埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2444|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly8 X3 z- Y4 y# u: k  V4 \
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
+ ~1 ~' i, O# s& Y' V' I. k; vunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house/ j) }6 X! X2 v0 N
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ o; U0 j& `" G4 h# a
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This# g5 W' Y5 k+ }( @$ J  a
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
7 {. x' ]2 _. ^" S6 E, Pthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
! x! O# c' K) m0 j. {' O8 T8 b12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past4 j4 Q. ]3 l5 p! A
three years.
8 p+ C0 T$ C4 G9 B. @/ l+ UBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
4 u2 z7 l5 D1 W4 w% dtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of0 q' D8 Y* j; p3 J' F. j# x
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects) n$ M5 w, o, ]. T3 y
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices# ^7 ]' A. x- A" t( m2 k
to fundamentally justified levels., h1 o2 r+ Y8 u
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”9 C3 l$ a+ k: ^' f8 H0 X/ z; n
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and2 M0 I  R, b7 \- S
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”1 ?: q1 y3 `! G4 a8 N: K2 k+ B1 i" @
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
% b, u9 l$ f# V" othere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
9 p! E6 R. @2 X# H' a“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
# v5 \1 z# d6 r0 ~) j  u1 t2 V# Khomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch7 j3 V6 L4 B$ S3 y7 `9 W6 u6 X3 P9 e
that is now being rapidly reined in.5 A7 P9 Z* m/ t  k# X
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,3 L: \/ S7 [" x
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
" e8 S3 q. i8 w4 fmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
: k! S# H/ Q3 H" B0 kon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
' L$ j  V+ M0 Nfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
' d' {) l1 k9 ]3 d* L) ~remain choppy and new residential construction will be8 |3 k1 L7 N) q7 o, y2 l; [
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction9 x! n5 K# P3 a: [
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this, ?* L6 G9 p1 A; J) X" G( T
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
( l1 y+ q* U6 q9 t8 A* a8 ?residential construction will fall further to around% }1 j4 m5 x. ?
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
( C' `) P8 n& Lin the fourth quarter.; Z9 e+ F! i. v' s
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
' @# _' I  L* ~+ [1 C0 Awe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
) U2 \6 s1 H, f: |fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
8 c% U0 t% X  Z) T$ C5 f& e! Dprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
5 w5 v( }3 D7 A# `4 d- @# Mvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
$ C. {) G' s- T6 w, y* u2 l9 ilong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we, \# h# }& D' P; ~1 R
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers* `( E5 W: T. i& w# k
of residential construction.
5 g' B2 o9 |' w! x& m. g- qTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a5 N5 p' P3 b% Q% s( Q
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction- n5 g6 @+ [, Y7 \% u  E
would have occurred if housing had been priced. u5 z) a. y5 z* o7 Q* L& P
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this( t6 K" T9 B7 A" l  I& w
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new" p& B0 b( c/ o) }0 S5 H
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too0 ~* J3 F9 D$ |
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
, O# R/ ~% ?' F8 v$ b! |Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,4 \- G+ `/ U& u$ i; ^) C# C
where housing demand will further contract under waning
) v# U# W8 A0 F' c- Kpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
' z) `  E$ y! V3 J- P, {) lalready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
8 L, s, q; _# M: ^" Rvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
$ K' M! q" H6 O# q6 z) dbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces$ S" ?& m) c; J. L/ I; K
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural+ ]& J& h3 f8 `  m
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.& z  K- |, g4 C, \- I
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
- _9 c6 N7 k' }' \# tstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
4 R  ]% @* S! f) UMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,3 r9 Z) z; h" a) K9 L
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
2 Y/ O, |: ?- V: grates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a! P8 s9 k9 m: P, b# B' L* J: F, y
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
0 P( H) I1 b6 P% k: d4 olimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
. k( x2 a. ~/ a7 B; l8 Rcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically
7 q& L4 Z- F' C; j/ h! f6 Fhigh levels of apartment-style units presently under3 E9 |8 w3 ?( L: [' @0 b6 `
construction mean that record numbers of condos will
% V, r7 @& t! ereach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as5 {! I! @+ X0 ]% k
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
2 F0 F: a7 n1 Q* i4 Fspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while- v# o9 o' m- r  o4 G2 I
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
" C, x* {- y$ eanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
9 y& b1 n5 K) u7 W& h0 i" ginter-provincial and international migration over the coming- s4 Z$ I6 x6 J. r" l4 |
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
1 a; f+ s1 N2 k3 M( x3 i; kwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.8 ^! I+ A  ?& h
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING* m" U4 \* f* y# k
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS7 Y( j% p+ i, s) r+ i
Grant Bishop, Economist" N% V* M8 n0 n* ~" K# V# S% K
416-982-8063
4 N7 f% [& d5 a1 v$ APascal Gauthier, Economist: d0 n, [) N1 |$ z! O4 ]9 q
416-944-5730
# p+ b, z# Y) W
( f1 Z8 {$ Y$ M0 d' Q3 Hhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-16 16:49 , Processed in 0.165767 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表