 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 ! g( O5 r6 ~+ ?& p! Q
0 X5 G6 ^+ { s& c1 J. V8 d5 U- C& w/ Z) H0 F
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
$ A( n; l# F+ ^* QRalph Klein9 k1 P `$ ^1 ?( t6 G
" J7 s" |$ @- e+ }, t& ]0 J: o我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!% |" J/ `1 a; l% z6 |* Q
2 F8 z. h: T( I
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。: f; w' g$ g; ?$ D1 ]8 w, u" E
8 O e0 U' ?7 I! G+ m* V4 y8 h0 d
9 z, A" Q. Q. ~6 P% }" Hhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades& |! g) E9 \5 l# O
Historic Alberta budget balances:/ j* f& t( p; T* S9 N O
# l" r; P- z9 S7 b/ `7 y5 ?( U
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus& C$ ]4 d+ N* G6 U0 K: B
- I6 l" y0 D5 V9 w8 H1982-83: $796 million deficit% P% W" r4 r# O4 o2 X
( m- @# w5 C+ Y: C: P
1983-84: $129 million surplus5 ^. M5 t+ G9 u& b6 ~4 O" A
2 W+ g' e6 z7 K) S5 ]7 ?5 ]: |
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
9 C3 R; @' y/ ] t% s3 n/ ]$ c# U% B8 `+ j- }2 A% U5 W( O* d
1985-86: $761 million deficit
- A" }" S+ h) w/ e/ I1 M2 F. b( J4 T# t1 d0 K3 z4 _
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
! o' m G. S0 j. Q! b3 z, i1 `+ X5 x% U
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit D; |' Z! @' o1 P( ]% t
/ F1 H! \( O2 ]+ ^8 J1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit% W% k2 y( h: D: p
+ u4 w& i: d1 p# r% K( \1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit. F% ]' Z+ b0 a& e. g6 \) D8 V4 h
1 x! _1 O' T1 @
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
7 I( {3 j% e0 `" e/ J* p* t8 {& i$ `6 w) L5 U3 _" D0 y
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
, n, K( F; o9 v0 T
7 q& o+ g3 x5 m/ ]* [1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
$ F% f9 O0 D" J* f$ {9 ~7 x$ v" h" H
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
( |) H* h3 d7 F7 v; X! Q$ W5 k- ?
7 ], q8 M" h# D* b4 e) e1994-95: $938 million surplus
: b( H) Y2 B! f0 }7 g; z1 l
# A) H: Y3 Z7 J6 l3 S1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus" _0 h1 d* q7 e8 j
9 i+ U. ^% P( U% L# z9 r2 d$ j5 p
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus6 W' t; P+ C3 X5 h; L
. @- W* ^ \9 ~6 {7 ` \! A% I1 t3 G1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus1 ]5 b( b& U& c0 j& O
! P6 o$ m6 y: F p4 C( S+ k
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
' _9 Z( |' D# U* d" l2 f% t. _! w$ |1 _
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus4 R$ T4 |% i. N( ~) i
* v/ o* d) |. b1 E n% l2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus) } m) a- m6 B7 h3 t5 w w/ n' _
; R5 q6 W j: f @2 e5 S
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus- S* P$ q5 N5 C" a
7 x6 l7 C; v0 q8 d; x2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus% |7 T" X7 C/ \
2 l' z6 H% G8 h7 A2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
( Y! O+ ?7 z. W1 L% }) |. ], R
0 U- G* [, f" n% d+ D7 n( a2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus4 d+ e& `% v. j9 z3 n7 L, ]
6 I, B7 a5 E% g, C2 b) p
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
& ?1 ]- a- p# o2 z3 k6 G: Z/ [, R4 j
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus( v3 C6 \( L' f' `
4 q/ N: ^1 a/ s6 B; @2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
7 Y8 G1 y0 a4 _& K" t+ q
' t$ n, ], m5 F& `" J) w. Y; F; a2008-09: $852 million deficit
6 e3 f: r; N. W/ w, u _
7 _9 @9 U c c5 N P, X( q2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
, t* L; h9 K0 a* F6 V1 u8 O. E$ ^- F- S |- d3 i
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit1 M6 y# q, @, n0 O9 B) j
2 y L3 k( O$ P l# g
2011-12: $23 million deficit0 v8 t2 M+ H& K
' ] K! M7 N8 q4 X% J7 |
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
' k6 w. k: x0 L5 m" H& G7 [6 o2 o$ o7 i W+ I
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|