埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2313|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
9 M2 V* C9 L( L& E+ f
* @8 b3 |4 q. Z- l# T2 [0 G- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
3 u+ d2 l- {: c
+ J6 V5 N/ f- A    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market3 ]/ s8 I( d+ x5 t
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
& x5 I2 Q( \: `& }: {+ o( pquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' s% g& _! P2 p2 e6 v/ rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit: f" e7 N  }4 u2 A
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
- U- C6 N, D0 f& Gmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# j$ ^/ j& D* @1 G/ n! O( p5 m- IQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. y$ S6 g: R4 J" E1 m8 a
LePage Real Estate Services., {+ O; b# ?2 h* e0 p/ l
; l2 Y# q( C# p1 t' _
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
3 [) n4 _8 L# K) X4 }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
8 }& ]7 E6 z9 j" W* }7 E, mconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and  l- c# {7 l: V  N) p
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the1 g0 e9 B9 L2 z
residential real estate sector.
' }+ G9 l8 j3 S0 H1 O- p( @% A+ k. I7 l' n7 d+ y
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: \3 f; U4 m2 `8 s1 O4 Loccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
3 ^! j. n! ?, j* ]+ u- f; H2 n5 K  cyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) c6 N  b6 Z0 x! r  W
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 I; `8 a3 Z. B0 B" m; w0 `
(+13.2%)." Z6 n1 p" x- w. r
8 F" G  C! c8 t+ {' o; ]! K' M
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth- a  J" T. \0 J% _1 ^
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the6 _# V& H! h3 U) H* `6 o' ^7 X
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) ?' K4 d3 F& l. ]) `, V: y) ?' h3 [
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
$ l! `  r/ x& D# Spresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.- B9 d2 g1 X( D5 a1 w! T+ T) l
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We! k/ k! Z; j% `  v# c9 E4 ]  F
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy" V' m* r! a3 H+ j2 y& w
balanced market."
; a7 k* X4 v: }/ F/ @; g1 N: Z0 e$ U3 a$ u' }  }  n
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
5 o* G* S7 t0 l4 Vconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
4 m2 ?6 ]" y3 O3 G) Lto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
0 a1 h+ @! f/ x' i+ ?. p2 ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core% S+ r1 K. m9 S, l% V0 M
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
: L$ a: K9 z9 a: }% R! Vmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: w: Q: Y3 |, j8 y
breaking price appreciations., P$ ]1 m9 d7 {& w; k3 d
; m( k7 \4 {; P5 I
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
- G% T: d6 y; G$ _+ meconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
  H' ~) `- o% q) {1 c' F: nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
3 n8 T% N2 e  F
* j- ^, L  c/ H  y6 `, T) X    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid8 S. X% _3 C' N' _
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 D; @' [2 Q, c9 e" R
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) i  Q' D1 ^: I; ?
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( e) H& h2 F5 T) n0 o5 D1 sIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
" g- l9 d- o8 k! I. s& ~greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of/ z! j1 |) ~  L# ~1 m
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
# _  N* C9 v( i6 ^6 H0 d/ |/ j' _% B4 @) ]+ A
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
" x- [* `8 F! x. j7 Omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and% c( ]) _) ~& Q" K3 L% U9 u" V+ d
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada5 o0 i; {/ A  Q3 l
are markedly different than those found in the United States.5 G4 Y! k- Q  V6 S) r% q1 L

