埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2587|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 X1 `5 G8 Q* j* R& s! Z3 d1 i3 A+ @+ O0 V: z& J. s$ R; q% r, k
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
# _. t+ ?! L+ }; n! M0 f/ ~* u  \- Y' Q
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ M" R- @# Y4 O/ T' \% B/ ^4 v4 w! A; O
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. l* e/ t2 Q+ F6 e# J5 B/ Mquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic0 c( X5 F+ Y' ?" d/ g3 Z( p) U
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit& n* K' w+ w6 b9 l) [6 }/ k/ T6 W" E
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and- G. Z) b5 j9 U& _/ n
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
% r  K+ F5 R7 n, qQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. o4 R! F+ I0 q- b4 w2 K, e
LePage Real Estate Services.
/ U" L6 A% h- i2 `+ b' @' M, T% O7 {- I! P4 W8 `% j- H; v% d: T
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters3 R! f+ f0 v4 P; Z& H  h5 J; E
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic) x- J* U' M4 M: n/ x
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
, i& G- ?- w2 Esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' P+ n' A% y. s) b6 Fresidential real estate sector.
6 @5 X; e% r: n' v
! ^9 W# m6 ^7 R4 P$ A$ j    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 j  A) `- t! T- t* B/ t+ F! Q
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) m9 K( W) H5 ]7 T% w
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 E/ e4 f- e; J# M: R2 `
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
! g6 x# Q5 \: _8 x. Q6 v(+13.2%).; b8 K: ^+ I# Z1 @" Y2 ?9 f
( V. b2 [) v2 m/ P
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 p1 ]+ s* n5 b& B& ?- A' b
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, d: z' U) o7 T* d5 ?% _frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are4 }" g2 {. N, ?8 l; h
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,# i. e8 J+ A/ J, _6 a: Z! W2 c8 ^
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ K1 @1 y, ]4 e1 w% J4 t5 N2 B& R, _- A
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We9 z! G$ \% z5 l" q  i; P/ E
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
7 ^! O4 W4 v4 C2 |balanced market."
1 A* C3 i$ Z6 P0 N* H% d% N* z# Q) l6 q% u- c1 N) z8 j4 M7 g
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
8 v" U5 p& K' w7 O" q) p0 Z: Sconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; K0 O) p9 i7 H, A9 u( Mto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued# O& C9 F/ T9 ?& o+ [+ R
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core* W* H! M5 s5 Q& {" }4 ?9 r
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,$ R8 D- j5 s1 \4 z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record, T! {$ M4 M$ H3 S/ p% F5 i
breaking price appreciations.2 |3 G( ~* R, B' m3 N2 w9 q5 V

- ~! y3 Q6 p+ `$ z1 _! d' U7 `; U    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. j9 C/ q0 k! b+ H+ Weconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ y0 t2 F, w5 R; v& slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
' ^  v! }; ?1 D, Q1 W  C1 f6 N* |; X) Y* `
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
+ G% x& X3 {+ F& V0 A! P5 v3 feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
7 v7 y$ V! [9 B( j$ F1 m6 ], `confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off# Q3 l/ \! _$ T1 J
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.( I' X0 ^5 `9 s/ G  T+ l0 {
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
  E( M/ U' j) s# Bgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of( M/ }5 m; E% J, F1 w$ H# `
price appreciation when compared with 2005.5 ^' k# c7 Q, ?) {% y9 n

