原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: 2 Q4 d' k2 `% U, e1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.* n; J+ z% K/ O' V' n
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. ' }6 Y4 [1 E/ U( u $ `. J l& G: W5 l上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. " I( k) R* Q) R. N , g2 l* M+ \: [5 @* M4 A[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 / E0 h9 L7 E7 `# r, p2 @* s IThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" $ [. \* _( p7 w( d+ U/ U9 X) E6 [8 ~
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." ! \. @6 X* A, L& Y9 ^2 W% g# O1 [ : e' w3 k3 P8 C. EYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。. b. l0 o+ t" {) I
# D- i7 L" G+ q+ X
, J0 q: }$ L; z: j5 x
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:6 H- f, W9 \% \: s: k. A& {
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 $ G4 o' T2 U) y: ?( p% nThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"4 b3 C k0 @7 s6 @* |* X; d. G
4 ]# X# C5 d+ [ ~2 x# o c"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: & ]) O. q- y, I3 B8 m' Y3 Z& i1 U2 W9 \/ ]) f1 k# A$ D
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.