埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2220|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: * U( X! K/ Z8 q( {0 H

) N4 C# d+ R2 c& SDespite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat & `+ `5 |: J% ]! K, D) w
    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US
3 T1 B  j+ z8 y* D4 m( acommercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern! v7 H3 h6 `/ O5 Q- O
as the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging
$ P5 ?, u2 Z' h7 @Trends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)6 z9 b/ c9 h! E$ H. r
and the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more+ ?4 ~  U7 W: ^( V6 ^
upbeat.
6 @1 p4 p) k4 t; F$ W3 y& g5 g    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded  l% l9 T9 h' \7 E0 L* \* A
annual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects
2 M: i- x# H4 w: F! K( y4 Yinterviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real8 a7 u/ T" J: p& [. T1 a- j
estate experts, including investors, developers, property company5 ^" k, L. X! R% O
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.: D5 {" X" V+ O; I! e
Other versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world
. H; N/ U( M; |- V' U4 ]including Asia Pacific and Europe." _( Z" v! a3 ?: }1 N/ c
    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian
' J  s& }9 _8 XReal Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
7 ]$ `7 M/ y/ W% b$ X. {environment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to2 R. ^" D8 r. g$ A6 h1 Y7 h
be avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record0 ?" C$ _* |- [" X5 H1 |
highs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space.": v5 ~* A0 L5 o) ^( R
    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the
: N* D$ T/ q' pborder will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game7 S% P& T# w$ v' d# {# l
speculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey' H4 j6 i4 f$ s# P" b
remain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US7 H* c0 D, n  i$ V/ M
correction. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be/ x+ |' r8 v9 J& b& k: ^
very good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.  W& ]3 U3 G! O6 R+ }" K
    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian
, ?1 x+ F) K! B0 Srespondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by
0 r7 \- }3 y8 ^- p4 \7 Ocommercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land
# M- a6 P& N" y4 H+ Fdevelopment. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country0 u* u( S% W0 S1 U9 B! H
especially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating' U: C2 o% h2 I2 X# O$ m  M
development prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The
4 O) u* `% e6 |residential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to$ |9 `3 y+ O& _4 j" z3 t, a
take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and* V4 `' ]- r) a4 H* g3 A+ a
single-family housing looks overpriced.4 C, ~( F  }! i& ~, p! S/ w9 G
    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
: V/ C. E* R+ w! }tenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian
8 Z: Q2 M" z% o/ Y2 V  ]metropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push3 `% X+ n/ O2 m* f: U7 \. _% P3 \
higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting
5 F6 h, [& \: u' j" U" S6 |9 c/ Knew development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,2 o9 P" ]! e5 D) @
and most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental/ W5 O  c" i1 P! V6 g, G
apartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary- H$ T! i  q9 U, H# C3 V- e9 @, ~1 f
western cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing% p4 a% |0 g  r" O; D: ~* G
shortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into, F3 g$ Q2 v7 Q4 b* _6 y
the energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development
* w8 j/ t" o; r1 D" C4 h1 `# u( p. Cin other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.
' w' b8 ~0 \* a) \2 x, ^3 u+ U8 b" y
    Canadian Markets to Watch% {2 |. h. `6 ?6 x- f8 S

# h: n5 @4 Z  }! U- b    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central
& I! }$ C7 N# D# Y8 m" Bcities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour/ u) h  N  W5 ^% n# K
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back9 r2 V& t7 u! y9 i3 j
into the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in& K' \$ J( _/ O* j* }0 D; I$ ]
downtown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical
  R4 i" b4 E/ R6 n( B( Cprojects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out
7 x% N3 D8 d: ?* W/ a8 Wwest - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment# ?7 X, M& I- d' A, j# e0 E
prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain
* h. {- h  r" |% Y* }whether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this., R# Z6 e  ^3 r
Toronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high
$ w* t4 ~+ ^" Q) ~$ nratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.
3 E+ {" j9 W" L& A' B0 |  w8 Y4 T: o3 Z0 m
    Calgary/Edmonton
5 Z! N. q' m) N9 [/ r9 \
: j* P# L# ?) Z9 K4 z' E7 ~    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one
* ?& X7 z0 b) ]" u. P6 |" nboomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a
& c9 n5 D  D, L  K0 Z% p( _buy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,# e' R) u+ }5 Q/ E
48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.4 J: [4 o2 A/ M# f1 F: E
Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale
8 G8 o- F  X) i2 U3 v3 C7 y7 K# sHomebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the
/ m6 K8 g2 X( KCalgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays. ]2 a2 p3 b: y9 N$ i7 L- u+ V
strong, this market will continue to do well.
3 f8 \* T4 q% t0 S; E+ u* `: g& \, m2 P$ h3 b+ f" O
    Vancouver
  I+ f  ]8 m: P) y+ m4 A
* ?( g0 O" y$ A& Y- z$ u& R1 K    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is. \8 s( F' Q/ k3 [6 f- \
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous% Z+ G, a9 _$ e+ w1 {
real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the
4 H3 c6 L) \8 y2 f. Z$ x3 }/ smarket is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
3 j  u& H8 H* R9 ]7 P/ tgrowth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy
" T* v3 d9 {, p! K7 l3 t9 N4 u8 ~recommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%
; W) Y& T( O# G+ dfor Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%
- d, x; H+ t8 w) f: t( Gfor Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very1 I3 b: z, ^- f5 k5 w) g5 S
good mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.. Y1 o5 e+ k2 k# }7 D, D6 V+ a  a

