 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 1 W0 \" d0 m; O, p& {6 D
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14
- O+ O- Z6 o% ^/ o. \1 { Z# C# K' hOne party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
' r: |; C1 g0 ]
0 h) y8 `4 e6 T! R: B# f7 JIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. : |: W/ _( G6 b4 g: v
2 B, L$ t; f, K
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.034 x; u5 p5 f' r: q
^" @+ _* I& i8 [" N) B% a7 }8 tcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
0 [, M' `9 O$ v C9 T5 y0 E" U% |! X0 i! i
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
9 Z6 u, y0 S2 j( l% v+ f2 c* H |
|