 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- a. M9 u3 |$ Z, W5 K
9 R" W, S- i. b1 S8 M, W- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -% \# o$ f- y, P3 e6 G1 ]3 O5 s# e
& c5 y) R2 r+ x: z$ ? TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market% d2 o* ~% ?' r, ]5 ~% r
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third( Q1 M6 g5 I. m" J
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic" e, w, W- i1 |9 p1 s4 X* v
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# x% l# w0 Z$ Z2 e" {+ J2 M5 ^9 t, q% ~
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 M6 Z! y J2 B! D
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" j0 ~, y. M8 Z( U1 p9 _: X. CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal; y9 Q3 A4 N. D, f# [# g
LePage Real Estate Services.
, n/ I4 E) _- y) ?) z
; f( a2 B) e/ [: ^ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. K9 U" j1 a) [0 f
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' R D E1 C% L
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" j+ ~3 T, ?5 Esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, ]& d4 m0 ^1 m- }
residential real estate sector.& L% i) d' ?) D
; w2 V, d6 I* r$ ^
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: D2 v6 R/ J0 i+ n6 ^1 c
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
' i* f) r6 Q4 ^6 G; `year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ x4 f: ^: J+ b* L
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 U6 V. @5 T9 a& [* |
(+13.2%).5 u4 J \: r( `) H2 N
$ N/ E; C! y S5 v$ Y7 o "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
e! _( w& R/ _& x, k- o, M, Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
4 k" v3 t, t0 L# Gfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are: e8 R7 [5 c S! m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ C5 w5 W- k3 X' @7 ?( epresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
. U$ A, M8 h/ b" t7 M1 T) i"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 a4 X% ^; E1 ^8 Y3 `$ q, \
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ B! N3 @% Q7 g ebalanced market."1 y- e! v! T$ P8 G5 b
1 J) y- t7 ?; i1 k% ~, W Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
T# c+ I/ o% Zconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift9 w9 ]1 E' C, I9 k
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
5 m: T# t0 p r. H* ?: V8 M5 V0 G9 s' ethroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
, B) L- Y7 N, k' k, @5 aenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 A! q" B9 y& ]! T
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
- A/ ?5 s- B% _$ z4 T. n* ]) Bbreaking price appreciations.
l$ A& H0 e& G! c/ m/ U/ O& K+ Z* G! Q3 Z: A+ z! l
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 @) F1 w* j1 \. l! weconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" _; M6 _% D8 ?/ i5 N; B }9 @
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.; @5 {) R6 P U8 B! \- s" n
/ d0 }% J6 \5 p* e% {5 o In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, g1 G5 }) q7 ] B) peconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) F! |5 y. E6 i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
8 ?: q. h( h- x% \slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ _' [6 A; N; }6 QIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers) R5 k+ n7 ~* A5 w4 Q
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of) o9 G" P! D5 j- J1 ]
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
" U" N" o4 K: `3 f4 G! |) T
4 Z5 y, x' {0 D. p# \! l While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
9 F/ U9 f( L% I: gmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: i0 `) B' R h" g% n; g. E
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada e! p: B9 v7 T' r
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
7 ]2 t1 b3 B: z, J) C' e% c/ T& A3 @9 I2 |: D& h" o, t
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the8 Z g3 x% b Y9 n9 y) V' M' l% A
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's, y) ~# d3 f) W6 z$ m
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the' T) \, O7 I9 |0 [% ~" R( n6 X
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
y$ M0 {4 u% }2 R& X; Vaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% o5 U' K9 e1 L7 kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ d4 S l; l# j; b1 o4 eaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization) j1 T% Z1 p8 ]1 @, x7 d: Z) i
