 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
+ a! y, u6 u8 m6 z$ d" |& I# n! a' i3 O! R" }
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
) T1 _! y) P+ o( P* s
2 T c8 J4 G( k TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
5 ?4 g/ ^* l* F; Oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third7 |1 A' K3 x( R9 M. g6 m/ \
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic! R4 Y& {; u, v
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit% o- X' Y) V2 Q& q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( W1 I$ s! |% dmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,# Q6 I6 S! T5 b& x. D" o9 i5 p
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
% V2 D. Y4 [* v2 c0 QLePage Real Estate Services.
. i1 G) b* o7 b# }' x* N. r/ O/ \4 G. j# B* G; [) e6 E
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
3 b! H! J) x% v( oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
9 F9 I. R7 _: x/ p5 q9 d4 r1 Yconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& P# A/ q! S3 a v wsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 x8 }7 @# d4 o" d5 j
residential real estate sector.9 i, V2 N f. w
& b) W! C+ ~6 z5 f# N
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: C5 l M9 k0 W7 x0 c* \
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 E: l" _. T) `7 I
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562; a- @: T7 ]( y; \$ ?: |
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
) W2 J0 q, |0 B$ z( O9 _(+13.2%).$ M# o% m, f( ^! W8 K) w' B* @+ S
# O7 x7 o5 g) n* Z- I "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 K7 K* I( f' y' X% j
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the6 j! L, H% C+ r. U: n' Q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are5 C3 X+ s. q4 m. b8 J4 a
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
; W2 {6 @) d! B& fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.4 h: f3 `/ G. x1 [
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 ~" a7 K& {5 R0 d. Ywelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
! _. i/ L+ |6 Sbalanced market."
7 r0 b- t6 ~$ T; X* ~$ B, @
( \0 Y; J8 O+ E. t( t+ \+ ] Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,- o. N1 \% b3 r. l
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* _ E% t5 @' v6 P. jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 q) Y4 S% _$ w7 k" u/ ]1 [/ I$ c, N. k
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 x" Z+ D# n" o4 d% P& m
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
- U0 S* `8 h L$ r3 C6 G% `. c0 lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" I5 d, u" M7 I8 e4 Q5 Sbreaking price appreciations.
' O% n1 f. M& T8 }
5 U( y4 r2 |9 }5 \/ e! s: B6 N Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& d' r3 {4 g. P8 [
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
& L: l/ E& P' [+ T3 ?* L0 dlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
3 z3 y& J# l1 l% {; k
' {8 n" V5 E: L* J; e In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid! X4 \, u: E- V3 d* @
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
9 V+ y4 j5 i) g1 x6 gconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' {# H F7 W1 Z3 x) Y9 M0 v
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
9 I" {! S' z4 j: yIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ f1 V3 _6 v; x; }; a$ r
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of. M" I" C3 }: d+ V% P
price appreciation when compared with 2005.( G) h5 j( S2 B: h j' ]
' s: K8 t4 |1 s; J# n( T1 M
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 r5 t- k* e% [) v; _1 `3 Kmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
8 n& u5 @6 r5 ^5 D* ^- bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) o8 c% C! B' p$ w3 Z6 Fare markedly different than those found in the United States. [; @( W& L7 H
6 |& S9 \: Z9 d4 U' o3 j" n" H% K
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the* _% _. }' h9 u5 n: H
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
0 V H8 @/ D( nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( A" I5 L- d0 j% A* frelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 g- h( Q, I" ^! `6 Q6 x
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the" n# B6 r$ |. U1 Y: | P
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 w" T* v+ ^, I ^$ Y4 jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ i; l3 D1 K7 w/ q/ V. ~
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; u/ K* X' p$ C; M
0 A: e$ F7 c. K9 }% r' g
<<
8 ^6 _! v5 I( N$ D& }$ ^6 r/ Z REGIONAL SUMMARIES5 H' A" L* h9 {: D% ~' x
>>
; N* b. Z/ k8 d8 ~# c' W" f- n
$ ?6 F" B% V5 W# |/ Y: {, j Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" ^2 D# ^' ?% ?! O1 OHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
0 r' x( [9 w- S, k$ a1 H- ~7 D* r/ _of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 \( D A8 D0 d4 |: l# N Q5 glooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ E. P) I2 ~6 y8 C+ t
renovations.
