 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
6 F; f3 k5 d O: {0 A0 f O/ A6 C( w楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!& l' w; H" S4 x' q# c8 v; w
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
7 t- v1 E" R) k! C# K$ j# V) A: [( J! v! S6 F
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。8 X& D( [( t0 U x8 ^. h% @0 q m( ]
7 U0 r n1 I& d# t安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
/ S7 W/ y/ G. D2 j+ J9 Q4 K, |: k/ H" Y& z9 Y- o, K
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
) @) X J& y# @, ]# }9 m( Z" @2 J
: f: }2 x' n8 x+ r( P0 p% ^另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
% z% p$ E8 p% n* I4 B1 ^9 i* E# g0 J* t, z4 G% C# K
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
m6 F) \& ^4 FYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
, G: G5 n2 }1 K( [9 J& J) w
# s1 ?* d( }0 G" X0 {6 LOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".0 G: X4 p9 q- K- Q6 o2 P: s `
( C7 S4 {1 k8 D2 o/ n2 nBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
* [6 e, {% B) l: S1 W9 s8 H$ o: d+ u* a" j" I$ y' m
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|