 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
2 Z/ c' c) E$ Q: U: \
+ R; C6 @/ y$ h! Q3 \# u- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ y6 K/ Y# y$ ]0 T4 ]4 W' I
* ]3 F7 e- F k1 H1 i3 q& v9 b TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market3 |& Q8 `' _) |1 |. b0 U! z9 {
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third$ [& d M. i8 A$ ]
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ H0 O* D' P) k3 c
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 h. U% D: n& [/ Fprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 b% f7 _- w2 ?8 w; Q0 U+ \
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' N3 X$ X( c1 x9 I2 ~Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal# e9 S# ?3 d$ w M4 F% E* Y0 m' w
LePage Real Estate Services.
/ h. F7 e G8 j1 E4 b) z# u6 {5 [4 Q9 Y! X) U5 w
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 M+ j( F7 { D- b3 ~are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
0 L; ]. G! A1 I# qconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
j- w7 b2 r6 G8 x8 L! hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the' K; y1 r- o& M' j1 x
residential real estate sector.
4 Q& o3 ]& F1 Y" {
6 L) X/ [5 u# P( g) }/ f Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation* D" m% l, _, Z7 f) d* y% {; E
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
v/ `5 ]8 v8 J; byear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ C; t% W! V1 G3 y, Z
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380- X; Q' {+ |2 X# @, b
(+13.2%)., M4 N n9 ]" d% z" ]/ v7 \$ }% z: s* y
0 J& }0 D0 K# a/ Y "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
! a: v0 ^1 s9 X w# [8 M$ Uduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' Y: K- A/ g( B; q" C5 Gfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are, e# W9 X# e2 i4 u4 N! ~
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,- Q6 L J7 k# {, C; d
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.5 x' M N" s* r+ z X; U3 x
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
* @$ t1 D# i3 S8 [3 U+ vwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy$ p. n8 ~, V# g9 D
balanced market."8 o' B+ x3 U7 d6 v; p9 P5 ? |. a
$ \. f" m0 _1 `7 B Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
1 I2 }$ h- r; d# R& Z/ _+ gconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift, N9 P) F) T* @: g* u0 [
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued/ I4 x+ D# t/ ^. p% p
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& U" `# l/ k* \! r
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,: ?8 E! ~; }7 P7 u Z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 b* w' L; h8 U) W& ybreaking price appreciations.
; O& K; Q, r$ `3 o) @4 ?' q9 l- _3 Y3 E! p' U, K
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
+ V8 g! P- S9 Z& e1 Z2 Aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the# {% T: ^/ g7 X3 H+ ?/ C
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
) e+ k3 j# x7 a, K& L, i- |0 K5 d$ a$ c+ Y, @3 O+ Z9 {
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, X0 z; e: H9 Z8 E; z/ Jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 M5 a/ W* E1 F3 c7 n; |' _% {
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off( O2 N8 e* O- U# C5 B' S3 f. S
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% }$ D9 g- j2 TIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( o: Q/ X! T. [7 g! U7 r
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of0 s d9 u- b! |0 n: x. N
price appreciation when compared with 2005.& O$ w5 l* m& y
4 d4 ~5 k1 }$ H K8 B: v6 v4 k While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing8 t5 ^% `9 d; Z! ~5 @, A
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 P9 L4 ^) K4 Z; {- D6 p7 r
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
! M2 [# w/ P* {" k7 I. tare markedly different than those found in the United States.
G: y2 K& e3 M9 e
^! Z% S) e$ H7 L e+ o) G- e- U Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
$ j( w% |) g" d k0 D$ h0 H) U& ZAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 d3 y" K+ D, g' vfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
8 g* c5 T* }: W& a+ Vrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ F; V8 r: F- I$ A/ a% w$ P F& M' }affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
. _( Y! X' z/ K2 Z( N" C' y2 ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and" I$ K+ x9 f' t. c
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
3 {2 y. q2 X- b5 Y! emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
4 x, R5 \2 a; d8 `. T0 B. Q6 { N$ h, y5 x x
<<
" k6 x! I9 \1 b l# Y I; R REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; L* k4 @' B5 Z8 ]: g >>
" j" M2 W, F# R5 t$ ^5 s9 w3 q$ |3 d! B9 q: Z% _0 y+ N# X
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in1 N w' i2 p2 T# H
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& Q0 `2 j0 M. y. f2 g: O! z( b8 Fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time E( X- [! b" z7 g
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
8 e" @0 ^+ G: B0 p7 ^* W! N+ Rrenovations.
