 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 - x' v5 \1 g6 P6 _ |: C3 G
/ T, J( F1 A- m
" F6 z) m, F3 ^: p8 ?+ }% a& |If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
% d" K3 ` M8 V
0 g; _( z& w0 l8 f# b+ }7 BLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
2 P7 Z8 h0 @# X# I: ^! `. I5 R( d! I" L* L' Y$ i, d4 T! B
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same... K6 _+ r% r; s9 c
: |( }- u) b9 [4 A& r% |4 bNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
; R& n- b: H5 f |
|