 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员8 k' O* ]$ ]( z1 b/ s1 q- i
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
0 A0 B/ b$ O; x% g2 X7 k* z1 C. r- f& I5 U: u4 z$ B. ?( k
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.( O: A: s6 _* v) L
, r B, J5 q+ }, B8 y8 pMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
' f; E c! N, {6 f9 `' N# p7 |7 i6 L
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
$ |5 S+ V9 z- _! u5 a ]
) v9 Q* @2 @8 \* W1 X/ p/ u* KDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
" W1 y* n( r: R, l+ Y& A* ^
1 x$ p* @9 H U& P5 NDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.( q3 {: y1 h2 t4 m, v! o. b$ K% t
7 G x L* V( }( x" V0 |1 a/ q7 B
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
# y/ y s5 G$ I$ }" ]" f5 Y* t# I/ y/ I
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction. S; j% k7 K# y0 c* q1 @8 \
1 L& X9 L' \. P; nPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.$ [8 T9 Z$ c' j g7 X0 e6 G
# s9 G$ Q4 Y( k2 eDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|