8 E! l, ?8 T5 F8 L9 T7 E* @0 p( f4 c0 W
! d8 k4 z3 F1 M The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
& m+ L( d9 X: v7 ^) yincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 o R, m8 v, ]7 n$ \2 R: Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
2 v5 Y7 v- ]: B0 z7 s2 ~% L6 F) cSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: W& | x( l; A8 O# m6 ^* H7 f: b
. X3 O' n9 P1 I/ g5 ^ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer x0 `8 J+ o+ O
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
$ H" h6 O+ ], c1 @( t" W f! y4 fquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) l, y, f b A600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores& T4 Q7 j. u/ h0 U* E% x: \7 |$ g
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
* P. N) f4 @/ vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.1 X) H+ O$ o! N$ f/ | d }& w
. u- i8 v$ ]" D' K* K In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
( U% @, d2 L* s1 q" Iconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
* T t: i% A8 }1 P' l' jhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
0 Z4 i/ O+ B) X0 {9 G# dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian2 Q* b1 b, @ O
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ q6 G) A1 W, ^# t' @" D* Q; u
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
% a! d$ ?, U2 y
O( |" i m* j+ Z% C Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
2 f, K) n( V% C B1 d: G7 U Bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes+ O7 S& [3 i3 o% R' |3 ~
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,) s4 L8 ]/ f, {$ O
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) x- z% U2 N# G3 J& l( P
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.' V& n# {) W! F! e( S/ Y4 M
* o% e9 y+ A& J/ y% \' J6 D# X
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* ?4 E7 [! d( J0 E, r
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
: o6 Z7 f% Q, S1 d5 s) H- i, {levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 [* m' q, ?% L& `9 ?0 r2 i% f
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& |3 z0 K c9 J1 B# I; J
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# x0 S+ [* @# p7 Q. X2 kpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
/ u7 P1 N( ?8 P9 M8 K$ u# K* Dmaking a purchase.
7 x* l" q5 ^4 W+ Q- L' w
6 A4 i \2 i9 d Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing1 b6 Q8 x' {# k% I/ r. h
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
# }& ]& z0 a# {/ G/ i6 B( \. Lconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
& _/ ^1 U! |; @/ \7 i/ Ucentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
e6 G. I0 M2 S9 n5 [' T$ v3 tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
$ x$ j: H, K7 H/ L3 _4 aamenities.
1 L' K2 a: ^! J6 T% `
7 B \6 m$ g3 w The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
0 ~5 [, z% u, p5 T$ F" jthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand+ x/ w1 ~$ n) ?$ ^
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% A1 n& |) W) ?
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
7 }3 C# T6 X1 o J4 S' Ldriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle& M6 U, |- \4 _, e1 Z* s
residence, rather than for investment.
1 W+ r% Z4 y/ }8 T4 C7 c/ v3 h4 o, s" g4 w6 I5 M" y: a
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as& z# i% p/ k9 |) ]
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 b; t, S5 ^: u) }4 Cin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer0 N- x7 ]8 `& `
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 ?# {6 }/ F; w' t3 [2 I9 g# ^rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter5 U5 q" P/ ]5 b ^
the market./ v. S7 ^/ Y v2 ~8 ?0 [
1 c4 J2 S* F( o In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
# r* V) t; g) w# ]- ^ wJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) Z7 P9 [# W3 [$ X" B$ K% D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
9 t% _+ V8 S7 {# y, vmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due2 _, `2 p! U d$ g) W; C
to the shortage of available inventory.
