Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
, I4 C" O4 E( [" u" G# [
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

; Z  a( `2 Z: M3 G; K0 ^5 C6 O) ]Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
/ Y% a8 _# I) O( ~( M, P( N! U
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


3 ?) `5 x2 a, e3 Y; {3 D* E( N# ~In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

/ ?. E" X9 o$ _8 O" ZSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
+ B/ F$ t7 b1 i9 l! E' N0 FSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

8 F( c. @, p0 ?  [; _4 k# o# D6 IIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
) {* j2 f/ \4 d2 q3 w
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
+ q! i2 W( N& C! F+ i( K% t
1 B& C: v( D. j Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
* D! o5 A, {$ S3 a/ E8 X Avg. 1988-2000 2001
8 C$ I  d9 l0 v  l' ABoston  20.5 30.2
: [2 q9 b* f  L4 ^& ^San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
& M& C4 b6 X* X8 Z8 p  wDenver  17.7 23.7
' p5 p0 [& d! R8 I+ H3 CNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
: i4 Z! m" S' i4 F- rWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
; f3 s  r( S" c2 e% Q( W/ ^& `# A
" W0 C1 [7 m2 j/ V" `! S% |

' x- J6 g6 v5 g$ T6 ?& q! M3 ^It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
, ?+ ~+ a, x( O5 p5 o- d
6 F  H; f4 n8 c8 B, e3 n( N
; `1 n1 N. G3 a4 n4 S: p7 ^From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

$ Z* T* T! h& L" Lit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
7 i2 V. o( W8 A+ ~' E0 ~. J
! o4 u, d' Y% y1 W  R( h[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]