! W  ]) O) v/ F# U, q- ]! a/ O    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the# s$ t1 P6 M7 w) Q! b) T
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's; N3 H( k  u# i
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! W# K( l7 g1 w9 j3 q
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ y% s4 x. m1 m* S4 U3 Saffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the" s# R% g# k  o; C
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. u2 D/ S1 u$ K& O0 {
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
9 R; t6 a& o' T8 S6 \1 dmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 J5 h1 Z% R  J" R8 [5 J" ^- v: V+ S" I
    <<6 U! ]8 a6 }5 z" ~: t2 e% f4 U" v
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES2 V2 W# V$ s% h
    >>
8 Z, [$ `5 J! d% L* B( R& q
$ i2 H6 [3 i/ B4 t8 f( q5 h    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
0 e0 S4 s, T- j3 wHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate# K+ s) T* Z4 |" C3 ]2 A
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
+ Z4 X& E" }3 Q0 r2 r! c0 Tlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" M1 W; I' {& d" R# {" ^
renovations.* V& c" {0 {5 A$ [4 i7 K! a
$ {" ~. {+ @, h4 R1 r3 c
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
- a& \$ Z( x5 E- D$ |+ g& Rincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, i1 c# @. [3 f; y7 Lcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
* V2 y( k5 |. f% FSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
) C# b4 u4 w8 Q8 I/ J5 ^4 Y
1 ~& l9 v6 w; C3 r; l8 _0 E    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer! }6 G$ K* o% `' `4 Q0 s8 Z( ^' ~
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* v' B" _" X& F) b0 j4 w4 q. I* \quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
9 k( B& a4 `- W# A600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores- f; k  a0 d3 @6 o* F9 X
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
0 @1 ~+ q7 l  V; `and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.' R  f4 W. V3 ]
; z5 b) t0 T, w8 C: |0 n
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ r: ^. ]+ ~4 }) U7 G/ D$ j
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
. f- ?$ o3 f& L# |) J& Lhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers" {. S# N5 g' O$ w4 s( Y0 }7 d
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) e$ b2 g0 Q2 k: ]) E6 Ydollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, `) r: w1 Y: g# g( I' o; [7 F) E6 Dbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
- b* {0 c2 W8 c2 T; ^
5 v# v) m: t" [% y    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, Z7 [4 _' k7 y. a7 ]
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes# Z; M5 b' B! q8 n
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
  k9 I. N' S: e. V3 |as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ G' r+ v- r" h' S' T; J: n8 u; c' efew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.) F  Z9 f9 B0 h" b2 [2 I5 |

7 e. j  Q! E$ c3 t    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house; m1 t# ?* v8 R8 c% V& M
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ n9 N. u& u7 a7 g9 {0 k& _levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
, Z  L! u6 p' h% k/ `* X6 dfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,* O& I# g  F6 Y* S5 ^
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 u( F$ S/ ^) F" A+ Ipressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 Y, P- c5 M7 i; V; Vmaking a purchase.
$ U  F! v8 d' k6 W! s
6 \+ _- j# S+ r# [    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing% B+ W8 x) g6 G: |, V! g% P! {
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
; Y9 ?8 _0 M6 ^- aconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
& x7 Q" K2 T1 Ocentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
/ s+ X9 \: e/ S- n( y& Y% uattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 d* V( z8 M; n- z  r9 x
amenities.4 V  l0 Y* {6 e! F9 e3 e& e
( F2 _, Q0 d! F9 ]) ~
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
1 D' d% D5 x; G) u2 c! gthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
" D+ e0 {' `3 |4 z0 G: bacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has3 `( u' v. a1 j: n
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* U2 a  B) U# G  {3 |" Q  g4 ?/ j: d
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
1 Y" I3 e4 ]" O$ Rresidence, rather than for investment.2 z; N; \8 v* _3 u
0 \: B4 `. P$ j* _. D6 ]& O
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as+ }8 j+ z/ S& K" K
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted+ I: T9 l' j8 M2 @  T
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
  {  U7 K4 c6 e2 Q; P' Vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ l7 S/ P$ x' ^0 M, i* A0 G; A4 [rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter7 M2 j) t2 b4 j0 v0 a  i
the market.; K% f! y# n" p$ X" h
3 {  Y/ e7 L" v1 b6 m
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through" K# @9 E* p  C  N, ?
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In* [! K" ]7 @+ v% t6 r! X
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% B  N+ M9 P3 V! w
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due8 t0 T! P, B, z1 @9 i
to the shortage of available inventory.
- Q1 T4 d) k6 @9 `2 [1 V+ A- s9 W
# R& [; [- U6 G    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
2 I8 y; ~4 u0 T( Emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains, s* _) P, l! t, C. G9 _' p  g, @- E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! q: v( U1 t4 C% s, V# }
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.2 T& H4 ]2 D. k. j' T# C2 _5 q