4 ?* z" N( K  \7 T9 }5 {/ O. Q8 a) {    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 |- e3 V  l4 W# c+ m: q; omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
" ^2 G4 X8 p1 {4 ffinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada  W7 ]3 E- S$ r! _' S
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
7 M" J' n& q+ O% G
' s1 r2 X  l$ b% [4 k9 }, G/ {& R    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the4 n" U7 z% ?2 _- q% r+ m
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 Z7 t* ^4 }  U4 \* S! S+ N
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the; N3 h; S- ]4 i8 B7 j
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" e) i, f2 b4 h* H  o5 S
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 x0 S0 F: ?* C5 Y. L; T9 a
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and* a2 k6 |7 X5 P! \6 f* M3 h
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
* K# @# ~/ }( W2 c5 v+ R9 ^. Pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."6 T" w, t5 Z. @; a+ j- ^/ z
  i. s* j$ ]2 H$ I
    <<
  y  L4 T! \0 e                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
1 c- o1 L' N3 G8 v9 Q1 i4 |% r    >>5 K8 L3 M+ X' z0 K' f$ v3 }3 x
( u, S" b+ h- i# O/ ?: [# I( X- X1 ?
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
. b! z. e8 b9 M+ {0 I2 sHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; f& {  w, g2 S3 k: D
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time% \  Z- p$ i8 U$ n' w
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of& {0 a' g- S# C
renovations.- ^. X7 {. \( T2 j

5 x8 A, u2 S6 r: h    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; b% E9 Z. M& Z- a' D
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 j/ s$ T+ d- J$ P' ecompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 ^; M; f" f& l7 l8 B$ {5 [" S
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.1 U% r- {- S: _- {6 c
1 e3 C' a2 b% R( w
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
4 i: S6 O: W3 L" l+ u( ]  eslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 [3 O$ j4 G; @- R
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new9 N* C- ?* _# \* K/ c4 x( T! H: t
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
) R+ p3 s- I" m( [: Eto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
: [* p' ^6 B+ n7 h9 Eand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
9 j+ O/ ^8 Z5 x2 E
' s  S' A/ U& W) C) J* X) C    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ G% h  Q+ U, y) _* @
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their. r+ Z" Y! Q' \4 S
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers+ z( `1 V* G" u" X9 e: o: i) B
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
7 ~2 |" W% ?9 R4 D4 Ndollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing) }" {% [# D- j8 l; m$ R% C
buyers with more options when looking for a home.8 Q9 u) J/ ~; h, b9 {" V4 M

( V! G4 O/ o2 c, |. Z' D, G$ o    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly# b  q% a) o) J+ X# K- l1 Q8 J5 R
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' Y* L2 g& O$ R9 D  p0 {
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,: D9 \. l2 V# _  N# y. Y
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
0 }" e( o2 i$ O& n$ y8 ~5 a  Vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
) d$ R8 o# B. L3 k* l, |- W
- h5 b5 U- F8 C; e6 A0 G4 n    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" p/ F, s3 z5 l3 Z3 bprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- f7 U9 Q- {" t. }7 }3 Z" Hlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
8 N- N) R$ d& ^$ Ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
; z) P* C5 b- Nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
9 d4 B7 R  Q) z: npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
. q; v* g* d" Q: j& ~# u0 R9 vmaking a purchase.9 n6 I5 o) `6 I* l. m% I

8 \9 z+ X8 x  d' J- A. Q    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing5 l2 C, r2 {4 i; o9 y/ ?0 s
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 X0 A( i! p% j2 B8 K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
: @) I8 h4 C% `6 Z, {centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 s; ]+ K  V( M
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# X9 @, |% T  N: `; }1 x- R
amenities.
( `' ~: _9 ^6 A1 K
' j4 T$ |. l7 Y8 a    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
4 W* W+ Y2 m3 N" Othroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
. e2 h( {0 S5 _" I9 B  Zacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: ]% T, h' h3 c& I
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been1 A6 @; p" }% f1 j7 T8 k; B
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle5 y$ S( d  Y  \, q
residence, rather than for investment.1 Z  M! A# l3 H7 p

