 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 # t* w' h/ V( T+ y, x# m' H
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!- m1 o3 S4 |% [& r& f, W. \
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 3 n9 X: @3 ^; a" ]5 p: b. }
* T& S( y" X" W, |6 V' w
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。" @* d, `: A1 e" c
" X; e" e1 Y9 A# d6 e
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
* d( g! t, F0 t4 d* H& l
4 h7 S9 }; L) {; p不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?: n0 S' C6 m) h
! [) c+ m! S- C; M另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。6 f# \, V4 d, a8 \$ H) |* |3 l
2 s: m% g7 L9 y) ~4 h关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):" k4 A# E$ \4 i% ^5 ~
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
: r/ j! ?5 W% y7 B0 n X) b
. M+ b% d2 ^% C3 N) |3 t: b0 _. l( BOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".6 U' x( t& K% {
0 A( q0 [3 N6 {7 t; [% ]* |0 ]
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
. r* I7 W4 f* k7 p# y& g H& M$ d4 A
2 q: K* z; O! n$ n* D0 g[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|