 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ~! Y6 n7 U) i ~, D' ?* S3 y
( ?: {( ?5 T0 Q: F; l- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -- I E X+ c- v8 [1 @' f/ ]* t; ]
% }" w5 s3 Y+ C+ b7 ~1 A; ]1 R# N7 z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market7 a8 i$ `/ z$ ]. X- C
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
1 q4 d: n; f( k) D/ e; X+ Gquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic8 y! H0 T0 {$ d) G' l& F: J
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit; m. Y0 `7 ^" |- P4 j9 v
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
d4 d) q2 _; v% C' ~, ~0 J, |more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
6 y) z) ^% v) o' p; yQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal/ `: O/ \2 W& F( }, z8 E; s0 O
LePage Real Estate Services.9 X$ F& E6 S( x
( p3 h9 M! p- j
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- L0 ^ Y7 d$ w4 Y4 s9 Iare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
% c- H( r) D/ q; }0 V* mconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- w, r7 p. g" Q- Q+ m9 t) B
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. c6 U% t; m% P7 ]. Iresidential real estate sector.; W$ I* X! U2 E3 }# V& X
* j4 J/ G1 V" b @ D
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
, F1 G6 n4 s$ o+ coccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; M: ?5 E5 N) E; E2 e$ uyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 G8 P/ s+ ?: c# t6 y6 Z6 c4 S8 s
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380; k1 Q7 L0 [1 K* r$ t
(+13.2%).' M8 F5 Z- E/ P- h: S
9 R4 w* f4 V% X5 l% {0 }& t$ _ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth0 t/ U8 N$ x: O: b C4 I
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. D# I% s% Z+ x% u' O/ Jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. I' Y7 b, w5 G; V3 G- x. s0 \
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ }3 I6 W8 L& v. D- A xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
+ W+ ?. x- O7 E i$ y# j"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We: U6 ~' P! e: Y- w9 I, y2 y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy1 A. @/ r5 L$ W# @. a
balanced market."
; q& @- Q, v1 }8 T2 X% \/ P& g, @* L: F& O* j9 j6 l
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
! a2 M9 ]: x& Y, \considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
7 j5 B$ B" I3 A: T/ n" Jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 @3 r) }9 P/ {1 ]( i. ^! C
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 L7 z& P0 X" W7 M+ genergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. e. J! M6 y9 d8 k% C+ Kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ t# q, u, \, cbreaking price appreciations.4 J* w% o8 [ l% y
3 H8 r( D' X) J Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
8 x3 ^* J0 k/ a; xeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
# C. ?2 L4 E; }1 c3 Clargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& L9 j7 @( Z! I Y+ ? ~" N
0 ]8 a% e, @3 e( K3 {* v
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid! J2 T# @: ]6 T
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" X. ?& F' {0 u4 \6 F
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off( q+ C0 L2 @& a4 }$ P0 {; w
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.8 R4 @ [' D) ]' t5 x# C
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, g( U4 N9 E, a& ^ ~greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of) R- W! X u2 M" h: c! m
price appreciation when compared with 2005.0 Q) O! v0 c) d: Q
. e- U' D) T: k9 A8 c- Y4 a' y
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( H( I& z8 q! Y, S# V! C7 u5 c
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; P: s9 U& E6 n& x4 l2 vfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada% m; \! Z7 ^4 B. S. I+ A" W0 s
are markedly different than those found in the United States.$ @7 S5 ^2 o; ]9 L
% O( S& z" j1 a9 Z, i
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the) w# u7 `2 |: W. ~
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. ~5 c8 [5 `3 M( Hfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ Q# ^* o t; C* G% Y) X. Hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
! e: M! p! m, @0 e1 M, u/ Q# kaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 [) g" l$ r/ M5 `5 z$ L
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and' _2 b% ^' o3 C! [
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ f/ a, v- c" {0 a& ?mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."9 I5 K% A: R) C5 V c+ I
0 t( L! ]4 ~% a <<
- \$ j8 R u* b: q0 @; J2 T8 M REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. O6 z% k; R0 K" |) N. y >>, U4 Z: i; d( p! u1 a
0 F6 C' c2 o' Z/ z2 t; Y+ C
