 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
" A% z, n3 f$ _( |- K" ^Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:147 q& S( A1 x" u$ f! f- W0 M3 A3 [
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
6 F3 G/ P% q' Q3 b6 e. \$ s
8 _$ v. I: _ S; [; J5 ^9 X, BIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
. \9 M, Z6 z% v3 o# J
3 I4 r! U! g6 J* G; x I1 T& q+ \Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
( ^# n5 J$ E. F, D+ A9 u, {: J- T5 Q+ \* a$ O* {. @ E( C
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
+ [8 J; T J9 P# T
& w5 F3 L: v9 w4 v, s8 yNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) * W8 z7 W# |6 u* o/ T% {
|
|