 鲜花( 79)  鸡蛋( 4)
|
本帖最后由 youngguncn 于 2016-3-1 00:45 编辑
, p( \' f" P' x8 O5 H8 l/ _+ T9 A! y J* a
, `* Y$ U0 [+ J0 Y第二个罪是criminal negligent homicide,是 class E不是manslaghter,class B,你就是把manslaughter和homocide搞混了。# T" v- C" t, t" ]5 {
纽约没有criminally neugligent manslaughter,如果有犯罪行为的manslaughter,是顶级重罪,像你所说的仅次于谋杀的重罪。这个在纽约叫一级误杀。梁Sir没有被charge这个。梁 Sir如果被charge这个罪名而且成立,至少刑期是4年,而不是说得0到15年。
/ ^* \) S% B0 a2 U5 }9 M梁 sir被convict的五个罪名是以严重性排列的,第一个是C级重罪,0到15年,第二个是E级重罪,0到4年。 M" f" l: C5 r3 B
梁 sir没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有任何犯罪意图和行为,梁 sir也没有,同时也没有DA起诉梁 sir有主观意愿去误杀小黑。# |7 B8 Q7 \) X6 f5 u" o, V
梁 sir的第一个罪我已经贴出来了。
8 ?; c, X3 s! R+ P7 l, [" E' j
, T' N# X0 g* z. x* H7 w& E$ D梁 sir被判的第二个罪是这个% U9 L/ A+ v. L) c9 e e1 {% |
S 125.10 Criminally negligent homicide.
6 J; O: h0 W4 B& g+ y" j$ w% Y$ j A person is guilty of criminally negligent homicide when, with
+ u$ S+ e Q$ rcriminal negligence, he causes the death of another person.+ S0 E' e3 P, {( Z
Criminally negligent homicide is a class E felony.
* P8 ^* c+ g6 w9 t7 ~, dcriminally negligent的有多严重呢。NYC是这么排的。
+ ?9 `/ Y( _+ {0 u最严重是intentionally,然后是knowingly,然后是reckless,最轻的是这个criminally negligent。比不小心还轻,因为太轻了,但是还确实怪你,没办法了,来了个这个表述。就像你在TNT买东西,但是你还是食物中毒了。1.大统华把保质期擦了重打,这肯定是故意的。2.大统华知道这批货过期了,没换,3.大统华太忙了,想换没来得及就被你买了。4.criminally neglegent,大统华正在换货,你也不知道,顺手拿起来换下来的货买了,这个根犯罪一点关系都没有。. y: h+ g2 A; Y5 q: C' S
9 O! \, w2 B4 h6 m7 ~1 C0 ^9 [$ W% J如果这个你还不理解,那我干脆都贴上来吧。
% t; ^9 z/ f- j, q- s# Z- V, V你说的那个manslaughter在NYC是下面这个。梁 sir要是这个,整个NYPD估计可能都要上街的。都轮不到华人。* A$ S: |! Z4 A( h+ s, M# G8 @
9 l9 N+ T9 H9 c+ P g9 cS 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.
& K2 ~; G. ~( d+ U+ p# @ A person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when:# q- ?2 L. _* h3 h/ i
1. With intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he
$ c0 S1 ]3 v* H" f3 T8 Qcauses the death of such person or of a third person; or, I# l* {) Z" Y
2. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
3 o( o7 ]3 U1 U6 t3 H5 x0 I& ^9 Odeath of such person or of a third person under circumstances which do* U$ [* b! K" a& [2 V. |" U2 c; x
not constitute murder because he acts under the influence of extreme
# E: ]) Y3 s% `* \4 q( r3 [$ lemotional disturbance, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of
1 R1 r# Z+ J2 Vsection 125.25. The fact that homicide was committed under the influence
* I) w3 t1 }: Y. v! m/ P- c8 cof extreme emotional disturbance constitutes a mitigating circumstance( b+ ~1 [7 ^: ^& |; ^9 \7 a
reducing murder to manslaughter in the first degree and need not be
7 u2 b# M; s5 n* _proved in any prosecution initiated under this subdivision; or
, a* e+ Y" ~" R' s 3. He commits upon a female pregnant for more than twenty-four weeks
& x" O2 c( T5 N! z* U* _, Man abortional act which causes her death, unless such abortional act is7 q5 h; C# N8 T H# c7 ^
justifiable pursuant to subdivision three of section 125.05; or/ x6 A: I' V4 W0 F0 H8 T
4. Being eighteen years old or more and with intent to cause physical) q0 V3 N; L8 M9 W& }
injury to a person less than eleven years old, the defendant recklessly. Q/ \ F- o t" u7 {
engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury& q- l# B+ G) y4 f! f
to such person and thereby causes the death of such person.
) p0 Z: H X1 ?6 W# w' E Manslaughter in the first degree is a class B felony.
5 U* N! [6 _* F |
|