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
# B) `; C/ D. W7 h
( S: W& U6 r8 ` <<
$ J/ x) a& O# T$ G; ] REGIONAL SUMMARIES3 e; ^: r, f- g" h/ q
>>
* ^: p, X6 Z5 Q% n! v/ Y. Q# c( Z5 a
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
$ n6 d1 W6 _7 g# I. x9 VHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate+ w! |/ {9 [) j/ ]4 C
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 @6 s5 [& ~7 clooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of; \2 `/ j5 x: L7 T H5 q
renovations.- A5 }) E4 V {$ Y0 ]) e @
) W0 n9 E0 }7 `. A) I The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight1 a& m( o2 c8 t8 `, N8 H
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation" I1 ?' k. u1 {
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- e% w- S& o, d7 O, Z( Z$ Z+ {
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
) M9 N3 j" \4 |6 M3 d- y/ `/ c; ~ Q( t F
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 s/ z9 G3 j. o/ C4 Y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. C0 r m& w/ `3 k" I7 X2 S$ H2 S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' D5 Y% x2 e4 }9 \% m* B' ]
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" ~' z( x( f- p* r
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
0 r6 V9 h# o% a. d9 c$ `' hand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! H. U" I% | z
/ i: y6 M, Z r+ \7 D In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
+ y! j2 s% H9 s0 y' x* e! Uconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
% l, D( |, U" i! g/ D- e- ehomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
4 p }7 g0 }4 w6 I& O" iwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian) {, G9 M1 p0 Z# \1 i, ~9 l7 U8 H
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* G, |; H4 y+ e2 v4 ^0 U0 xbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
% v4 o$ {5 W9 e7 ~7 t# H' ] K2 t2 ]) x
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
* g" c! u% s+ e; o. Z4 Gamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( C2 B! X T1 q: M- H* {priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 ~' _9 h8 C4 M9 S3 S3 Q
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) u" L/ [+ Z5 L" e7 f* f! O' D1 }
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.1 w+ e% }8 N& \% @) a$ X
. h' T( v7 f3 y$ O* _' } Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house' j$ e+ t$ R! }9 L( r
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
9 t1 B- {8 p `7 D& a5 m- O% B+ klevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
- i8 o. _( @: @$ Qfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# i2 T% N# [- W, ]5 k2 swhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# U. ~! S7 g+ z# J ?) {pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before( x$ m6 a0 o& u7 o$ V7 F2 W
making a purchase.
% [/ I, [% f( D5 k0 W' D2 {' V U. F5 ~; ]& P, e( S) q
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 V w' ?. U) W* vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
1 S1 K+ p8 U- Vconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# j) k$ S! X; L. H9 _* c) z
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 p) G1 E6 Z1 }/ }1 f# mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! P' o( v1 J1 A9 [* S7 E1 H, I
amenities.+ Y0 U" n1 `/ {+ B
7 W# G% j( b7 Z% [' M The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' Z5 ?# a6 A( ~- l( i9 C- e
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand2 B9 {# e+ A/ `2 ~. ^# y1 g6 g9 C
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
& t6 `- E7 K, ^/ G: @+ e; @* r+ t3 a* Rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been+ Z4 i" \4 d# y) h& ~$ R3 \
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
/ O( D$ c- E* M# ~/ V% \residence, rather than for investment.5 X; _, ~6 J) E- u5 Y* s' l y6 c2 o
" r& u% r, g6 d+ N& `7 F' l
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
# ~+ ?. k- @. V0 o( ohouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* E. e* @$ ^7 S1 S! n7 _2 xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer% C, Z. ?' g8 w+ N- J7 M
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% |6 P& A+ N. g3 _- [
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 B& ^0 K2 c4 W/ i; U
the market.
