 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
# x: r9 i% E& ^* C s3 h$ L |from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
- d x, V6 V" E* j; g Tunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house( g6 N) v; M" }! |, T
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
1 W5 J! |% | i9 H Lfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This2 `1 q! S9 i0 |) Z6 u
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction$ J7 X5 t6 F, h" G }/ K/ B% f9 C
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately; q+ _+ B" i0 Z% j
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
. G4 m- {2 x3 x/ ^6 q8 h* rthree years.
$ S' ~3 G5 e3 ~$ l. v1 ^$ X! I$ xBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from. d' h. T+ a3 `# Q
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
$ p" F1 `/ o; d' `. Iaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
% s( r+ S& F7 _0 }# Y% Rboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
0 D% {3 d% ]7 @$ o4 S" f: ato fundamentally justified levels.
* U' a) b8 ], _1 ?We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
8 T. J. N- K+ [" c# n5 |# Xwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and" J" H1 p7 \. K6 B; H; y/ |7 t
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”% h+ }+ r3 @/ s5 G- R; @3 F) L
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
: Y1 O2 v3 `: a Y8 R6 L( @- ~there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
) a/ p7 f5 i- S: `1 O; o“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
. Z! D; E$ y; z0 `homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch/ j' a2 A7 ]" a) H5 l
that is now being rapidly reined in.
" N. Y0 t7 u3 Y$ u* {" B3 UWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
7 a( s8 L" v1 c+ n3 Nthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
$ m% m1 K; R: S* u! I2 w& cmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh$ d* B, y0 z( G
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers) u8 S) b: C. y1 a/ _
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will" V+ ?5 W9 Z0 `# y& x% r% i# x" O
remain choppy and new residential construction will be' b6 H) H) `3 K% ^8 y- n2 ~
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction8 E) Q( ^5 |8 ?" K+ Y3 e4 `, ^# P
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this3 g2 t7 r) T7 o1 I
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
7 z1 | W: x1 ]; @) n2 ]$ cresidential construction will fall further to around
x; J0 B2 i6 @' U6 e" ~( X125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units q% D: \1 l' d" h' Z! c# M2 o I
in the fourth quarter.5 T) K- V0 M8 P% O8 @7 [ L+ A) J9 N0 c
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
# {; Q8 e/ t+ i3 v3 [3 g& Ywe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run' K- _2 U1 h5 u% G! O8 q
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
( ]9 u: m# d, M( eprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
" O6 I: f4 p) S0 m# Z T# D; Evalues since house prices should track incomes over the
/ U, x* s- c7 ^- u0 vlong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we3 n: a* J: J" d- v4 F) Y, [ b
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
5 b) Q) }5 z) c; Aof residential construction.& i! I W* M$ p; g
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a& p2 x$ M' w% K
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
8 i8 p$ \. t2 z5 H+ A+ e. F$ R: hwould have occurred if housing had been priced8 [" E! L5 }2 o* H. J! U9 v
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
+ S0 A& {' s! @% _* c$ ?( Z2 T, Vfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new3 t( W4 ^ X- S) e
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too) W3 g4 g, `) H# Q" w) n# x. A
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
* M( N, r# \1 k/ m) E, ?( _Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
' H2 o- @ C- M" P' E* n, |4 swhere housing demand will further contract under waning$ {& u) \# x6 |; W3 Z
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
2 D! L9 W! L* y& |& ~; Aalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the- ~+ c+ h2 h ?' u
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
8 m. b5 ?# @- z* H3 `" }" @buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
/ w5 f- O' _5 u# Q0 j" r# I/ Q+ w+ X1 ~has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural6 \+ n# S- v/ W4 w) K, k i
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
/ z- @5 z9 m5 j& W; r- Y: [Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
" t9 m5 K" [' ^! istrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de1 I1 q% v8 E! H8 ^$ Q: K, C& \
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
7 Z' `* b* T" T/ v4 c1 s/ kgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership+ m1 ^5 \& o4 j0 Q+ d
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a+ e! Y. @( n5 t0 R! S
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears( @# m& z9 k2 `5 D3 O7 e
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto4 \7 |& g0 E/ C. \# U
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
+ t# z+ r' ~0 T# y, u5 D" B/ Vhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under" g, N0 t4 l+ F% `% _/ M9 l
construction mean that record numbers of condos will% k3 n2 Q- ]$ ]
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as4 @2 P5 ~2 M: G* m) r
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
) Q& p" b; {" n! J1 _spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
0 U$ C; `( s. p$ m0 K9 iresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
- p1 f* C; z& y: `0 A. v4 Banticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from) H! B! h( E: m
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming% c' v/ `3 D: |. j
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
; h( l, K* U7 r* cwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.( `; a8 W* n* p& E, y9 @7 q
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING' q( g7 @0 j6 o4 m* g9 `2 K
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
# Z0 U2 u) x. C: sGrant Bishop, Economist6 ~8 L9 f9 b- O
416-982-8063% H9 \5 Q \' Z
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
! q* U5 O: d- ]% M8 H416-944-5730" x- p0 i4 j( Y! q9 W
( g+ J, ^: F( W& nhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|