 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
本帖最后由 小黄 于 2009-12-21 13:39 编辑 " q) D8 R8 w o) ~7 M
你也别整呢些弯弯绕了。你就说吧：CIVIC和卡车撞，谁比谁更吸能？谁比谁更容易死？3 \9 m0 E9 |$ u9 J. t4 \
降龙十八掌 发表于 2009-12-21 11:33 
7 t5 d6 \' a# G$ M7 M3 y# _There is no data available. If you do have some, please share. But please don't make up scenarios and data yourself, that's 意淫. Use a published source, or statistically controlled experiment.9 i9 J) f) |2 Q Z
& Q, U, r2 \" P8 k: H
From the existing data, there are 3 types of death:
; j' ]0 B& m3 r: E1 x1) MV: multi vehicle collision, like when a Civic hits another car/truck
* ^! P" A) E; f1 v6 c o8 h. G6 }2) SV: single vehicle, like hitting a tree, or roll over" j& K$ G" s9 N3 a; w, | B
3) SV Roll: roll over, this a sub set of SV.8 O0 X6 t3 i( \9 B* L. Y
( ~. D$ o" m9 ?- H0 E3 ^
For Honda Civic:
2 W, e0 g2 C# d/ s4 f* ?! dMV 34
& u0 f5 p0 c; R8 |: ESV 33
- A4 G8 r" h( A( E; l: _) }SV Roll 13) _/ u2 t4 m- V9 V7 J0 |7 W' `" q
4 s' P- j; l: w& T) y
For Ford F150 (including super cab, crew cab):
2 h3 y' [& `% `# X0 kMV 28~34) G- E! B, \# v! J6 C' _+ n3 B: S4 L
SV 79~94
) _- D/ b- Z% N- gSV Roll 48~82
$ |! p5 K q/ K0 w* g% d
8 s+ r- _3 p& v7 V( pFor Chevy Silverado 1500:6 j! F' j9 }5 B: S' o( V+ R* e
MV 40
6 E3 o" m5 o1 w( B0 q+ W5 q% [SV 85
6 ^( X7 R# h, L! A6 KSV Roll 616 c& e8 Z* i$ C" [) ?; r! E
- h% R% P7 c4 `3 N" u# E& h
As you can see, not only would the trucks roll over more easily, they don't perform better even in a vehicle on vehicle collision. So, yeah, Civic is definitely safer than F150 or Silverado. |
|
楼主: kismet
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-12-20 16:58
显身卡
