 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
" f' w9 N X" I- F8 R* w
( k6 ^6 G% e3 V- mF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
% `4 J9 U1 e) v6 g% c3 L; V5 }& P: M1 X, H; ~4 u* g6 ^
**********************************
6 N5 Z+ C4 {6 [& }0 F* U# MAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
2 s: |! V6 k+ e' }5 e# n0 p: z, W; n! ^* N6 ^
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.' P% u/ }: r) K* P1 a
5 }% y) a8 H2 q: ~1 n
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.! T* k5 X; Z: S, O. j/ X
+ M; u J9 W* S
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.6 Z2 o* Z( T; P$ E, Y; w
6 s P5 Y e4 ?2 I
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
0 ?0 `5 A9 `0 s4 R. J8 Z# a+ D& u6 Q% [* F: Z
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|