: T+ C8 j( J; n0 |    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 R" A) t8 V. R, K' e# Win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low( `0 u+ g! x% \
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that6 A& N# X( w4 h8 z
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring) D$ a6 A  M9 s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
9 |4 J6 V9 S: Q& J9 Aseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as1 a8 N: u( u6 U$ p/ A
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" M% J( F! H$ |2 {: M. ~

* W5 b/ Q1 ]1 R9 r    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter! }9 h2 }5 E+ f& S, I
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 U+ @5 ~, q* W: N8 h: O" _remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( i9 Q8 E% ]+ |" O5 ?% j) I; {
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" G/ _0 i1 a# M
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
6 h+ ?' o# y  G: ?4 ]' @in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly+ m; K. k: \7 j$ |+ z) R+ x
towards the end of 2006.
    " R" [, T! ]  ^" q/ C
' W+ u- I& N$ F; D6 F6 C
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; D) Q% j# G  @  h% Finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable& P) I6 T9 ?" p% ~; a
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse. ]4 g9 [1 B  T9 f3 K. W
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( ^6 B. [4 r$ A% C8 h! Dforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
) d. o0 D) v% epressure on tight inventory levels.
" T- ^+ W% U+ `7 @2 `( @" `
6 @8 Z! B( @) f: U: ?6 q* y    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
7 w/ @) C  W) mfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
  \8 h' Q7 U% Z- `into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;$ p! D+ f7 ~  ]" \( a+ A2 v, r
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# ^2 ]: H$ D, p3 l6 w  b- J- B
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., b: [, D2 ~; o6 F9 P: r' v0 S

" F4 R9 n1 b8 J6 t    <<  Y  k' g1 k, R: p; _$ Y
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' g1 [- F7 Z0 U! [" V2 Z, r1 b5 n+ l& y' O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ w! @6 j; C$ g  l+ [' H# ^5 P9 X                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
4 o8 l! t0 z* M- v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* r" |* Y5 `+ Y4 A4 o                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
4 `0 o, W- E0 F! q    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average0 j$ R3 Q( r% `! [9 ]+ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ w+ ~. i# J! b9 B
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
# z* O4 J* [3 ~% J4 b% p: U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ }4 C) T; V0 }; Z! e3 J    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000- @( N$ M& u1 Y' m0 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* z; w* k: R1 @/ O5 Y8 M* M& Q3 o
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000* ~; z1 a, a) l5 L: C9 a7 D; x, d) p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Z+ d' x0 s, x7 D
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
4 C# n- ?9 V- q+ a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  E0 m2 l) `! r6 Y4 g& `" j    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
5 g0 s# J8 u0 e) U, V: L6 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( N+ E' L3 i$ j2 H! k
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
6 I8 Z  S: p/ H& k5 M; A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" L2 m) [# @0 w
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
  L; {: @3 ?& l5 @$ x0 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( r! Y. ]/ P$ h3 F- s
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250, r9 S2 ?$ _, J$ ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; `' |2 s, z3 E
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766/ _0 }2 |0 g  g2 m( F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 c- r* _2 `: U
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707) \0 w% S" j$ }- W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: l* g4 {' i; {% C    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
5 }- \1 K" ~& F2 ~; d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Z* l6 u( K+ C4 q4 ?    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
* ]* O+ ~. p% y6 ]% u. I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" E& f* M% J8 m  s2 ^! z1 _    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
, s8 G' _: v- i: t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( R- U, N4 x  f8 s( u+ h2 e9 j) z6 W/ K    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5004 m8 ?( o( G+ N- v4 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, s9 v; W4 G8 I, f7 [! V0 r
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
$ z: S: w8 s2 B7 d- Q& u4 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' y" Y& j1 g# `/ }. ?; S
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8605 V* i7 L$ v/ j( b5 ~& ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ~$ O" I- n( P

