 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
" n- L7 s/ x; g: G+ H5 @+ m楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!8 H9 B1 ^1 h; j0 s
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
7 l0 r# W' J4 e* U9 C) G- s* ^) r$ Z
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。. A* M! b$ j6 M- p. }, m$ x
: |( L9 T, r: m* A+ Z安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless." l" h7 Q; T3 O6 n( e. {. ]. O
( |0 F2 Y/ I4 q! } p8 \( G6 a9 v不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?' O' P: k% p! v1 c* a0 {( f
8 g- B" K: u* b9 |% r另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
9 V. H$ M" g, Z0 A9 w& F$ r: g1 f% u+ \0 [
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
4 b3 q, f4 L5 T6 h" } ?# MYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
# t1 g- p6 a2 j- e5 s a
1 e3 O3 Y% e0 S) F U* \; S% v0 ~Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
8 v9 y0 u- x; x! g! `1 P, t+ s
; O$ l3 h9 V; Z, m+ I9 g; C- xBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.5 r1 R# X$ C, `7 l) I
5 u/ [) S$ z# E; M1 j7 G; ~8 ~0 w
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|