 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:1 b2 ~& w0 F, `" g* N2 b
: B/ L9 V6 `% N& ~ B9 o3 R" x) c% q, M
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。 v! e; a2 E7 z( ~/ N
0 a. ]$ i+ ^4 ?& f% \5 I; f7 G**********************************
# I) r+ a" u0 [Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
* y. y6 x% I3 z' H% f+ D# j2 v p9 ?
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
0 ?6 Y4 T1 @3 s! H
) H3 z, {4 r7 u' q& x" `, T' j3 Z/ Q2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
1 Z2 l7 l c) Q/ i7 h, O8 Q1 ~; B |
. {8 g& @$ g _4 i6 c C3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
" D! H' l- C/ S3 P! J* R/ Y& M/ u7 k3 o% o" C
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
4 _# C! C' Z* \7 z/ O( J) ~
' X B) a; l0 @$ o: ~$ Q5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|