 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 % ]1 H' s. U( B( b+ T
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
3 ^ ^# p' y2 f3 T R. H, Z0 ucorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 4 u- h& V) L M: U0 t' X6 G
: ^) B2 f& i1 R. G7 T您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。( |2 H6 l2 a$ M) |
( s, [( g. y- E2 O& h: _
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
) s. y6 }! Q$ v# _
! p. E; A' p5 ^不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
# v% G: G( k1 ?% _6 @! e5 r
4 v0 w y, r2 b( |" {+ X另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
. c. k* u! o2 k+ l) X8 |. x& W5 L. b) x
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):( @% B3 Z C: X
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
/ A- r* g% H; _9 b2 i
4 D1 o/ ~1 q: x$ X% lOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".4 Q/ n& b7 ^1 t1 c$ @: ]; w, T2 A1 Y
& H L; N: P( n Q) e3 L. \; wBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
' f9 W5 m3 m: {& @! g1 s
) g0 r* ]! X+ k# P! L[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|