6 X) u5 S+ P3 s/ _$ Q' [. Z/ l3 w# _& H: }2 j5 T+ {- D( ]
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% ~# z [" L9 T
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 E, J" \2 G- T) ]
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and# I! ^0 i o( [1 v' |0 s
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 Q( Q3 s6 X9 P8 q, ^" q. l% m
- V% o; w5 H0 w3 S# K" J* X7 d$ [
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% I3 [. {, s/ {! q2 Q9 c0 j
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
2 ^' q, _ R3 s& s! ~quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new3 c: @( ~+ h( w1 J' H- G, j
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
" |1 W7 K6 m8 S+ k2 E, t3 Uto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" K: L0 `7 b8 t2 ~
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options./ Y: J$ }' J) b$ ]' c1 M7 Y3 u* O2 T
" m2 F) T8 D1 N" G In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced! [* t- @* p2 r, i% g1 K8 }! i
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
, F, D$ J* l3 d2 w. t+ D( L b% Bhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% S5 l; u, L& m) g/ L& p
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
, }6 p3 ?$ [& i$ n* D2 d# D2 edollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing s3 k9 m* e6 I" l# j" C
buyers with more options when looking for a home.+ l1 m' E) t" t9 I+ d5 A: z1 M# {
5 I: \5 K- ~$ `2 `8 P, L& D8 \ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
2 s0 P" D0 J4 u( e) Iamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 k6 `2 q) z/ E
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,: r+ h' _3 r0 N# n0 Q
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
( f, W3 h; v, H& l. u* e& [few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.+ ^/ r3 \: S0 M c! R" W7 w
4 i) C. A. q: R) F" B& C Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 `7 K- d- X! h/ W
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
; W5 n# D4 {0 x+ O Flevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 o9 D2 k1 I5 W# U! rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) Q- L4 G# o2 R* z7 c) x% j1 o" F
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
4 x; h0 d5 u% p( Jpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) d, P$ i L9 K+ g: {9 o/ {% K
making a purchase./ V- L+ ~3 H5 K$ t
1 [% h! u8 C/ j) I ?+ V" M Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing: Q5 p: d7 D0 W# Z( X* E/ f
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" [; O0 q5 c: V- F7 r7 Oconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 x# T% l9 o; C2 I* j4 Y# c5 fcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
( H1 N7 v9 U$ H3 Aattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 r: q- z8 ?% m/ I$ } kamenities.
j5 u+ i2 N, P* D& T$ q# [
2 H$ ~8 U1 T/ V$ N# U: b( A The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' c' [, N6 l6 i. l' `3 Q. u
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
% b) f1 k/ Z: i1 w4 O. {across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has- W6 Y; J0 h7 U6 Z; |" d; m, Z
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& N9 K6 z0 v" h: o; K+ p0 a/ ^
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle# T) O$ k' [/ i: v( C
residence, rather than for investment.5 k8 r: n$ U: H! G R; y8 r
5 n2 [# y3 e) ]% v/ u The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ _5 u/ B+ |, G* k
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
7 }& q% C. H# S; L3 T0 M f" ?in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 ~* o+ N# c3 i/ Pconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization3 {6 N }/ s. g% o' B' k$ Q
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter% V" n5 @1 D" y
the market./ t: E/ t* m' u' `1 ]
: c; [6 L* W3 z' h. Q# D1 N( _
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
) @$ E2 n7 N4 n3 z9 x: YJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
- A% A) o/ _5 F7 ]0 u% e' mAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% T. o$ @% ^1 k. n, f1 t
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due: Q0 ^# Q- W3 Q- I7 C1 g
to the shortage of available inventory.! B. [0 e+ _" O. E; ^. } C
" o7 B9 }& }% ~0 y; }
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
; k; @% F( L; x3 L% z1 \5 m5 I2 Ymomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
' c8 B. M, u! r! Z) [# Y) ]vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses b o; x9 t; |% @1 K! q) U" h
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.( i0 h5 {; S3 W% K! l
' M5 D; s4 Z0 T/ f Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- c% X) s/ I7 ~6 g' y# win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
+ L! z0 r) m, R4 m7 v8 {5 uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 U3 e. M6 }- S" \4 {: rpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" d0 J" c# j1 y# c3 d# e0 q
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
: n1 p* {" k3 @8 Useason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as; B% i0 B+ o0 |; O* @ \" _6 Y
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity., W& m$ |" H# d8 U* Y+ m
. E: J; H, [. D- |6 ?' J. e
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
+ G- n' C! e& v+ `: P4 d7 bas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton9 N! u1 K0 ?0 O, n7 ]( K
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" P' S; Z6 j1 _* Y2 R) L% W% Lmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) b% M, ]; W" D/ y7 i9 |3 ]
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve+ N/ `: I7 `% B/ S2 J% R! x
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly7 T& N7 F! F# f+ \+ q( t* @7 L
towards the end of 2006.
