6#cactus_2009 ( y# b$ L3 o- `% @& x6 s: D0 g0 g3 G) o h5 Q5 S
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 * a; C* X. I. H/ s2 {
+ M. }. L! j) P: o5 P/ q
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ... # j* C; \$ v, \" Uceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
" [8 a# H9 p; M+ J' L( p( u& [# z
7 M1 ]/ g( I7 K* eSo which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? d1 r+ ?+ d& b4 Y$ B5 f
特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
# W5 r4 H& e" W/ m8 U
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.