向阳花, 你说的第二个例子,不是在法庭上吧?9 D5 ] H7 N3 p) I1 K
- n9 H& l1 ] w7 o {; e4 W
我现在的了解是:一种解决办法是上法庭,这也就是选择了不认罪(plead not guilty),面对的是法官JUDGE 和警察. 另一种是不上法庭,这是选择了认罪(plead guilty), 面对的将是justice of the peace, 有求情减少罚款的余地。 5 G# }+ @/ B. t @( K9 ]/ k2 r) y* v% Z' n; o' a5 k. s6 J
所以,向阳花你说的是第二种情况减免的罚款吧?) O" i& A. Z) }' x+ O) a
警察上不上法庭实际上没有什么关系,因为市政府/警察局常年聘用律师在交通庭坐镇,一场不落。当事警察到场不过就是多一个证人而已。如果你有把握推翻此案,则没有当事警察你就占了大便宜。其他几位的主意不错,错可以认,态度要好,但是可以哭穷,以得到减免待遇。 6 b/ ]2 d2 U' t E7 g& L$ f. [$ H6 d' S! B. i. | f: P7 P% o8 I* W7 b
开车可是千万要小心呐!现在罚款比前几年高多了。
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005! T% d2 O% Y+ u- c+ q
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"& H/ O5 l2 Q) Z4 `
. w( T$ V( U4 ~! y" n1 M7 O"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances.") K, G9 N$ Q# u
1 v2 q9 X" \ b8 f) [; ~
You should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 ; d: a- R F6 s0 a( |# f + e* O, z5 c) K2 h: F& G/ t. j1 r5 p( w- u
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:; f/ O; |1 S% U" T0 C- R
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 $ a: _# {4 S4 O: Y. Q& V9 d( [The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" ; k# D$ e* b+ e+ d. C0 Z+ s0 f P2 w2 K$ u! q$ H8 h
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: + e) t/ e8 V( @2 q: D2 G 1 i7 m7 S* L9 @! T' M/ [Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.