/ V8 P" s# n* g+ s7 ^% u1 J1 Q    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 _+ ?" i) T/ M. Y" thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted# J3 Q$ V9 w) R0 f: D# V3 w
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
  H( X" y/ i4 Pconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
8 I4 _! w7 C! C( T0 }' x$ S- trate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
" q- i4 \. Y/ ]  qthe market.
; o# V/ z4 r  X8 t, [; w% }5 c; o) q: }' j/ V9 `: b& y
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 ~+ w3 i4 Q- X) g$ mJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
% i( H( F; {% w2 W" c5 PAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- v! o8 W( x* n/ z3 \, ?4 bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
+ p& P9 @- N& G3 D7 ~to the shortage of available inventory.
5 W8 N6 V/ O0 E4 h, B, x2 }8 v0 c  Q
; @9 e9 ]6 `; \    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its% s4 Y$ C1 f' k# T! j  ^/ _
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains9 u* r- G& f3 y+ u1 x$ P
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses8 Q/ O8 _9 V( q( w& Q+ E
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
9 ^* f) l* J6 A1 d# v1 h/ z
1 Z7 ~2 H; [) Y3 C1 B    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& S; d7 J0 P8 c+ ^* ~  X7 c+ xin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" o. V1 v/ q0 h- u: t+ Bunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" @6 K# ]6 g! @/ l1 k5 }7 u% _pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring3 @' q: F3 U- J( g* j3 `/ t3 J; W
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' H, ]. G  @* U# mseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
! F0 W1 m- g8 G1 M* a/ {2 ?buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 h& c$ e3 X1 i& k5 ~; I! q
4 N5 m+ T5 ?6 {2 G3 c1 A5 f  z
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# R' h2 Y. M* q8 m
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; M, @9 u& w9 a9 B& `) e& |5 m5 {6 L
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 ]! i) W  X' @* W" W9 w
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 q! l+ b$ m- p  S( sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve3 d4 o; |+ O' e. R; O
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly' I' ^4 ]  G. K' x& D5 r
towards the end of 2006.
   
: {8 m" V( B  d0 T# l, ^1 s, A
5 Q$ ^3 w1 q" z. w+ ~3 |While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
: q( P( D' e. m, p) J! f: hinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
. Q' c1 m0 |' ?to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 @- r  g: R( S/ I* Q* b" U
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 h+ T* F( u/ \. P
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( A4 C5 _' \8 H+ J2 hpressure on tight inventory levels.
! v; R  q1 q  U: h! R( w/ N. Q( h4 [: l9 B
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
0 Q! l5 H0 I, |8 ]' Jfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people4 f# f# _; B8 c6 C
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;, Z- x, X2 n  \4 ~3 o* L( n' E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching2 |1 ]1 X( H- t- [- x+ y' Y
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.* j* W# J. C, s0 D- Y& @5 Y( w
! c7 G* \% u2 d7 ^! [
    <<5 Q. ~7 w, [4 `( ]  y
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20068 }# o& I' a! I& {

