 鲜花( 5)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2014-2-24 10:13
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 爱逛公园 于 2014-2-24 10:16 编辑 : I5 g% P4 @% q4 H2 G+ @
]) @4 m- V& H) y我不懂,不过我的理据是基于简单的数学。假如我没有以前剩下的10,000额度,我2013年收到的Notice of Asseement 就会是:7 v C( u& \8 `; T( x9 b
7 o4 {9 I4 ? c0 Z$ w) F, J9 l
- @9 V8 j8 f6 k/ f3 m, T; f( v$ x( Q3 p$ A# t
- I/ X) @1 i$ U: B! \6 a
/ q: e. J! N$ T+ f1 P! S7 ?. S' F( j, H- _9 w* g( P
(1) RRSP deduction limit for 2012 $0
* B6 t: F7 T! }(2) Minus: Allowable RRSP contributions deducted for 2012 $0
7 }4 ]/ L1 U& v" T3 [5 T-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
! p$ y, }" M0 G9 T2 ^0 N7 ](3) Unused RRSP deduction limit at the end of 2012 $0' Y9 j* y* f4 h5 w5 \
" P4 x5 `1 s4 _1 r6 \# B3 [, q. [1 F
(4) Plus: 18% of 2012 earned income of $5,000
9 S$ ~7 u& l: V1 `, j(5) Minus: 2012 pension adjustment $4,000 $1,000, B5 H5 b1 ^& j8 ~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, v, M7 i) o' o+ h) D: g: J$ }8 s9 Q( k2 U
(6) $1,000
" n5 |3 \3 u, W8 \" kMinus: 2013 net past service pension adjustment $0
7 d3 }; t8 }9 ~/ W( N. aPlus: 2013 pension adjustment reversal $0
& j+ a- u. \0 q" _* h-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, k$ K5 P* X5 ?4 `0 V: {% E# z
Your RRSP deduction limit for 2013 $1,000
$ [# w: v" Z3 @! i4 E7 w G8 E' G: k* ?' C! p" y) a* _
假如我2013年有 -
6 ` ]2 b2 R8 q: }! {5 p18% of 2013 earned income of $6,000
) x. x6 u0 a0 V+ }Minus: 2013 pension adjustment $5,000
+ I: I2 E4 q$ c8 K
& L3 {, G4 ~+ `象你所说的,难道我要1,000 - 5,000 = - 4,000, 我还欠政府的?pension adjustment 已经在(line #5) 已经减了,同一税项怎么会在同一张表中出现两次。所以我认为不需要再减去pension adjustment。请你解释一下。( ~: e% W; Z2 Y: p+ }: B
% `7 m7 ?0 U3 J ^
如果有人家里也有pension 的,也请提我解解疑。谢谢。 |
|