 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员& i2 h N4 [2 m" Z
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
: k1 [" S @! [# x1 |$ r
6 h+ [8 p' s# iEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.) K0 G$ ]4 @9 |$ Q! g5 d. i. X
( g) {: n; n3 l$ @$ {6 j/ D
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
& B, f( d2 Q) n/ n2 Z6 Y0 x5 E* p
" u$ w, \! Y7 q* {5 J# qThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
# J/ D7 x& J3 M6 O8 _8 O1 l* {! x* ]$ s ?
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
6 c- O) p+ {; q( R
/ d) d. q. _3 \* B2 p! c7 R0 TDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
/ z; @* R/ k2 K% q. c! H }* L I% o3 ?* k
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.+ ~/ I+ B) h8 r
( ?' i% Z) w) k b+ \/ D" [Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.! X2 ? f3 u2 V+ f$ R, \, I7 o
- q5 e+ u1 k* j! Q' ~+ UPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
! B/ R) j$ W' ~: ?/ `# r( Z$ z
1 e/ r( _5 H; \' RDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|