埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2487|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ! x* z0 {! Y0 H. m# S
" e1 K8 l& `! @& C7 |
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
6 X' V: @; `# h* @0 b. O# U( S7 q+ ?. O
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market8 X- n/ i) r( k3 _# m# @! I
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 j) w; M% D) Z' M( t
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 T  b& y8 q% c
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit3 [! d9 e. G5 @
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and2 s0 T3 ?+ I7 e3 l1 n4 L1 P
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" b+ y1 Z6 h" c9 MQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
" ?) i4 m- N, ^# MLePage Real Estate Services.
7 }  K/ B* j( J$ i; h- Z6 f) p
! _% }; g1 j$ }+ J    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. Y  h! X; J( ?; m1 Y. I
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 D1 t. \. T' i2 f: l. Aconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
) T( l4 {+ r8 csound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 w9 i2 ]1 U0 U: tresidential real estate sector.9 F3 l# I5 I" B: m4 J. U
. k. ]; o# k" }4 V& U
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation; g% [- [3 t$ m% W9 T5 g
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
  n- `+ a; O# N1 Syear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 h; J. t* ]' ]9 x
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
1 c$ l# S' a& C(+13.2%).
3 b# I$ ]* u2 a
: ~% g& d: D5 g  J% b    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth( J$ W& i: X8 E4 I: F2 d7 ?9 M
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
- E2 X' b  i# h; }# tfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( G1 c6 Y2 M; U+ o3 R+ U
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,# ^7 ^1 C- N5 ^7 |) o2 C
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 S6 r) K, x4 y$ P9 b& N"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 Q4 i' g; J+ Q2 M
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, D! [: K$ V" a/ q+ k" k1 X/ ^
balanced market."7 a# O9 ~5 b4 n* @4 J

; Y. f& {9 i8 ^5 ^/ t- B    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
0 g# H/ Y4 s% e( v' t( [considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
6 g# t3 ?" b2 K6 }  Q6 u1 _9 uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
/ t* {$ p" [; G: r1 Ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
2 V( N" q9 c. |0 X2 N5 A& X% W3 Penergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,' o% x" v4 a8 F/ O' m9 n- x: `4 r) Z' j
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: e, W5 L* O, m* u4 q0 ?breaking price appreciations.
5 g( F* u  z! N/ ^2 p4 T* {+ Q, ^  k
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
8 b" K  H5 \7 k7 j; A( Y" Y& ?economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; Z( M+ V; U% H! q- Jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 D7 M9 W. |& N  A5 G, s+ m
/ n6 O& A+ q& U6 [* B9 K8 D0 @
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) f4 c% a9 D, H- E: p% G+ d. j! `
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer/ b+ S8 L" \7 @. f$ H4 r5 n" E# u
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off0 D& f- B' x$ @. F  N2 s
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.5 u$ _4 _/ G, d/ n% f
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers! d6 ~, g. y8 v, N
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of4 W. v6 h) W' g& b3 M; I
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
4 l! X1 e6 V5 {; a. l) l
& ^! N; s( C% Y' G5 X% A+ P1 z2 v    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
" D0 s; ?5 r# v, wmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and/ V/ i+ I* O& l  A
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
  d' r6 e0 [& Q6 {! V+ c5 A4 nare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 V& i( R; {8 X6 B8 x- w$ y- W9 d
4 F; o' b8 ^6 w/ @( E4 ?
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
$ r* r3 h% B8 M2 @American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
8 I9 K6 M) [; y! {! i% f# U# ~. }9 Ofavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. k0 Q" g3 g5 Z" M- m7 grelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 G1 J5 S  w/ y; A# h/ n  b2 }affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the& u4 a' r: R, O0 z* `
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 l6 k0 K. n5 E& ^aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 p  ?$ m. }# ]2 w* [7 i' tmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."0 |7 ?; h7 O$ S, @9 S
; W3 ?  W4 ^' i$ m6 ^) i
    <<
% L5 {$ i) W; |& ^1 _6 f                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
9 d: d3 ^0 y  P) d0 [    >>. T, m; ~$ e! q' i