" s8 w2 ^. m; E) J% {2 S* i6 S; Q) X6 o7 X G5 v; | j$ q
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% {6 G% F6 Q# k: T& _) g- ?- x/ Jmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
& R% S/ ~0 p6 e2 Y0 x' l5 vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
1 b$ ^7 b! U& V# ostruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.# j' R, v, C3 f; |) Q$ o
; j- J) c; P8 Y$ u4 S$ q6 S Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases4 f, Y! S) y9 u6 T- `0 }
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
T) {% ]8 j! T+ F6 q, c! ^unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* z- {5 a7 w" C) J' k: t4 t- gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
1 |) S3 ~7 U! |* K3 U, Y$ qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' g5 V# C/ r7 j; m3 ~
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ }+ s+ r: g" c' `" @
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.( y- k- }: L1 s7 O8 x
: J' \! J) i7 m) b: t- \
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter/ X: F2 d* D& I: H/ m
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# K8 m8 ^4 ]0 O! W3 T3 Iremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
|# B' x( g& T) w& l. S* k/ ~3 @maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
3 |0 t( N6 t9 U7 k0 ^( z. Tincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
1 N" f+ u' K+ F: k6 {( b& a8 _in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) E# a: z$ i, F! f5 U2 A8 T' L B2 O7 ^0 Ntowards the end of 2006.
l* \7 K5 h! [7 E8 q" r( g
& |7 [$ X& l M0 U. A4 N K+ KWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% E0 u" S5 A( F5 h0 ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) Z0 _: s4 b9 p2 Q& y: g+ Xto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* G3 w1 y; T% e/ V$ t5 T. Wgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
6 t- B. F8 q& f0 |1 D* h7 d5 A2 iforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added9 ?# Q* o' T: W/ \
pressure on tight inventory levels.3 L+ y6 d* J' H* S
! N7 y4 M7 l5 W1 m Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic* l3 @ ~% ~) X' P
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 M) d# B! k/ s5 Z6 Finto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! v$ I K# U+ h3 U. ]8 K
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* x0 B+ U$ P, P
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., w# ~$ V: I6 g5 F% e
9 a/ e: j; D- K: m9 W; N <<
5 C; J1 }& Q% k% f' ~$ e Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20069 e g& ~0 V( B0 b4 u% ^ _! ~
! K; j* A% Z: ?& \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# d3 [8 P( Y% U: }. Z# h! q$ s Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
( d3 K2 J& c( h, b0 o- l; G -------------------------------------------------------------------------. P3 a/ b1 |: q2 h) Q/ r
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( ^ v$ v% Y3 o& I+ {$ M Market Average Average % Change Average Average% Y9 R0 D5 I# J. ~3 c( J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 j# D& ]+ N7 b, H5 l, I
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
/ o# t- I3 y- V" t Y2 I2 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 \6 D' H/ ~3 n% ^ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
- b- ]* K4 u6 X! p ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I/ y5 P% x* q! V% c% A8 m n
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. b+ ]" ~" o( \$ P: f+ ? H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& w( C* t4 {2 V& V$ x6 J Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - - f, r- P" t! Q. i: Y5 D9 l% z$ Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 a7 A+ L3 k: B- F
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3336 |2 x% A1 u; R/ q. B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, I$ m; f! q( n# h: E) H Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 V9 c6 o: T$ a: n! [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 K- S& {3 l# i8 ], B6 ^5 O6 b4 l
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
! g( y( H5 S* P" S7 |: w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) U" m- G4 F, o1 O8 j Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
9 Z$ D6 \ ~. y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' v8 t' Y$ t; w3 m Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
* w- }8 S! b/ a1 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, g0 Z2 t1 l/ N ~9 G1 y! z3 i Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
' z/ N9 Q1 X: o1 H# } ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------' g; ?8 @0 k+ Q4 o
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
7 J S. _2 l7 h: T5 v2 f# u ------------------------------------------------------------------------- l# J+ o( r- v; Y" I* p; s+ S" u
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
; G5 w K% Y4 q+ q' E0 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------" G: u: S2 \/ |. q d0 `; e% e1 |
