 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
7 u( z0 w$ A. M" j+ V# @Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs2 C6 o0 c' p+ d
: z2 f6 W4 Q( T. [; \
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.# {3 \* W& b/ r3 l7 k/ ]4 c
0 S7 C) p" C; y& l' D4 mMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
9 ~2 H v4 {$ i$ `+ `( B7 P: M2 i& I( P E# ]$ @' C; a: n/ _. Q
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.6 {) t; s9 Q) {2 \. E5 Y6 v
" l2 _4 r5 h: V; j8 W
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
! s& ^. r [+ X, p$ g) _& K8 t3 z2 D( x! |) k( E# z" A p
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
* ~7 c+ a; c. _% C& g! j) I6 {. @# q' G0 t# ^1 i$ a
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
$ [* x5 A- B; q; d/ u9 T& }9 [; b8 S+ N
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
, x3 |0 g, u1 \( n" `; M$ y' j( T2 ^3 o
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.* g; t2 C+ w" @, L9 b9 G7 P
4 e" R" f9 M Y8 eDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|