 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ! z7 g1 e( P* X
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!" c' s- p! j4 |. i% d
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... + l' p2 a, B0 {9 o9 p: B
6 ^% Y: }) Z+ J. P9 g6 v
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。; H" c8 U% w2 G* C2 k0 _2 P: l
# q4 s1 i+ D, b' m5 s安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.' K2 I! U3 ^' z: j6 P
3 {8 y6 }! w8 s% L0 I不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?0 y4 H& h5 c/ \: X
4 j6 a( K6 D o/ K, N另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。3 p# v9 f- G# C @+ E
3 a; L& { I. h$ d: T- w! K' Y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
8 d! P6 X& {- AYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.$ k; v/ g8 ^$ f! z6 @; \
# ]* ~& b6 Z, D ?- mOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".' S9 g: x( y8 e! s) \) A+ P
, U7 C& n( s+ y' P$ L7 R' FBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
2 Y9 D, e2 O. Y; y0 A5 m) j
4 [3 K+ `; |0 s. s- _6 a+ Q[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|