Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
6 t. v: H/ \- {0 ?/ [
# Y7 h1 z) U+ U. k! F  fNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
7 B% v6 V/ s, y/ Q3 B# W
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
: X5 @( w3 _2 A- \) t$ l# J1 ^. B3 [
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
2 ?6 C! L; Y3 v0 z  Y" J- v* B
* t4 @! v  A( z! z; ^' n6 \% X
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
- Y# d+ k* x, c3 s
) I7 V1 D2 G3 |; sSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
# |0 r- l: K: G1 LSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
, X  K, j; a; j$ o3 D5 L6 pNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
. i& x# V7 }& w: l, B' S. Q
& P4 O  @. M& X* z2 a! z; f- ^0 gIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

3 U5 ^- y* X! b6 p: K. b1 j Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
) s% S6 Z7 O/ @' q. O' k2 I Avg. 1988-2000 2001
1 N2 t1 j. i$ E8 j, D! lBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
7 T* }* M$ n' D# G0 a3 k& j* MLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
0 ^0 V% Z* h# m+ aSeattle  20.4 25
" I8 I0 q2 o! O7 O& A5 ?Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

0 M! L0 @- O5 d9 ?# [
1 u  \1 A6 E% E2 C& u, J0 _; ]' k
) v4 S3 I+ y2 k- N! @' HIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

. W" F$ O: g" I: B4 q) m1 N
% _6 {$ [8 F+ q( iFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
- r6 Q2 v, [' ]
, W' l2 e; Y0 e9 }it would be a good reference.

% S8 X  S/ ~+ Kthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
! n" c: r/ x6 H7 l9 W0 Y
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]