TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

依勒特

During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
3 Y0 \; y& X$ ~8 R# e7 s1 a3 Cfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
* L  p8 K6 x9 K  n8 i& Ifundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
+ u  J6 e# [/ g+ p* vthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
  x3 A3 v6 @* A! l8 ]  G0 G! ^8 s2 W8 K- rthree years.
/ i* M3 y, {& d) U7 n# QBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
8 O1 q2 N2 o; A/ v7 }  Hboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
0 o% E- @# ^( j* O3 U  w. Fto fundamentally justified levels.
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
- i- V" T/ M: Dthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
9 @+ E7 H8 ~: S3 }* Ohomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
, j2 |7 W. j6 R( {8 k( Zthat is now being rapidly reined in.
! G9 Q4 u# n! ]+ VWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
( Q: h3 c. _3 L  Z( U% R$ o9 lmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
/ w* l( j& O# b. wdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
4 h9 `% I! Y5 t* ^to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
9 w# a7 w, {7 ~  R+ {) T. t" k3 bresidential construction will fall further to around
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
* [5 J% h9 E2 fin the fourth quarter.
4 W/ C. ^) r% x# y0 [: m  @4 OTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
6 p- S# J8 z  @4 N. N2 Qwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
) r6 V' v* V& `- b" Vvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
- [! \- e- h- K2 V  E: _2 G% Y4 _long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
( s2 J# J( `+ O) b. s, _+ Pof residential construction.
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
would have occurred if housing had been priced
6 M- p+ f9 G! {% N; Moptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
4 N  U  d# V0 z; ?9 N" Afundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
! [1 e/ O, ]6 u1 S( B. Runits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
where housing demand will further contract under waning
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
$ o  C" y5 p8 x" P7 f) U7 |9 H  overy time that the resale market has swung into strong
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
$ ]1 A+ N6 y: F- ?weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
0 }9 g$ `, D0 t( j- s( f8 t  ugiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
- f: `# O; F8 O' N" G5 ?rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
$ P: g+ g) Y& o/ H) olimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
! c# ^% V& A" W/ R$ C& [" q% phigh levels of apartment-style units presently under
) q5 _( }# |( O, Aconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will
) D2 [) _! }- }0 kreach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
5 n/ U$ N0 C2 RMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
Grant Bishop, Economist
416-982-8063
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
& q8 J( f* P; K416-944-5730

http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf

宋兵乙