 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ; ` R+ v/ [2 ~4 N9 Y
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! `: Q. E8 g4 U
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 0 i3 _: w! M0 }+ P G: c
! _! X) U! T9 z7 q0 ]& r您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
8 q, n# b( q$ G8 @7 f
E6 A$ E5 E4 B) e- T安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.1 }# w- m1 v; F4 s. y) A! r
" B8 z) b, |* g+ E3 g6 I
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?9 z/ d7 x8 n A2 N2 g' Q
; C" t+ L' ?+ \- l另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。4 h4 m" a" Z5 D
d. U$ f- B, c% A7 I$ U关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):# f( z5 r+ h r' [# U( U
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
. t" C) h6 ^& g! L9 k1 X4 Y: L! X
) `" [" v" c e/ t; P3 ^3 JOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
, _, r* S+ e* i
* n) ~9 j# ] B% E) rBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.# {4 y2 W O; k5 f6 r
) x( \; I: J- j/ ^2 D
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|