: b! g) p  h" Z, k; v3 v: N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% B3 ~. D; q, g1 s, h  R
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
* s! j( F2 z* s6 _3 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 i8 k' B& ?, o) O/ f                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3; e) ]0 B0 E9 C
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average. g" Q! J: w$ ^3 i6 ^7 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ _: W; R2 L1 t% h1 S6 N    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
8 u( C0 x! S; |( d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( w& d) L. j! h  j
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0003 S6 p. x+ Y; ?$ E$ O* v* N  z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) d; A. H) l( K, }' O
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0008 M* D  e( q, M1 l, _0 u: [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- @* F, k. v7 a/ \% Q8 b% w    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -5 c6 }1 }5 F' ?2 a. E  ?1 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 H) m! U" J1 ]4 ^1 m
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333) G% ~) t) ^/ Y/ x9 A. t# u+ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! _  z) l& {, \2 K    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583+ R. D2 b! i# N6 y- r. z0 Q9 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 w! l9 h: z( o& D- _/ e    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
! Q, e; b) I$ l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( B& {% d( a' @9 y+ d0 r5 a4 w    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
( ?  y) I" H7 @2 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# N7 X' J* z; d. A
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
' B6 c2 R6 s( I; s; x- \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) g5 T2 X* u. C+ ?* f6 ~2 A8 ]
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
3 y1 y; e9 H7 @+ O6 v# Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, I3 p; S4 p9 F# e8 S# O
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
0 T- p4 U8 |- }6 ^# G# ?- c$ M; S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 |. s2 Y; K1 k3 V" ~: m! G/ `
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389) z6 M0 v2 N) q8 ~, F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& @3 t# S# M) g; y% `/ r2 U3 m4 u    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714/ Q) S, B; f2 q) ]2 O4 q; ?* A! a+ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) r5 n" f  m: g6 H) \) z% @9 |
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
/ o2 W7 k, ~( V9 P, s( X) e' I. k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: T! D! A: n8 S$ t+ k: E1 _+ b* Q9 D    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
7 t- P4 O, q! ~6 C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% v% n* G" L& w1 L" h" v3 J    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
6 t; n/ G5 Z' c4 U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- d7 b2 O; l: y# g  \+ f" O
: L5 ^& H+ A" X& l1 s( K1 N    -------------------------------------------------------------0 R' i1 _4 v5 k2 a1 K; v
                               Standard Condominium
6 X- K9 P; n! P, C( l    -------------------------------------------------------------5 l9 p4 f0 n" S; n" T5 o
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
9 u- G. m& V7 g" @: ?. y    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change9 C$ }+ E$ I8 b( A% A* z
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 d, A: k4 y) r* D' L5 ]
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
* A, n4 ?6 I0 k: o2 j( Q! W$ w: A    -------------------------------------------------------------, J. p3 ~1 ~8 L7 Z9 z
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
% c9 U7 s2 j, @) V# L& A/ M0 E    -------------------------------------------------------------5 ~/ O: h+ z$ c6 a# ]
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A. ^* ~1 J. E+ U5 O4 x8 Q6 }0 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 S- U' Z7 A. Z' b# P2 |
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
3 X, }: E* M& e+ k; G, Q- h6 {& Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
: ~, Y+ X3 ]0 ?    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%9 X( K) {* l0 @) ?8 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------" r$ ?& ?& @7 _, v1 p/ j& L
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%  Y- ]4 F7 T# K7 Y; v2 I- O5 {- u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( T) ^' c7 L; J7 j    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%0 g1 b1 ?+ y% H6 C% b8 [
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 _% B& R0 R* z& D: n    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
5 T) \9 I9 z8 B. ^7 u  K    -------------------------------------------------------------( o, A( d* N- y; G$ p1 w
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%. E4 {. j4 p2 K, }; \& C* \
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 k5 H! F& }! }5 X1 f) W$ n
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
! a) R7 w2 p# P" Z  U    -------------------------------------------------------------
* W6 U" C( N) _2 g+ i+ w1 D    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%8 W9 r2 R7 Y; `7 q# |
    -------------------------------------------------------------- [+ l# C) ?, s! z$ Y; L
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
$ n- a/ I# Q+ v. M+ {2 h    -------------------------------------------------------------/ K2 _2 y* Z% }& ~
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
1 V* n4 C% a0 n/ z    -------------------------------------------------------------' I( h$ O/ n- p7 y2 E
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%2 O0 d9 K- `. j' g  V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ?8 x: h- r6 z0 z    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%* }7 }  \; w, f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, y7 v+ m3 }, I* m( w    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%% T: Q8 T! c. K* Z' ~4 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; f6 q4 i; W+ l# v) j- @    >>
: s" @* J  W4 U0 G$ O9 h' }
& T, E# [* O+ U    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined( }; z: _6 L$ d7 e. j( n
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint7 F7 u: I- c% b0 _+ T
John and Victoria.
. d2 h4 k: W) X( x# S8 O% c5 ?
8 I$ |! D0 Y# G0 F' W) {    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most; R+ z/ h8 L$ S
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 t4 I0 l! v# B5 Ghousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release# n* l, c* t0 Q( s  v
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 P1 z( v1 B& @1 D9 ptrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities; Q. W4 k  D) i% `+ {
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
1 X( ~5 V5 F9 ?/ ]' C) b1 ]* @available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ c* E& Q3 T( ]1 u0 k+ j6 X3 {
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
. n3 O4 ?- r5 A% c8 B9 O" ^version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ n, a/ J5 \5 j, J( j
November 15, 2006.
# {0 F% _0 I& E! J    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# c/ p5 n" |* f  x( Z
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge- Z+ z, b+ ]& `$ x1 ]  |% i1 e& D
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
( d# ]4 J* r: n3 navailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-8-25 12:16 , Processed in 0.178541 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表