 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 3 O s* a7 \$ L* |; m
- W1 U" u$ I4 z* G( v8 \7 A
5 }. p. W& {+ Z' i" Q3 M1 PIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
0 K j- R5 E& G5 \: F7 p* W) F$ V& r1 f+ ?' Z7 P
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
5 H/ x. S. y, e' |0 c B+ K/ {, I* h m/ F
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..! w$ @+ t4 @3 u0 R* T) o
# j& T9 R% ~+ g1 T9 _9 b9 }Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) # I3 q0 |( ]0 o- ?4 U# z; d$ d
|
|