 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
( I0 t! v% o; a& N) D% N4 c楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
8 J, c% X; s3 R+ h& x8 h5 k' m; w" wcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
3 Q9 e* P6 v; v' R- }; Q
) q5 u* J! k) Y! N. _3 @! ]* b1 F您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。( l+ ?) q7 H s
$ u4 J, s- h G/ Q a" H
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.0 q; ^2 U7 s! p- x# ]) s4 `1 Z3 P5 b
% j/ Z( _' V: g' P8 Z- _3 {' u; q不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?; \" t+ p# _0 I* x
( E; ]0 @9 {! s; R
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
- p4 E$ {3 t8 @$ A2 T# A( g3 m: V0 H9 {9 @1 Z, a- |& }
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):+ k! m/ r+ D2 p) o1 ~5 ]9 b( J
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers. W" `# l& \1 ~1 K( Z( X
3 ~4 t1 X. @: v7 }: k
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".) y+ }; {% O2 k" I" C
% W" I. N: N1 }: }/ S! r
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
& i6 ]4 R5 N4 Y: d. p: [# s! @) o& \+ P0 e. I( U$ A
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|