+ Q" u0 e7 Y" M. s8 y' R
4 C* a3 c" b: F% h9 _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of3 p: c! f; k# ?( X/ Y9 X, p! }
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable- u- ]+ a, e, }: t! s! K
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse0 z5 t1 I5 B) q, ?; O. ~
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' F5 O! {) p, oforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 t. i2 F" S, P& Z" U! l( v/ j! V8 w
pressure on tight inventory levels.# b7 |0 p* A) y- _/ g( W+ q
2 L- e& A" R& ^2 g z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 o2 K$ @( ^- N' ]fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people E9 `; y" a l" c2 Y4 b
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;$ o* p5 Y0 q" V2 z1 p
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
$ ^( I9 j6 E) v% J2 B" x+ \for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.& J' R! i8 x8 C6 I" d" T7 |' ~
9 S! g7 Y3 @' h$ ]( x; m! c
<<
6 R6 H2 z5 B! `& y1 V. F Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ d. X' H @) ]) [
0 {1 t& M1 ~1 s+ [& T, P6 G% C9 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 m; t B7 I- e* x
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
6 O$ ]8 ?1 M6 L5 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ~$ l# _; D/ I9 p( `1 W 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; _7 g9 F" T0 I4 J$ A Market Average Average % Change Average Average
+ }' K q! m( J* {: F9 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2 v/ q7 N J5 g8 e Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
' X3 q' F. K5 [4 V* u: b4 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 v7 n/ a! t3 m: Q
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 `9 [9 b# N( ~$ n1 v, n -------------------------------------------------------------------------# f' J6 P1 d$ J7 I) r: f8 F
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0002 G r m2 q( R' [5 P2 {; g) s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# g$ _. b, c5 r F5 h1 C7 P
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
d+ D8 J4 l- C! y6 ?0 k4 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------. F; `: U) v" _
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
5 g' E# z1 p3 T6 N. P( v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! c" W4 i" m( x7 E. Z Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583' v( A7 |, n* o3 k& @9 @8 Z" T ~) @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Q: B. E$ U3 W0 L2 T# G* b
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
7 F8 V9 U2 S- o( u% F& T -------------------------------------------------------------------------) D( n: j- N* l" U1 r) Q+ Z/ `
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 l5 p& D1 Q* z7 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% v7 o' _8 {' `! e2 Z Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: S% r# a. t# Q, r8 w& t& e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ a" o+ c1 U3 H0 c Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707% d' K- D- y; [. g9 ]1 Z& a" f7 {( v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 h) l* \4 Q/ V5 {3 b/ [) N Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500, R/ f( ~3 m# K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. m! n+ M p4 F6 a- l& ]3 I Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
) Y% D" m+ P% t' t -------------------------------------------------------------------------- n4 @( I9 \ p% @
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
2 m2 C0 C4 h8 Q8 b+ C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ I. |3 H3 M+ X" Q/ j, e8 w0 w Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
& N; [# Q, H/ x8 h# [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: y" G: Y9 h, d: j Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
! c# V3 _1 ]8 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 u" H( [0 n. l3 Y National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860. ^+ A) J! v5 o* @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 q( R0 P% o$ I5 w+ J) d! Y2 x8 {
! a* E' v8 l: T }; T8 J) I -------------------------------------------------------------7 `: d; M( B; r
Standard Condominium
