 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 % E( }# F; \/ d. f- L. ?
) K8 ^$ b! l+ i$ T% \1 B3 b8 b5 Q9 r3 Y
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 2 K5 u" ?& X/ n) O, b# c6 ?5 O
. c/ P# }! I- x- `/ M6 D! ~
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03, F; D3 J0 }& P& D% W7 K
" L1 m9 D/ D" }4 I& x$ ?
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same.. ^3 B( ?5 X& T* K2 k: S
3 X- x0 f; i: X. S% Q/ K BNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
; y7 R( G9 ~) d6 u |
|