房市可能有回暖的趋势。

十年移民路_

下文转自以下 BLOG， 房市可能会回暖了。

7 V6 d1 q' z: x/ P1 C
2 a1 I3 n  Q8 _8 ~' @' mhttp://edmonton-homes.typepad.com/
8 d0 J! I0 Z6 S3 d1 ?

* g9 i9 g% m+ [( S' |# xNovember 02, 2007
Weekly Update on the Edmonton Real Estate Market
Here is our weekly update on the Edmonton real estate market. As a reminder, these numbers are for Edmonton only and don't include the surrounding areas.

For the past 7 days:
1 A7 b, p: u; g4 @* x. z/ [, W
# New listings: 558
# Sales: 259
Ratio: 46 - Balanced market
6 z) g& t/ J, j7 H# A) @# Price changes: 487
) [. w  y' Z& ^) b/ b1 [# Expired Listings: 660
# Canceled, withdrawn and terminated listings: 492
" ]7 x. ]- f+ w6 vNet loss/gain in listings this week: -853
' C7 w! U9 `% Q2 T1 W  TActive listings for single family homes: 3703
# o( D% {9 t4 }" `# d2 ^& t+ U) wActive listings for condos: 2518
( B$ t0 Z* Q  I: F) c3 m
! t! K& j  Q6 E+ |That's the best sales to new listings ratio we've seen in three weeks bringing us back to a balanced market. There is also a significant reduction in inventory this week which suggests we may see a reduction in inventory for the month for the first time in a year, which is very good news. Comparing to last week it looks like twice as many condos came off the market (sold, expired, cancelled etc.) as single family homes.

It definitely feels like things have picked up a bit this week, more showings, more calls - even a multiple offer situation the other night.
$ s4 V: Q8 c6 \* o9 o1 d
' J0 K% }6 Z0 W+ X* LOf note: an entire complex was terminated counting for 48 terminations. Last week we saw that happen and all the units were re-listed. I wouldn't be surprised if these 48 units show up as new listings next week.

油沙工

原帖由 十年移民路_ 于 2007-11-2 21:51 发表
下文转自以下 BLOG， 房市可能会回暖了。
' {, B- `1 H7 g/ y6 L! S
) Z) d$ y/ `& A# Z# }
7 D6 G! U$ `6 w1 H- p. phttp://edmonton-homes.typepad.com/
7 m8 w9 w. ?, H2 ~8 k- V

November 02, 2007
Weekly Update on the Edmonton Real Estate Market
- C% s& ?( e, O- SHere is our weekly update on the Edmonton  ...

# New listings: 558(新增加)
- }9 ?: a5 r* c/ J" i3 N7 f0 h1 ^# Sales: 259(售出)
# Expired Listings: 660(超期的)
' K( F& ^; i0 g6 l- G  d5 Y! h& F3 s# Canceled, withdrawn and terminated listings: 492(撤出的不卖的)
; q$ g- |! i) r6 Z2 }6 G. f( T- H( t稍微懂得一些数学的人,就很快算出答案,不知道哪里来的回暖,应该是回冻,这些专家总把我们新移民当傻瓜!
我认识一些炒房子的人,从七月份开始,行情不好,根本就没有卖,等到明年春天上市,还有一些不肯降价没有卖出去,撤出销售市场,等到明年春天再出手,
还有一些建筑商要建成还没有建成的,要建还没有建的,明年春天会陆续建成,冬天来临,本身买卖就少了,
) d* g( r5 P7 [* o9 ~% [6 ~4 T
[ 本帖最后由 油沙工 于 2007-11-2 22:20 编辑 ]

老农民

原帖由 油沙工 于 2007-11-2 22:03 发表
% ^8 {3 R9 d3 ]" K
' m" r: c9 a2 \6 s. i& P% P& x' B2 o  a# New listings: 558(新增加)
# Sales: 259(售出)
5 \0 b- s; X+ a# Expired Listings: 660(超期的)
# Canceled, withdrawn and terminated listings: 492(撤出的不卖的)
稍微懂得一些数学的人,就很快算出答案,不知道哪里 ...

“专家”就是大象鼻子上插大葱，装洋相

万年小腰

此文很有倾向性，数据不可全信：“ a reduction in inventory for the month for the first time in a year, which is very good news. ”

老杨

这个帖子十年老兄应该卖点金币才对。

自由的像风

房子多的人怕说？？！可这东西也不是嘴能作主的。

十年移民路_

原帖由 老杨 于 2007-11-2 21:26 发表
这个帖子十年老兄应该卖点金币才对。

5 A$ B- \) \. [! x" R* q0 ?
) W3 [1 H, o6 u+ G  G. u9 ~& r也就是转个看其来比较奇怪论点的贴子而已．不比太认真了．
! L8 s4 [0 A# S3 b0 j7 g- {
. `* l) F3 E1 T5 S1 R- H另外，我看不出原贴有任何＂新移民＂的任何文字，想不通为什么有人把它和＂新移民＂联在一起．

老杨

原帖由 十年移民路_ 于 2007-11-3 22:59 发表

& x6 ^) @. d( z+ S1 D* v3 c
也就是转个看其来比较奇怪论点的贴子而已．不比太认真了．
; W% g$ E; r( S! p
% [( Q  ^# Q/ R+ y1 o7 n- S' x0 W另外，我看不出原贴有任何＂新移民＂的任何文字，想不通为什么有人把它和＂新移民＂联在一起．

% h; s1 v1 u# x) a6 H5 H我的意思是你好心转文章过来，却引来。。。。。。。。还不如卖金币把一些人挡住。

xge

原帖由 老杨 于 2007-11-4 08:17 发表
$ Q( o( I* E+ M9 E8 l/ P9 B
+ o2 v' B- [3 o3 @+ ]$ v4 I: O' u我的意思是你好心转文章过来，却引来。。。。。。。。还不如卖金币把一些人挡住。

BaiLing

原帖由 老杨 于 2007-11-4 08:17 发表

我的意思是你好心转文章过来，却引来。。。。。。。。还不如卖金币把一些人挡住。

9494

Z

原帖由 万年小腰 于 2007-11-2 21:24 发表
此文很有倾向性，数据不可全信：“ a reduction in inventory for the month for the first time in a year, which is very good news. ”

这句在理，每年秋冬存量下降是常见的季节现象。所以说10月末存量比9月末下降是毫无意义的。应该比去年10月末数据。事实情况是，现在存量是去年10月末的双倍以上。

十年移民路_

原帖由 Z 于 2007-11-5 12:10 发表
. d! q, ^% ]% [- q+ {

. O- j. [) `# a+ T3 ]这句在理，每年秋冬存量下降是常见的季节现象。所以说10月末存量比9月末下降是毫无意义的。应该比去年10月末数据。事实情况是，现在存量是去年10月末的双倍以上。

( c& _( {" c: |# e) f3 m+ H/ E; g
0 f1 R$ X0 s5 N这才是讲道理的方式! 同意.