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& m2 g9 ~: L6 k2 d9 n: `+ r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 w, y$ r% n; Z$ n" ^( D0 B% c! o6 G Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5001 g1 C( f8 E* x1 ?6 I7 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 A/ ?/ N' `+ s! _/ ` Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
0 T1 B, s t+ M" W3 T: k ------------------------------------------------------------------------- [# v! w0 E& K. ~5 c
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860" t% w- H! L* e7 V) S* J0 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ o- K. W0 i1 b6 x# I7 }( f* {1 o0 q E" \" W& ]7 n' ^' M. j
-------------------------------------------------------------
* \8 A- e I. z# K$ O; w Standard Condominium0 y2 u4 X _+ q# b3 R0 O2 |
-------------------------------------------------------------- \2 O; s% Y" b& @) _# g& {
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
+ ?8 ]7 o C# M9 H Market % Change Average Average % Change
8 A6 }! n; O. \7 a1 @2 j -------------------------------------------------------------
) }- z0 u3 w1 n9 X: J! H q& Q Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%# |$ h, l3 C k, \$ \9 H- N
-------------------------------------------------------------
( {: k# a2 g! t6 x Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%$ i$ W( o% j& M
------------------------------------------------------------- i( l* L. y! h9 e( ~
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
! L( g3 K) d- l -------------------------------------------------------------
0 x, v, D) ?) g' ]& | Saint John N/A - - N/A
; q% o& x4 }1 x: V -------------------------------------------------------------
' j6 I1 _3 Z6 V& p- @5 U" A6 W St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%* V6 i( H7 q* x0 }2 ?/ i5 E; n
-------------------------------------------------------------, J. Y1 l: M. v* B" R. }& k
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
+ M- O. {! d! c. t: V5 V! c& d -------------------------------------------------------------. a8 z: @' N0 O( z% c- X
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%2 d+ S5 b I; G3 o
-------------------------------------------------------------9 u' H' U [$ b( d
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
; p/ Y% [) F D8 P) O% T& v* D2 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
8 b/ v2 S/ I) N/ W( L Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%& f- y9 r3 m% ~& A0 U: H7 o: m
-------------------------------------------------------------2 x3 l; C4 l# C- Z& f
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%4 G y3 x" e9 U# ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ F- x5 V" ^* u* L- U& R3 w Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
( k. N6 D" E; L -------------------------------------------------------------! ~" |7 c0 U* V- @
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
5 P9 F; X {4 E6 f -------------------------------------------------------------0 t- b( Y% q6 y6 ?! w
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%* x( c) _1 P5 g, M! R! i
-------------------------------------------------------------
* f/ I/ A% C9 a Q) C Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
+ e! @6 ]/ ?) `- X -------------------------------------------------------------- x1 i" Y! N5 g" x2 ^4 {
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1% C! }4 ~. M$ z2 {0 m- ~0 ~% a
-------------------------------------------------------------
* P9 x' A, G1 u( Y2 q( ~/ l National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
, [" |, b/ K9 o' J -------------------------------------------------------------
n$ k6 s! q/ I# a3 I g& s >> Q4 E1 D6 E( W6 n# m1 W" `8 a- h; I7 [
4 G0 A% S S9 K4 Q A }+ p* Q Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined: {( `* j4 t }$ J' B9 |; J
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
6 c1 \- r$ _; U, l: Q! W* TJohn and Victoria.
0 r6 \& v4 D6 Y$ I. A% x) [* @5 ?9 e0 W& a1 a2 F
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 C; N$ K2 p* @! \6 S6 D8 R
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 J3 O r1 C- q! f; thousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ {) h& o3 S9 k- V1 t* w' O5 wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" b. L$ e" T; |5 m9 P& n5 F
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) Q' O7 h2 K$ a' y
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
1 Q1 Q3 J( u% W+ W) Mavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current) O [. w8 [, b& L2 J/ o. k
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 G# p) O; }2 ^* m! Z/ b& U: jversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) ~; f, H6 k/ T9 I$ B
November 15, 2006.
8 _* u5 b0 @7 J& h, N Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
9 J" O/ d8 e' ]$ O) Xfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge- ?2 o6 R9 c5 O2 E
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
% U, ~' X" Z" N6 y# Davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|