2 q( W; i9 S& ~: l1 X    Toronto" p. h( Z* f" `, }& ~
- b: K  J! |6 p. A
    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and
0 G4 _+ M- B; i+ T" cmanufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is) e1 G' T7 C) w$ s& Q3 ?
relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing
! H2 `$ h  ?  |! p! u% Uindustries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.
; g  `6 p5 I* W/ xThree new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square
8 x/ O2 J% _+ B) ^feet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and
0 i+ X, _# M2 F/ t$ |$ wApartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.8 n0 L# R) \$ A; h
/ S5 K" I9 R. X7 i
    Montreal
* I3 m+ u9 l- Q/ o0 }0 F# e7 m' p7 p! J
    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall+ U8 c0 l8 H2 c6 t- x1 A+ Q
growth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
; H% Q) X3 b6 x  fshop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in
1 N6 s! Y4 ?4 w3 D- E2 vCanada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate8 W/ r( q& j$ a8 [# @) p* ~# P
sectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors
, R$ E6 ]" D) e9 Thigher as a "hold" recommendation.
: N' G5 j  ~. g5 g! z
  }; c. b6 u4 A( o    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
9 D  i1 `! k. I# P% P+ q3 p* Iinclude a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy! {/ ^" ~: V2 x- |. ]
markets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos6 n. z9 k# _7 `, x+ }
near subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest
, s2 r0 A( g3 k! \0 B7 s# noverseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current+ X, i4 }8 E4 |1 Y2 K1 |+ p' `
prices."
& a; {1 ]6 m' S    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at
7 A  s+ R5 \: X3 Swww.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.
6 t" i6 _* C0 _) U: D% M# ?9 L. K8 N) \8 z1 x/ g+ B: x
    About PricewaterhouseCoopers
: }1 P) U) f; W) @, K5 s; y  c) S5 A  `# J  q+ _9 u/ S+ R
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,
& A  p& |  w9 W9 i0 \2 itax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its4 p7 X7 H# D  n; @' V, i
clients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries
" Q) Z: [# j7 D; Cacross our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop- V6 Q! f! k( K, o3 n
fresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of# V9 A' N* A' p4 l( \$ ]
excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
; x3 L' f+ `, r5 N6 i: H6 i7 Drelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the9 s* y3 @8 J8 v
country.3 u8 l: k# d' p. j) b4 c
    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario
4 J$ P. {* g( r# Klimited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the6 b  a) n2 V9 h" d9 I' e" _
PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
, ~/ |$ K4 a* i" Zeach of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
! E) T# X3 i7 r8 k( {; w: Q: R2 r0 H+ a
    About the Urban Land Institute3 @& v/ g9 N. z; w

9 U/ G5 ?% T% B! P( f7 s! C    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and
0 {) Y% B; j2 l: @7 _3 gresearch institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide
" Y! \; ^( |3 G& fleadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating
/ n5 p7 {" [4 ^$ ^) V- |! D- o; othriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more( K; P/ r7 B, F) w
than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development( r8 T, t3 K& a# M# O
disciplines.9 _' [, ~" b" Q  t/ ^6 f
    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.
" u9 Q' e9 b# ]; D- b4 H. J+ C  w. aWith nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District7 @( f2 n4 h8 N2 Q
Council was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is# m% g0 {. f9 z( e* o
now being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
" y7 B$ z7 U7 O/ K! s6 U8 n9 Lhosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,
7 a$ ?3 a2 ?, s. t2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake0 {9 c& f6 S! u( e" \6 `  \
Hutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras," z  z3 p! J' I: P8 L
President of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please
' u4 c% [( Y3 O" H3 ]0 Z- icall the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on- P% X% @7 }1 u1 w6 f# I) Y* V
the web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.
0 h3 t2 v7 e2 h: S2 N( x
. i) ?$ `: \9 s9 C8 s/ l! K. O! r$ k& a  A# c

