 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
8 w3 @6 o4 H% m, [4 T楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
7 k9 m; z) g; Hcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 9 |- h' U6 }5 v0 b) @# K
" i' l B5 h* q; b5 n* s4 Z1 y6 a您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
% n% j S$ {- O( j5 \$ \7 V
. k, [- x' U, [" N: K' ]安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
& @# ?+ Z1 v, x. i" B9 S& ^, [, m! F( p/ u1 W0 a
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?: u& Y# c' }( `
/ x5 s. ] ~9 J, g另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。/ u; t# m2 X. R* y r
8 `' c* C: B- t7 J% X关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):3 R& I3 O9 x7 z4 B! z2 f
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
* G: f0 w, j( b- f4 h# V3 m
4 }4 j. w, J% G0 ~5 Y. o" b" q' TOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".3 [5 N6 B" h' [/ R! ?6 `& `
4 c# y# Z3 o3 C# j
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
9 o; l0 v8 R5 R
7 p+ Q2 K. }; [3 O% d$ z1 S[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|