3 d- G( I! X0 h+ T6 {9 \& Y    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
# i" p4 c2 z2 wHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 q; s% B9 r! H  I1 |' F9 fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time% R% n) z0 @! M+ m$ ?
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of& W% D3 h, O0 o+ j! `
renovations.( z8 S# m9 S/ g& N: b* D7 q
" B$ w2 [0 Z4 P2 H: ^/ m+ y
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% Z7 q6 j* Y  o5 K- Aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
- u8 _1 t1 U% Z" w" t" B; Rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
2 A& l9 B  M+ f4 ~September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
- ?/ N2 w( P$ v- x5 ?# _. S! J4 L# N
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
+ B# b: i3 ~! q, E, u& ^, E2 Aslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 }* L" R  O  Q8 f6 ]+ [2 C: |: T1 m
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
0 Z  z% _0 r  j1 F* ?9 X3 p600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores6 Y! w4 X2 F) V& R6 ]/ C  {
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
2 f- |+ A: C- ~  Z2 w! Yand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.4 `) b8 s* F* p& N

( Z! ~" E. y# n% h- B1 s    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
5 j6 T) F7 s. P8 aconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- O. l5 ~4 i9 N: o4 Rhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
* F0 M2 q* _  b* x5 c9 I2 x, xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: ^8 U4 M* U( m3 L; _" _7 F
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, H) g9 l; A% h' a1 u  obuyers with more options when looking for a home.9 t+ {8 `$ d0 v

& v6 d. U3 o; F" j( ?! O. m    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly* _0 R, F8 v2 k9 t0 C
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
/ f* P, }- r- {2 s4 U# Y& lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 K% p( U3 ?! b2 E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
2 ?: p" m8 W8 kfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 @8 t9 {) B+ T3 N% {

  O: r6 q6 k9 M$ c% c: n' M    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house  x, K3 q& M" T: e0 j6 Z2 q; l
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ s$ K2 f; v# E1 Q1 f- Y# mlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
  }, B1 d6 R  Y% y  H! n5 ?first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! e( ]8 j- [$ Owhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( e0 F7 u) W! D% @4 k7 G+ D. Spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
9 V- C% k* d4 q! Gmaking a purchase.$ X: u- I- C  I9 ?  H

9 ?% O6 {4 ?1 i: n, i, D    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! ~6 J& A  S% F5 W, ?2 _% B# n( G# `markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 \, u* M8 G( D+ A
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
0 C# l. |! n" O7 H4 Scentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 i  @; C3 T; f1 ]) Dattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( Z" z) R* o3 t# y) k6 ~; Y) n
amenities.7 q' v- x& U  W% w+ z- H7 x

! [; o. F5 Y: p0 X$ R# d$ `    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
% a% ]4 X3 L0 @+ `) Rthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
; p' R. m7 s  M& `8 H0 macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. O' q& j, D. m! Econtinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
2 s" v1 m- |3 G- @; Ydriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 [) @: u0 {4 i" Q3 {3 _residence, rather than for investment.
+ {, u- z: G1 G/ K* Q9 X
( L" j9 f) N! k9 D6 ]% A    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
9 j( l, E# c0 a8 N7 |5 Rhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) s4 T  r8 ~+ v" q7 J  M2 e% Gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
- A$ \) z8 R% P3 Rconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization9 W# \) l+ I0 W/ m( ~5 L4 z+ E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
3 z6 K0 |! Y8 h2 Athe market.( p+ T6 r( J$ V' `  `1 [

