 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 & ?7 R: D. X9 |
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
5 n8 ^ i; s: h9 x- J D! hcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
+ B! M9 B' Q. m5 g, U4 g) m$ D4 B
5 x* H/ t* ^( k) w您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
* x0 {4 h9 y: t* r: @" b
# n' {. E3 Z. o9 Q安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless." [0 i% l4 v! w" R1 H+ y/ U
- @ P+ B/ T9 q# h, I
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?1 _: o0 j+ Z$ a# g% Y7 ~, Y3 z
& t+ X4 d# i) u* T+ |$ c
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。9 |+ n. r0 w& g
% N4 P; g1 H4 C# Y5 e8 B. Q, R
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
1 G! X; R. N- C# QYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
3 g7 u: j+ H# s$ r* n) [4 Y
/ k2 F! J) {! m% o" |* p1 m; fOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".+ Q9 [9 w7 i% L
2 M1 p; @ q; c$ F0 o# j
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.* m3 z6 p) E2 D1 X7 e8 \
9 d2 v# \: M' V( N8 k[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|