0 v; l; w, F$ r0 _6 \
B1 u( H* H+ A ^: n In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 _5 I4 \. X; W# d) M, t2 ]7 S5 hJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In! _1 e3 p( o) ^! Y7 S
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- H: P( A/ _9 W6 s! k. c: Q& w
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
; P" t P, K3 A# J9 O: H0 S1 oto the shortage of available inventory.$ x& G5 C1 z- D, {- E6 B2 t
! W9 Y" y" U9 i% p+ U( I# G' K, y9 K
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its$ ^; \2 b" U$ d# m7 l J. y6 ]
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 H8 e6 d+ p% u9 c( d$ ^# S
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses' }- U6 W3 [2 T" J
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
. X6 d$ j; w. f9 x! t6 H2 d: u6 i' w) o. u
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- \' C/ f, {3 Z, g6 H- x4 Bin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low$ x- N, V# w0 f- }5 c2 J5 \, G
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& G$ V1 E. q r4 L" B; W# j3 q0 ^" l
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring- V' \( z* E. q# v9 Z8 x
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer" t* ]! T; F- `8 ]# H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as6 C; |7 a. a* F- Y! j+ S
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
8 `0 P5 F$ W- ?3 v% Q9 s3 o7 x; N+ d6 Y
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 A0 n( L# K) P* Das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
$ \/ X& ^, N, f3 ^7 \ C7 t @0 oremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,# L8 F) ?) g0 }
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 ^! X/ p }, B1 r/ T( Dincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
7 W4 ?' g, G3 T( w% Q' q3 Zin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 g ^; E4 D% j# m* Y/ D! [
towards the end of 2006.
8 S+ N" P7 |7 {: B- k" L* O: f( ?
; T4 X" ]1 d, LWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) }4 o$ U/ O6 s9 ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
/ }: {9 O- S6 E! ^! p* D, t, W+ }to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 T @2 C- E% X3 K( A+ j d
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to1 y& v) r( Z4 S# H0 `
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
5 ~2 m+ {, ~7 N* D' D2 Apressure on tight inventory levels.* p: X9 I/ L7 K' f$ j
I; G' e6 L7 l' ?& S
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic/ l3 {; u1 z6 V% T; |9 i. Q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people8 d! S& q5 V3 I0 {! ?0 O6 b
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;% }8 h; v7 {, o* t& ]: h. _6 q! \
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 C0 B& X$ Z- L3 f3 M& P( Q" }2 h
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
% l- c- Q. @# a' ]& r, D/ O2 y5 m0 i* S3 Y( v" o% x
<<
1 l( d F& v, E* @3 F7 N Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" y" a1 k; Y) b0 i x
! E/ }8 `, [8 Q$ w& y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. v5 D& E8 T* I% d Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
1 j9 i! {7 C6 R6 G2 c6 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 G" `5 w3 f7 f W
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
- U \) O9 b" `! O# }1 C9 h Market Average Average % Change Average Average
0 } l2 Z3 E( ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ D, @" p; p- h8 \ Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 ?! }% m9 T4 G2 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( I0 d. g4 p0 N. P& g% B Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
) n/ I7 W( _3 Q6 N' @2 s1 J2 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ?) I/ ~6 p# v' d+ [ Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
7 o- w, @, I3 p! O -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 r+ u$ x, K+ h& F. b
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
3 T( c: I z) Q1 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Q3 N) `1 N% d. u1 {- f0 P3 a St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333: g) B& |- ^. c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 q k+ f; |& L Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
& [) K6 s z# n" \2 j ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^$ W d3 E% ~8 Y
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
8 X3 t$ H. X, u! y. Z& h* b3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% s. [) F, u. I5 ]! J9 G Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2506 O& N; f) N+ N: S- Z/ @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& j9 f5 O& W. L. W7 f Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7668 R1 {7 G7 ~! n/ ^ Z' J9 d, @4 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 z3 J5 T, X4 F' [: |' j) h Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
- `8 E: V' m7 @4 e" ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 S- P7 n- D! l+ y! m) Z Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5008 ?6 A2 U' X* c) I) F5 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 A* \2 e* I0 @
