原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: " S' p1 K& q9 Q3 o1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行./ f. f5 S- D s/ \, Q5 Z& h' H5 W! b
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. J3 M) j1 u/ R! N5 F" B
6 {& N6 `1 {. }8 }
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. 8 m& n; K0 E4 K2 X$ g! p( m! C- K. w" u
[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 / ] @( E, k0 ~The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 9 [$ A# ]' X( R7 J0 \# I! Y) e2 n, V! n9 P5 t( ]2 X/ Q4 p' C1 M
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."% \# n" F* B% F4 u' [' E- k* z
# Y7 v& N% W! F" k4 s1 g- \. G$ m
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 / a8 z- D S3 G$ w5 l% } ; u' C( a4 ~, U, N - G$ l: s# x9 F2 p7 r) A) R% d# \
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: ( R" \& H- D/ M9 eHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 v H" M7 K: i: f( Q0 {
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" 8 v! i: x* }1 Y- [$ }) V+ p& Q + I6 ^2 w8 x- y% ["Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend:1 g7 b: b- h" E2 I8 g7 f6 \$ O
& B1 M/ b- S5 _1 t
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.