 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员. d5 Z% E3 ?0 H6 O& F
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
" G9 H! d0 J8 @: n0 S. q
3 F) O& S$ a J" \2 l, B- e4 v7 d+ mEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
0 |$ f6 j" D1 y$ d: [2 E% ?" `( n& A! t+ T' ~0 H
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 3 W: M- r$ P" q% j& h+ V
. a X$ P8 X0 R" F2 p4 K8 v
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.% N5 u" J$ v2 A p, O
3 ^, b) A% i6 k. |) i. ^: v1 J
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
3 H9 c k- q. y, Z3 \
6 x/ |0 m7 h+ V) JDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
! C$ @! \ I' y. Q( P) e! f/ @& H0 h% O( U' ?
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture./ n8 Q, t1 O' u& p
) X* P0 |5 ^( H( ADow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
( \" i5 r8 ]6 q2 | i
" @0 T+ [. R* b. L9 V- h0 y$ @Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.9 P. d- F" M8 g- w5 W
/ @; m- Z4 }% J3 u% x" s* Y, v5 c7 rDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|