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389# F9 ^% I! g5 V* O/ L0 ?0 e6 o T j5 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- g7 l: `$ o: O' O' S6 z* \
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714" e6 [9 }7 A4 \8 ?. h: F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' O+ H) X" P4 L0 U+ L u Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
( H5 j0 ?! Z: A; U+ W -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 R! L6 N& |' S" O5 n2 W
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000( c' r9 Z& M* P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P! A" K- i0 O! R National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860& E4 T* D% o: f$ b3 X9 s" j p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ]& }+ X0 c" t4 S4 r, ~; b* a" A
- z1 [; Y Z- ?" g8 H" q2 h4 F -------------------------------------------------------------2 @& p' I! g& S; V; h1 i! S
Standard Condominium' ^6 F, P" N e7 D1 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------0 `" |* A5 x9 C2 u
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
5 I, ^2 y6 k p5 R6 v5 w Market % Change Average Average % Change% ~. P T6 J7 c
-------------------------------------------------------------
; r8 {! l+ j& l& |1 y Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%8 ^( D2 B* E7 z* }. \& Z7 ?! L
-------------------------------------------------------------! h9 B6 z; W" A- N( h
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%, Z' `% y- ~/ z- }
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 ?. Z) I. b: _. C( V Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
/ y6 J/ ^5 D a; n) p7 Z -------------------------------------------------------------
5 G9 U, w8 a7 S3 G$ r Saint John N/A - - N/A/ k E/ r, R' G0 k
-------------------------------------------------------------( E3 a; V+ E* V& P- d
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
) J) c8 G7 A0 C# E D% n: T& u -------------------------------------------------------------
/ @9 `. N! `$ } Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%& a5 F2 }/ P$ F1 X# G8 o2 M; G! Z1 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
! v+ M3 ?# ^/ s9 A Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%4 p7 Y; A1 R# n, a
-------------------------------------------------------------0 M/ z; G- w+ J) x/ L" S- r4 `) p
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%( L+ o/ V3 X6 y$ m+ Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 r, a# D$ d) R/ p0 X5 l Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
. h4 s8 I' B2 e c8 K9 k9 g _ -------------------------------------------------------------# S# r) v% Z! t K
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' N: x1 M0 b4 b( T# m5 J
-------------------------------------------------------------8 ~; b2 j* r# E$ n' {2 g( F
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%- O- }3 P- ]1 r5 }% w
-------------------------------------------------------------" }: Y- F! w* q% {3 ^4 d. B; C6 q
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 M* Y. r: `9 Z$ M -------------------------------------------------------------7 L0 \, r7 [6 v, R# F; z
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%7 W+ J1 _; ~' w6 x" l) u% Q
-------------------------------------------------------------# I1 Z2 x2 q! W) Y
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
/ D4 _; D, T( Y+ V* r9 e# z -------------------------------------------------------------
1 H% F. l$ @9 l/ h0 I* V4 {" u, u; ^ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%, ~$ E6 C% [) a9 a; R I
-------------------------------------------------------------
: Y1 D2 h2 ^4 K/ [! e( _5 Z National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%9 O- r' Y9 q6 M% n
-------------------------------------------------------------9 [' o3 `5 z; j8 e8 @
>>; N3 F; e5 q5 z# C. ]& Z. j
0 g* d; F5 ]/ C) {, d( s5 G0 r Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) y+ K1 n/ [7 S K' `6 g0 Oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
+ [7 u3 X5 Z4 |' q" y9 l1 F) {John and Victoria.
) [( W3 o2 f3 q5 o3 B1 M( P9 x# s7 g) n0 C9 U( W3 W1 U
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 { k* ]) V$ ^6 v$ w
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of0 {* U: k1 ~+ U. Z$ r1 S3 M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
% W* S4 [% E3 E7 `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 ~& I7 F/ p% {: r2 h
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities3 S1 M4 n+ w6 a0 R
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
( M) v: F! y4 S% x- i* v: g. L; Zavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 i* }( A @+ B6 {& f3 _3 L) e
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable# q% ^( c; n1 y! q, s+ W
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& w& y, V0 J4 Q9 QNovember 15, 2006.$ M1 P' O+ ^& Z
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of6 {% f: Y4 I# B) }
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ t( D4 f/ x2 ^9 G% A* Zprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
: H2 [9 C) \8 j6 C$ F: gavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|