' a+ X: b- p/ T) L2 Q4 s0 Z, vFor further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
" {7 i0 h& x' ?6 F(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com
/ ?' Z1 h, [, K1 H( w3 }( c0 x/ V0 dhttp://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html- j; N2 h3 C, d- I9 y
  n/ S- {8 L8 Q3 K* _
[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说: 6 a$ q. k5 E; V2 y

8 l+ X! F) J" v; z8 T6 f3 M尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观" e- d1 Y$ `; n* H
    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
# \0 B; L* \; i. }9 ]) X商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。 1 k1 `4 S& Y- w! ?2 ^
由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴  G, I) K  k4 K: D, ~$ q
趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会) & j! m! Q% X3 y  u5 V& ^4 {" R4 ?
和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多* ?. i) U5 e* Z9 ~$ l
乐观。 ' h$ d0 V- I2 o  E. l5 A. S
    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的
; Y1 m- r( `" K8 n+ |# q: j2 D' I. m) q年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了
: l6 ^9 ?' _" c0 G, U) x访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
6 Z4 E9 t2 F) k1 f- P9 Q4 h( J地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司! ^& A+ |+ a/ ?, o
代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。 ) A- ]3 k. y: H% g$ T8 c
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷
; U" y- h+ @- N0 Y5 b3 q- t6 @包括亚太地区和欧洲。 5 P$ i8 L: w" q8 E# _! W/ T+ D- I- J
    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大
4 m: N+ }" \3 u. C# n- N/ N' ]房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资
, z, ?' r4 X3 h0 r环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎& s6 u6 C! y5 H) _1 t
可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录
( c. |0 ?/ E% c7 Q5 {" u$ ]高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 5 }2 \. }4 i9 `  ~' U
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
9 K. X9 B$ S5 c8 l4 F" C0 P; Y" j边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏
' G* L; A( {/ A2 R2 b% q( K! r炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者, Y. R6 f( _( X! ?. W4 x5 g
继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国
  P; X4 V3 g0 n- D更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将
! ^- p( i! _3 Y& w4 n非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 # ^& I; C! B  h0 E1 e
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大
5 E0 \3 q; `( l受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是0 m# ~8 |' y% \& b! t
商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地. e3 |- ^2 d) n  r" G
的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行
; ?! Y! g  s) k尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明
+ A+ I& Y/ c! W/ V的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该7 ?; \9 z6 L& O9 Z% ~8 \
住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要0 A+ u2 I( y9 z5 Q2 ~& ]) o
以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和) [, Y1 ?7 E2 L& D0 D% F5 ~
单个家庭的房屋期待过高。
/ I. h0 J  P( p; ^& ^    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了
# Y- M& _3 {8 ]租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大
% }- Y' d1 C) [( ~7 q, X大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动
" t8 F( L* ~0 x. [5 k# w更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制/ F7 e- p& w$ `) P
新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚,
! k" P+ n- W0 F; X' N& M% ^和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租
. E5 y; F* G( D9 T6 b公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学; Z4 T0 a' R7 {3 V8 {
西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋
, G  ]: ^, k4 @5 V. R短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入
) y7 q8 u% w+ T能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展
2 o" o* b  V  {& R  ^在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。
! p2 |6 s4 P  L$ w* b
+ J( ~' @! q, V+ c1 @7 l& L. ^* B    加拿大市场上观看
/ C9 W( g* S$ A) Z; Q6 |, K
6 x4 C  K! X# j    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央/ f. N, i/ a% A1 P$ P7 r* b( x
城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时$ U  Y( V, x7 G+ c
居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回
3 b' e' [7 L* W6 n- X( B8 Q" ]进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在" z1 D7 [" ]1 q, R4 \8 y6 W
市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直
) l  y  n  z' I" k  l) A# P) w; q项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市
- ^* ^; }' o; f% _1 L4 D  g西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资
/ ?2 M+ k8 F2 c1 y9 G7 `前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定
: N* L* W* F) I! f是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。
0 I4 R% C+ L5 |5 G0 g6 i3 g% @; r* @多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
$ L1 I' ?' h/ r  z, _% J5 t评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。
7 \# q; r" P. B
5 U; ~* q( v9 p) |; H/ |    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿
5 w1 X! Z# V  n1 l
: o  K: J/ n, o. l9 W7 k8 M% N. Z    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号5 Y6 c  O' X/ F. ?4 B4 |
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作
! _7 ^4 u& F% n4 P& |* U购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送, * S  P- f( @, r% ~0 R6 Z/ B8 H
48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 % X; Y; W! p/ [5 M9 }
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后# k9 O/ p( u) e: ?
住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
1 w$ K( q: j' @6 C卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留, Z3 y% |2 E8 u1 z4 z0 e& I- R
强大的,这个市场将继续向好。 ; c: z& Q2 v- B" U
* z9 J- |& U8 a' m
    温哥华  @; _; y1 }4 a. |% B' L
3 `. \- y3 H. n- q
    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业
4 {7 m4 p0 G+ T- v  L6 E/ ^红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理8 K' n* y) x# Z
房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和+ M4 |: X5 A8 b) y/ j0 C( b
市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个7 z8 l: O# j. B8 |2 i
主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进
3 x$ c# v( a- }7 ^% u0 T建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 %
4 h) ^) K6 k: W. M, p, k工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 % 1 R1 ]" ?' e8 ^% o: U
为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很
5 Q- j# h* D  Y$ G+ W  A5 ]良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。
8 p8 f+ A) T- w' _" H# `3 @
' C$ o+ S. w) p* D% x# H    多伦多& l. S! F! ~+ @" z6 y
( M1 s) |$ {5 k# w5 a( ^
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市,
' o2 S; l" U8 Y# d. M制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正
8 r2 N) B8 i! m: r价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造  h% x$ z, Q# n$ h
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。 7 Y4 l3 k. w  K  {+ {- v
三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场- ^7 ~* C; z8 n5 C  b
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和4 R% G7 L' U& C: q$ ~5 ]8 r
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。
  |- \6 @* v2 R
1 T6 A. }1 a: H4 T$ h    蒙特利尔
; h" }6 P3 E4 m) m( k) T7 h* M: d; c4 w2 c0 j
    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体
; t- X3 H, ]8 R4 N. ?经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立' H$ X: N! i% d/ X. w. x
店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市
2 x" ]6 y9 ?( p) f. Q- z7 J加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产. x7 U' C0 N2 }& T4 w
部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业
5 A1 R% y) s$ {2 C高为"持有"建议。 1 D, N  }: B" g! l9 z1 j0 p

