 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
2 h. V8 v8 h) `" I0 H, P2 c: D
; H* k$ |- {% l' J h; ?" b8 m! x- S% |0 I( o( s. k! [
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:+ j, _/ H O0 `) V8 F( ? O
Ralph Klein
! |- `! r0 h3 O' y- e S! ]5 K& V/ d2 x+ u6 m- J n( F. d
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
$ S) w$ S6 @" Q
6 ^- R# p/ P% E ^: f! G所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
9 i& s4 I( U. _3 i* _! E" }0 A* j) k0 @
' | M& o" Y/ ?
4 ]2 c! {7 Q0 Y( j: A/ Ghttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades' m4 D& j+ o; Q, m9 M) Z
Historic Alberta budget balances:
& n5 g5 ~4 f5 U- t2 P0 C; O8 d2 G9 v8 A' X; z
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
* W: N4 j4 c' J. e1 V4 L$ _- O+ O/ q5 }' \4 d9 f, _
1982-83: $796 million deficit& k* ^. T+ K! n3 ]1 p7 r l
7 h0 `( [' o5 v7 S. M( U- r, w
1983-84: $129 million surplus- j+ G, x) y2 C4 e# V
; p; \) e5 r2 q6 S1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus4 C; v; @# \9 P( Y
6 v& v! \ t2 O" r& p( S+ W; T) R
1985-86: $761 million deficit/ v) f7 N" I/ D3 W- g
l# k K/ a) o& }7 G2 g% M1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit
% l* ?) k+ w. @3 O2 @, C* |" S, n5 J. X7 L: v+ ^ G; |# r
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit! w+ T" {. k% U. I5 W
* M+ B% P, o L$ ^" h5 W1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
* l% d4 Q2 z5 q- w- M l9 `* r
- D, S6 [* Y0 p' m$ h3 m1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit k, o- Y5 o, f' y# Q+ X
, h6 H& Z7 \; T/ H# y1 A1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit0 ^4 [0 Q* T: Y9 N' o3 s1 `
1 c* h" ~/ y2 `* a$ \- ~
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
0 S8 @. ~4 b* G) D/ Z
3 W: `( s4 ?6 X/ Q1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
/ O6 ^9 w4 s+ p8 `* k+ f: S$ v9 N- c( O$ u2 _* K" s
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit, S& l: o! M' ]0 z- j7 _$ n
3 b& p0 N# `; g5 U4 {0 O ~
1994-95: $938 million surplus
. V+ W; h$ L, t' @- q- e# M! ^# q$ ?& `5 |3 _1 D
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus3 \5 x4 @. |# Y8 P. i7 c
$ E: ?- _' r" T9 T J+ ]1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus+ o9 y- ^, B0 V
5 C3 P9 b [$ n% M& {1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
8 @! z/ A8 X) J" t- [9 S
) S9 i% H6 o8 e) h/ |1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
9 h* }9 s8 }- ?: I# v0 [
/ B+ R' a9 F( ^- U. [1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
4 t5 A0 u% F7 i! x+ Q# f3 E. U; J4 S. O( x- D
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus. Z4 T* G; K {# e6 z+ f. U* |! f7 @( X
* j7 L* J# k; V9 h" O) `+ I
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus+ W& k S. {2 o4 o" D4 V! u
8 w2 W! V# @5 x! u
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
" K, g2 K! x5 s" E- D
$ P% F2 K; S, p0 u+ p9 k4 o6 M2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
, L0 Z: U9 X; m I5 i7 O; Y' i3 h3 u0 H0 S2 Y
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
; }, i5 D) s' Z7 l, P. c" s: |
7 ] I( u8 v3 J4 m# ?/ w9 k* L2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
' t. B! v& j! w1 Z# n5 u8 g. M
$ L8 z; M" M2 m! U0 C% m2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
* F6 v$ [/ m; L% e+ @, @6 x( @3 C1 s, P% `" G, n5 z/ ^
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
4 T) |# ~5 v9 Z: L) d) P' D/ B3 H0 t* L% @
2008-09: $852 million deficit( s, n; L+ T+ E1 K4 N; k. U
! q# Y% J+ K: G& i* S/ w0 I4 G
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
) l. h$ K, z# C9 \+ b+ [. h$ W/ @. j
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
+ ?6 G* o M* o8 h* i7 g! _* E) E4 S. J3 S
2011-12: $23 million deficit
% U% b" U, [' Q6 J& N7 V' x' f
8 o N- {' u: Z( x B3 P* H5 h2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
. C# ~. [ p/ Q, d% x. [* k( H) o, c% ]/ o7 p0 M
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|