 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
' I6 h' U& o9 ~) G# `Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14+ p# O( @3 v. j, N! D8 K8 D' {1 m
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
* J& }7 I" s# c% I) n0 m
5 g5 j% }6 y0 A! e: ?If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 5 Z7 k. D5 v* u
. J% m* A% C" Z% Q4 E: x* E$ d# }Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03( g7 _% F' c2 g! K5 P. x9 o
0 J2 `; T% U1 N9 g0 Q" S+ ccomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
- |/ A0 x9 r) h
2 g5 T; o' V1 t7 j, s HNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 0 z! d* {, n+ h4 W4 i+ H; V$ M
|
|