+ I! j, `: t% m5 q
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995., g6 k) }3 T& Y6 g' \
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.8 F, u$ Y2 G: H* X [
" {7 n" f, \# D! L2 g, o6 b! I
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?; [2 c& o, a: d: T2 U/ Z
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. 4 i, j% F2 ~8 X8 u& B2 FThere is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.+ H% v$ s! R5 S
' s4 q/ z. B# M
# o6 u: }, e. _2 A8 }0 S) Z# W
$ l7 e8 y9 R6 F) W' ^ 7 x) M' j0 `" w, z& m ( M: c0 x/ d( |' O& ~, N ' s R% S: B; u+ `* r. ?# L小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
2 Z& G% r" o1 k' }! d
$ O9 g0 k; r! `$ X# A/ h没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, ' u4 M% X; s( H" X# n' i1 r! i3 r& F5 o
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 * ~+ Q! @& I: y; _0 t4 P" B! Z' v9 u P6 W, z. r
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则