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in+ b1 ~1 h5 ~* v
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
0 w3 N6 g" c8 T, V$ `. M4 w2 p+ jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
) z8 O% K% i+ w" p* }looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of4 A8 A9 }# |# {- q k; o1 p
renovations.& @# E, [ O( y3 [
- o; c) w' E6 F, g" k3 Q
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% |# d, }8 Q4 b4 P1 Z' s7 v$ e# k: b5 c( K
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
W, v$ B2 u* s2 R* k/ i( Z$ T+ }compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
7 t; J0 `1 w. ~, e- sSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 L l: y, Z" N+ a( O
; i1 x) f, q) J5 _: b, J The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, i9 N, s c2 a( a2 lslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
. c6 x, x9 K, @quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
+ p- S* X0 j! T1 A: G7 w600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# e1 Y# f2 T2 o# [
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ N& ^3 {7 Y% P7 N6 wand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 L" r0 I: u! |
* g* k$ K0 U( Z/ [/ U9 O! b+ [ In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 U8 m+ {3 d# ^9 [conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their& l* ?5 G/ k' k2 a; r
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers9 Y% ^/ K0 z6 z' P, N
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian s0 {1 y0 `2 e ?% [
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing8 G7 u, W# L4 f# E
buyers with more options when looking for a home.& z7 c5 B3 M) }
9 c9 S! M2 n9 x) s( V
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
. D* J' I, P% ?: [among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ F* o5 l3 u. `
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 B8 `) B6 w0 M; G# \
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last, L$ Z- N2 R: g7 D# _
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 V6 s) v0 T& |# V, ?6 Y
, J4 T0 z& G+ i' |" k- n3 G Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house$ n E# n1 o9 L$ p# Z/ u
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory( h9 \' c# h) q. \
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting2 ]" r0 h* V3 Y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 E B7 O" p4 [when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 V* G8 D" p$ k: @5 Epressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# h! P& i, t9 `% r5 z+ Qmaking a purchase.
. x+ Q4 i6 C: O j/ {% K+ X7 u
# B8 q% i; a! L4 _' O' Q) ~2 k Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 r6 n! z6 q, q" B$ o/ B, ymarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong% p, K1 C* O- R, g' [3 r. m
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city* s( h# S" T2 i$ a5 x. N
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
, [) i0 F9 q9 \7 mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# n2 V, `% F: i
amenities.
5 Q0 R$ ?7 N* X9 F+ l
5 f9 c1 j) r6 f2 T# V8 ] The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
8 I. h' a$ ~7 D+ gthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
7 j) v1 d' }6 r2 o, u1 {across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has: |) \# ]" ?7 Y7 j8 I1 R& ~! l0 M
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. ~8 V$ ?/ O1 b2 A2 Q& O; h" h7 l
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 T- \( Y! c( G5 X5 Presidence, rather than for investment.- [) D; R& g3 |/ N2 X; z
3 m( Z1 K1 h7 r: z8 K0 M ^ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as! L+ f! h h( o; I7 [
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
; V$ X9 x& t! o0 Kin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
- z0 { i; `% P1 i4 ^) h7 c8 Xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) u2 E. F9 J- d" v% [& I2 N
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
( M0 `; w: |# j4 P+ |the market.- b7 L, P {1 C, h9 d6 q7 f$ W
8 h7 l' R$ z! p$ c' h In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through: c7 L v8 [ i8 P% I; Z* W3 U
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% ]2 W d; q/ z) B6 Y7 [
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring1 M# Q3 n+ s! R% `
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due9 P5 y* p6 M' o0 y3 K9 ~! h: _
to the shortage of available inventory.0 {% r8 l+ N+ x9 ]9 |# f3 s
d& m; i& K" o2 V2 y- o
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its. U, a: t" [- J1 @4 B9 _9 S4 ]
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains' W$ @# [+ ]# E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses- }7 M( L9 S v2 g
