 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
' G, z; Y( C0 N8 S1 U# ?3 Z! z, ]Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs3 \( C9 o" x5 N; m$ }9 z R
0 B3 A! U. a" x. ^5 N2 w
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
+ Z9 x5 [, d b; A9 \9 p+ N! \% o7 T4 A! H9 ?
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
9 G0 I/ L- p, _7 r: G; Y
' i8 O1 A1 G2 \- i' T6 h4 eThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.9 F: o& M2 |- F7 G
3 e( `3 y# R) M8 l# [; P4 ]% M0 A* S
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
' Y9 }. J+ O: b% ?9 p
8 v& R3 J0 g1 t( wDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives." N8 d; A0 ^" [/ o: S
1 H9 c! m3 l- ?Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.5 `7 d s9 M8 C8 h9 v, U+ F' ~. a
0 z& V2 i) G) \9 ^/ @
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.& D0 j: Y4 v' t8 }3 I& T: I
/ o! C/ f3 _. S6 k/ O
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
5 `/ c+ Q& Y: W" B" ?
/ J3 }( J! `2 w2 W% B" L/ dDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|