 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员* i( T$ `: n$ r" `! c- o$ A
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs2 L, q- r0 P! R* w+ M
) Q% C- V) h, L( |" L N
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
8 K. C9 ^" }2 H$ `5 Y, P, _. I3 A; x/ h' S5 E
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. , @8 X [% S. [' \1 r! ~
0 {! z8 s& W! O7 r* u8 k2 \3 FThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.5 X4 J7 [! f# M3 M" D7 `7 R
0 E! B6 M) a4 ~: r7 J8 cDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.2 b3 G& T' t7 P" f4 s4 ?
; Z* T% M \- H9 }: M0 kDow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
5 Q% o% N5 N: P, t c8 V$ M0 u% V8 k& \* |: i, [! Q
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
" ]' v! q% U+ M
! I4 k! n, I% Y# k8 rDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
/ d8 v+ y9 e4 H4 e( }% d3 |
7 |$ s0 f" G6 ?# D5 ^0 Q8 TPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
2 j/ K3 t9 {+ c. p& `, e z9 g
1 B9 _; ?1 q1 Q9 H8 |8 lDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|