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 i7 N. n. ? L$ t5 J3 j- M# V" D! c' e5 K
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% b# H& @0 R5 e0 Y3 |
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 B) ^# n0 @. W4 { Bunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% }! `. M" ?- H! L7 N& Dpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
# r; ^( C; ~/ X6 X! rprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer$ C/ d3 Q7 g% Y. C$ r4 \
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 E5 ~. e/ K" K! P! |# {% H5 Lbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.4 ^( B: N/ `. I% F( i% j7 n
6 ?. e9 L& H% v
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 D0 @1 s0 F/ s. {: V' xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
0 G$ Q+ }$ Z! I- |5 o% o# ^remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
. O8 ]) h. | |! s: r, F/ amaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices1 n, ]' z. D& F8 x/ Y
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; c& o, [+ N9 lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- h2 y. }8 H. E/ d. e* b5 T
towards the end of 2006. 7 a0 { j4 j% p5 k2 B4 S
6 Z! ?( [8 K8 ]4 C# M1 g6 jWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of* c# L2 O l0 X4 C4 G
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
, Z) e, Z0 r) G W& Ito meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
& V! e1 x6 E: U) {: vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ I% [* @6 Y. v- I# t: m5 k3 v
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 M) q, \' g( x- apressure on tight inventory levels., i: T- |3 W' {2 K$ B- M/ m
^/ _; ~- L0 w1 R- [* {6 z, Z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic a8 X* K. u7 w2 L& Y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" _# m, {! A( z: x) n$ W+ M+ o l! ]into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 a* `! a6 p$ y. M! h, b- ]
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: u3 X0 r4 O4 w, g! S
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; T h- ]9 f. G4 ~/ Q8 ^, p. i& q" z2 H+ y. m2 N4 u* B
<<
: O' |7 C1 W- V7 u) t Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20063 _( U6 q" ] ~
4 f4 O& E2 F( @0 ]7 D0 U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" S; E! Y8 Q# o) Z( l Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
: C: R% S% H; k, F; C, A( A -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ^9 ~1 H+ Q1 M8 Z0 t8 R9 Y% L4 y
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
5 \4 z( c9 M7 V: S7 j Market Average Average % Change Average Average
4 {# N& c0 n0 T, g6 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Q! n& |, K* b$ l% d5 S. p; B! W+ j Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000! R; k0 T# v0 I' f# `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- f% @6 U* O) N! R' X Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0002 E. z |+ E6 u9 F/ O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 G0 \" z/ ~# s# S" r! j Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
0 I4 t- A) j+ u8 [5 Y) N; I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: P6 C8 B f1 G/ h4 S* Y6 [ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
" Q2 F1 A. i- V3 t9 j; Y$ T- S- o -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 o6 b/ j! L+ ]5 j
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
; ]! ]- u- L# P: K$ A; | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. K% U3 X6 l' D, p3 }: X7 {) k Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583: u/ B4 A5 p( @( ^1 C$ J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( y# H, |) O/ Q% E. Y( d! R
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
* @' q6 Z& L0 t6 j: u& h% H* g -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 a8 F, o' L" w( x* y; q$ e; D* Y1 k9 n
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 I1 P$ v }$ Z6 `9 y$ y$ J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( V6 q6 c' {$ r% V3 p* ] Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
* x- F0 F0 v! s" [. h, j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 `. v+ d9 C- b% B, c1 l: R Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
) z* y. w; m( b2 d3 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 f% A2 R" e- X" H5 E- M
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5008 D% p9 S5 x) u* a& i, t: J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ t1 z d# ?6 u- A) { Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
1 A. d* X1 T3 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------& D: C' u+ [! |/ ?" Y# X7 S
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714; \! ?3 ]* P; y8 s: f) {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; s- ~) j4 Y8 f% _ A9 _. E$ M