, b$ u8 v" n2 V- ]& M6 c    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through4 B6 H: {* O; Y0 m
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In5 B/ p0 t0 H( a6 g5 s; ~
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 c& K. c4 {8 y, g% g/ lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
) Q0 u8 ?2 X" E3 l/ `to the shortage of available inventory.$ Y4 y3 f% h! `1 @* }; U, G
* v, `1 r3 I% w1 x$ ~6 O( |
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its1 e$ Q2 ^3 ]4 c! M! e7 _( w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( N. q- M8 |6 Vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 }+ [2 ?3 M6 Z" M3 Pstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 A) @/ t8 g- e% a

' A. Z# v) K  K! m    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
0 d# c0 x# J+ Q" gin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. Q( y' e+ N, h, i) A0 L+ q% }unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% K9 A* q/ h/ M; ]
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring  l+ y3 T: x) a- K! p
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ b$ n  g' g# a6 Q6 wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* u/ g3 G. l( F: U! y
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" r2 O. F! u/ @7 o9 P0 U. }
+ j& Q7 B7 [* {% a/ \$ b- i; [2 ?
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter+ t8 f! f; p* @8 }0 @8 D; E
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) S- b! c+ V1 {0 b  M
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,5 i8 l& O+ Y$ _6 e, J* M) b, ]
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# N( _& K+ Y! \: j" B* g8 L
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
/ V2 d, d% ]9 oin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly5 p4 T1 X6 H' Q) i2 @" R
towards the end of 2006.
    ! \9 M. w4 z' k& Q, N. @' v/ `6 P8 P
: e# k  Q. B" R2 l. |5 k+ L
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of$ _( C% Z" u) a3 m' h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
5 t+ j3 k$ @" d6 rto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 u- x0 P. t9 h$ _3 b: b
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
$ P9 F8 d. D' d, {/ u7 x8 rforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added/ m3 g- r, L- N1 y. ]/ x& V
pressure on tight inventory levels.
9 A' [  w) H5 g" t! E$ \
! P9 C& V+ }+ P2 V1 r+ g2 B    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic9 }1 g( O7 H0 R% `9 c8 h; U
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
2 q* _* z+ K$ Q, N+ Kinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;" e/ w# M( w2 N- B9 J
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching0 b" N7 x- r, Z7 h) R$ _/ c
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) \. s, M) |- z4 j
6 \- w) j) _: q, r, Z6 ]
    <<
3 {% L; |: H8 a; D4 o      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006  P5 v1 y, ?9 ~, B1 `4 M
1 o& X$ H; U7 k4 o' p9 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- P2 h. j# c; Z
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
' q  v- K8 N4 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) u" D% R$ A/ G) k
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q39 Q! `/ G2 `! e
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average1 k- Z! q) d& f# Q4 ~& n' @; f' g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Q9 M- u% e) h6 a4 o3 D$ U    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0009 `3 ]3 {# o. [: ]4 f- {/ V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; t0 X" }4 ]; }8 J% `    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
( l* p9 {: I$ i3 n9 _* `  L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 C# b: f' A7 W6 T. A, B    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0004 ?( S6 y$ E# e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. K: i8 P- W" ^" \
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -" V% {! O: q- Y+ S+ W3 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ]# [. ]4 O& l% p* K
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333* F* {# o2 I* A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ M+ ~1 T/ h3 g( ^7 M3 O
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
4 T+ K/ Q% j, K! ?& ~" ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ y: {( v" ]( Z4 a* [" Q' X    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185- T) K6 o# q/ ~; E9 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 w* x# i9 t( l2 _' C
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
3 a- o: e* y" W* g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 \; W1 y& }7 U, e3 ~7 F    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766$ O2 n7 g; w/ o6 [! h# |; H5 }" I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* C" g; E$ P9 ]( M
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
) P  h. j& S9 D( H5 n0 _+ l) U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' ?5 h1 o; T4 P  C3 F# i# X
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
, R6 n2 T1 x; e' j6 ^" H" o; l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" d4 ?. I: G4 @
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. a/ i. v6 {+ c- f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" T0 N- L5 a% O  }; S- D
