 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
; N- d9 {1 \2 {2 Z8 ~- _2 X, X( P4 s* x6 B5 v# ]
; f( P) O8 M$ }5 s9 S1 zIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. + p( g$ H7 [9 _" I1 |' ^( X6 _
# f9 v% g( O8 I4 f1 d
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
$ R+ O9 [ H1 d6 V( n# S$ f. ^: J, G' L3 S0 ^9 k
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
4 R: D! H* c/ _9 p; G5 p- C; |& f- g4 R* _: R
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
+ C/ d8 p* l9 D+ H, s$ u) [- M |
|