2 S. X& _) ]* q0 p( Q, k -------------------------------------------------------------
* z3 [7 ~+ b6 `2 A$ p- B 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo5 G" z% D( L" L
Market % Change Average Average % Change) t; h; O0 G2 l5 R6 C
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 d# G: V% [( H) \. ]; { Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%% v* C/ K* x( l4 ^, R% ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
' Z& M/ V3 _) h7 j Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. ~, o) l. Z6 B8 ~- d6 ~9 y' V; Y -------------------------------------------------------------
( W* N1 s# [) [) Y: w7 f) N) E3 M! h Moncton 4.9% - - N/A, t4 a. e5 Q( l- Z$ r4 s, r/ \
-------------------------------------------------------------
, c3 `8 A7 Y* i! Z Saint John N/A - - N/A9 B8 L( ~' q; O- J9 r9 L& K/ k4 k/ z8 K
-------------------------------------------------------------$ J8 c7 e6 S2 i
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
0 H3 R# J0 y/ q" q -------------------------------------------------------------2 @0 n: q, ]! B+ J: O) `9 D
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
$ B; F9 l4 `! F$ @+ J -------------------------------------------------------------1 a8 p! M% o5 w! o0 n) ?1 N O
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%% u) Y- y5 j" m; C9 [5 {' t
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 y+ W3 P* G l% x4 b% F Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
% F9 B" b" R9 f6 @; x4 A# z) A -------------------------------------------------------------
1 E. ?3 o2 g; q x, _& { Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%( v/ `0 j" Q+ s/ H @* X, Z. v
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 E( u6 a6 f4 O* ]" w- Y( c' g Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
r1 W' @5 W" c& P# @( D -------------------------------------------------------------
" W0 S: X M, x9 v8 p! X; O+ U Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
6 \' G3 U+ J7 f2 q- c+ c- F- f -------------------------------------------------------------/ j) U4 o: s$ F2 O
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
) b `, \$ d% p6 V -------------------------------------------------------------
, x) k' A+ {# Y: A2 A# e Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; m$ Q; Z: N( i0 ]; V& G# c
-------------------------------------------------------------; B. M; k" W/ M: f8 r6 R2 S
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%0 l+ Z }+ B9 @# ? d4 }7 ? e
-------------------------------------------------------------% u w" n( m( r' p9 V+ f
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
$ \6 X3 Z4 S( d! r# u+ B1 {, } -------------------------------------------------------------
$ V& N/ D2 x# l* ?( Q4 \ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
: H7 m. c+ l- F3 o& h -------------------------------------------------------------$ m8 C& e. O' | N: a- \
>>- v7 T4 U8 z7 X8 p( T# c" |) b. J
: y! t: M7 y6 c$ |- F Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 N& ]& J2 A( h5 K- r: f# Cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ o: p0 A* |/ EJohn and Victoria.
, W4 f& ^1 K; }# p/ W/ ~/ _$ [: }- w2 Y; s
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most' P9 X. P Z8 R
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 t- ?" {) d' E/ |housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 R9 s: ?) }$ a2 a7 yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 `$ n) x& f. j, ^* q, U0 utrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities( ~7 f) {/ F1 ?9 L$ v
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is8 w% m5 ~: V9 ^0 O* C) u2 {" ^- a6 y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
) u6 D/ {. Z& ?5 W0 p0 M. W) g4 \( Mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 `0 R- h8 S, m$ f+ B* I) Oversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& P# u4 Z# Q2 T/ B1 f: i3 ~+ lNovember 15, 2006.
G! J+ }- X: p* W3 @. R Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; S- U3 k9 k. g. W y6 Z6 cfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
! q+ j/ D3 x( dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
+ ?* e; s1 |7 n2 z8 javailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|