4 y- N. U( |7 r. D, D0 e: W    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 d. X* J2 V+ C5 n  X& r3 U                               Standard Condominium0 k2 ?, ?. v7 W( S. \5 ^7 f# [# r
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 u& T  C8 e9 `8 h, N% }0 V- N/ {
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
" P4 h! h) `6 W# [" ^3 G$ }+ _' V    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change( P! {  T5 W0 x9 o& h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' U+ n# A/ m8 Z: o  s' h* q! L* L    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%/ x& `% l; C8 M( g( c. F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 E6 J5 S; H5 ~3 O    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%; Y4 S' y. X+ T& k+ p- k
    -------------------------------------------------------------  L4 L% ~- w+ E7 k0 G
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
) Q% l  W: v, C8 b; _5 F& c; O& z- `    -------------------------------------------------------------
# w1 b; ^' G" x; x/ e: J- C" q    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A/ |; a" y% f. T$ G1 |& |# H
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ T/ _; J* T8 c7 Y7 D- k- `- r, k
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' G+ I/ u/ t3 b* ^1 {0 E% x' Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------! W! [: A/ d* L0 e8 W0 q
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
" U  m7 Y8 h+ U6 N; b1 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
: [' v/ J8 R# G$ U" Q  ]2 \    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%3 M2 |3 `3 x, Q: a" E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, S- r5 r1 B2 K  e/ j8 G6 I9 G; L( }8 Y    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%# ?; e; G0 z) ]9 y3 v! Q( G4 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------# z# C2 x/ p, \# T6 Q) }- F+ c
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%+ l# i1 p, S' ?, R, |+ i9 Y. V
    -------------------------------------------------------------( {$ k+ @9 H: R0 I8 C
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%  s" u4 N$ d1 y. b. d% W! c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& N  j5 o' i  o8 W    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%1 Q4 [: A/ o1 ^& A8 h: \! r7 j: B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- I1 _3 r. |2 I4 w- l' e    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
) R6 W" \5 p) P6 V3 p2 X* @4 ^$ u    -------------------------------------------------------------2 C5 B% s. S1 A$ n+ y! \
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%: e/ d2 y% V4 ^5 L- k; b9 f% b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ v- G. u0 W- R0 l8 G    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
  T2 e) ^3 J; I0 |* O5 w# w    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 Z1 [# l/ W1 M" T  u& S3 U( a    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%' j7 B) b' |# e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) Z! d( q" p, A# H, q    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%- C, h5 F4 H+ f4 g/ h/ ^) }
    -------------------------------------------------------------# J+ f; ?: v+ G) j, R3 j# ?
    >>
2 C" [" D' d" J/ ]
3 l/ i2 A9 a/ p" i6 y/ K" A8 G    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined7 ~! f% Q) S) o$ s8 ?* l% V5 a
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint* x; p# O2 I2 t! `
John and Victoria.% J" [8 G% u/ m# p8 E

- d* V- g2 k2 y9 f6 N    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ t1 V3 `) @9 M( E) _
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
/ U/ X: o9 N7 D; h* zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 V) t% K: G0 }% preferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( S) M# f/ c8 Qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities3 f3 u" g1 D' T. W8 U; E. `' Z& b8 |4 H
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 Y& \. s1 K9 B! e  E/ A0 s- Aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! }7 L3 ?8 s/ S* }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
# M( K6 M! m9 _, K" ~5 i; n0 Z8 @1 Wversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
0 c4 N$ ]+ M) m5 C6 |1 DNovember 15, 2006.
. e- @0 ?0 b/ ~0 {) T+ F/ ~    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 x# U" Z# k; L. K! R# g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 u& e3 |1 M+ h  `! i" b
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ k3 X$ \- y' ^
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-3 11:59 , Processed in 0.093091 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表