s9 P6 x. ~
7 n( ~! G! _ F0 t
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe./ C! Q- m& Z [& s
7 R* w$ p e# v# C" y% ^[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|