Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

: f3 X& i% P0 p0 `& }/ a6 bNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
' F: ~; U5 Q% M9 Z! ~9 Q$ `
- G! R7 y$ v* e% H" f$ K7 y8 ^5 F
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
# f1 y: O* J5 ?! }8 c9 t# u0 i
7 o% }- K- W5 N8 }+ b& b1 ^San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
+ l: |& V2 o5 r, y9 cNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
; p8 _1 j5 d# D3 h, G4 oYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
( J* U2 V& z8 s) }
% s2 `1 Z, h2 U6 PIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
/ M+ e8 g6 |: d1 T6 q5 s$ p Avg. 1988-2000 2001
  \5 K/ O5 |3 q5 q1 L3 i3 v  [. CBoston  20.5 30.2
$ u. w( L  t9 \# N+ @, i* ?- z9 ySan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
7 `+ V8 D. b# S; GLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
$ y! r6 z% [9 h7 o2 B3 _Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
) |# R  B% j0 O0 v  x6 o( qNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
$ r: \% G+ Z/ m( m, J4 X3 L

9 ]3 x3 _$ w4 q' G2 i$ d
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

: Z  |% y/ E- Q5 [
! e3 {$ Y2 q2 iFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
1 L3 I0 b5 C. Q) n
, m0 D  K% j' z5 E% `- B0 q7 R[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]