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
3 r- f- W+ l! u$ ~0 N5 N' p6 V% C6 u% z -------------------------------------------------------------------------& Y9 w8 ~! T; t5 F
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0000 c# d/ H* |; X' x0 o# h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 G" r& \3 B7 X& x: ^# n
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
+ ^+ n( T4 S# Z) h! r; D9 T% u3 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 K1 ~" i4 q* U6 x7 a
9 B& W& |% `& Q+ }. z9 F7 Z$ @9 W
-------------------------------------------------------------
; E2 C G' f" W0 m Standard Condominium/ A" u2 e5 s+ t( W+ I1 q5 O" l
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y4 W' o& x) D+ | 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo7 J: |1 _' F/ l' G6 x2 [4 y3 D! l
Market % Change Average Average % Change* b: x5 l b8 n* X5 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
# k% c! I" x9 @& `7 t% r& Z s* e" Q Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%9 A* k% c0 b2 C. b/ l3 {
-------------------------------------------------------------
, e% }7 e6 L7 j) O1 s T* p Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%& ]: D5 g. I4 F& r& O7 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
# s! ]6 X" I. h9 _2 C- |* b Moncton 4.9% - - N/A" E+ x! J# H6 C/ p0 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 k! V! _' a; S0 T8 S$ c6 r Saint John N/A - - N/A- j3 b) l; i4 c a' o% t* d9 S
-------------------------------------------------------------! D- i: m0 b5 c9 a
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
9 n( C1 K7 b$ G, K5 c g( A -------------------------------------------------------------
- D: q" `4 X3 `. g/ B Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%4 J/ _" `9 L8 V: `8 e& H
-------------------------------------------------------------: c" Y3 \7 D! a, {& t
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%0 J9 A% F# T; T- H
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ e1 s4 G9 u: ^, e& i$ @ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
j# ]& u3 k; m [ -------------------------------------------------------------
4 q2 s# e. K; G9 f8 T9 q Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%% A; s4 a9 z3 }6 v! u; K
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ k; M z8 k, U. V% E Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
/ b' i/ e q, T -------------------------------------------------------------7 V1 `! Z/ e7 K
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%1 W6 N6 j& b% V
-------------------------------------------------------------
" K. v- U8 D t0 O Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
. }8 ^% n2 t5 L0 s$ [ |! k) R -------------------------------------------------------------
9 u- W! r0 s, v4 C* j9 A& ]) q Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
( s" \' x- U. t* i h# E -------------------------------------------------------------
, V, O9 b$ E9 Q: F) K Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%$ N1 d {8 Q* n
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 b7 w& f w! _+ G Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
2 J- E8 q; q( Z- \" r" B -------------------------------------------------------------
8 V, U* R0 z: u National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
0 _3 }% i) i9 v* ?! j -------------------------------------------------------------
: @7 n% N/ I+ G! m# l >>8 c5 i6 p$ Z+ {7 m7 v! ~1 p( n/ }
- M% F- A- F* y U& y6 |
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
. J# W# i# t6 y) B, a& D4 @in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: w4 C7 `! F/ c
John and Victoria.3 q# V/ P6 i$ q k" q
; J5 [ k8 I' I }
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( X) D4 ?3 A) Z2 W+ \, Y8 c6 G
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- m* w2 j0 e( ] xhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 A/ _0 `; h/ j9 E# e
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
$ c3 _* r$ }$ h: n! l5 ~/ ^2 htrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) o4 K! l0 `) h( {+ h
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is+ W8 {4 D: B; ^! h
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% K3 g i9 t: V# V( a
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ L h# S7 O I. @9 f
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on( @" }! U) U' T) U! H
November 15, 2006.! m3 D6 p! J! f( L' t2 o
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of1 `8 a5 }8 n2 S' J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
7 T& q) {) C6 t. d x# c; v; t, Xprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
3 ]; k$ t( l E3 R- }available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|