 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表  $ }3 x3 r2 C, p- ]
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!' w G# b; i: F+ {7 u8 p" x- }
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
4 h* r& ^: p/ n# M& l6 _
; Z+ B, u! _2 ]. A$ Z您说的对呀，我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理， 所以听您这一说：我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了， 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。7 b4 c5 f P: x4 |' o8 w
, t3 @( F3 f8 x N8 Z安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有：可靠性高（故障率低，ｏｒ ｈｉｇｈ ｒｅｌｉａｂｉｌｉｔｙ）, 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.& @% B) G6 i# P9 Q6 ^3 y
2 ?$ C: q z" k4 l x5 ?7 E$ \) D不过，你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择，Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗？
* n1 I/ l" R- g" i# A! ^* h
, z$ u# j6 M- ^( t w另外，“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息，偶要查他个水落石出，好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。! m8 S+ U8 X& R4 T
9 I" T5 ?( D& s/ B( b( O; I& }关于安全，我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 （SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了）：
% d* Y7 z0 Y4 m4 x" B4 h" H2 L. nYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers." [7 N7 g4 N5 h& M+ u$ `, Y, q: h
3 |5 s* @- z, j: y- P1 |
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".! A: b$ o9 b' ?, z
' o }+ |3 I4 d9 `% o, }
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
: W; j1 T( }$ H& ]9 A" Z& \) J: D; n% _7 B$ b9 c/ W* n' s2 H6 G
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2007-12-9 21:44
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