/ r! A% w5 O% b  j. e/ j    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年- R% p* p9 v5 |3 n& X
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源% L* S$ Z1 _. c4 i" j4 s8 W
市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓% L( g, V; T6 q7 f# S
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资& V5 ]. R) M" W  f. o
海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的+ u2 k& r7 r: y
价格" 。 5 p9 A: j" k; ?+ H3 c# C! ~. G
    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
9 U5 d7 \- S7 O1 s$ Nwww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。
9 N) {) t" }* o5 A# E- F/ v, u: J9 ~3 u9 U5 l
    约罗兵咸永道- Y( {7 i/ h1 A3 i4 ?' {

! B/ A- H4 \* c    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证,
  l: [3 k0 n4 w) U税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值; h/ r$ d: W4 E
客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家7 D1 a# b/ K& S1 W- V  z: P
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发4 e, m8 |# G7 ?' p
新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的
8 O8 _" {" G: P: `* X  u# t卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其
3 `# \8 ~' _: R- ^. _相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
8 G! I, ~7 ]8 F2 k% y" c国。
+ j4 K: J) V. `     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略+ n, u+ N+ P+ j$ E8 y! u$ k  Q7 g
有限责任合伙,或视情况需要, 4 j$ L4 u) d8 {0 m8 k+ _: D
普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络, ; q4 Z" n' e# O- m
每年这是一个独立的法律实体。 # r& y; m& m3 f/ `! D, s3 M$ f
* J% B5 s  I5 o  w2 h
    关于城市土地研究所所长
' N" U! B/ Y- z5 s3 ~& {" F) q" b; _4 o' e( M* D
    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和. K1 A+ A5 {. k4 ~' ?+ E
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供; c( m0 K9 i1 G: M8 F& N5 l
领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造. J( X8 Y: M  G1 |( K
蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更4 u, i" a. v0 w# S7 |# {
超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展: W7 E- e( j% h; d! I) f0 ^' n
学科。 5 ?7 j- K" b' m( l5 g1 D. E8 \
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 7 D% |. a' i  v
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区) w% x1 C0 F# o% ^1 v$ V/ H0 U
理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会/ [" i5 v$ ^" J
现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会  A! R1 C8 n: ^4 n
主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日,
5 j  r9 a" {% J( R* `5 p- N9 J2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力. M: c& {+ o+ ~0 T4 G
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , ' s# ?4 |# x2 U& B; y; U4 s
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请
# h$ Y. _. z( N致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈( g; l  S2 O$ F7 g, G
网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066 。 # O' e2 [9 p  ~" ~+ ^, X
* S( f: k; Z% [5 ?3 Q

) W9 U  ~) @% t
6 p( N( K7 r5 `更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园, - t% U1 S0 g- \) c0 J. M: f& I$ f
( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层

6 `. w7 f) @! T9 V+ F2 O6 v" R$ p3 I) @' @' y
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层

9 l. u5 W7 r+ W7 ou
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-14 06:12 , Processed in 0.284061 second(s), 23 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表