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
0 R- m1 H3 W, Z2 Y7 s* S5 }$ T6 m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% E1 E7 x, e9 D  ~; n, z
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
/ y4 V  B  f6 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# J) S- A# ]. ^& i0 s    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
0 O4 V5 w; a6 [8 K8 h6 [. o, [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ]9 u5 {# D! g: U4 Q" Y7 l) t3 M
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
$ ]9 X# S% {" D! L4 W( O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 u  w1 q& O( G7 H, b! \, p
! E! O0 b7 B/ [3 F1 j2 s% X    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 M3 R/ ]: M6 G/ e2 D# v4 t                               Standard Condominium
0 R* u3 t$ J6 @' o* H  {    -------------------------------------------------------------
: T5 w6 G) o1 u. j! o4 O                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo  c: j$ G: j: ^  @! N
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
# D7 N/ b  z4 m5 F    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 y& u% z3 P- g( D    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
( G" c, ^0 ~1 P; f    -------------------------------------------------------------) {* `+ M+ d; b7 h
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%3 k# s6 D: }2 h( B3 Q% M( h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 z0 I5 l, b+ k6 T    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A, V; b$ h! j: m8 v$ Z# F; `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 Y- z' b$ }, i: J2 W    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A3 ?# l% Z! C0 S! N4 d2 D! n8 }6 w1 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: c* R3 m, T3 J& q' d. [# B* h    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%4 y) V/ s; j" R" O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 _" b7 l; G  R( d. q' ]    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%9 u' n6 q3 o0 @1 R" A. r
    -------------------------------------------------------------, g( g4 N; ~* a
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%' \0 O1 z- i# d
    -------------------------------------------------------------! k: I2 L* N# n& f- `
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%- R$ B2 i+ |/ V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, g+ i% L) G( ?% g, T' o; L    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%2 L1 S- u0 i9 m% Q. l0 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------# J1 Z; f3 l$ v! r3 `8 j
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%& _4 i% B# y( c5 B' t" w) ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------, E6 S) U1 x4 \% b# c6 i
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
9 x2 E1 a9 W& B) ]7 w" X    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 H# M9 v" w% {1 G! S0 q    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%$ @' R( _; e- @
    -------------------------------------------------------------( C# y4 w  F& ]( @3 i" i# O
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%4 _  J5 g! k7 h) E7 i+ }. a
    -------------------------------------------------------------! W4 O  w/ a- Z; |5 k9 M1 U
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
' _& `: I% t5 W1 m    -------------------------------------------------------------8 F: Y- V$ j. l0 k$ M
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
+ Z( G' ]2 d  N% @$ s, u    -------------------------------------------------------------
  X& r; k3 v; [- Y8 Y9 c    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
9 S5 `% j: [. B- T    -------------------------------------------------------------
* N% G& F7 R0 @3 f% x6 O% A    >>4 f& R$ j$ [% L3 [; U. T5 l  M9 o

$ t4 C1 E2 I4 s1 S1 A- x& J! H    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined0 {9 k5 V( g( S- _! j9 Q7 z
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint( \' c( Z' `  b9 S& q
John and Victoria.
1 J+ {1 Y6 e2 o( r: v* e* ^4 V# _  x$ t2 i# I
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
8 E. m" O; @; b& d3 B5 Lcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
* L* u: ~, u& f' ^8 [2 ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release& ?% S* ^* W" i0 s% W6 `
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 M( T: |; q+ D+ v  w9 i8 P* E9 W
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities( s6 w9 e) c( t" Q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* e" k$ P5 M8 ?1 s3 uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ [7 v# t9 ^) s) q- W1 [
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable! O6 b/ T- V% u, {% A  A5 F1 {
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ a, n1 z/ ]9 w: S) L6 m1 _9 B
November 15, 2006.
9 W+ R4 S! H! G6 ~1 G2 @) i    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
! E; j  S6 @7 P1 Jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ {7 S# A! \& Z' _2 X9 R+ a) Kprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
0 E+ `* ?! E* C' n# l& c  davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-26 10:11 , Processed in 0.113660 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表