 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
i5 k% Y }' u7 [4 f% `: u# @; _' sDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs h1 m; s( e# E; p
$ w4 U4 f0 i0 Q# p pEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
1 R$ O, h+ Z: a8 [
4 @* R+ S6 C, @8 Q3 M( jMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. / z; X+ A. E+ ?1 b
$ G: |2 i" t+ W/ C. V1 H& ]1 N! |The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.4 M$ @+ Y, h G2 r# U4 J, L
0 z- d. z D* E% ^* Z- O% a" CDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
1 c& Z9 R6 Y5 u" q9 @+ A J- P: L. \0 F! r% j
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
0 z! {* m) c- x: |9 v" I
2 \) ]: r8 N0 z- e* T+ W+ _) ZDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
8 w |* E" J. s8 ?
g9 G4 T( t8 F0 \, o: [Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
1 T( r# z; p- u Y* I2 a9 g; I0 _) A- x2 _+ w0 v+ s& L- A
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
. ~) M8 n3 `) a" d2 X
8 W* t! s' ?" f4 cDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|