 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:: w7 a; [* J5 t6 m0 s; A
8 I, V$ Y2 z: R
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
* I: H' \! `" {7 I8 a) d! p) F* h( B7 i5 F8 H) q4 j* _' A
********************************** q. H1 D; t& w) R5 o) K7 U
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:, L' _2 b+ H5 L2 G1 Y+ z0 y
, | }7 u& h J1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
5 a# a2 s3 Z# q7 B: O
' r. b+ \" q- k4 Z2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.; t4 U/ c& r; T2 u1 r' Q7 r& B/ B) P) q
7 I9 {( Y% Z( h+ I; w3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
) _ p5 l6 I5 a. s, w. ]: b6 V+ F& l: ^1 L' c
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8./ ^3 |; [$ u) q- X0 |* J
3 E* U! y' ^2 V/ g
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|