 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
, C+ ~* L, R# N: U( B3 s! _楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!/ c( v c- `8 B" b. u8 K) a3 }
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... : p. M7 p9 C h0 v; G* k% j' A
$ `" ]) N* Z2 h% N4 I: T* e
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。2 v$ o( a0 a1 F/ M9 p" j
5 F0 @: y% P# A% I; F3 s! }, B安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
0 ~- }* l0 E9 w/ @3 M. c. l; h4 \* [ p9 _. V6 L* ]3 d
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?- n/ J6 @- b9 y3 r, I0 O! m2 D* l$ T
: Z* l7 G, s; D- `/ {
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
& w: |8 h7 _) x9 u {+ T4 Z+ r" H. ~3 o$ K6 J; J
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):4 N7 k' F& Y" y0 {. e9 g; j
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
( S$ p7 |8 ]& X) B
3 M! S+ L6 B2 COr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".. C8 X! u) m b8 s
3 c C2 }; W# \- a7 c" u" n* b# EBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 b+ |7 P. L1 I9 i& u
5 Y4 J) A) U3 H4 }3 Z1 x3 v, w
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|