埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2198|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员7 t; h  ^* `# M3 e/ @
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
' p9 M% ^) G7 K3 r0 |2 k1 r/ F* u; L' s" M; m
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
: E6 ?% l* A2 D) _' ~
- [" \. t( A# E4 S/ w, Q; s7 GMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
1 {; z# h# }0 }. ]; K4 W& `8 U
5 J1 a" y) q! y! ]2 EThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
7 I: t7 h* }; z& M" f: u4 h$ A2 Z
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
- J9 D/ _: o* L  h# W4 `% S3 [
& o: d! z1 E, _7 K( jDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.  {: C& ^  q. q3 o
0 l3 n% r' p& `4 k2 n; f
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.2 i) M/ T: N  p) M8 d+ l
( J3 q7 M4 ^* o4 p
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
3 a. L/ Q) R9 H2 y( N* Z: s+ W( C, F! q& X: X# S) N$ Q0 b0 J+ E; T' o
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.# ^1 y" N/ G# L
" [0 |4 L+ M6 V) P. X
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-7 12:41 , Processed in 0.094598 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表