 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
! V3 M7 l9 Z8 i$ T7 X1 A# Y" r楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! D9 Y# d2 q, K- d/ |4 _! J! Z# n
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 3 z/ q8 r: \" M2 h
) t- g8 E S, S. }# v' E2 h+ \( @
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
+ M; a8 h$ ]! ]
9 k' Z. |4 j( N5 h7 M" L8 s安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
' \. W8 ~7 n& {' n/ F$ Z4 X9 k( _* G; h
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
. k3 g6 C6 n0 D7 W0 u) p/ h3 f2 g( Q( \) s
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。4 B6 w; B O! x
1 P1 |4 D0 ]' _" w# y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):- p) K7 `, a6 z) J
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.. A, O% y4 J& n/ |7 x( y
9 f# c0 b: G9 C8 U& T. z5 e+ u
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".' v$ M) E: n7 V5 ~; D9 m* t. T9 l* U
9 T5 ~5 |7 L( h! v X* f: L$ L
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
- O; x G% q+ B4 M p
: N4 `7 u; [1 h" D e8 v5 v[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|